Re: Building kernel udebs from kfreebsd-*
Hi Philipp, 2011/11/5 Philipp Kern : > Would there be a volunteer to implement that for kFreeBSD too? It could be as > easy as calling kernel-wedge post-build, but at least for linux-2.6 changes > to kernel-wedge were necessary[1]. Nice idea and thanks for the tip. I implemented this for kfreebsd-10 (being uploaded as I write). For kfreebsd-9 maybe it's better to wait a few days since it'll have to go through NEW soon (upstream 9.0 release). And for kfreebsd-8 it would interfere with TERM=xterm transition (see #647672), I'd rather not touch it for now. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnusrgwdidzmkg6hk+r_zvoo1sbynwpwv6n9-npiy0...@mail.gmail.com
Release goal proposal: Archive-wide build-arch and build-indep support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep". The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal is related to #629385. According to Lintian, currently 5542 packages are missing at least one of these optional targets. At the current rate these are fixed it will take over 2 years to get them all done and unfortunately the rate appears to be slowing dropping[1]. Jakub Wilk did an analysis earlier this year, which suggests we can reduce the problem size considerably by looking only at source packages that builds both "arch:all" and "non arch:all" binaries[2]. I have filed #647227 against Lintian asking for a separate tag to identify these packages. To keep it attainable, the goal for Wheezy is to fix the subset of packages that would need to differentiate "build" and "build-arch"/"build-indep". Once we have the data available, we will put up a dd-list for the reduced set. If you would like to help: * Fix you(r team)'s packages (see [3]) * Sign up as an volunteer. - There are up 126 QA uploads waiting to be done. :) - There will probably also be some NMUs. * If filing bugs for this, please use: * User: debian...@lists.debian.org * Usertags: build-arch-target The release goal wiki page is at [4] and the current advocates are Jakub Wilk, Bernhard R. Link and myself. Thanks for considering. ~Niels [1] This data is available on lintian.d.o as: /srv/lintian.debian.org/history/tags/debian-rules-missing-recommended-target.dat format is: [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2011/06/msg00018.html [3] This dd-list is the full set of packages (the reduced set is not available at the moment). http://people.debian.org/~nthykier/rg-build-arch-target/dd-list [4] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/BuildArchTarget -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOtZrYAAoJEAVLu599gGRCekUP/296/iJsyugdBZ3bgk/MsF9E z6lIFve0KdkH8+ze8tigIW7fXtXE2Zep3/Yr3AxUfrJ7gPmKJEPUpDxD+k8bxCs3 46MdgGAGydwmYz2sYdEp7T+HCeZwVqEcW9beWSlXj5ni9qxZSfcev7/f0mQL7z3v pyGzRZE8EloaDpflFCi9Hclot07pVoO8VHNMJq2mZpw1Sx2mAEAeFisq9UQgUTcH C3MNo541TF8v8WiyvH5UA+LG6uG+MrN/1mB7MGYzYWB4byx3SelcilSdgDmbWasY T0MZ4zt+1kEas7GwO1gMM4w6ezsr/PLN+INh56i1SgiKOvucza5OK2MA1uyybnMB pp6MQerLJYbPkhMEkPDqTqYNDKUFwLmaV7hXcUNFZYaAh8Qcrz1wb9r9+xeI8A2b MY+jiiQABBH670IAD70EhaVAHa9YzjcZLqXN1NEwBLCpiipfj5QeYdhZt4Ssu45Z ofbw50sA3qjRupJA50WhWtN605w3SYmxaWLGdsyRN8cA+UkJJGsoxr1YQoDuCA0Y KY/dmz73mufWmNdj2MAPEWvOszCEympYbZ0/ks5b0vgB3xK1NJKj2IHLO7RtrrC3 T6LMc0/EuZnGFUS8yW01G94rLJjZFylHaRpHbXELR5goREZMkjS/4QPOjVcIF0zP 7VByuLIO4kQtFePvesbm =s/mk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2005202219.be91c2000a...@thykier.net
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: byobu_2.80-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rmmri-0007zq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647248: pu: package rng-tools/2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:57 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > This is a request for an upload to stable of the rng-tools package.
> > The upload will fix two important bugs in stable: #609289, #630771.
> [...]
> > There's a lot of noise because autogenerated files are removed by the
> > build on the newer packages in unstable. I can provide a diff with the
> > noise removed if you want.
>
> Confirming what the diff will look like when rebuilt on stable (as the
> package for upload should be) would be good so, yes, please.
Ok. The diff previously attached is the result of:
debdiff rng-tools_2-unofficial-mt.13-3.dsc \
rng-tools_2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1.dsc
Therefore, it is the full diff of the proposed upload (built on stable)
against the current stable package.
The noise is there because I screwed up in the 2-unofficial-mt.14
*upstream* tarball, and somehow shipped it without the autoconf output.
The large diff is recording the fact that config.sub/config.guess/
aclocal.m4/configure are missing in the upstream tarball.
That stuff is regenerated in the Debian build anyway, so it doesn't matter
at all for the Debian packages. I don't think anyone but Debian and
Ubuntu uses this fork of rng-tools, so nobody complained and I did not
notice the problem until very recently.
Here's a diff with the noise removed.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
diff -Nru rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/ChangeLog
rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/ChangeLog
--- rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/ChangeLog 2010-05-06 22:25:05.0
-0300
+++ rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/ChangeLog 2011-06-18 00:06:56.0
-0300
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Fri Jun 17 2011 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
+ * Work around CPU errata: Nano xstore corrupts memory
+ * Support kernels 3.0 and later
+
Sun May 02 2010 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
* enable LARGE_FILE support, otherwise the VIA Padlock code
won't work, thanks to Janis Hamme
diff -Nru rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/configure.ac
rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/configure.ac
--- rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/configure.ac 2010-05-06 22:25:05.0
-0300
+++ rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/configure.ac 2011-06-18 00:06:56.0
-0300
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
dnl along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
dnl Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
-AC_INIT([rng-tools], [2-unofficial-mt.13], [rng-to...@packages.debian.org])
+AC_INIT([rng-tools], [2-unofficial-mt.14], [rng-to...@packages.debian.org])
AC_PREREQ([2.59])
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([rngd.c])
AC_CANONICAL_HOST
diff -Nru rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/debian/changelog
rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/debian/changelog
--- rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/debian/changelog 2010-05-13
23:25:01.0 -0300
+++ rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/debian/changelog 2011-09-14
11:18:24.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+rng-tools (2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Debian 6.0 (Squeeze) backport to fix important bugs in Debian stable
+(closes: #609289, #630771)
++ No changes from 2-unofficial-mt.14-1
+
+ -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:16:19
-0300
+
+rng-tools (2-unofficial-mt.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream version:
++ Work around VIA Nano xstore bug (closes: #609289)
++ Add support for Linux 3.0 (closes: #630771)
+
+ -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:12:54
-0300
+
rng-tools (2-unofficial-mt.13-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Re-upload to fix problem caused by a bad i386 chroot on the -2 build
diff -Nru rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/.gitignore
rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/.gitignore
--- rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/.gitignore 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0
-0300
+++ rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/.gitignore 2011-06-18 00:06:56.0
-0300
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+config.sub
+config.guess
+aclocal.m4
+configure
diff -Nru rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/util.c
rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/util.c
--- rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.13/util.c 2010-05-06 22:25:05.0 -0300
+++ rng-tools-2-unofficial-mt.14/util.c 2011-06-18 00:06:56.0 -0300
@@ -59,15 +59,22 @@
long i;
char *p, *q;
- if (uname(&buf)) return KERNEL_UNSUPPORTED;
+ if (uname(&buf))
+ return KERNEL_UNSUPPORTED;
+
if (!strncmp(buf.sysname, "Linux", 6)) {
i = strtol(buf.release, &p, 10); /* Major version */
- if ((i != 2) || *p != '.') return KERNEL_UNSUPPORTED;
+ if ((i < 2) || *p != '.')
+ return KERNEL_UNSUPPORTED;
+ if (i > 2)
+ return KERNEL_LINUX_26;
p++;
q = p;
Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package
tags 607438 + pending stop Thanks for the reply Adam! On 11/5/11 3:26 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 18:36 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: How should I go on here? I see three options: 1) Update stable version with the single patch from the bug report This would be the safest and generally preferred option. I took option 1 and prepared c-ares_1.7.3-1squeeze1: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/c-ares.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/squeeze Uploaded to mentors for reviewing and testing: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/c-ares/c-ares_1.7.3-1squeeze1.dsc Andreas, could you please upload to stable (if you have no objections) once the release team gives their OK? Thanks, Gregor Debdiff: $ debdiff --diffstat c-ares_1.7.3-1.dsc c-ares_1.7.3-1squeeze1.dsc diffstat for c-ares-1.7.3 c-ares-1.7.3 changelog |6 ++ gbp.conf |2 +- patches/fix_ares_expand_name.diff | 26 ++ patches/series|1 + 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -Nru c-ares-1.7.3/debian/changelog c-ares-1.7.3/debian/changelog --- c-ares-1.7.3/debian/changelog 2010-06-13 22:01:50.0 +0200 +++ c-ares-1.7.3/debian/changelog 2011-11-04 15:45:58.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +c-ares (1.7.3-1squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix ares_expand_name bug (Closes: #607438) + + -- Gregor Jasny Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:33:10 +0100 + c-ares (1.7.3-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Gregor Jasny ] diff -Nru c-ares-1.7.3/debian/gbp.conf c-ares-1.7.3/debian/gbp.conf --- c-ares-1.7.3/debian/gbp.conf2010-06-13 22:01:50.0 +0200 +++ c-ares-1.7.3/debian/gbp.conf2011-11-04 14:59:24.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ [DEFAULT] upstream-branch = upstream -debian-branch = master +debian-branch = squeeze upstream-tag = upstream/%(version)s debian-tag = debian/%(version)s pristine-tar = True diff -Nru c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/fix_ares_expand_name.diff c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/fix_ares_expand_name.diff --- c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/fix_ares_expand_name.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/fix_ares_expand_name.diff 2011-11-04 15:44:26.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +Origin: upstream, 70b726c3343f83d7d3460dce0b24e8930c6f6195 +Author: Stefan Bühler +Date: Sat Dec 18 14:17:09 2010 +0100 + +ares_expand_name: Fix encoded length for indirect root + +diff --git a/ares_expand_name.c b/ares_expand_name.c +index 2af6b2a..e3eccd2 100644 +--- a/ares_expand_name.c b/ares_expand_name.c +@@ -87,7 +87,14 @@ int ares_expand_name(const unsigned char *encoded, const unsigned char *abuf, + * Since this function strips trailing dots though, it becomes "" + */ + q[0] = '\0'; +-*enclen = 1; /* the caller should move one byte to get past this */ ++ ++/* indirect root label (like 0xc0 0x0c) is 2 bytes long (stupid, but ++ valid) */ ++if ((*encoded & INDIR_MASK) == INDIR_MASK) ++ *enclen = 2; ++else ++ *enclen = 1; /* the caller should move one byte to get past this */ ++ + return ARES_SUCCESS; + } + diff -Nru c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/series c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/series --- c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ c-ares-1.7.3/debian/patches/series 2011-11-04 15:44:26.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fix_ares_expand_name.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eb593d9.9030...@googlemail.com
Bug#647649: pu: package bti/028-2+squeeze1
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:03:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Attached is the debdiff, and I've also tested the change successfully > > on a stable machine. > Please go ahead; thanks. Uploaded; thanks to you! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `-NP: Status Quo: All Around My Hat signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Update to byobu in stable to fix bug #548717
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 12:35 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: > On 05/11/11 10:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Please make this 2.80-1+squeeze1, and s/unstable/stable/. With > >> those changes, please go ahead; thanks. > > > > Ping? > > Uploaded, thanks. Sorry for the delay. Flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320516516.5736.5.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#647649: pu: package bti/028-2+squeeze1
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 17:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:05:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Luckily the patch (included in 031-2) is simple and consists of 4 > > > characters: s/http/https/ in 4 URIs: > > > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/bti/031-2/identi.ca-oauth.patch > > Only three, afaict. :) [...] > Attached is the debdiff, and I've also tested the change successfully > on a stable machine. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320516221.5736.3.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Update to byobu in stable to fix bug #548717
On 05/11/11 10:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Please make this 2.80-1+squeeze1, and s/unstable/stable/. With >> those changes, please go ahead; thanks. > > Ping? Uploaded, thanks. Sorry for the delay. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:13:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:23:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now > > > and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able > > > to > > > pursue this goal for wheezy. > > Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring > > further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to > > experimental on sunday (October 23th). > > > > But I will do this release from a leaf branch that will not (yet) be > > merged in master. That way Guillem still has a chance to improve the > > multiarch branch prior to its merge in master. But this merge must > > happen in the next 2 weeks so that we can upload dpkg 1.16.3 to sid > > no later than the 6th of november. > > > > I will also ensure that this second upload happens. > > so are we on track for the upload of dpkg to sid by the end of the week? Ping? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2005154326.ga26...@thrall.0x539.de
Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:06:42PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Please see attached debdiffs. > [...] > > Okay. In that case, please go ahead; thanks. > > For the record, these were uploaded and accepted. > For the record, thanks very much for your assistance in this. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Updating libcgicc in stable to fix #600943
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 00:23 +0100, Chris Butler wrote: > I've had a request in #645616, asking if I can update the libcgicc package > to fix bug #600943 in squeeze. The bug is fairly trivial; the .pc file for > pkg-config is installed in /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib/pkgconfig. The fix > I would be cherry-picking from 3.9.2-2 is equally simple: > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 820a095..6acd614 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +libcgicc (3.2.9-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low Please make the version 3.2.9-1+squeeze1 and set the distribution to "stable". With those two tweaks, please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320504200.14556.29.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Update to byobu in stable to fix bug #548717
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 11:42 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: > > On 14/10/11 20:05, Alexander Chernyakhovsky wrote: > > > I encountered bug #548717 on my Debian Squeeze system that uses kerberos > > > authentication and hesiod groups. Unlike the situation described in the > > > bug, I could not easily remedy this by deleting the directory -- the > > > package was not installable. > > > > > > I have corrected this by backporting better chmod semantics, which makes > > > this package installable, and tested it. > > > > The minimal patch proposed by Alex is attached. > > --- byobu-2.80/debian/changelog > +++ byobu-2.80/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +byobu (2.80-2) unstable; urgency=low > > Please make this 2.80-1+squeeze1, and s/unstable/stable/. With those > changes, please go ahead; thanks. Ping? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320503976.14556.27.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: BinNMU for drizzle
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:24 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > drizzle is currently not installable in sid: [...] > drizzle : Depends: libdrizzledmessage0 (= 2011.03.13-1) but it is not going > to be installed >Depends: libprotobuf6 but it is not installable [...] > I tried to rebuild packages from the source package. It works, packages > can be installed and the drizzle daemon does start up. So could you > please do a BinNMU for drizzle ? I've scheduled binNMUs for amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc. I didn't bother with kfreebsd-* as the resulting packages won't be installable there in any case (RC bug being filed shortly). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320503949.14556.26.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.12 for squeeze
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 15:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and > > > > I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.12 release targetting squeeze. [...] > > Would it be ok to upload this now? > > Yes, please go ahead. Sorry for the delay. Ping? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320503273.14556.24.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 18:36 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: > I have a question regarding the c-ares package (a library to query the > DNS) bug #607438. The bug report has a patch attached. But browsing the > upstream repository shows many fixes since v1.7.3. > > How should I go on here? I see three options: > > 1) Update stable version with the single patch from the bug report This would be the safest and generally preferred option. > 2) Update the stable version to 1.7.5 (the library hides private symbols > and should be easily replaceable) On the whole, this isn't appropriate for a stable release. > 3) Cherry pick all the patches from below (and maybe ask upstream to > verify the list) Selected patches of specific import, possibly; all (or even most) of them, probably not. The list you provided includes, for instance, at least one new feature, patches which only apply to non-Debian systems and fixes for issues which don't exist in 1.7.3. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320503162.14556.23.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#647248: pu: package rng-tools/2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:57 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > This is a request for an upload to stable of the rng-tools package. > The upload will fix two important bugs in stable: #609289, #630771. [...] > There's a lot of noise because autogenerated files are removed by the > build on the newer packages in unstable. I can provide a diff with the > noise removed if you want. Confirming what the diff will look like when rebuilt on stable (as the package for upload should be) would be good so, yes, please. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320502399.14556.18.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Building kernel udebs from kfreebsd-*
Hi, linux-2.6 did the lead with building the kernel udebs straight from the kernel package. With that change we always get current udebs for use in the installer. Also it's much easier from a release management point of view if you do not need to get all the udeb source packages rebuilt for the latest kernel update. Would there be a volunteer to implement that for kFreeBSD too? It could be as easy as calling kernel-wedge post-build, but at least for linux-2.6 changes to kernel-wedge were necessary[1]. I guess the best starting points would be the existing kernel udeb source packages and bwh's changes to linux-2.6[2]. Kind regards and thanks in advance, Philipp Kern [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/09/msg00017.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/09/msg00018.html -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#647649: pu: package bti/028-2+squeeze1
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 21:30 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > After recent changes on identi.ca, bti has problems when requesting > OAuth access tokens; cf. #602507 (starting at message 80). > > Luckily the patch (included in 031-2) is simple and consists of 4 > characters: s/http/https/ in 4 URIs: > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/bti/031-2/identi.ca-oauth.patch Only three, afaict. :) > I'd like to get this change into the next stable point release. Would > this be acceptable for the release team? Ack; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320501940.14556.14.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > [...] > > > > Please see attached debdiffs. [...] > Okay. In that case, please go ahead; thanks. For the record, these were uploaded and accepted. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320502003.14556.15.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
proposed binNMU for libjpeg transition
Dear Debian release team, In the interest of moving forward with the libjpeg8 migration, I suggest to binNMU packages that depends on libjpeg62 but do not Build-Depends (directly) on libjpeg62-dev Please find the list below assuming my computation are correct. Cheers, -- Bill. Imagine a large red swirl here. aeskulap 0.2.2b1-8 aterm 1.0.1-7 burgerspace 1.9.0-3 digikam 2:1.9.0-3 dvdauthor 0.7.0-1.1 emboss 6.3.1-6 flatzebra 0.1.5-4 freedroid 1.0.2+cvs040112-2 freedroidrpg 0.14.1-1 gnudatalanguage 0.9.1-1 h5utils 1.12.1-1 jmagick 6.2.6-0-8 leptonlib 1.68-4 libparagui1.1 1.1.8-3.1 logstalgia 1.0.3-2 nagios3 3.2.3-3 oggvideotools 0.8-1 open-font-design-toolkit 1.0-3 pdl 1:2.4.7+dfsg-2 pfstools 1.8.1-2 photoprint 0.4.1-4 plplot 5.9.5-4 pygdchart2 0.beta1-3.4 ruby-rmagick 2.13.1-5 sdlbasic 0.0.20070714-3 sdlperl 2.2.5-1 sunclock 3.56-9 tesseract 2.04-2.1 wv 1.2.4-2 x11vnc 0.9.12-1 xpaint 2.9.1.4-3 xsidplay 2.0.3-3
Bug#637809: transition: perl 5.14
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:12:24 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:51:00AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 22:24:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > I wondered if you had any idea when you might be able to handle this > > > transition, so that we can get perl 5.14 into wheezy - and when I should > > > upgrade the severity of the blocking bugs. > > > > > After meta-gnome3 is in might work. > > Okay, I don't see a release.debian.org bug for that, so I'll await further > instructions on this bug. > That would be #637331 (and #633304, since ocaml started in parallel). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2005112418.gj3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#637809: transition: perl 5.14
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:51:00AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 22:24:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > After a few months of rebuild testing and bug filing, perl 5.14 > > > packages are getting into shape and are nearly ready to transition > > > into unstable. > > > > Hi release team, > > > > I wondered if you had any idea when you might be able to handle this > > transition, so that we can get perl 5.14 into wheezy - and when I should > > upgrade the severity of the blocking bugs. > > > After meta-gnome3 is in might work. Okay, I don't see a release.debian.org bug for that, so I'll await further instructions on this bug. Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2005111224.gh3...@urchin.earth.li
Re: Bugfix for #646434 in Squeeze?
On 11/04/2011 08:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> due to a major change in the gpsd protocol it won't be possible to connect >> with >> a recent gpsd (not uploaded to unstable yet, but soon) to gpsd daemons using >> the >> old protocol. The gpsd version in Squeeze will be the last usable version >> which >> understands the old protocol. >> >> Unfortunately there is a bug (#646434) in the Python bindings which makes >> them >> useless to connect to a server which speaks the old version of the protocol. >> As > > How soon is "soon"? The reason I ask is that one of the first tests > we'd tend to apply to requests is "does the issue apply to unstable and, > if so, has the fix been applied there" and as things stand the answers > would appear to be "yes, and no". Well, actually I want to upload the latest version of gpsd to unstable which doesn't even contain that part of the code anymore. So there is nothing to apply there anymore. But if it makes you happier, I could upload yet another 2.95 revision including that fix. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eb4eb0f.7080...@bzed.de
