Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Aron Xu wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
The patch doesn't look right:
man dh_pythonsupport
[...]
Appropriate dependencies on python-support, python and pythonX.Y are put
in
${python:Depends}. The ${python:Versions} and ${python:Provides}
optional
substitution variables are made available as well.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110531060322.ga5...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Bug#625544: marked as done (transition: imagemagick4)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 06:02:21 + with message-id e1qri21-0008se...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625544, regarding transition: imagemagick4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 625544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625544 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, We would like to perform the transition from libmagickcore3, libmagick++3, libmagickwand3 to libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4 This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a (minimal) API change. Package are in experimental grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends libmagick-dev -s Package /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Sources Package: ale Package: dx Package: gnuift Package: imview Package: kismet Package: nip2 Package: psiconv Package: rss-glx Package: vips Package: xine-lib Package: drawtiming Package: gnuift Package: kismet Package: nip2 Package: vips Package: xine-lib Package: drawtiming Package: gnuift Package: kismet Package: nip2 Package: vips Package: xine-lib grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends libmagick++-dev -s Package /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Sources Package: drawtiming Package: dvdauthor Package: labplot Package: dvdauthor Package: gem Package: gmic Package: gnudatalanguage Package: k3d Package: kxstitch Package: labplot Package: pfstools Package: pstoedit Package: pythonmagick Package: synfig Package: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang Package: zbar Package: dvdauthor Package: gem Package: gmic Package: gnudatalanguage Package: inkscape Package: k3d Package: pfstools Package: player Package: pstoedit Package: pythonmagick Package: vdr-plugin-skinenigmang Package: zbar grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends libmagickwand-dev -s Package /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Sources Package: xine-lib Package: calibre Package: dx Package: libdmtx Package: librmagick-ruby Package: obex-data-server Package: php-imagick Package: rss-glx Package: virtuoso-opensource Package: calibre Package: dx Package: libdmtx Package: librmagick-ruby Package: obex-data-server Package: php-imagick Package: rss-glx Package: virtuoso-opensource Thanks ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: calibre Source-Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of calibre, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: calibre-bin_0.8.2+dfsg-1_amd64.deb to main/c/calibre/calibre-bin_0.8.2+dfsg-1_amd64.deb calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1.dsc to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1.dsc calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1_all.deb to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.8.2+dfsg-1_all.deb calibre_0.8.2+dfsg.orig.tar.gz to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.8.2+dfsg.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org (supplier of updated calibre package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:38:22 +0200 Source: calibre Binary: calibre calibre-bin Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Miriam Ruiz little_m...@yahoo.es Changed-By: Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org Description: calibre- e-book converter and library management calibre-bin - e-book converter and library management Closes: 625544 628640 Changes: calibre (0.8.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuild against libmagick 4. (Closes: #625544) * debian/watch: Update for new location on sourceforge. * Drop kfreebsd.patch, fixed upstream. * Unfuzz the other two patches. * debian/control: Change build dependency to unversioned libboost-dev. * debian/rules: Drop fixing recipes permissions, they are installed as a zip file now. * debian/rules: Rewrite weird env python2 style hashbang lines to use standard /usr/bin/python. * debian/control, debian/rules: Force usage of python2.7 for now, as long as it is not the default yet. The new
Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1
reopen 625544 kthxbye On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:02:21 +, Martin Pitt wrote: calibre (0.8.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuild against libmagick 4. (Closes: #625544) Err, no. #625544 is against release.debian.org, not calibre. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110531062126.gy2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: Re: Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 625544
Bug #625544 {Done: Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: imagemagick4
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
625544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130682289010205.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#625544: marked as done (transition: imagemagick4)
reopen 625544 thanks On 05/31/2011 08:15 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 06:02:21 + with message-id e1qri21-0008se...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625544, regarding transition: imagemagick4 to be marked as done. why are you closing this bug? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de488c3.8010...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#625544: marked as done (transition: imagemagick4)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 625544 Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick4 Bug 625544 is not marked as done; doing nothing. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625544 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130682308110680.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com writes: I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff). [...] +gwrite (0.3.0-2) stable; urgency=low This version was already uploaded to unstable in the past. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4d7o17c@marvin.43-1.org
Re: Bug#625544: marked as done (transition: imagemagick4)
Hello Medhi, Mehdi Dogguy [2011-05-31 8:20 +0200]: why are you closing this bug? Sorry, copypaste fail. I meant to close #625556 (and did so now). Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110531071335.ga2...@piware.de
Bug#628663: nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nmu patchage_0.4.4-1.2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new flowcanvas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3knSUACgkQRdSMfNz8P9DW2gCfSOalAlai41WajFO8ybtPzUIZ t40An21Lt6mUz/iMhaGLQtkURb3xuEJG =xPq6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110531074749.5935.50285.reportbug@alessio-laptop
Bug#628663: marked as done (nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 10:33:30 +0200 with message-id 4de4a7da.9060...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#628663: nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #628663, regarding nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 628663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628663 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nmu patchage_0.4.4-1.2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new flowcanvas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3knSUACgkQRdSMfNz8P9DW2gCfSOalAlai41WajFO8ybtPzUIZ t40An21Lt6mUz/iMhaGLQtkURb3xuEJG =xPq6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 05/31/2011 09:47 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nmu patchage_0.4.4-1.2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new flowcanvas Scheduled (with a depwait on libflowcanvas-dev). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap
On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying the fix to stable. Are there any plans to do that in the near future? No plan yet, but how long does it need to be in sid to satisfy this wish? I'm going to follow a two-track process here: I'm uploading the proposed update of openldap to squeeze with the fix for #596343 backed out, and propose an NMU to sid for the latter. If that has been accepted and aged long enough (?) then I may create another update for stable. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9b45cbc7925e72529d5ebd47d6b5c924.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff). Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
unblocking busybox for -testing
Hello. Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for a long time already, and the only problem found so far has been fixed in subsequent upload. It's a new upstream version upload, so the changes are somewhat large for such a delicate target as debian- installer (the busybox-udeb flavour of it), but we tried to be very careful to not break things. I already got an ACK from Otavio Salvador on debian-boot@, http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/05/msg00374.html (msgid BANLkTikzcFiP48__G=2fg1oqweh-zcy...@mail.gmail.com). There are other, less drastic, changes for busybox pending too, but I'd love to have some point release before processing further. Thank you! /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de4cc1b.4000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
On 2011年05月31日 14:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Aron Xu wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
The patch doesn't look right:
man dh_pythonsupport
[...]
Appropriate dependencies on python-support, python and pythonX.Y are
put in
${python:Depends}. The ${python:Versions} and ${python:Provides}
optional
substitution variables are made available as well.
Cheers,
Sorry but my pbuilder produced a false result for using
${python:Versions}, which didn't add the correct python-support entry in
Depends. Maybe I did something wrong that time and I'll prepare it again
now.
PS: I've already used ${python:Depends} substitution variable to fix
this problem in the version in Sid.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff). Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.) Kind regards Philipp Kern So this means missing Depends (python-support) does not worth an update? -- Regards, Aron Xu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff). Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.) So this means missing Depends (python-support) does not worth an update? It still installs. It also runs, I presume? If so, as #592087 is only important, too: no. (The update-python-modules invocation in postinst is guarded by a which.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[SRM] Update for apt-listchanges
Hi, I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable: apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low [ Sandro Tosi ] * Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo IGARASHI for the report and to Robert Luberda for the patch; Closes: #590541 [ Michael Biebl ] * Upload to stable. -- Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org Tue, 31 May 2011 11:57:14 +0200 The complete debdiff is attached. It is basically the 2.85.8 upload, Sandro kindly made for unstable, minus the tranlation updates. Without this fix, apt-listchanges will silently skip NEWS files for packages which only have a single NEWS entry during a squeeze→wheezy upgrade. That's why I think it's important to get this fix into the next stable point release. Please let me know if I can go on with the upload. Thanks, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? diff -Nru apt-listchanges-2.85.7/apt-listchanges/DebianFiles.py apt-listchanges-2.85.7+squeeze1/apt-listchanges/DebianFiles.py --- apt-listchanges-2.85.7/apt-listchanges/DebianFiles.py 2010-12-11 21:27:58.0 +0100 +++ apt-listchanges-2.85.7+squeeze1/apt-listchanges/DebianFiles.py 2011-05-31 13:53:31.0 +0200 @@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ if not is_debian_changelog: return None +if entry != '': + entries += [entry] + if reverse: entries.reverse() changes = .join(entries) diff -Nru apt-listchanges-2.85.7/debian/changelog apt-listchanges-2.85.7+squeeze1/debian/changelog --- apt-listchanges-2.85.7/debian/changelog 2010-12-11 21:27:58.0 +0100 +++ apt-listchanges-2.85.7+squeeze1/debian/changelog2011-05-31 13:55:27.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + [ Sandro Tosi ] + * Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo +IGARASHI for the report and to Robert Luberda for the patch; Closes: #590541 + + [ Michael Biebl ] + * Upload to stable. + + -- Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org Tue, 31 May 2011 11:57:14 +0200 + apt-listchanges (2.85.7) unstable; urgency=low * Update the program Catalan PO file; thanks to Jordi Mallach; Closes: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: unblocking busybox for -testing
On 31/05/2011 13:08, Michael Tokarev wrote: Hello. Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for a long time already, and the only problem found so far has been fixed in subsequent upload. It's a new upstream version upload, so the changes are somewhat large for such a delicate target as debian- installer (the busybox-udeb flavour of it), but we tried to be very careful to not break things. I already got an ACK from Otavio Salvador on debian-boot@, http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/05/msg00374.html (msgid BANLkTikzcFiP48__G=2fg1oqweh-zcy...@mail.gmail.com). Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de505fa.9050...@dogguy.org
Bug#624637: marked as done (transition: libquicktime)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 17:16:58 +0200 with message-id 4de5066a.3080...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime has caused the Debian Bug report #624637, regarding transition: libquicktime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624637 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi! I've uploaded the new release of libquicktime to experimental and I'd like to upload it to unstable too. Although the SONAME has been bumped I think no porting is needed, so a rebuild might be the solution for most packages affected by this: dvgrab gem gmerlin kino mlt pdp smilutils xawtv Please let me know when I can start the transition. Thanks in advance. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 24/05/2011 16:26, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: Good. Please go ahead! Uploaded, thanks. $ dak ls -s unstable,testing libquicktime libquicktime | 2:1.2.2-3 | testing | source libquicktime | 2:1.2.2-3 | unstable | source Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Please binNMU adplay and ocp against updated libadplug
Hello, A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0). nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' nmu ocp_1:0.1.20-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktim9jtmvzask2rjmrxyuljqr3hx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [SRM] Update for apt-listchanges
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 16:03 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable: apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low [ Sandro Tosi ] * Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo IGARASHI for the report and to Robert Luberda for the patch; Closes: #590541 [ Michael Biebl ] * Upload to stable. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306867477.3872.62.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:11 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying the fix to stable. Are there any plans to do that in the near future? No plan yet, but how long does it need to be in sid to satisfy this wish? I'm going to follow a two-track process here: I'm uploading the proposed update of openldap to squeeze with the fix for #596343 backed out, and Thanks; I've marked that package for acceptance at the next dinstall. propose an NMU to sid for the latter. If that has been accepted and aged long enough (?) then I may create another update for stable. Okay. I've made a note to keep an eye out for a possible unstable upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306867694.3872.78.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: klibc 1.5.20 stable/oldstable update
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 17:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:41 +, maximilian attems wrote: * [klibc] ipconfig: comment new escape function security fix for CVE-2011-0997 type vulnerability corresponding cve requested but not yet given out. http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=46a0f831582629612f0ff9707ad1292887f26bff As mentioned on oss-sec, it would be nice if this didn't write to a predictable filename. From the stable update point-of-view though, I realise that's not a regression relative to the current lenny / squeeze versions. It is not of relevance for current pre-init usage, as you don't have unpriviliged users there, but it will get fixed upstream, by making the used dir an optional switch. Thanks for the update. * [klibc] ipconfig: Only peek and discard packets from specified device. This fixes netbooting on boxes with several connected network dev. (the commit is on the largeish size, but got tested together with 1.5.20) http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=92823d1a78a8a6f3e7a7cc36f949ca6379c4e77c concerning oldstable only the first one should be fixed. ipconfig has deeper troubles there. if acked by SRM I'd upload a klibc-1.5.20-2 with just the 2 aboves fixes for stable and a 1.5.12-3 for oldstable with just the first fix? [...] I'd appreciate debdiffs for a final check before the uploads, but the above sounds good; thanks. do you mean belows output of debdiff on the dsc files? belows is for stable, oldstable will follow once this is acked. Something very much like that, yes. :-) Please go ahead with the stable upload; thanks. (Ugh at the debian-changes auto-patch, but that's not a regression from the current squeeze package, so never mind.) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306868080.3872.102.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#628147: Bug#598361: Make SRM aware of #598361
tag 628147 + pending thanks On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 17:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Gaertner wrote: retitle -1 slapcat gives unclean shutdown detected should be fixed in stable thanks Hi, Please consider #598361 for the next stable point-release. Fix is already in unstable. Please don't make such requests by cloning + reassigning - or, if you do: - cc debian-release on your mail, otherwise all we get is the result of the control@ commands #598361 is fixed in openldap 2.4.23-7.1, which will be in proposed-updates after the next dinstall. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306868214.3872.111.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#628147: Bug#598361: Make SRM aware of #598361
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 628147 + pending Bug #628147 [release.debian.org] pu: openldap_2.4.23-7+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 628147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628147 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130686822418988.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Please binNMU adplay and ocp against updated libadplug
On 05/31/2011 05:28 PM, Артём Попов wrote: Hello, A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0). nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' Was this #553626 fixed? nmu ocp_1:0.1.20-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' Scheduled (with a depwait on adplug on mipsel). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de53d6a.6050...@dogguy.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.23-7.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrv16-0008te...@franck.debian.org
Processed: limit package to release.debian.org, tagging 626844, tagging 626845, tagging 627742, tagging 626003
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: limit package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' tags 626844 + pending Bug #626844 [release.debian.org] pu: package kdenetwork/4:4.4.5-2+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. tags 626845 + pending Bug #626845 [release.debian.org] pu: package qt4-x11/4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. tags 627742 + pending Bug #627742 [release.debian.org] pu: package libfinance-quotehist-perl/1.14-1+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. tags 626003 + confirmed Bug #626003 [release.debian.org] pu: package qemu-kvm/0.12.5+dfsg-5+squeeze3 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 626003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626003 626844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626844 627742: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627742 626845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626845 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13068735033521.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: apt-listchanges_2.85.7+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze0.1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrabz-0002ow...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: rails_2.1.0-7+lenny0.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrabb-0002pb...@franck.debian.org
