Re: move to britney2?

2011-04-30 Thread Andreas Barth 
* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110501 01:08]:
> We certainly did.  It's not a new idea, and I certainly don't suggest that
> switching to b2 will suddenly cause patches to appear.  But OTOH, the
> current muddled state of britney maintenance does make it harder for anyone
> to submit patches should they wish to do so.

No doubt about that. We should fix that - and the state of dpkg.c in
britney also doesn't help new patches to emerge faster.


Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430232613.gl2...@mails.so.argh.org

Re: move to britney2?

2011-04-30 Thread Steve Langasek 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:35:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:

> > > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same
> > > >   source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries
> > > >   going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a
> > > >   transition.

> > > That was already discussed and approved for testing I think in
> > > Helsinki. However, it needs someone implementing code, and isn't as
> > > easy as it looks like. Feel free to submit patches though.

> > I guess that the continued need to run both britney1 and britney2 in
> > parallel is somewhat of a barrier for submitting patches.  Any ETA for
> > switching to britney2?

> Last I remember was "after the large transitions are done", which
> would be ... now. And yes, that should happen.

Ok, great :)

> But re the "keeping old libs", that was already an issue before b2
> existed. Also, I seem to remember we discussed that already in
> Vancouver, but you should know that better. ;)

We certainly did.  It's not a new idea, and I certainly don't suggest that
switching to b2 will suddenly cause patches to appear.  But OTOH, the
current muddled state of britney maintenance does make it harder for anyone
to submit patches should they wish to do so.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430230303.gd14...@virgil.dodds.net

Bug#623719: marked as done (transition: muparser)

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2011 00:28:09 +0200
with message-id <4dbc8cf9.2010...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#623719: nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME 
bump of libmuparser
has caused the Debian Bug report #623719,
regarding transition: muparser
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
623719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623719
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libgetfem4++_4.1.1-2 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
nmu meshlab_1.3.0a+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
nmu ovito_0.9.2-1 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
nmu scidavis_0.2.4-3 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"

For reference see:
BTS bug 606120

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 04/28/2011 02:26 PM, Scott Howard wrote:

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Mehdi Dogguy  wrote:

On 04/28/2011 10:29 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 15:57:25 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:


But, there is an issue with getfem++: It build depends on scilab-include
which is
not available everywhere:

  scilab-include | 5.3.1-3 | wheezy  | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, mipsel,
powerpc, s390, sparc
  scilab-include | 5.3.1-4 | sid | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, mipsel,
powerpc, s390, sparc

So, it's stuck on kfreebsd-* and mips (at least) and, thus, needs to be
fixed. FWIW, csound
and koffice build depend on libgmm++-dev.


britney doesn't care about build-deps, though, so removing getfem++
temporarily would work, I think?



Sure. I was just hoping/waiting for a comment from Scott.


Yes, that would work - it looks like the transition went as expected.
Everything is now build and the only failures were existing/unrelated
failures or missing build-deps

(I also fixed the FTBFSes in qtiplot and uploaded it, it now is linked
against the new muparser as well)



muparser migrated now. Closing.

Thanks for your work!

Regards,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Re: move to britney2?

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 23:35 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > 
> > > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same
> > > >   source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries
> > > >   going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a
> > > >   transition.
> > 
> > > That was already discussed and approved for testing I think in
> > > Helsinki. However, it needs someone implementing code, and isn't as
> > > easy as it looks like. Feel free to submit patches though.
> > 
> > I guess that the continued need to run both britney1 and britney2 in
> > parallel is somewhat of a barrier for submitting patches.  Any ETA for
> > switching to britney2?
> 
> Last I remember was "after the large transitions are done", which
> would be ... now. And yes, that should happen.

Yes, it should.  I've been trying to make sure that the bugs we know
about in b2 are documented in the BTS and fix them; the first part
should at least be done now.  I should also dig out my RFC mail on the
switch which I think is sitting in my drafts somewhere.

> But re the "keeping old libs", that was already an issue before b2
> existed. Also, I seem to remember we discussed that already in
> Vancouver, but you should know that better. ;)

>From what I've seen of the code, I was under the impression that this
was what b2's "smooth updates" feature was designed for.  It's not
currently enabled as doing so would cause potentially significant
differences in the output between b1 and b2.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304200084.4138.6615.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 09:51:49PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > ATM that gives 4164 binNMUs for 392 source packages
> > (http://release.debian.org/~jcristau/perl5.12-binNMUs.txt).
> > 
> > I hadn't planned on making it multiple rounds, hoping that
> > BD-Uninstallable checks would sort it all out for me, but if you can
> > send me your lists and double check mine that would be great.
> 
> [and you subsequently mentioned
> 
> on IRC].
> 
> I don't think perl itself should be in that list, but other than that,
> it looks good.

Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention: collectd only recommends perlapi-5.10,
presumably because the perl bindings are an optional plugin, but it
will need rebuilding.

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430213627.gk4...@urchin.earth.li

move to britney2?

2011-04-30 Thread Andreas Barth 
* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> 
> > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same
> > >   source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries
> > >   going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a
> > >   transition.
> 
> > That was already discussed and approved for testing I think in
> > Helsinki. However, it needs someone implementing code, and isn't as
> > easy as it looks like. Feel free to submit patches though.
> 
> I guess that the continued need to run both britney1 and britney2 in
> parallel is somewhat of a barrier for submitting patches.  Any ETA for
> switching to britney2?

Last I remember was "after the large transitions are done", which
would be ... now. And yes, that should happen.

But re the "keeping old libs", that was already an issue before b2
existed. Also, I seem to remember we discussed that already in
Vancouver, but you should know that better. ;)



Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430213522.gk2...@mails.so.argh.org

Re: [SRU] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

2011-04-30 Thread Philipp Kern 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that
> >> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UINT?  And why does it
> >> overflow?  I guess the reason it overflows comes from the X server (where
> >> it's a CARD32 so uint32, too).  It's not entirely clear to me why, though.
> > After talking with Ulrik (upstream developer), he made me notice current
> > upstream code has TYPE_UINT, so using it should be a better choice. He
> > told me this bug could be caused by X server being active for a lot of
> > time, making its timestamp bigger than the variable defined by Kupfer.
> Attaching debdiff this time.

Yep, please go ahead.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430233049.GA3458@spike

Processed: block 619117 with 624255

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 619117 with 624255
Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition
Was blocked by: 555000 623924 613188 620936 621999 623929 621078 579450 618871 
615571 616454 623928 623726 623930 624597 622014 620777 621940 621466 623927 
624578 624255 553387 617212 606006 613780
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #619117 to the same blocks 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130419910914597.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

2011-04-30 Thread Steve Langasek 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:

> > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same
> >   source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries
> >   going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a
> >   transition.

> That was already discussed and approved for testing I think in
> Helsinki. However, it needs someone implementing code, and isn't as
> easy as it looks like. Feel free to submit patches though.

I guess that the continued need to run both britney1 and britney2 in
parallel is somewhat of a barrier for submitting patches.  Any ETA for
switching to britney2?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430210843.gc14...@virgil.dodds.net

Re: nmu: Please binNMU binutils-mingw-w64 on i386

2011-04-30 Thread Stephen Kitt 
Hi again,

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:57:04 +0200, Stephen Kitt  wrote:
> Since binutils is now up to 2.21.51.20110421-2, may I suggest
> 
> nmu binutils-mingw-w64_0.1 . amd64 i386 . -m "Rebuild for binutils
> 2.21.51.20110421-2."

Sorry for the to-ing and fro-ing, I'll actually be uploading a new
binutils-mingw-w64 package shortly to fix #624545 and help fix #624591
(because of gcc-mingw32). So the binNMU would just be a waste...

Regards,

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Processed: block 619117 with 624597 613780 620777

2011-04-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:39:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > block 619117 with 624597 613780 620777
> Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition
> Was blocked by: 618871
> Added blocking bug(s) of 619117: 624597, 613780, and 620777

#613780 doesn't actually block the transition, does it? rxvt-unicode
builds okay for me (even though it doesn't install).

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430210944.gj4...@urchin.earth.li

Bug#624591: transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10

2011-04-30 Thread Stephen Kitt 
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:25:04 +0200, Julien Cristau 
wrote:
> - gcc-mingw32 (build-depends on mingw-w64, which depends on
>   gcc-mingw-w64, which only exists on i386 and amd64; so all screwed up,
>   somebody should file a bug)

I hadn't expected this to become urgent, I'll fix it this weekend (on both
the gcc-mingw32 and gcc-mingw-w64 sides).

Regards,

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> ATM that gives 4164 binNMUs for 392 source packages
> (http://release.debian.org/~jcristau/perl5.12-binNMUs.txt).
> 
> I hadn't planned on making it multiple rounds, hoping that
> BD-Uninstallable checks would sort it all out for me, but if you can
> send me your lists and double check mine that would be great.

[and you subsequently mentioned

on IRC].

I don't think perl itself should be in that list, but other than that,
it looks good.

Thanks,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430205148.gi4...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed.
> > 
> > I'm assuming that's #621072, which it looks like a resolution has been
> > found for?
> 
> Right.

Are there any other outstanding fixes or other blockers for a 2.6.32-34
upload?  The approximate two-monthly schedule for stable point releases
means that we should be aiming for 6.0.2 to be around the end of May, so
it would be good to try and get a finalised kernel for that in the
not-too-distant future.

(fwiw, the next lenny point release - 5.0.9 - shouldn't be too far
behind; we need to poke relevant people but I'm working on an estimated
schedule of around mid-June).

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304196097.4138.6341.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#624716: [britney2] Does not properly undo failed migrations

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: britney

Filing as a bug so it's documented somewhere more formal and doesn't get
forgotten.

On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 10:29 +, Cron Daemon wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2841, in 
> 
> Britney().main()
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2836, in 
> main
> self.upgrade_testing()
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2548, in 
> upgrade_testing
> self.do_all()
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2447, in 
> do_all
> (nuninst_end, extra, tundo) = self.iter_packages(upgrade_me, selected, 
> nuninst=nuninst_end)
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2243, in 
> iter_packages
> pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg)
>   File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.py", line 2039, in 
> doop_source
> if binaries[parch][0][binary][SOURCE] != pkg_name: continue
> KeyError: 'fixincludes'

(and the docvert-openoffice.org and openoffice.org-dmaths crashes from
mid-March, which I suspect are other occurrences of the same issue;
possibly also related to #618805)

>From a bit of debugging, this appears to be an issue with cases where a
particular binary package has either moved source packages (as in the
"fixincludes" case, from gcc-4.5 to gcc-4.6) or moved from being
arch-dependent to arch:all, and the package is considered during
multiple phases of the b2 run (either as part of an "easy" and then
during the main run, or in the main run and then in a "hint").

When deciding whether to migrate a package, britney removes all of the
current binary packages - making an "undo" list - and then adds the
binary packages from the new version.  If the new version is not
accepted then the "undo" list is used to revert things to the previous
state.  However, in the "fixincludes" case at least, that reversion
seems not to be applied correctly.  The run in which the above error
occurred included an "easy" for gcc-4.5, gcc-4.6 and a few other
packages, which failed; when the main run came to consider gcc-4.5 again
the sources dict still listed "fixincludes" as being built from gcc-4.5
but the binaries dict included the information for gcc-4.5/unstable,
meaning that it was missing the "fixincludes" package.

This appears to be "fixable" by disabling the use of the pre_process
dict, but at the expense of making the run slower.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304195971.4138.6330.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: Bug#622817: perl: CVE-2011-1487: taint laundering in lc, uc

2011-04-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt:
> 
> > I do share Florian's concern about the potential breakage as a result of
> > the change.  Do we have any idea how many packages in {old,}stable would
> > be affected and to what degree?

I don't think we have any reports of breakage -- I'm not sure how we'd
undertake a comprehensive analysis.

> Particularly in the case of oldstable,
> > with its four month update cycle, fixing packages broken by the change
> > could be somewhat painful.
> 
> Okay, then we should release a DSA for it, so that the breakage is
> more easily blamed on this particular change, and that it's less
> confusing if we have to issue follow-up DSAs.  Perhaps late May or
> early June would be a convenient release date?

I'd be happy with that. The fix has been in unstable since 2011-04-22
(and now in testing). Bear in mind that once perl 5.12 has been
uploaded to unstable, it's quite likely that any breakage caused by this
bug will be more difficult to detect in isolation.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430201903.gh4...@urchin.earth.li

Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.

2011-04-30 Thread Bill Allombert 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > They'll still need to be fixed when we make the switch, since some of
> > them are libraries with a non-trivial number of reverse dependencies.
> > Of course one option could be to make them build-depend on
> > libjpeg62-dev, but if the maintainers are unresponsive you should be
> > prepared to NMU.
> > 
> hmm, I didn't see an answer to that.  :/

Sorry, I got distracted by an unexpected popcon.debian.org failure.

> Either way we should probably get this started at this point, so please
> feel free to upload at your convenience.

Fine. How should I proceed ? Should I upload both libjpeg6b and libjpeg8 with
libjpeg-dev pointing to libjpeg8-dev ?

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. 

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430202759.GA17342@yellowpig

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-04-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qggfv-0004ex...@franck.debian.org

Processed: block 619117 with 621078

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 619117 with 621078
Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition
Was blocked by: 620936 613188 623924 555000 621999 623929 579450 618871 615571 
616454 623928 623726 624597 622014 620777 621940 624578 623927 621466 624255 
613780 606006 617212 553387
Added blocking bug(s) of 619117: 623930 and 621078
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130419369127973.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Raising severity for bugs blocking perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 555000 serious
Bug #555000 [src:kildclient] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Bug #623726 [src:kildclient] kildclient: FTBFS: undefined reference to symbol 
'inflate'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

> severity 623924 serious
Bug #623924 [libafs-perl] libafs-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.12.3: non-numeric 
version
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

> severity 579450 serious
Bug #579450 [libdevice-cdio-perl] libdevice-cdio-perl: FTBFS with perl 
5.12.0-1: 64-bit integers
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

> severity 615571 serious
Bug #615571 [libclone-fast-perl] libclone-fast-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.12.3: 
test failures
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

> severity 623726 serious
Bug #623726 [src:kildclient] kildclient: FTBFS: undefined reference to symbol 
'inflate'
Bug #555000 [src:kildclient] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 623726 to the same value.
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 555000 to the same value.
> # merged report
> unblock 619117 by 623930
Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition
Was blocked by: 555000 623924 613188 620936 621999 623929 621078 579450 618871 
615571 616454 623928 623726 623930 624597 622014 620777 621940 621466 623927 
624578 624255 553387 617212 606006 613780
Removed blocking bug(s) of 619117: 623930 and 621078
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619117
615571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615571
579450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579450
623924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623924
555000: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555000
623726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130419335226952.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed (with 1 errors): blocking bugs of perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 619117 with 622014 623726 623924 621999 615571 621466 623927 617212 
> 613188 620777 624255 623928 579450 616454 623930 624578 621940 620936
Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition
Was blocked by: 618871 624597 613780 620777
Added blocking bug(s) of 619117: 555000, 623924, 613188, 620936, 621999, 
623929, 621078, 579450, 615571, 616454, 623928, 623726, 623930, 622014, 621940, 
621466, 624578, 623927, 624255, 553387, 617212, and 606006
Failed to set blocking bugs of 619117: failed to get lock on 
/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge -- Unable to lock 
/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 545.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130418483223393.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: Bug#622817: perl: CVE-2011-1487: taint laundering in lc, uc

2011-04-30 Thread Florian Weimer 
* Adam D. Barratt:

> I do share Florian's concern about the potential breakage as a result of
> the change.  Do we have any idea how many packages in {old,}stable would
> be affected and to what degree?  Particularly in the case of oldstable,
> with its four month update cycle, fixing packages broken by the change
> could be somewhat painful.

Okay, then we should release a DSA for it, so that the breakage is
more easily blamed on this particular change, and that it's less
confusing if we have to issue follow-up DSAs.  Perhaps late May or
early June would be a convenient release date?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqo3bt84@mid.deneb.enyo.de

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
[Apologies for managing to miss this earlier]

Hi,

On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:27 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:,
> I'd like to push iceowl 1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1 to squeeze proposed
> updates. It contains the same updates as current icedove. 

Presumably this now requires a further update, in light of at least
MFSA2011-12?

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:15:16PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> [..snip..] 
> > We should fix iceowl updates which only update the Mozilla copies via
> > s-p-u. If there're targeted vulnerabilities against iceowl (e.g. buffer
> > overflow during contact import), we can push these through s.d.o.

Given the lack of support from upstream for iceowl beta releases, do
they actually provide details of which portions of updates might be
iceowl-specific?

I do note that the discussion before the release about updating iceowl
in stable very much implied that security updates would be pushed via
the security archive, albeit not as the security team's top priority.

Regards,

Adam




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304179073.4138.5370.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: vlc: security update breaks mp3 support

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
Hi,

As this regression was apparently caused by a security update, I've
added the security team to CC.

On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 14:43 +0200, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> After I update from vlc version 0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3 to 0.8.6.h-4+lenny3,
> I couldn't play any mp3 music file. If I reinstall the old version,
> everything works fine.
> 
> $ vlc -v file.mp3 
> VLC media player 0.8.6h Janus
> [0314] message packetizer warning: message queue overflowed
> [0344] ffmpeg decoder warning: incorrect frame size
>  (mp2@0x8f4b600)
[...]
> For my investigation, the bug must be situated in the mpeg_audio patch
> hunks of CVE-2010-1441.patch.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304177433.4138.5276.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.

2011-04-30 Thread Bill Allombert 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:13:08 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Mar  5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Dear release team,
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to proceed with the libjpeg8 transition. What are your 
> > > > plan ?
> > > > 
> > > #547393 is marked as blocked by a number of other bugs.  Can you check
> > > with the maintainers of the affected packages?
> > 
> > I could, but consider that:
> > #592925 is fixed, #582417 is not really a bug and the others seems to have
> > unresponsive maintainers, it looks like a loss of time.
> 
> They'll still need to be fixed when we make the switch, since some of
> them are libraries with a non-trivial number of reverse dependencies.
> Of course one option could be to make them build-depend on
> libjpeg62-dev, but if the maintainers are unresponsive you should be
> prepared to NMU.

One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends on 
libjpeg62-dev instead of libjpeg-dev. This might cause packages to have 
uninstallable
build-dependency until they are fixed.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. 

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430142917.GF2835@yellowpig

Processed: block 624591 with 553947 594279 615776 536905 621808

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 624591 with 553947 594279 615776 536905 621808
Bug #624591 [release.debian.org] transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10
Was blocked by: 606642 623162 614486 624588 620573 624593 620528 621879 618127 
623598 594281
Added blocking bug(s) of 624591: 594279, 536905, 553947, 615776, and 621808
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
624591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130416269412934.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#624591: transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10

2011-04-30 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 23:49:07 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Filing this to track the missing rebuilds.  Once they're done we'll be
> able to remove the gmp4 source package.
> 
Remaining packages follow.  A whole lot are probably stuck until the
haskell stuff settles down :/

- acl2 (rebuilds scheduled)
- anubis (FTBFS, #553947)
- cheesetracker (FTBFS, #620573)
- denemo (needs mips build, scheduled)
- dico (needs armel/mips builds, scheduled)
- freetalk (needs mips build, scheduled)
- g-wrap (needs mips build, scheduled)
- gcc-avr (FTBFS, #594279)
- gcc-mingw32 (build-depends on mingw-w64, which depends on
  gcc-mingw-w64, which only exists on i386 and amd64; so all screwed up,
  somebody should file a bug)
- gcc-snapshot (don't care)
- gclcvs (FTBFS, #618127)
- gnurobots (needs mips build, scheduled)
- gnutls26 (needs mips build, scheduled)
- hol88 (waiting for its mipsel build)
- libzn-poly (FTBFS, #623598)
- lilypond (FTBFS, #621879)
- mailutils (needs amd64 armel i386 mips builds, scheduled)
- maxima (waiting for i386 mipsel powerpc builds)
- mcron (needs mips build, scheduled)
- meep (needs mips build, scheduled)
- meep-mpich (needs mips build, scheduled)
- mozart (FTBFS, #624593)
- mpb (needs mips build, scheduled)
- netrek-client-cow (FTBFS, #620528)
- ntl (FTBFS, #623162)
- regina-normal (FTBFS, #624588)
- snd (FTBFS, #615776)
- strongswan (FTBFS, #614486)
- uuagc (FTBFS, #536905)
- xchat-guile (needs mips build, scheduled)
- yap (needs powerpc build, scheduled)

- agda-bin (haskell)
- arbtt (haskell)
- bnfc (haskell)
- bustle (haskell)
- c2hs (haskell)
- darcs (haskell)
- darcs-monitor (haskell)
- datapacker (haskell)
- drift (haskell)
- frown (haskell)
- geordi (haskell, FTBFS, #527719)
- gtkrsync (haskell)
- haskell-* (haskell…)
- hedgewars (haskell)
- helium (haskell)
- hlint (haskell)
- hmake (haskell)
- hpodder (haskell)
- kaya (haskell, FTBFS, #621808)
- lhs2tex (haskell)
- pxsl-tools (haskell)
- pandoc (haskell)
- raincat (haskell)
- srcinst (haskell)
- threadscope (haskell)
- twidge (haskell)
- xmobar (haskell)

Cheers,
Julien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430112504.gj2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Processed: Re: Bug#620210: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 620210 + confirmed
Bug #620210 [release.debian.org] pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
620210: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620210
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13041610208125.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#620210: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
tag 620210 + confirmed
thanks

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 06:59 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Since the servers run the packages I intend to upload to
> propsed-updates, this bug is no longer hereand we started
> uploading 64-bit drivers to the servers and migrating the Win7
> machines from standalone printing to spooled printing.
> 
> This was #611177, of course.
> 
> #614429 was not experienced by me. Users reported it got fixed by
> 3.5.8 but, admittedly, nobody (but usptream author, of course) can
> really confirm that the set of patches alone fixes  0x03e6 errors
> on Win7 clients.
> 
> 
> The latter two bugs were confirmed fixed by 3.5.8 users. I'm not in
> position to reproduce the bugs, so I have to rely on upstream, here...

Thanks, and for your patience with us on this.

Please feel free to go ahead with the upload.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1304160993.4138.4448.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: [SRU] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

2011-04-30 Thread Luca Falavigna 
Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
>> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that
>> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UINT?  And why does it
>> overflow?  I guess the reason it overflows comes from the X server (where
>> it's a CARD32 so uint32, too).  It's not entirely clear to me why, though.
> 
> After talking with Ulrik (upstream developer), he made me notice current
> upstream code has TYPE_UINT, so using it should be a better choice. He
> told me this bug could be caused by X server being active for a lot of
> time, making its timestamp bigger than the variable defined by Kupfer.

Attaching debdiff this time.

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna 
 `.  `'
   `-
diff -Nru kupfer-0+v201/debian/changelog kupfer-0+v201/debian/changelog
--- kupfer-0+v201/debian/changelog	2010-07-17 14:29:47.0 +0200
+++ kupfer-0+v201/debian/changelog	2011-04-30 12:48:21.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kupfer (0+v201-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/patches/TYPE_UINT.patch:
+- Backport a fix from upstream git repository, use UINT signal
+  parameter type to fix an issue with ui.keybindings (Closes: #615060).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna   Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:52:09 +0200
+
 kupfer (0+v201-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control:
diff -Nru kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/series kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/series
--- kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/series	2009-11-01 22:35:57.0 +0100
+++ kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/series	2011-04-30 12:50:59.0 +0200
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 debian_path.patch
+TYPE_UINT.patch
diff -Nru kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/TYPE_UINT.patch kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/TYPE_UINT.patch
--- kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/TYPE_UINT.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ kupfer-0+v201/debian/patches/TYPE_UINT.patch	2011-04-30 12:47:59.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+Description: Use UINT signal parameter type
+Origin: http://git.gnome.org/browse/kupfer/commit/?id=4b72c5317ba35462d8974efc5d35c0906febcdf7
+
+Index: kupfer-0+v201/kupfer/ui/keybindings.py
+===
+--- kupfer-0+v201.orig/kupfer/ui/keybindings.py	2011-04-14 22:24:52.954179649 +0200
 kupfer-0+v201/kupfer/ui/keybindings.py	2011-04-14 22:25:11.642179656 +0200
+@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
+ 		self.emit("keybinding", target, time)
+ 
+ gobject.signal_new("keybinding", KeyboundObject, gobject.SIGNAL_RUN_LAST,
+-		gobject.TYPE_BOOLEAN, (gobject.TYPE_INT, gobject.TYPE_INT))
++		gobject.TYPE_BOOLEAN, (gobject.TYPE_INT, gobject.TYPE_UINT))
+ 
+ _currently_bound = {}
+ 


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Alessio Treglia 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Christian Marillat
 wrote:
> For me ? You always forget that I'm a Debian developper and here my
> main concern is to have Debian binaries installable in other distro and
> vice versa.

OK, and sorry to have been rude.

Keep up the good work!


-- 
Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/banlktimltci9o7vw00kyzuqr973nkom...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Christian Marillat 
Alessio Treglia  writes:

> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat
>  wrote:
>> Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname.
>
> A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed.

OK I see.

> Is it enough for you?

For me ? You always forget that I'm a Debian developper and here my
main concern is to have Debian binaries installable in other distro and
vice versa.

For now only Debian use a soname of 1 and 2 now.

Christian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mxj8ox4m@christian.marillat.net

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Alessio Treglia 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Christian Marillat
 wrote:
> Which symbol and wich functions ?

lqt_start_audio_vbr_chunk is no longer provided [1] by the shlib.
Other changes have been made to exported symbols (like
quicktime_write_chunk_footer, quicktime_write_chunk_header) [2].

[1] 
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/libquicktime.git;a=commitdiff;h=35d6da8a009
[2] 
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/libquicktime.git;a=commitdiff;h=449bf7252b

-- 
Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=r_cnxv93gvjqxsb0kbyfkx...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#624647: pu: package akonadi/1.3.1-3+squeeze1

2011-04-30 Thread Modestas Vainius 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello,

Please consider accepting the patch fixing #545139 [1] to squeeze (full debdiff
is below). It can be considered as regression from lenny (KDE 3) since kmail
used to work fine when HOME was mounted to the network filesystem. Since KDE SC
4.4, akonadi-server is essential daemon for kmail (and other KDE Personal
Information Management applications) to work.

The patch addresses the issue that sockets cannot be created on the network
filesystems. akonadi before this patch is only capable of creating a socket in
the subdirectory of HOME. With this patch applied, it will safely create the
socket in /tmp if it can't do this directly in HOME.

1.3.1-4 with this sole change has just been uploaded to unstable to get wider
testing. Consider waiting a bit to see how it bares there.

1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545139#29

diff -u akonadi-1.3.1/debian/changelog akonadi-1.3.1/debian/changelog
--- akonadi-1.3.1/debian/changelog
+++ akonadi-1.3.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+akonadi (1.3.1-3+squeeze1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Add patch 04_socket_location.diff to allow akonadi-server to run when HOME
+is mounted to the network filesystem (Closes: #545139). Thanks to Ansgar
+Burchardt for the patch.
+
+ -- Modestas Vainius   Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:50:31 +0300
+
 akonadi (1.3.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Didier Raboud ]
diff -u akonadi-1.3.1/debian/patches/series akonadi-1.3.1/debian/patches/series
--- akonadi-1.3.1/debian/patches/series
+++ akonadi-1.3.1/debian/patches/series
@@ -3,0 +4 @@
+04_socket_location.diff
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- akonadi-1.3.1.orig/debian/patches/04_socket_location.diff
+++ akonadi-1.3.1/debian/patches/04_socket_location.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+From: Ansgar Burchardt 
+Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:40:18 +0100
+Subject: Move sockets away from $HOME
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/545139
+Bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179006
+
+Move directories used for sockets to /tmp, using a symlink (that includes the
+hostname) to remember where it is located.
+
+Based on upstream commit e4affdfc2922efc10b647939fd4e068c02e256eb,
+includes the fix 1fa22c55fd98f29321b943605466ef4d4640de53 as well.
+
+--- akonadi-1.3.1.orig/server/CMakeLists.txt
 akonadi-1.3.1/server/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
+ set(libakonadiprivate_SRCS
+   ${AKONADI_SHARED_SOURCES}
+   src/akonadi.cpp
++  src/socketdir.cpp
+   src/akonadiconnection.cpp
+   src/handler.cpp
+   src/handlerhelper.cpp
+--- akonadi-1.3.1.orig/server/src/akonadi.cpp
 akonadi-1.3.1/server/src/akonadi.cpp
+@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
+ #include "debuginterface.h"
+ #include "storage/itemretrievalthread.h"
+ #include "preprocessormanager.h"
++#include "socketdir.h"
+ 
+ #include "libs/xdgbasedirs_p.h"
+ #include "libs/protocol_p.h"
+@@ -84,13 +85,7 @@
+ connectionSettings.setValue( QLatin1String( "Data/Method" ), 
QLatin1String( "NamedPipe" ) );
+ connectionSettings.setValue( QLatin1String( "Data/NamedPipe" ), namedPipe 
);
+ #else
+-const QString defaultSocketDir = XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( "data", 
QLatin1String( "akonadi" ) );
+-QString socketDir = settings.value( QLatin1String( 
"Connection/SocketDirectory" ), defaultSocketDir ).toString();
+-if ( socketDir[0] != QLatin1Char( '/' ) ) {
+-  QDir::home().mkdir( socketDir );
+-  socketDir = QDir::homePath() + QLatin1Char( '/' ) + socketDir;
+-}
+-
++QString socketDir = preferredSocketDirectory( XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( 
"data", QLatin1String( "akonadi" ) ) );
+ const QString socketFile = socketDir + QLatin1String( 
"/akonadiserver.socket" );
+ unlink( socketFile.toUtf8().constData() );
+ if ( !listen( socketFile ) )
+@@ -202,8 +197,7 @@
+ 
+ #ifndef Q_OS_WIN
+ QSettings connectionSettings( connectionSettingsFile, 
QSettings::IniFormat );
+-const QString defaultSocketDir = XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( "data", 
QLatin1String( "akonadi" ) );
+-const QString socketDir = settings.value( QLatin1String( 
"Connection/SocketDirectory" ), defaultSocketDir ).toString();
++const QString socketDir = preferredSocketDirectory( XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( 
"data", QLatin1String( "akonadi" ) ) );
+ 
+ if ( !QDir::home().remove( socketDir + QLatin1String( 
"/akonadiserver.socket" ) ) )
+ akError() << "Failed to remove Unix socket";
+@@ -261,7 +255,7 @@
+ void AkonadiServer::startPostgresqlDatabaseProcess()
+ {
+   const QString dataDir = XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( "data", QLatin1String( 
"akonadi/db_data" ) );
+-  const QString socketDir = XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( "data", QLatin1String( 
"akonadi/db_misc" ) );
++  const QString socketDir = preferredSocketDirectory( XdgBaseDirs::saveDir( 
"data", QLatin1String( "akonadi/db_misc" ) ) );
+ 
+   if ( !QFile::exists( QString::fromLatin1( "%1/PG_VERSION" ).arg( dataDir ) 
) ) {
+ // postgre data directory not initialized yet, so call initdb on it
+@@ -3

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Christian Marillat 
Alessio Treglia  writes:

> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat
>  wrote:
>> Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname.
>
> A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed.
> Is it enough for you?

Which symbol and wich functions ?

Christian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87tydgoy4o@christian.marillat.net

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Alessio Treglia 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat
 wrote:
> Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname.

A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed.
Is it enough for you?


-- 
Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=ythd4+TJx=w2g1nffubt9ays...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:30:57 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:

> I've put my notes from rebuild tests at
> 
> 
> This adds
> 
> - courier #622014
> - kildclient #623726
> - libafs-perl #623924, #621999
> - libclone-fast-perl (5.12 only) #615571
> - libvideo-capture-v4l-perl #621466
> - ming #623927
> - net-snmp #617212
> - perl-tk #613188
> - znc #620777
> - collectd #624255
> - freeradius #623928
> - libdevice-cdio-perl (5.12 only), #579450
> - libgstreamer-perl #616454
> - libsgml-parser-opensp-perl (maybe, can't always reproduce) #613199
> - redhat-cluster #623930
> - libembperl-perl #624578
> - pidgin #621940
> - libclutter-perl #620936
> 
> to the list of problems.
> 
Thanks.

> Should we block the transition bug with all those too?
> 
Yes please.  Also make sure they're all at RC severity.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430094503.gi2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Christian Marillat 
Alessio Treglia  writes:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi!
>
> I've uploaded the new release of libquicktime to experimental and I'd like to 
> upload it to unstable too.
> Although the SONAME has been bumped I think no porting is needed, so a 
> rebuild might be the solution for most packages affected by this:

Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname.

Christian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739l0qdky@christian.marillat.net

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

2011-04-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:04:02AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:40:56 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > - apparmor (only in sid)
> > - gbrowse (only in sid)
> > - gpib (RC buggy, only in sid)
> > - hyperestraier (FTBFS on mips)
> > - libgimp-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> > - libqt-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> > - libsys-syslog-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> > - opendchub (only in sid, RC buggy)
> 
> Shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> > - lasso (gcj ICE on kfreebsd-amd64)
> > - openbabel (6 days / 10, SONAME bump, FTBFS)
> > - rxvt-unicode (RC buggy, depends on ncurses)
> > - slurm-llnl (RC buggy)
> > - zbar (FTBFS on ia64)
> > - znc (FTBFS)
> > 
> These are the problematic ones so far, besides possible FTBFS in the
> rest of the 400 packages.

I've put my notes from rebuild tests at


This adds

- courier #622014
- kildclient #623726
- libafs-perl #623924, #621999
- libclone-fast-perl (5.12 only) #615571
- libvideo-capture-v4l-perl #621466
- ming #623927
- net-snmp #617212
- perl-tk #613188
- znc #620777
- collectd #624255
- freeradius #623928
- libdevice-cdio-perl (5.12 only), #579450
- libgstreamer-perl #616454
- libsgml-parser-opensp-perl (maybe, can't always reproduce) #613199
- redhat-cluster #623930
- libembperl-perl #624578
- pidgin #621940
- libclutter-perl #620936

to the list of problems.

Should we block the transition bug with all those too?

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430093057.gc4...@urchin.earth.li

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

2011-04-30 Thread Alessio Treglia 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi!

I've uploaded the new release of libquicktime to experimental and I'd like to 
upload it to unstable too.
Although the SONAME has been bumped I think no porting is needed, so a rebuild 
might be the solution for most packages affected by this:

dvgrab
gem
gmerlin
kino
mlt
pdp
smilutils
xawtv

Please let me know when I can start the transition.
Thanks in advance.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110430085621.13013.58833.reportbug@alessio-laptop