Re: SE Linux packages
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Currently I have a problem though, policycoreutils in testing depends on libcgroup1 which isn't in testing. Really? Which architecture at you seeing that on? There shouldn't be any packages in testing which depend on libcgroup1, otherwise it wouldn't have managed to be removed. policycoreutils in unstable does indeed depend on libcgroup1; is that what you meant? policycoreutils version 2.1.10-9 doesn't depend on libcgroup1, the functionality in question never worked so I just removed it. I've fixed quite a few bugs including the mcstransd issue that was breaking upgrades from Squeeze. Also shortly before the freeze a number of packages were uploaded which call restorecon from their init.d scripts. If they are run with version 2.1.10-1 of policycoreutils then #662990 will hit them and play havoc with the system boot. Could you please do something to force policycoreutils 2.1.10-9 to testing to avoid all the problems that 2.1.10-1 has? Also what's the situation with selinux-policy-default? rmadison says that 2.20110726-8 is in sid, but I uploaded 2.20110726-9 yesterday (before the freeze was announced). Is 2.20110726-9 going to get in? It has a lot of little fixes that will prevent people being annoyed as well as a fix for #679277 which is fairly important. Thanks -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207011616.25545.russ...@coker.com.au
Re:: 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...
01.07.2012 2:20 пользователь Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk написал: Hi, As previously announced[1], testing is now frozen. To keep this mail short, and make our lives easier :-), further details about the freeze process and the type of changes which will be eligible for unblocking can be found at [2]. We'll keep the page updated as the freeze hardens, with any major changes being announced on d-d-a. Freeze exceptions have been added for packages in unstable at the beginning at today's 19:52 dinstall; the exception applies only to the specific version of the package - further uploads will require explicit unblock requests as usual. The grep-excuses script from devscripts can be used to determine whether a package has been unblocked. Adam, for the Debian Release Team [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg6.html [2] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Please unblock smarty 3.1.10-1
Hi, gosa/wheezy packages seem to be blocked by the smarty 3.1.10-1 dependency - which has missed the testing migration by a couple of hours before the freeze happened. That wasn't on my radar. Sorry :-( The problem with that: smarty 3.1.8-2 which is in testing is too buggy to run the gosa packages without adding major workarounds. Maybe other packages are affected, too (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678095). Would it be possible to unblock smarty 3.1.10-1 and let it pass to wheezy? Thanks for your work, Cajus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Freeze exception request: systemd 44-4
(please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed)
Hiya,
I've got a couple important fixes for systemd I would like to get into
wheezy:
systemd (44-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Move diversion removal from postinst to preinst. Closes: #679728
* Prevent the journal from crashing when running out of disk space.
This is 499fb21 from upstream. Closes: #668047.
* Stop mounting a tmpfs on /media. Closes: #665943
-- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:17:50 +0200
This is on top of yesterday's upload to unstable (44-2 is in testing
already):
systemd (44-3) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Biebl ]
* Bump to debhelper 9.
* Convert to Multi-Arch: same where possible. Closes: #676615
[ Tollef Fog Heen ]
* Cherry-pick d384c7 from upstream to stop journald from leaking
memory. Thanks to Andreas Henriksson for testing. Closes: #677701
* Ship lsb init script override/integration in /lib/lsb/init-functions.d
rather than diverting /lib/lsb/init-functions itself. Add appropriate
Breaks to ensure upgrades happen.
-- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:34:16 +0200
I have not yet uploaded 44-4, so this is a request for pre-approval for
an unblock.
Full patches are attached.
Cheers,
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index a0e237e..535d27a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+systemd (44-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Michael Biebl ]
+ * Bump to debhelper 9.
+ * Convert to Multi-Arch: same where possible. Closes: #676615
+
+ [ Tollef Fog Heen ]
+ * Cherry-pick d384c7 from upstream to stop journald from leaking
+memory. Thanks to Andreas Henriksson for testing. Closes: #677701
+ * Ship lsb init script override/integration in /lib/lsb/init-functions.d
+rather than diverting /lib/lsb/init-functions itself. Add appropriate
+Breaks to ensure upgrades happen.
+
+ -- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:34:16 +0200
+
systemd (44-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Biebl ]
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 7f8f011..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 7638583..33717aa 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Vcs-Git: git://git.err.no/systemd/
Vcs-Browser: http://git.err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=systemd;a=summary
Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.0),
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
libcap-dev,
pkg-config,
libudev-dev (= 172),
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Recommends: libpam-systemd
Suggests: systemd-gui, python, python-dbus, python-cairo
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, util-linux (= 2.19.1-2), initscripts (= 2.88dsf-17), udev
-Breaks: lvm2 ( 2.02.84-1)
+Breaks: lvm2 ( 2.02.84-1), lsb-base ( 4.1+Debian4)
Conflicts: klogd
Description: system and service manager
systemd is a replacement for sysvinit. It is dependency-based and
@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ Description: system and service manager - SysV links
Package: libpam-systemd
Architecture: linux-any
+Multi-Arch: same
Section: admin
Priority: extra
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: systemd (= ${binary:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: system and service manager - PAM module
systemd is a replacement for sysvinit. It is dependency-based and
@@ -107,7 +109,9 @@ Description: system and service manager - GUI
Package: libsystemd-login0
Architecture: linux-any
+Multi-Arch: same
Section: libs
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: systemd login utility library
The libsystemd-login library provides an interface for the
@@ -125,7 +129,9 @@ Description: systemd login utility library - development files
Package: libsystemd-daemon0
Architecture: linux-any
+Multi-Arch: same
Section: libs
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: systemd utility library
The sd-daemon library provides a reference implementation of various
@@ -143,7 +149,9 @@ Description: systemd utility library - development files
Package: libsystemd-journal0
Architecture: linux-any
+Multi-Arch: same
Section: libs
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: systemd journal utility library
The libsystemd-journal library provides an interface for the
@@ -161,7 +169,9 @@ Description: systemd journal utility library - development files
Package: libsystemd-id128-0
Architecture: linux-any
+Multi-Arch: same
Section: libs
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: systemd 128 bit ID utility library
The libsystemd-id128
Please unblock wizznic 0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1
Hello, my translation / desktop file NMU missed the freeze just by a couple of hours. The changes are: wizznic (0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non maintainer upload * Fix typo in extended description. Closes: 637850 * Add German translation in desktop file. Closes: 640230 * Add Category Game in desktop file. Closes: 652616 * Provide infrastructure to i18n the man page. Closes: 640232 * Add german translation of man page. Closes: 640244 Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Freeze exeception for amavisd-new-2.7.2?
Hi, unfortunatly one of my upstreams decided to release a bugfix version this night. The (upstream) diff is pretty small and so I want to ask for an exception, if the exception is granted I can upload the new package til monday. I attached the release notes to help you in getting a decision. Thanks for your work Alex amavisd-new-2.7.2 release notes BUG FIXES - a generated Received header field was missing the 'IPv6:' prefix in the TCP-info component of a 'by' subfield (as required by RFC 5321, section 4.1.3) when amavisd received a message over an IPv6 protocol; (btw, the TCP-info component of a 'from' subfield was correct); - changed data type of a SNMP variable LogRetries from C32 to C64 for consistency with the MIB; - updated AV entry 'AVG Anti-Virus' to consider status-403 continuation lines when searching for a virus name; suggested by Ralf Hildebrandt; OTHER - reduce a log level to 5 on a log message: Amavis::IO::RW: Error flushing on close: ... to avoid an innocent but sinister-looking warning when a pipe to a virus scanner is broken and needs to be re-established; reported by Stefan Jakobs; - updated an AV entry for 'F-Secure Linux Security' to version 9.14; options updated by Mika Ilmaranta, a patch by Tuomo Soini; - fix a Unix socket compatibility issue with Net::Server versions 2.000, 2.001 and 2.002, where a method NS_unix_path no longer exists. This method was re-introduced for compatibility reasons in 2.003. Reported by Paul MacKenzie; Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701083803.gb5...@lisa.snow-crash.org
Are FTBS on mipsel release critical? (goobox #679554)
Hello, after a broken NMU I uploaded (before the freeze) essential the previous version with just some additional translations. For some strange reasons (the code in question has been built fine several times on all archs, including mipsel) the build now fails on mipsel (cf. #679554 and #679552). Looking at http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html I'm not sure if mipsel is a release architecture. If not, I could downgrade #679554 to important. Of course, hopefully the issue (maybe a temporary glitch?) could be fixed still in time for Wheezy. So, my question: Are FTBS on mipsel (alone) RC? Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Are FTBS on mipsel release critical? (goobox #679554)
* Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de) [120701 10:42]: after a broken NMU I uploaded (before the freeze) essential the previous version with just some additional translations. For some strange reasons (the code in question has been built fine several times on all archs, including mipsel) the build now fails on mipsel (cf. #679554 and #679552). Yes, FTBFS on mipsel alone are RC. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701084427.gd2...@mails.so.argh.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: Package: ia32-libs-i386 Version: 20120616 Severity: serious Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in unstable. It is still in wheezy. I assume it is going to be removed there as well? Dear Release Team, as per http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I'm CCing you on this bug (#679671) to ask for a freeze exception. == diff -Nru ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control --- ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control 2012-06-16 21:30:00.0 +0200 +++ ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control 2012-07-01 10:54:26.0 +0200 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ libavahi-common3 (= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1), libbsd0 (= 0.2.0-1), libcap2 (= 1:2.19-3), libcomerr2 (= 1.41.12-4stable1), libcups2 (= 1.4.4-7+squeeze1), - libcurl3 (= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (= 4.8.30-2), + libcurl3 (= 7.21.0-2), libdbus-1-3 (= 1.2.24-4+squeeze1), libdirectfb-1.2-9 (= 1.2.10.0-4), libdrm-intel1 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm-radeon1 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm2 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libedit2 (= 2.11-20080614-2), == The package is uploaded to mentors awaiting sponsoring: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ia32-libs http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_20120701.dsc MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vci7lu8n.fsf@frosties.localnet
Bug#679727: RM: netapplet/1.0.8 -- ROM
Hi, The same upstream version of netapplet is in stable, testing and unstable and you didn't specify where you were asking for its removal from; I've assumed testing. On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 00:23 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: netapplet was meant to offer a user-friendly interface for dealing with networking configuration for the GNOME desktop. Currently there are better options and the package lacks of upstream. I've orphaned it before since I cannot commit to act both as upstream and maintainer for a stable release, despite better options exist now for the GNOME desktop. On that basis, would it better to remove the package from unstable, rather than just testing? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341138121.8055.35.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: SE Linux packages
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:16 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: Also shortly before the freeze a number of packages were uploaded which call restorecon from their init.d scripts. If they are run with version 2.1.10-1 of policycoreutils then #662990 will hit them and play havoc with the system boot. Could you please do something to force policycoreutils 2.1.10-9 to testing to avoid all the problems that 2.1.10-1 has? As grep-excuses will tell you, policycoreutils's migration is being blocked by the new setools, which was uploaded at urgency=low. I've aged the latter, so assuming nothing else is blocking them they should go in during tonight's britney run (this morning's has already finished). Also what's the situation with selinux-policy-default? rmadison says that 2.20110726-8 is in sid, but I uploaded 2.20110726-9 yesterday (before the freeze was announced). Erm. The freeze was announced over a week ago. I'll assume you meant was in place. Is 2.20110726-9 going to get in? It has a lot of little fixes that will prevent people being annoyed as well as a fix for #679277 which is fairly important. rmadison isn't real time. If you want to know what's in the archive at the moment, use dak ls on ries.d.o. Or try checking grep-excuses for the result of the last britney run... $ grep-excuses refpolicy refpolicy (2:2.20110726-8 to 2:2.20110726-9) Maintainer: Debian SELinux maintainers Too young, only 0 of 2 days old Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by freeze-exception Not considered Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341138984.8055.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Please unblock smarty 3.1.10-1
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 09:39 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: The problem with that: smarty 3.1.8-2 which is in testing is too buggy to run the gosa packages without adding major workarounds. Maybe other packages are affected, too (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678095). Would it be possible to unblock smarty 3.1.10-1 and let it pass to wheezy? smarty3 3.1.10-1 already migrated to testing last night, so there's nothing for us to do here (and in fact wasn't when you mailed). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341139722.8055.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Freeze exception for warsow{-data}
On 07/01/2012 01:26 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: Would warsow (and warsow-data) qualify for a freeze exception? No. It is far too late now. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff02979.5020...@dogguy.org
Re: Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
Am 01.07.2012 um 11:13 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: Package: ia32-libs-i386 Version: 20120616 Severity: serious Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in unstable. It is still in wheezy. Not anymore. I assume it is going to be removed there as well? It was removed yesterday when libdb4.8 4.8.30-12 migrated. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vf3kazj.fsf...@turtle.gmx.de
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in unstable. It is still in wheezy. No, it isn't (and wasn't when you mailed). I assume it is going to be removed there as well? It was removed in last night's britney run. Dear Release Team, as per http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I'm CCing you on this bug (#679671) to ask for a freeze exception. == diff -Nru ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control --- ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control 2012-06-16 21:30:00.0 +0200 +++ ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control 2012-07-01 10:54:26.0 +0200 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ libavahi-common3 (= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1), libbsd0 (= 0.2.0-1), libcap2 (= 1:2.19-3), libcomerr2 (= 1.41.12-4stable1), libcups2 (= 1.4.4-7+squeeze1), - libcurl3 (= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (= 4.8.30-2), + libcurl3 (= 7.21.0-2), libdbus-1-3 (= 1.2.24-4+squeeze1), libdirectfb-1.2-9 (= 1.2.10.0-4), libdrm-intel1 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm-radeon1 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm2 (= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libedit2 (= 2.11-20080614-2), == Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package? If so then feel free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock request. Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741 in the way. Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what happened to: ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341140209.8055.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Request unblock for clamav_0.97.5+dfsg-3
On 07/01/2012 04:18 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: I've just uploaded a fix for the RC bug 678247 Unblocked. Thanks for your work! Please CC me on any replies as I am not subscribed. Please submit a bugreport (unblock or freeze-exception) against the pseudo package release.debian.org. It makes the work a little easier for us and prevent us fron missing any request. Thanks in advance. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff02b8a.1000...@dogguy.org
Re: Please unblock wizznic 0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1
On 07/01/2012 10:35 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Hello, my translation / desktop file NMU missed the freeze just by a couple of hours. The changes are: wizznic (0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non maintainer upload * Fix typo in extended description. Closes: 637850 * Add German translation in desktop file. Closes: 640230 * Add Category Game in desktop file. Closes: 652616 * Provide infrastructure to i18n the man page. Closes: 640232 * Add german translation of man page. Closes: 640244 Unblocked. Thanks for your work! -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff02bfc.6020...@dogguy.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
[Dropped pkg-db-devel from Cc because it apparently doesn't accept posts from non-subscribers] On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what happened to: ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- Answering my own question, it's presumably a side-effect of no longer embedding loads of other packages, so not needing to ship their copyright information. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341141815.8055.51.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: [Dropped pkg-db-devel from Cc because it apparently doesn't accept posts from non-subscribers] On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what happened to: ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- Answering my own question, it's presumably a side-effect of no longer embedding loads of other packages, so not needing to ship their copyright information. Regards, Adam Indeed. It's just 2 empty transitional packages now that pull in everything that used to be in ia32-libs through dependencies. So no embedding of loads of other packages and therefore no need to repeat the copyright infos. You will notice it got ~400MB smaller too (including binaries). MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obnzbqi5.fsf@frosties.localnet
Question about my package kde-config-gtk-style
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to this mailing list) Hi, I have difficult situation with my package src:kde-gtk-config [0]. It generates binary package kde-config-gtk-style and replaces package src:kcm-gtk, which was in Squeeze [1]. The package was uploaded to unstable on June 18. But it have not migrated to testing automatically [2] because of new bug report [3] with severity grave. I should note, that this level of severity is questionable, because circular symlinks is not common situation. So nor I nor other users haven't faced with problem from that bug report. Next, I prepared [4] the updated package (on Jun 28) with such changes: kde-gtk-config (3:2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Update to stable release 2.1. * Deleted file debian/patches/fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386: accepted in upstream. * Added file debian/patches/ignore-symlinks: prevents of possible infinite loop because of circular symlinks. (Closes: #678714) There are very few changes in upstream between versions 2.0 and 2.1: * Accepted my patch fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386. * Updated translations. Unfortunately my sponsor had not time to upload the package before freeze [5]. Finally. The question is: could you grant me exception in this case? Or I will maintain the package in experimental [6]. The main point is that binary package kde-config-gtk-style is available in Squeeze and it is already installed in user systems [7]. So absent package will affect them. Best regards, Boris [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-gtk-config.html [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2012-June/016961.html [2] http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kde-gtk-config [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678714 [4] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2012-June/017223.html [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2012-July/017257.html [6] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2012-July/017258.html [7] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=kde-gtk-config -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/907401341147...@web25g.yandex.ru
Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
Hi Adam
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:31:00PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the
config? I
agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting,
but like
this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored?
I've rewritten the patch from Mel Gorman, now you'll get a printf
output on
the console if the config file is too large (and powertop will
abort).
Please have a look on the updated debdiff attached to this mail.
Bug reports are much easier to track. Please go ahead and sorry for
the delay.
Ping?
Re-ping.
Is there something one can help for getting this into a stable point
release?
@Release-Team: I know you will be more busy for the wheezy release
now!
As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff
(only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop.
(I have added win...@debian.org to recipient lists)
Can I upload this?
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u powertop-1.11/debian/changelog powertop-1.11/debian/changelog
--- powertop-1.11/debian/changelog
+++ powertop-1.11/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+powertop (1.11-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix segfault on newer kernels with large config files.
+Thanks to Mel Gorman (Closes: #610101)
+NMU upload prepared with debdiff created by Patrick Winnertz
+win...@debian.org and found on debian-release mailing list.
+http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/03/msg00292.html
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 13:12:05 +0200
+
powertop (1.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
@@ -188 +198,0 @@
-
diff -u powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list
--- powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list
+++ powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+increase-configlimit.dpatch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- powertop-1.11.orig/debian/patches/increase-configlimit.dpatch
+++ powertop-1.11/debian/patches/increase-configlimit.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## increase-configlimit.patch.dpatch by m...@csn.ul.ie
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: No description.
+
+@DPATCH@
+diff -urNad '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.svn' '--exclude=.git' '--exclude=.arch' '--exclude=.hg' '--exclude=_darcs' '--exclude=.bzr' powertop-1.11~/config.c powertop-1.11/config.c
+--- powertop-1.11~/config.c 2011-03-11 19:06:28.0 +0100
powertop-1.11/config.c 2011-03-17 13:23:23.969122826 +0100
+@@ -33,9 +33,14 @@
+ #include powertop.h
+
+ /* static arrays are not nice programming.. but they're easy */
+-static char configlines[5000][100];
++static char configlines[MAXCONFIGLINES][100];
+ static int configcount;
+
++static void cleanup_curses_w_errormsg(void) {
++ endwin();
++ printf(_(Your kernel config exceeds the limit of %i lines, aborting!\n),MAXCONFIGLINES);
++}
++
+ static void read_kernel_config(void)
+ {
+ FILE *file;
+@@ -49,6 +54,10 @@
+ char line[100];
+ if (fgets(line, 100, file) == NULL)
+ break;
++ if (configcount = MAXCONFIGLINES) {
++atexit(cleanup_curses_w_errormsg);
++exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++ }
+ strcpy(configlines[configcount++], line);
+ }
+ pclose(file);
+@@ -77,6 +86,10 @@
+ char line[100];
+ if (fgets(line, 100, file) == NULL)
+ break;
++ if (configcount = MAXCONFIGLINES) {
++ atexit(cleanup_curses_w_errormsg);
++ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++ }
+ strcpy(configlines[configcount++], line);
+ }
+ fclose(file);
+diff -urNad '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.svn' '--exclude=.git' '--exclude=.arch' '--exclude=.hg' '--exclude=_darcs' '--exclude=.bzr' powertop-1.11~/powertop.h powertop-1.11/powertop.h
+--- powertop-1.11~/powertop.h 2008-12-30 19:52:54.0 +0100
powertop-1.11/powertop.h 2011-03-17 13:23:35.981182381 +0100
+@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
+
+ #define _(STRING)gettext(STRING)
+
++#define MAXCONFIGLINES 1
+
+ #define PT_COLOR_DEFAULT1
+ #define PT_COLOR_HEADER_BAR 2
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Question about my QA uploads
Hi, I have done some QA work and have prepared few updates for packages which are currently have no maintainers. Most of them were sponsored. But unfortunately four packages were not uploaded before freeze: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?include=subject%3A[QA];dist=unstable;package=sponsorship-requests All these updated packages include non-RC bugfixes (for important and normal bugs). Also they have improvements not related with bugs (just fixes for lintian warnings and notes). The question is: could the exception be granted in this case? If no, should I prepare uploads to experimental or just left them as is? Maybe after stable release someone will sponsor them. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2490591341149...@web7g.yandex.ru
Bug#679778: unblock: spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package spandsp See http://bugs.debian.org/679736 . The test suite may fail when building in parallel. This patch avoids building the test suite in parallel. unblock spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701134836.10175.45641.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Re: Freeze exception request: systemd 44-4
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:18:41AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: I've got a couple important fixes for systemd I would like to get into wheezy: systemd (44-4) unstable; urgency=low * Move diversion removal from postinst to preinst. Closes: #679728 * Prevent the journal from crashing when running out of disk space. This is 499fb21 from upstream. Closes: #668047. * Stop mounting a tmpfs on /media. Closes: #665943 -- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:17:50 +0200 That doesn't fit the diff you posted. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Freeze exception request: systemd 44-4
]] Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:18:41AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I've got a couple important fixes for systemd I would like to get into
wheezy:
systemd (44-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Move diversion removal from postinst to preinst. Closes: #679728
* Prevent the journal from crashing when running out of disk space.
This is 499fb21 from upstream. Closes: #668047.
* Stop mounting a tmpfs on /media. Closes: #665943
-- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:17:50 +0200
That doesn't fit the diff you posted.
Indeed. Correct patch attached.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 079c118..eb58476 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ dist_systemunit_DATA = \
units/sys-kernel-security.mount \
units/sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount \
units/var-run.mount \
- units/media.mount \
units/remount-rootfs.service \
units/printer.target \
units/sound.target \
@@ -2306,13 +2305,11 @@ systemd-install-data-hook:
rm -f systemd-remount-api-vfs.service \
fsck-root.service \
remount-rootfs.service \
- var-run.mount \
- media.mount \
+ var-run.mount \
$(LN_S) ../systemd-remount-api-vfs.service systemd-remount-api-vfs.service \
$(LN_S) ../fsck-root.service fsck-root.service \
$(LN_S) ../remount-rootfs.service remount-rootfs.service \
- $(LN_S) ../var-run.mount var-run.mount \
- $(LN_S) ../media.mount media.mount )
+ $(LN_S) ../var-run.mount var-run.mount )
( cd $(DESTDIR)$(userunitdir) \
rm -f shutdown.target sockets.target bluetooth.target printer.target sound.target \
$(LN_S) $(systemunitdir)/shutdown.target shutdown.target \
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index d33ae7f..4bdbb93 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Bugfixes:
Features:
+* dbus upstream still refers to dbus.target and shouldn't
+
* journald: make configurable store-on-var, store-on-run, dont-store, auto
(store-persistent, store-volatile?)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 535d27a..6622eb6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+systemd (44-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Move diversion removal from postinst to preinst. Closes: #679728
+ * Prevent the journal from crashing when running out of disk space.
+This is 499fb21 from upstream. Closes: #668047.
+ * Stop mounting a tmpfs on /media. Closes: #665943
+
+ -- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:17:50 +0200
+
systemd (44-3) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Biebl ]
diff --git a/debian/systemd.postinst b/debian/systemd.postinst
index 778f60b..366f7f5 100644
--- a/debian/systemd.postinst
+++ b/debian/systemd.postinst
@@ -59,12 +59,6 @@ if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 40-1; then
fi
fi
-if [ $1 = configure ] [ -n $2 ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 44-3; then
-rm -f /lib/lsb/init-functions
-dpkg-divert --remove --package systemd --rename \
---divert /lib/lsb/init-functions.systemd /lib/lsb/init-functions
-fi
-
systemd-machine-id-setup
#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/debian/systemd.preinst b/debian/systemd.preinst
new file mode 100644
index 000..22b4e36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/systemd.preinst
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+if [ $1 = install ] || [ $1 = upgrade ] [ -n $2 ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 44-3; then
+rm -f /lib/lsb/init-functions
+dpkg-divert --remove --package systemd --rename \
+--divert /lib/lsb/init-functions.systemd /lib/lsb/init-functions
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/src/journal/journald.c b/src/journal/journald.c
index 87390bd..7d798d9 100644
--- a/src/journal/journald.c
+++ b/src/journal/journald.c
@@ -329,7 +329,10 @@ static void server_rotate(Server *s) {
if (s-runtime_journal) {
r = journal_file_rotate(s-runtime_journal);
if (r 0)
-log_error(Failed to rotate %s: %s, s-runtime_journal-path, strerror(-r));
+if (s-runtime_journal)
+log_error(Failed to rotate %s: %s, s-runtime_journal-path, strerror(-r));
+else
+log_error(Failed to create new runtime journal: %s, strerror(-r));
else
server_fix_perms(s, s-runtime_journal, 0);
}
@@ -337,7 +340,11 @@ static void server_rotate(Server *s) {
if (s-system_journal) {
r = journal_file_rotate(s-system_journal);
if (r 0)
-log_error(Failed to rotate %s: %s, s-system_journal-path, strerror(-r));
+if (s-system_journal)
+log_error(Failed to rotate %s: %s, s-system_journal-path, strerror(-r));
+else
+log_error(Failed to create new system journal: %s,
Freeze exception for exactimage (adopt+bugfixes; through unstable)
Hi,
I wanted to plan the adoption of the package exactimage. This package was
orphaned in bug #587062. A new maintainer was found in form of Daniel Stender
dan...@danielstender.com. I also asked him whether I can assist him as a Co-
Maintainer.
As it always happens, the time until the freeze of Wheezy was getting smaller
and smaller.. and then the deadline passed by. So, we ended up with an
exactimage in Wheezy without an maintainer and several bugs.
A possible solution is a planned freeze exception for exactimage. I've
prepared an upload to mentors [1] that could be used as start of an discussion
about what would be seen as acceptable by the release team. All cleanup or
refactoring changes were removed and only the adopt change, the program
behavior bug fixes and the libpng transition were included. Even lintian
warnings about the policy changes were not fixed (3.9.2 - 3.9.3).
Most of the patches are relative small and easy to understand with a little
bit knowledge of the code. The only big thing standing out is the
libjpeg8_compat.patch . It replaces some libjpeg62 specific files (from the
libjpeg62 orig tarball) with the same files from libjpeg8 (from the libjpeg8
orig tarball) to fix the hiccups/crashes in the jpeg code related to the abi
changes. It is necessary because it is not possible to build exactimage
against libjpeg62-dev after the transition of libevas-dev to libjpeg-dev
because this virtual package is not provided anymore by libjpeg62-dev. The
libjpeg8-dev package also conflicts with libjpeg62-dev (and would create even
more problems during runtime after linking both).
There are many more things in the pipeline [2] (package rewrite, update to
exactimage 0.8.7, hardening, ...) that I would keep for wheezy+1/experimental.
I would like to get feedback from the release team before I decide how to
continue with the upload.
exactimage (0.8.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
- Add Daniel Stender and Sven Eckelmann as new maintainer (Closes: #587062)
- Depend on libpng-dev instead of libpng12-dev (Closes: #662317)
- Depend on libjpeg8-dev to avoid hiccups with other libjpeg versions
* debian/patches:
- Add edentify_tga_mismatch.patch, Fix misidentification of PNM as TGA
(Closes: #575324)
- missing_include_vector.patch, Add missing includes for std::vector
- Add libjpeg8_compat.patch, Build jpeg functionality for libjpeg8 to avoid
crashes and other hiccups (Closes: #679775)
- Add optimize2bw_denoise.patch, Fix optimize2bw denoise crash on 64-bit
systems (Closes: #679772)
Kind regards,
Sven
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage
[2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/exactimage.git
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files of package edisplay: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-] {+0.8.5-5+}
Control files of package exactimage: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-] {+0.8.5-5+}
Control files of package exactimage-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Breaks: edisplay ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} edisplay ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} libexactimage-perl ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} libexactimage-perl ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} php5-exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} php5-exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} python-exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4),-] {+0.8.5-5),+} python-exactimage ( [-0.8.5-4)-] {+0.8.5-5)+}
Installed-Size: [-86460-] {+86283+}
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-] {+0.8.5-5+}
Control files of package libexactimage-perl: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Installed-Size: [-1554-] {+1555+}
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-] {+0.8.5-5+}
Control files of package php5-exactimage: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-] {+0.8.5-5+}
Control files of package python-exactimage: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
Maintainer: [-Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org-] {+Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com+}
Version: [-0.8.5-4-]
Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-3
Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-3. It fixes upgrades between incompatible versions by removing /usr/lib/xen-default. Also it fixes an oversight in the init script name and finally uses udev to manage qemu network devices. Bastian xen (4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-3) unstable; urgency=low * Remove /usr/lib/xen-default. It breaks systems if xenstored is not compatible. * Fix init script usage. * Fix udev rules for emulated network devices: - Force names of emulated network devices to a predictable name. -- Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:59:04 +0200 -- Klingon phaser attack from front! 100% Damage to life support -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701151228.ga8...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#679778: unblock: spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Please unblock package spandsp See http://bugs.debian.org/679736 . The test suite may fail when building in parallel. This patch avoids building the test suite in parallel. So far as I can tell, that bug does not affect wheezy, as it was introduced in a version of the package which has only ever been in unstable; is that correct? On that basis, the changes from both -1 and -2 are relevant to the unblock. While the changes between the current testing package and -1 aren't huge, the changelog isn't really very helpful in terms of helping me decide whether they're appropriate for an unblock as it just says new upstream version. Would it be possible to expand (briefly should be fine) on what the changes in the new upstream version are? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341157064.3721.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff (only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop. (I have added win...@debian.org to recipient lists) Can I upload this? Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341157295.3721.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
Hi Adam On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff (only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop. (I have added win...@debian.org to recipient lists) Can I upload this? Please go ahead; thanks. Thanks, just uploaded some minutes ago. Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-4
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:12:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-3. It fixes upgrades between incompatible versions by removing /usr/lib/xen-default. Also it fixes an oversight in the init script name and finally uses udev to manage qemu network devices. Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-4. In addition to the changes in -3, it adds a Built-Using field to track stuff it incorporated. Bastian xen (4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-4) unstable; urgency=low * Add Build-Using info to xen-utils package. * Fix build-arch target. -- Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:52:30 +0200 -- Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701182853.ga11...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kyotocabinet - -1 that got uploaded has the -dev package not depending on the shared library which is RC Bug #679683 - -2 now has a proper configure check for 8 byte atomics instead of a hard-coded list, which means it now works on mips and powerpc through configuring these out (any maybe others, the buildds havn't finished on -1) If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. unblock kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2 http://mentors.debian.net/package/kyotocabinet -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (101, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 3.4.0-tomoyo-6-gfd64aac (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701190636.1445.96142.report...@plug.jengr.com
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:06 +, shawn wrote: Please unblock package kyotocabinet We can't unblock something that hasn't been uploaded. - -1 that got uploaded has the -dev package not depending on the shared library which is RC Bug #679683 - -2 now has a proper configure check for 8 byte atomics instead of a hard-coded list, which means it now works on mips and powerpc through configuring these out (any maybe others, the buildds havn't finished on -1) If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. We'd need to see a diff against -1 to know if it might be suitable. See http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html for further details, as referenced in the d-d-a mail. Looking further, it appears that kyotocabinet is currently not in wheezy at all? In that case -1 only got an unblock initially because it was in unstable in time (having been accepted from NEW the day before the freeze); we might need a little more convincing that -2 should get one having turned out to be buggy so quickly. (Well, I might, ommv...) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341170604.3721.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 20:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:06 +, shawn wrote: If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. We'd need to see a diff against -1 to know if it might be suitable. See http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html for further details, as referenced in the d-d-a mail. Looking further, it appears that kyotocabinet is currently not in wheezy at all? In that case -1 only got an unblock initially because it was in unstable in time (having been accepted from NEW the day before the freeze); we might need a little more convincing that -2 should get one having turned out to be buggy so quickly. (Well, I might, ommv...) Well, the RC bug (which I reported) was fixed very early in mentors, (all with same version number) but apparently the later version did not get uploaded. I could not download what was in NEW, but I did notice immediately after it got accepted. If the default behavior is to not have kyotocabinet in wheezy, then I am OK with that. -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341171806.3130.285.camel@shawn-ssd
Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#668806: Bug#668806: Bug#668806: Bits from the Release Team: Freeze approaching!
Following an ACK from Julien on IRC, I've made an upload for xfce4-panel with the following debdiff: Differences in xfce4-panel between 4.8.6-3 and 4.8.6-4 diff -Nru xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/changelog xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/changelog --- xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/changelog 2012-03-03 12:08:12.0 +0100 +++ xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/changelog 2012-04-14 15:31:09.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +xfce4-panel (4.8.6-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/xfce4-panel.shlibs: +- conflicts against development panel. + * debian/rules: +- build with --parallel. + + -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:31:07 +0200 + xfce4-panel (4.8.6-3) unstable; urgency=low [ Lionel Le Folgoc ] diff -Nru xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/rules xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/rules --- xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/rules 2012-01-22 01:21:42.0 +0100 +++ xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/rules 2012-04-14 15:28:24.0 +0200 @@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ dh_auto_clean %: - dh $@ + dh $@ --parallel diff -Nru xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/xfce4-panel.shlibs xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/xfce4-panel.shlibs --- xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/xfce4-panel.shlibs 2012-01-22 01:21:42.0 +0100 +++ xfce4-panel-4.8.6/debian/xfce4-panel.shlibs 2012-04-14 15:28:24.0 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -libxfce4panel-1.0 3 xfce4-panel (= 4.7.7) +libxfce4panel-1.0 3 xfce4-panel (= 4.7.7), xfce4-panel ( 4.9) (sorry, the --parallel was present at that time, I didn't bother to change it). I think binNMUs can be scheduled, then I'll transform this bug into an unblock request (but I'll do that at the end of the 10 days period anyway, there's no rush). Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#679825: unblock: haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package haskell-network-protocol-xmpp A few days ago, I received an email from a user that network-protocol-xmpp fails to login to some servers when running on Debian Wheezy. This is due to some new authentication mechanisms in Wheezy's version of libgsasl, which are not being handled properly by n-p-xmpp. A new upstream version, 0.4.3, has been released which corrects the problem. The fix is the only change in 0.4.3. Without this fix, users will not be able to authenticate with many servers, including jabber.org . unblock haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120701203316.7412.85379.reportbug@vm-debian7-i386
Bug#679825: marked as done (unblock: haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:31:03 +0100 with message-id 1341178263.3721.19.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#679825: unblock: haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #679825, regarding unblock: haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679825 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package haskell-network-protocol-xmpp A few days ago, I received an email from a user that network-protocol-xmpp fails to login to some servers when running on Debian Wheezy. This is due to some new authentication mechanisms in Wheezy's version of libgsasl, which are not being handled properly by n-p-xmpp. A new upstream version, 0.4.3, has been released which corrects the problem. The fix is the only change in 0.4.3. Without this fix, users will not be able to authenticate with many servers, including jabber.org . unblock haskell-network-protocol-xmpp/0.4.3-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 13:33 -0700, John Millikin wrote: A few days ago, I received an email from a user that network-protocol-xmpp fails to login to some servers when running on Debian Wheezy. This is due to some new authentication mechanisms in Wheezy's version of libgsasl, which are not being handled properly by n-p-xmpp. A new upstream version, 0.4.3, has been released which corrects the problem. The fix is the only change in 0.4.3. Without this fix, users will not be able to authenticate with many servers, including jabber.org . Unblocked; thanks for the fix. As a general non-freeze-specific note, please try and make your changelog entries more expansive and specific. New upstream version (Closes: #X) is only correct if the bug report was purely asking for the new upstream to be packaged; even then there may well have been a specific reason for the request, which could be detailed in the changelog. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#679829: britney: breakage of packages on removal of virtual packages
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, As mentioned on IRC, I believe I found a bug in Britney2. As far as I can tell the bug is only triggered in certain special cases. The conditions are: * There must be a real package R and a package V in testing. * V must provide R. * Another package P must have an unversioned dependency on R and R must be unable to satisfy the relation. (e.g. R can conflict with P). * Britney must attempt to remove V. The bug happens because Britney (in register_reverse) does not record providing packages in a package's RDEPENDS if there is a real package for that given dependency. In the example above, Britney will think that V has no rdepends. This bug can be seen in the test basic-uninstallable-deep-breaks-rm-virtual (in t-unsupported) in britney2-tests. Once I have the bug number I will push a minimal test for this case as well. ~Niels From 2b00f6c27c7240546487880c8ffdd39b3a92884b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:52:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Always include providers of virtual packages in rdepends Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net --- britney.py |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/britney.py b/britney.py index 5205f64..c456460 100755 --- a/britney.py +++ b/britney.py @@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ class Britney(object): # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS]): packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) -# register packages which provide a virtual package -elif a[0] in provides: +# also register packages which provide a virtual package (if any) +if a[0] in provides: for i in provides.get(a[0]): if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RDEPENDS]: -- 1.7.10
Bug#679829: britney: breakage of packages on removal of virtual packages
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 00:12 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: --- a/britney.py +++ b/britney.py @@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ class Britney(object): # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS]): packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) -# register packages which provide a virtual package -elif a[0] in provides: +# also register packages which provide a virtual package (if any) +if a[0] in provides: for i in provides.get(a[0]): if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RDEPENDS]: Hmmm, does the rconflicts block immediately below not need the same change? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341181157.3721.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#679829: britney: breakage of packages on removal of virtual packages
On 2012-07-02 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 00:12 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: --- a/britney.py +++ b/britney.py @@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ class Britney(object): # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS]): packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) -# register packages which provide a virtual package -elif a[0] in provides: +# also register packages which provide a virtual package (if any) +if a[0] in provides: for i in provides.get(a[0]): if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RDEPENDS]: Hmmm, does the rconflicts block immediately below not need the same change? Regards, Adam Seems reasonable. I am not able to produce a test for that case. However, that may just be a lack of imagination on my part, so here is an updated patch. ~Niels From bbc59621e91131fec4048a22bb01bc31d8b42846 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:52:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Always include providers of virtual packages in rdepends Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net --- britney.py |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/britney.py b/britney.py index 5205f64..c7e3bda 100755 --- a/britney.py +++ b/britney.py @@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ class Britney(object): # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS]): packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) -# register packages which provide a virtual package -elif a[0] in provides: +# also register packages which provide the package (if any) +if a[0] in provides: for i in provides.get(a[0]): if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RDEPENDS]: @@ -613,8 +613,8 @@ class Britney(object): # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RCONFLICTS]): packages[a[0]][RCONFLICTS].append(pkg) -# register packages which provide a virtual package -elif a[0] in provides: +# also register packages which provide the package (if any) +if a[0] in provides: for i in provides[a[0]]: if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RCONFLICTS]: -- 1.7.10
Bug#679727: RM: netapplet/1.0.8 -- ROM
Hello, On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:22:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, The same upstream version of netapplet is in stable, testing and unstable and you didn't specify where you were asking for its removal from; I've assumed testing. On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 00:23 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: netapplet was meant to offer a user-friendly interface for dealing with networking configuration for the GNOME desktop. Currently there are better options and the package lacks of upstream. I've orphaned it before since I cannot commit to act both as upstream and maintainer for a stable release, despite better options exist now for the GNOME desktop. On that basis, would it better to remove the package from unstable, rather than just testing? I'd prefer this package not to take part of the next release. So, if removing it from unstable will trigger the testing removal. I'm OK with that. Thanks. -- Rudy Godoy http://stone-head.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702034307.gb2...@silverlight.stone-head.org
