Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 23:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Anyway, let's see the upstream call on that. https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/799603/comments/16 and I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the guard and the “else” part. One thing I can do is add a versioned build-dep for future version but that won't really help for the current versions. Anyway, could the binNMU be scheduled so at least unstable users have a working midori? -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to pursue this goal for wheezy. Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to experimental on sunday (October 23th). But I will do this release from a leaf branch that will not (yet) be merged in master. That way Guillem still has a chance to improve the multiarch branch prior to its merge in master. But this merge must happen in the next 2 weeks so that we can upload dpkg 1.16.3 to sid no later than the 6th of november. I will also ensure that this second upload happens. NACK on both unreviewed uploads. What I'll do though, when I get back home tomorrow from my current trip, is to push already reviewed stuff and keep pushing incrementally, instead of my usual big pushes, so that the progress is more visible. The 1.16.2 will still happen, as planned, quicker than our usual 2 months between micro releases. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111022102531.ga24...@gaara.hadrons.org
Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?
Hi Guillem, On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to experimental on sunday (October 23th). NACK on both unreviewed uploads. What I'll do though, when I get back home tomorrow from my current trip, is to push already reviewed stuff and keep pushing incrementally, instead of my usual big pushes, so that the progress is more visible. That suggests that there's some multiarch work going on your side behind the scenes. While I'm glad that there was progress (even if invisible), I don't understand the lack of communication from your part on this topic. I mean it's not like I have done the work and handed it entirely over to you, instead I have been maintaining the branch over the months and squashing some bugfixes into existing commits from time to time. If there are commits already reviewed I would like to see them so that there's no divergence between what I have been maintaining publicly and what you have done privately. Also I don't know how your private branch looks like, but supplementary review never hurts and I can't do that with private code. The 1.16.2 will still happen, as planned, quicker than our usual 2 months between micro releases. There's already 1 month elapsed out of the two. So you pretty much have to respect the schedule suggested by the release team if you want this to be true. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111022125220.gh19...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Bug#646095: /usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text
Hi, FYI claws-mail-fancy-plugin is also affected by this, when trying to load the plugin, I get: /usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text Cheers Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111022152539.1964b...@fornost.bigon.be
Processed: reassign 646095 to libwebkitgtk-1.0-0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 646095 libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.6.1-2 Bug #646095 [release.debian.org] nmu: midori_0.4.1- Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'libwebkitgtk-1.0-0'. Bug #646095 [libwebkitgtk-1.0-0] nmu: midori_0.4.1- Bug Marked as found in versions webkit/1.6.1-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646095 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131929113627423.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.12 for squeeze
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.12 release targetting squeeze. [...] The patches look okay, but given that they've only been in unstable for a few days and that we're coming close to the deadline for the point release, I suspect that at this point we'll be looking at getting the upload in shortly after the point release in order to help give us a longer testing period. Would it be ok to upload this now? Yes, please go ahead. Sorry for the delay. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1319295013.9165.12.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Wheezy BSP Marathon first BSP in Hildesheim/Ger Dec 2-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, the Wheezy Bug Squashing Party (BSP) Marathon[0] will commence with a BSP in Hildesheim, Germany from December 2nd to December 4th. The party will be hosted in the office of Pengutronix e. K.[1] For further details please have a look at the BSP's wiki page[2]. Please also use that page to register your attendance, since the number of possible attendees is limited. If you have any questions not answered on the wiki page feel free to contact me. Best, Meike [0] http://wiki.debian.org/BSPMarathonWheezy [1] http://pengutronix.com/index_en.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/BSP2011/Hildesheim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6i+fwACgkQuT3KDxRRCVtULwCfaBywzqRmxnkP9RoG7bhJsPV3 8n4An1/cKr3IrGZPMMSHJUQMVVdz6I91 =pkYS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ea2fa02.1060...@debian.org
Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal 5 packages need binNMUs for libhangul 0.1.0 transition: nmu imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 dw imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1) nmu imhangul3_3.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 dw imhangul3_3.0.0-1 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1) nmu nabi_0.99.9-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 dw nabi_0.99.9-1 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1) nmu ibus-hangul_1.3.1-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 dw ibus-hangul_1.3.1-3 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1) nmu qimhangul_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 dw qimhangul_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1) -- Changwoo Ryu cw...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?
As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a
packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released
with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and
shorewall6-lite in Sid. I have already fixed the latest version in the
git repository and the fix will go into unstable at the next upload.
The result of this issue is that there is some brokenness for specific
users. This occurs when a particular setting is enabled in the
respective package's configuration file to restrict the kernel modules
that got loaded to only those listed in the helpers file. The packaging
error that I made was to not include the default helpers file. I have
attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the
update. The first file would be included in shorewall and
shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite.
The files are already shipped in the respective .orig.tar.gz that are in
the archive. The packaging change would be to install the file into
/usr/share/shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} in the binary packages.
Would this be something that the stable release manager's might consider
for the next point release? If so, can I proceed wth an upload to
s-p-u?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I have attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the update. The first file would be included in shorewall and shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite. I cleverly forgot the attachments the first time, so here they are this time. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com # # Shorewall version 4 - Helpers File # # /usr/share/shorewall/helpers # # This file loads the kernel helper modules. # # THE ORDER OF THE COMMANDS BELOW IS IMPORTANT!! You MUST load in # dependency order. i.e., if M2 depends on M1 then you must load M1 # before you load M2. # # If you need to modify this file, copy it to /etc/shorewall and modify the # copy. # ### # Helpers # loadmodule ip_conntrack_amanda loadmodule ip_conntrack_ftp loadmodule ip_conntrack_h323 loadmodule ip_conntrack_irc loadmodule ip_conntrack_netbios_ns loadmodule ip_conntrack_pptp loadmodule ip_conntrack_sip loadmodule ip_conntrack_tftp loadmodule ip_nat_amanda loadmodule ip_nat_ftp loadmodule ip_nat_h323 loadmodule ip_nat_irc loadmodule ip_nat_pptp loadmodule ip_nat_sip loadmodule ip_nat_snmp_basic loadmodule ip_nat_tftp loadmodule ip_set loadmodule ip_set_iphash loadmodule ip_set_ipmap loadmodule ip_set_macipmap loadmodule ip_set_portmap # # 2.6.20+ helpers # loadmodule nf_conntrack_ftp loadmodule nf_conntrack_h323 loadmodule nf_conntrack_irc loadmodule nf_conntrack_netbios_ns loadmodule nf_conntrack_netlink loadmodule nf_conntrack_pptp loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_gre loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_sctp loadmodule nf_conntrack_sip sip_direct_media=0 loadmodule nf_conntrack_tftp loadmodule nf_conntrack_sane loadmodule nf_nat_amanda loadmodule nf_nat_ftp loadmodule nf_nat_h323 loadmodule nf_nat_irc loadmodule nf_nat loadmodule nf_nat_pptp loadmodule nf_nat_proto_gre loadmodule nf_nat_sip loadmodule nf_nat_snmp_basic loadmodule nf_nat_tftp # # Shorewall6 version 4 - Helpers File # # /usr/share/shorewall6/helpers # # This file loads the modules that may be needed by the firewall. # # THE ORDER OF THE COMMANDS BELOW IS IMPORTANT!! You MUST load in # dependency order. i.e., if M2 depends on M1 then you must load M1 # before you load M2. # # If you need to modify this file, copy it to /etc/shorewall and modify the # copy. # ### # # Helpers # loadmodule nf_conntrack_amanda loadmodule nf_conntrack_ftp loadmodule nf_conntrack_h323 loadmodule nf_conntrack_irc loadmodule nf_conntrack_netbios_ns loadmodule nf_conntrack_netbios_ns loadmodule nf_conntrack_netlink loadmodule nf_conntrack_pptp loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_sctp loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_udplite loadmodule nf_conntrack_sane loadmodule nf_conntrack_sip sip_direct_media=0 loadmodule nf_conntrack_pptp loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_gre loadmodule nf_conntrack_proto_sctp loadmodule nf_conntrack_sip loadmodule nf_conntrack_tftp loadmodule nf_conntrack_sane signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: block 637809 with 646286
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 646286 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 636132 640346 636762 638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 628501 634141 628500 Added blocking bug(s) of 637809: 646286 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637809 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131932107714065.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 637809 with 646295
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 646295 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 636132 640346 638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503 636656 628501 634141 628500 Added blocking bug(s) of 637809: 646295 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637809 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131932144217012.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 637809 with 646297
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 646297 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 646286 646295 636132 640346 636762 638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 628501 634141 628500 Added blocking bug(s) of 637809: 646297 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637809 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131932175719182.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 637809 with 646299
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 646299 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 646297 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 640346 646295 636132 638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503 636656 628501 634141 628500 Added blocking bug(s) of 637809: 646299 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637809 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131932201719922.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
