Bug#645053: RM: qcad/stable,unstable,oldstable -- ROM; non-distributable files
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Removal of qcad source and all binaries (qcad, qcad-doc, qcad-data) from unstable, stable, and old-stable 1) qcad is produced by RibbonSoft and has been in Debian since 1999 2) upstream stopped maintaining the software, and Debian has been using qcad- free [1] as upstream since 2009 3) recently a new project, librecad [2], has ported qcad to qt4 and is packaged in debian as librecad 4) this week, RibbonSoft asked LibreCAD to stop distributing fonts, patterns, example libraries, and documentation as they are not-free. 5) The project is advertised as GPLv2 and includes the text of the license with the code. The header files of all source code has the GPL header, but there is no explicit granting of GPL in the fonts, patterns, libraries, or documentation. In face, the documentation says "All Rights Reserved" 6) Since qcad depends on qt3 (which will be removed by wheezy anyways), and Debian is distributing non-distributable code in both binary and source packages, it should be removed. After removal, a future upload of qcad can be made as a transitional package recommending librecad, as per discussions on debian-science mailing list. [1]http://sites.google.com/site/qcadfree/ [2] www.librecad.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011224830.2079.19622.report...@esc-303123.ee.nd.edu
Bug#645050: RM: partlibrary/stable -- RoQA; non-distributable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Removal request for partlibrary in all releases (stable, old-stable, unstable) Nothing in the package is redistributable. Even where Debian got it from (qcad.org) didn't have a license to distribute these files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111012041309.2071.93594.report...@esc-303123.ee.nd.edu
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: bugzilla_3.6.2.0-4.4_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rdo2j-0004w4...@franck.debian.org
Re: binNMU claws-mail-extra-plugins (python2.7 transition)
Hi Jakub, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ricardo Mones , 2011-10-08, 12:39: > >I'd like to request a binNMU for claws-mail-extra-plugins, I think > >that could fix http://bugs.debian.org/644582. > > I scheduled binNMUs a few days ago, without being aware of the bug > report. I think it was reported later, so not your fault :) > Please note that we normally don't schedule binNMUs to work around > RC bugs, e.g. missing or incorrect dependencies (I haven't looked > closely at #644582 yet, but it seems to me it falls into this > category). Well, I just tried to rebuild it in an up-to-date chroot and it got magically but otherwise correctly to linked to libpython2.7 and even got installed and working correctly. This is the opposite of what the bug reports, so I thought rebuilding was enough. But maybe I didn't fully understand the problem. Which would be the incorrect dependency? -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#645043: RM: qcad/stable -- ROM; non-distributable files
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Removal of qcad source and all binaries (qcad, qcad-doc, qcad-data) from unstable, stable, and old-stable 1) qcad is produced by RibbonSoft and has been in Debian since 1999 2) upstream stopped maintaining the software, and Debian has been using qcad- free [1] as upstream since 2009 3) recently a new project, librecad [2], has ported qcad to qt4 and is packaged in debian as librecad 4) this week, RibbonSoft asked LibreCAD to stop distributing fonts, patterns, example libraries, and documentation as they are non-free. 5) The project is advertised as GPLv2 and includes the text of the license with the code. The header files of all source code has the GPL header, but there is no explicit granting of GPL in the fonts, patterns, libraries, or documentation. In face, the documentation says "All Rights Reserved" 6) Since qcad depends on qt3 (which will be removed by wheezy anyways), and Debian is distributing non-distributable code in both binary and source packages, it should be removed. After removal, a future upload of qcad can be made as a transitional package recommending librecad, as per discussions on debian-science mailing list. [1]http://sites.google.com/site/qcadfree/ [2] www.librecad.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011225629.2356.33758.report...@esc-303123.ee.nd.edu
Bug#644952: librecad in testing contains non-free docs and fonts.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 00:55:58 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: serious > > Hi! Tha package librecad currently in testing (1.0.0~rc1+nolibs-4) > contains non-free docs and fonts. > > I just uploaded a new version to unstable wich corrects this, > but I think it would be good to remove the version in testing. > If they're non-free but redistributable, then this bug should be filed against the package itself, and there's no need for a removal from testing if it's fixed in sid anyway. If they're not redistributable then you need to contact the snapshot.d.o folks as well. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011203614.gr12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
AŠ kvadrātā ir prom!!
IKP ceļās! He he, apnicis šis nodrāztais teiciens? Gandrīz visa mūsu valsts tā kā mazliet aplauzās, tā taču bija, ja? Nu nekas nāvējošs - Kikboksa Ainārs ir nogājis no skatuves, bet mums (man un Tev) vēl ir iespēja! Dari šitā - ienāc tur: http://www.chilhoek.woelmuis.nl/bsuse.php Novelc programmu (CCR software) par baltu velti, notestē un atstāj atsauksmi, tāpēc, ka tas softs ir vērtīgs! Kikitenko Grigorijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011200650.ac04d13a4...@liszt.debian.org
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny15_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rdiqa-0006te...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1+b1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5-appl_1.0.1-1.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.2.11-6+squeeze3_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rdiq8-0006te...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#644147: pu: package libdigest-perl/1.16-1+squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 644149 + pending Bug #644149 [release.debian.org] opu: package libdigest-perl/1.15-2+lenny1 Added tag(s) pending. > tag 644147 + pending Bug #644147 [release.debian.org] pu: package libdigest-perl/1.16-1+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644147 644149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644149 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13183622884918.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#644147: pu: package libdigest-perl/1.16-1+squeeze1
tag 644149 + pending tag 644147 + pending thanks On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 21:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:29 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > the last upstream release of libdigest-perl (1.17) contains a fix for an > > unsafe use of eval[1]: the argument to Digest->new($algo) was not > > checked properly allowing code injection (in case the value can be > > changed by the attacker). Versions in both lenny and squeeze are > > affected. > > Please go ahead with both uploads; thanks. For the record, both uploads have now been accepted; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1318362252.25039.21.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Processed: binNMU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertag 644175 binnmu Bug#644175: binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. > usertag 644177 binnmu Bug#644177: binNMU: lush 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. > usertag 644498 binnmu Bug#644498: binNMU: nitpic 0.1-12 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. > close 644175 Bug#644175: binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ralf Treinen > close 644177 Bug#644177: binNMU: lush 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ralf Treinen > close 644498 Bug#644498: binNMU: nitpic 0.1-12 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ralf Treinen > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644498 644177: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644177 644175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644175 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13183614891652.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Processed: binNMU
package release.debian.org user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 644175 binnmu usertag 644177 binnmu usertag 644498 binnmu close 644175 close 644177 close 644498 thanks On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 15:33 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: [...] > > reassign 644175 release.debian.org > Bug #644175 [mutrace] "binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4: > Bug reassigned from package 'mutrace' to 'release.debian.org'. Please make sure you explicitly Cc the receiving package when you do that. Otherwise all they (we) get is the result of the control@ mail, which is a tad unhelpful and annoying in most cases. In any case, these were all scheduled over the weekend, so closing. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1318361448.25039.19.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: binNMU claws-mail-extra-plugins (python2.7 transition)
* Ricardo Mones , 2011-10-08, 12:39: I'd like to request a binNMU for claws-mail-extra-plugins, I think that could fix http://bugs.debian.org/644582. I scheduled binNMUs a few days ago, without being aware of the bug report. Please note that we normally don't schedule binNMUs to work around RC bugs, e.g. missing or incorrect dependencies (I haven't looked closely at #644582 yet, but it seems to me it falls into this category). -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011192856.gc3...@jwilk.net
Bug#644971: marked as done (nmu: proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:23:58 +0100 with message-id <1318361038.25039.15.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#644971: nmu: proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #644971, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 644971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644971 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" dw proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) nmu proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" dw proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Francesco P. Lovergine --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 11:50 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" > dw proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) Dep-waits are against binary packages, and use standard dependency syntax: dw proftpd-mod-vroot . ALL . -m "proftpd-dev (>= 1.3.4~rc3-1)" > nmu proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" > dw proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) As above. Scheduled. Regards, Adam --- End Message ---
Bug#644741: marked as done (nmu: rebuild against ocaml-ogg)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:20:04 +0100 with message-id <1318360804.25039.13.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#644741: nmu: rebuild against ocaml-ogg has caused the Debian Bug report #644741, regarding nmu: rebuild against ocaml-ogg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 644741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, The following packages need to be rebuilt against the new ocaml-ogg: nmu ocaml-speex_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" dw ocaml-speex_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' nmu ocaml-theora_0.3.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" dw ocaml-theora_0.3.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' nmu ocaml-flac_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" dw ocaml-flac_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' nmu ocaml-schroedinger_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" dw ocaml-schroedinger_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' Thanks, Romain -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-486 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 18:31 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote: > The following packages need to be rebuilt against the new ocaml-ogg: > > nmu ocaml-speex_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" > dw ocaml-speex_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' > nmu ocaml-theora_0.3.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" > dw ocaml-theora_0.3.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' > nmu ocaml-flac_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" > dw ocaml-flac_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' > nmu ocaml-schroedinger_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ocaml-ogg 0.4.3-1" > dw ocaml-schroedinger_0.1.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libogg-ocaml-dev (>= 0.4.3)' Scheduled. Regards, Adam --- End Message ---
Bug#644971: nmu: proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" dw proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) nmu proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd 1.3.4rc3" dw proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3 . ALL . -m '(>= proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4~rc3-1) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011095018.ga15...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
