Bug#663362: marked as done (nmu: ekg2_1:0.4~pre+20110319.1-1 [experimental])

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:43:38 +0100
with message-id 20120311084338.ga3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#663362: nmu: ekg2_1:0.4~pre+20110319.1-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663362,
regarding nmu: ekg2_1:0.4~pre+20110319.1-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663362
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu ekg2_1:0.4~pre+20110319.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libssl1.0.0 -d 
experimental

ekg2 in experimental depends on libssl0.9.8 and is therefore no longer
installable. A rebuild in a clean sid (or sid+experimental) chroot on
amd64 worked fine and the package was installable afterwards.

Thanks

Andreas


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (10/03/2012):
 nmu ekg2_1:0.4~pre+20110319.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libssl1.0.0 -d 
 experimental

Done, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#663369: marked as done (nmu: juffed_0.9.1137-1 [experimental])

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:46:27 +0100
with message-id 20120311084627.gb3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#663369: nmu: juffed_0.9.1137-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663369,
regarding nmu: juffed_0.9.1137-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663369
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu juffed_0.9.1137-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libqscintilla2-8 -d 
experimental

juffed/experimental depends on the no longer available libqscintilla2-5,
but a plain rebuild lets this upgrade to libqscintilla2-8.

Please schedule a binNMU for experimental.

Thanks

Andreas


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (10/03/2012):
 nmu juffed_0.9.1137-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libqscintilla2-8 -d 
 experimental

Done, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#663371: marked as done (nmu: libcrypt-nettle-perl_0.3-1 [experimental])

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:46:44 +0100
with message-id 20120311084644.gc3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#663371: nmu: libcrypt-nettle-perl_0.3-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663371,
regarding nmu: libcrypt-nettle-perl_0.3-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libcrypt-nettle-perl_0.3-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against perl 5.14 -d 
experimental

libcrypt-nettle-perl/experimental was built against perlapi 5.10.
Please schedule a binNMU to rebuild with current perl. I tested the
rebuild on amd64 which worked fine and produced a installable package.


Andreas


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (10/03/2012):
 nmu libcrypt-nettle-perl_0.3-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against perl 5.14 -d 
 experimental

Done, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#663376: marked as done (nmu: tinc_1.1~pre2-2 [experimental])

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:47:10 +0100
with message-id 20120311084710.gd3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#663376: nmu: tinc_1.1~pre2-2 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663376,
regarding nmu: tinc_1.1~pre2-2 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tinc_1.1~pre2-2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libevent-2.0-5 -d experimental

tinc/experimental is currently uninstallable due to its dependency on
the no longer available libevent-1.4-2.

Please schedule binNMUs for tinc, I successfully tested rebuild and
installation on amd64.


Andreas


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (10/03/2012):
 nmu tinc_1.1~pre2-2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libevent-2.0-5 -d 
 experimental

There Is No Cabal!

Done, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#663378: marked as done (nmu: gst-plugins-gl0.10_0.10.2-1 [experimental])

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:48:04 +0100
with message-id 20120311084804.gf3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#663378: nmu: gst-plugins-gl0.10_0.10.2-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663378,
regarding nmu: gst-plugins-gl0.10_0.10.2-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu gst-plugins-gl0.10_0.10.2-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libglew1.7 -d 
experimental

gst-plugins-gl0.10/experimental was compiled against the no longer
available libglew1.6. Please schedlue a binNMU so that it gets rebuild
against libglew1.7, I successfully tested this and installation on
sid/amd64.


Andreas


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (10/03/2012):
 nmu gst-plugins-gl0.10_0.10.2-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libglew1.7 -d 
 experimental

Done, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Please schedule kdenetwork binNMUs with Dep-Wait

2012-03-11 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello,

I have just uploaded libktorrent 1.2.0 and ktorrent 4.2.0 to unstable. 
libktorrent bumped SONAME in this release. The only other its reverse 
dependency is kget which is part of the kdenetwork source package (ongoing KDE 
4.7 transition). I have verified that kdenetwork builds and works with new 
libktorrent.

This means that libktorrent effectively becomes part of KDE transition but it 
should not a big deal since all depends of new libktorrent4 are in testing 
already (thanks to symbol files). ktorrent itself is already part of KDE 
transition anyway.

Therefore, could you schedule kdenetwork binNMUs with Dep-Wait: libktorrent-
dev (= 1.2.0) ?

-- 
Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Please schedule kdenetwork binNMUs with Dep-Wait

2012-03-11 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello,

On sekmadienis 11 Kovas 2012 17:36:31 Modestas Vainius wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have just uploaded libktorrent 1.2.0 and ktorrent 4.2.0 to unstable.
 libktorrent bumped SONAME in this release. The only other its reverse
 dependency is kget which is part of the kdenetwork source package (ongoing
 KDE 4.7 transition). I have verified that kdenetwork builds and works with
 new libktorrent.
 
 This means that libktorrent effectively becomes part of KDE transition but
 it should not a big deal since all depends of new libktorrent4 are in
 testing already (thanks to symbol files). ktorrent itself is already part
 of KDE transition anyway.
 
 Therefore, could you schedule kdenetwork binNMUs with Dep-Wait:
 libktorrent- dev (= 1.2.0) ?

What is more, when scheduling, don't forget to

--add-depends libsrtp0-dev [ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386]

as you did before (in order to workaround #662951)

-- 
Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done

2012-03-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer:

  * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
  * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded
  * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing
  * once the packages are migrated (depends on the item above) we do
the upload of installer

If it all does well, we could have it done in two weeks ... I'd like
to know if someone has any objection with the above otherwise I plan
to start following it.

Comments?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoCe=vf39cwnpbbphjhgoibtt27ajqhapydfmjmwuz...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#653823: transition: boost-defaults

2012-03-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello Release Team,

On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:21:20PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:

 I need some guidance from the release team regarding Boost.  
 
 Last Sunday I uploaded another new version (1.49).  It's still in NEW,
 but I'd like to transition boost-defaults to 1.49 ASAP.  I plan to do
 local rebuilds as I did for 1.48 prior to transitioning and submit any
 patches necessary to support Boost 1.49.

OK, I have just finished the local rebuilds against boost-defaults set
to 1.49.

The good news is that of 249 packages, there are just TWO new issues
related to boost 1.49!  Thus I'd like to formally request that this
transition (bug #653823) be changed to Boost 1.49 transition.

My next steps are to work on the issues, described in detail below.
IMHO, none of them seem to be show-stoppers so I'd like to get a
sense of when you feel it would be appropriate to flip the 
boost-default and upload.

What follows is a summary of my rebuilds.  I use the shorthand
package: #bug [tag] explanation, where #none means no bug is yet
filed.


New Issues
--

luabind: #none [NEW] ./luabind/detail/call_member.hpp:319:1: error: missing 
binary operator before token (

This issue is described in upstream tracker ticket
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6631 .  I'm discussing the
options with upstream on the mailing list; see
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2012/03/191073.php . It sounds
like there may be a way to fix this in boost itself that I will
investigate.  Otherwise, it's a simple fix to luabind.



vtk: #none [NEW] vtkBoostBreadthFirstSearchTree.cxx:56:14: error: 'const class 
boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptorvtkEdgeType' has no member named 
'underlying_desc'

This issue is upstream: the VTK code depends on Boost internals and
needs patch for 1.49.  I've filed the bug and will work with upstream
http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=12988



Old Issues
--

These issues were uncovered when the defaults switched to 1.48, and
remain unfixed.  Two of these have a patch in PTS, the third is for a
package (wesnoth-1.8) that is superceeded and won't be fixed.

openvrml: #652790 [PENDING] 
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/scope_guard.hpp:122:29: error: 
'boost::mpl' has not been declared
wesnoth-1.8: #653806 [WONTFIX] error: 
'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable::noncopyable(const 
boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable)' is private (known bug, fixed in 
wesnoth-1.10; won't be fixed in wesnoth-1.8)
witty: #653807 [PATCH] random_device.cpp:45:63: error: 'const result_type 
boost::random::random_device::min_value' is not a static member of 'class 
boost::random::random_device' (patch known from boost 1.48)



Unrelated to Boost
--

These are all either due to inability to satisfy build-depends or a
build failure unrelated to boost.  All I plan to do is file FTBFS bugs
where none yet exist.

Tags used:
[DEPS] Cannot install all build dependencies, not related to boost
[FTBFS] Failed To Build From Source, not related to boost
[SOVER] Package builds library with SOVERSION 4.7.0, but installs or links to 
version 4.6.0

csound: #660232 [FTBFS] scons: *** [_csnd.so] Implicit dependency 
`/usr/lib/libpython2.7.a' not found, needed by target `_csnd.so'.
ember: #629767 [DEPS] Build-Depends dependency for ember cannot be satisfied 
because the package libceguiogre-dev cannot be found
esys-particle: #none [DEPS] libvtk5-dev : Depends: libnetcdf-dev but it is not 
going to be installed
feel++: #none [DEPS] Build-Depends dependency for feel++ cannot be satisfied 
because package libpetsc3.1-dev has no candidate version
freecad: #none [FTBFS] AppPartPy.cpp:495:69: error: no matching function for 
call to 'BRepBuilderAPI_MakeFace::BRepBuilderAPI_MakeFace(Handle_Geom_Plane, 
double, double, double, double)' (verified failure on sid)
gnuradio: #none [DEPS] dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts 
unsatisfied; aborting.
gofigure2: #none [DEPS] libvtk5-qt4-dev : Depends: libvtk5-dev (= 5.8.0-7) but 
it is not going to be installed
gpsdrive: #646446 [FTBFS] mapnik.cpp:33:15: error: 'mapnik::Image32' has not 
been declared
kdebase-workspace: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/libplasma_applet-system-monitor.so.4.6.0': No such file or 
directory
kdeedu: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakregatorinterfaces.so.4.6.0': No such file or directory
kdepim: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakonadi-xml.so.4.6.0': No such file or directory
kdepim-runtime: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakonadi-xml.so.4.6.0': No such file or directory
libgdf: #none [FTBFS] make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_install] Error 1
osmium: #none [FTBFS] ../include/osmium/osm/position.hpp:31:35: fatal error: 
geos/geom/Coordinate.h: No such file or directory
performous: #none [FTBFS] CMake Error: Required library Pango NOT FOUND.
player: #662593 [FTBFS] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgeos
smc: #none [FTBFS] video.h:26:62: fatal error: 

Re: Bug#653823: transition: boost-defaults

2012-03-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 13:21:19 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:

 kdebase-workspace: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
 `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libplasma_applet-system-monitor.so.4.6.0': No such file 
 or directory
 kdeedu: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
 `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakregatorinterfaces.so.4.6.0': No such file or 
 directory
 kdepim: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
 `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakonadi-xml.so.4.6.0': No such file or directory
 kdepim-runtime: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat 
 `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libakonadi-xml.so.4.6.0': No such file or directory

It'd probably be best to have kde sorted before the boost defaults
change.  Otherwise it sounds like it should be fine.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#657077: nmu: php5.4 binNMUable package (phpapi-20100525)

2012-03-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar  5, 2012 at 12:09:16 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:

 nmu exactimage_0.8.5-3 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu libexpect-php5_0.3.1-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 
 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu libhdate_1.4.20-4 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu libpuzzle_0.9-4.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-adodb_5.04-7 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-apc_3.1.9-0.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-geoip_1.0.7-5 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-imagick_3.1.0~rc1-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 
 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-memcache_3.0.6-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-memcached_2.0.0b2-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 
 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-ps_1.3.6-7 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-radius_1.2.5-2.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-rrd_1.0.5-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-sasl_0.1.0-1.2 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-ssh2_0.11.3-0.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu php-svn_1.0.1-1.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu remctl_3.1-1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu wikidiff2_0.0.1+svn55737-1.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 
 (phpapi-20100525)
 nmu xcache_1.3.2-1.1 . ALL . -m Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)
 
All scheduled.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: block 657077 with 656485 656482 656481 656486 656491 662621 661909

2012-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 657077 with 656485 656482 656481 656486 656491 662621 661909
Bug #657077 [release.debian.org] transition: php5 5.4
Bug #662618 [release.debian.org] nmu: php5.4 binNMUable package 
(phpapi-20100525)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 657077: 656485, 656491, 656482, 662621, 656486, 
661909, and 656481
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 662618: 656485, 656491, 656482, 662621, 656486, 
661909, and 656481
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
657077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13315025147031.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: [VUA 76-2] volatile archive discontinued

2012-03-11 Thread Philipp Kern
Dear Listmasters,

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 07:07:08PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
 
 Debian Volatile Update Announcement VUA 76-2  http://volatile.debian.org
 debian-volat...@lists.debian.orgPhilipp Kern
 February 26th, 2012
 
 
 The Debian Volatile archive is now discontinued.  There will be no further
 updates. Mirrors will soon cease to carry it.  Starting from Debian 6.0
 (squeeze) it was replaced by the suite `squeeze-updates' on the
 official mirrors, managed by the Debian Release Team.
 
 This announcement list and the discussion list
 `debian-volat...@lists.debian.org' will be closed in two weeks time.
 Followup questions should be directed at `debian-release@lists.debian.org'.

please close both debian-volatile and debian-volatile-announce.

Thanks
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


NEW changes in proposedupdates

2012-03-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-2+squeeze1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s6sth-00078a...@franck.debian.org



Bug#663527: nmu: rageircd_2.0.1-6 [experimental]

2012-03-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu rageircd_2.0.1-6 . ALL . -m rebuild against libssl1.0.0 -d experimental

rageircd/experimental was built against libssl0.9.8 and is therefore no
longer installable. It can be rebuilt without problems in current sid to
pick up the newer ssl library.


Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120312003209.6170.79136.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de



Bug#663531: nmu: mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 [experimental]

2012-03-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against 
libglew1.7 -d experimental

mupen64plus-video-z64/experimental is no longer installable as it
depends on the no longer available libglew1.6.
It rebuilds and installs flawlessly in a current sid+experimental
chroot.


Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120312004908.12102.47962.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de