Bug#681290: unblock: spice-gtk/0.12-4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock spice-gtk.
I upload 0.12-3 to unstable at 29th Jun, and
find a bug[1] which forbit other package to
compile. Then I uploaded 0.12-4 at 9th July,
and this cause 0.12-3 cannot automatically
migrate to testing
The difference between 0.12-3 and 0.12-4 is slight, just
copy .version and .tarball-version to build directory.
for the build script use the version information in
.tarball-version to determine the version it is building.
The difference between 0.12-3 and 0.12-4 is:
liang@guoliangc:~/opt/src/spice/spice-gtk$ git diff unstable/0.12-3
unstable/0.12-4
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 263fc96..161d6e3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+spice-gtk (0.12-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Correct version problem in *.pc (Closes: #680290)
+
+ -- Liang Guo guoli...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:36:14 +0800
+
spice-gtk (0.12-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Add patch make-celt-to-be-optional.patch
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 94eccd2..29c2b71 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ build-stamp: build-gtk3-stamp build-gtk2-stamp
build-gtk2-stamp:
mkdir build-gtk2
ls |grep -v debian|grep -v build-gtk2|grep -v build-gtk3|xargs -i cp -r
{} build-gtk2/
+ cp .version .tarball-version build-gtk2/
cd build-gtk2 autoreconf
cd build-gtk2 ./configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
--enable-smartcard=no --with-gtk=2.0 --disable-static \
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ build-gtk2-stamp:
build-gtk3-stamp:
mkdir build-gtk3
ls |grep -v debian|grep -v build-gtk2|grep -v build-gtk3|xargs -i cp -r
{} build-gtk3/
+ cp .version .tarball-version build-gtk3/
cd build-gtk3 autoreconf
cd build-gtk3 ./configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
--enable-smartcard=no --with-gtk=3.0 --disable-static \
liang@guoliangc:~/opt/src/spice/spice-gtk$
But current version in testing is 0.12-1, So I
think it is necesary to explain the changes
since 0.12-1.
In the 0.12-2, the primary change is add
support to usb redirect and multiarch support.
The detailed changes are:
liang@guoliangc:~/opt/src/spice/spice-gtk$ git diff unstable/0.12-1
unstable/0.12-2
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 5e42d70..a1952a0 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+spice-gtk (0.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Enable usb redirect (Closes: #677662)
+ * Switch to vala 0.16 (Closes: #675665)
+ * Enable multiarch for libspice-client-glib-2.0-1,
+libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1, libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1
+ * Build with hardening flags
+ * Use dpkg-statoverride to handle setuid bits
+
+ -- Liang Guo guoli...@debian.org Fri, 25 May 2012 21:52:45 +0800
+
spice-gtk (0.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 45a4fb7..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index c705d39..583766e 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Source: spice-gtk
Section: misc
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Liang Guo bluestonech...@gmail.com
+Maintainer: Liang Guo guoli...@debian.org
Build-Depends:
- debhelper (= 8.0.0),
+ debhelper (= 9),
libspice-protocol-dev (= 0.10.1),
libspice-server-dev,
libpixman-1-dev (= 0.17.7),
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ Build-Depends:
libcairo2-dev (= 1.2.0),
libpulse-dev,
libusb-1.0-0-dev,
- valac-0.14,
- libvala-0.14-dev,
+ valac-0.16,
+ libvala-0.16-dev,
python-all,
python-gtk2-dev (= 2.0.0),
python-pyparsing,
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ Build-Depends:
libgirepository1.0-dev,
gir1.2-gtk-2.0,
libtext-csv-perl,
+ libusbredirhost-dev,
+ libacl1-dev,
+ libpolkit-agent-1-dev,
+ libpolkit-gobject-1-dev,
+ dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~),
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
X-Python-Version: = 2.5
Homepage: http://www.spice-space.org/
@@ -46,6 +51,8 @@ Description: Simple clients for interacting with SPICE servers
Package: libspice-client-glib-2.0-1
Section: libs
Architecture: i386 amd64
+Multi-Arch: same
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Replaces: libspice-client-glib-2.0-4
Conflicts: libspice-client-glib-2.0-4
@@ -58,6 +65,7 @@ Description: GObject for communicating with Spice servers
(runtime library)
Package: gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0
Section: introspection
Architecture: i386 amd64
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${gir:Depends}
Description: GObject for communicating with Spice servers
(GObject-Introspection)
libspice-glib4 provides glib objects for spice protocol
@@ -84,6 +92,8 @@ Description: GObject for communicating with Spice servers
(development files)
Package:
Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2
On Thursday 12 July 2012 06:38:15 Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:27:23AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4, which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet uploaded libburn 1.2.2-2, so this is a request for upload to sid and unblock. Both, Thomas Schmitt and I agree we want them in wheezy. Our test suite found in libisoburn/releng, which tries to cover most of the libburn, libisofs, libisoburn functionality reveals no regressions. Please go ahead. I cannot do the unblock right away though. Please ping after it got accepted. libburn/1.2.2-2 got accepted and successfully built everywhere. thanks -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: BinNMU changelog handling for Multi-Arch: same packages
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Guillem Jover wrote: Sigh, again... There's no need to sigh every time I try to discuss something with you... I'm not trying to impose anything but just wanted to get a clearer picture of the situation. And this imposes some communication between us. Sorry for that. On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: So it looks like that the part of the changelog binNMU solution was just the possibility to tag a changelog entry binary-only with a keyword. No, the part of the solution was to create the needed user and program infrastructure interfaces to retrieve the metadata files from the db in a future-proof way. That's the new commands «dpkg-query --control-list pkg» and «dpkg-query --control-show pkg file», which should eventually replace the previous semi-private «dpkg-query --control-path pkg [file]». Oh, ok. That makes sense. Now we have the correct interface in wheezy so that other programs can start to rely on it in wheezy + 1. There's no other changes required from the dpkg side. To get changelog (and possibly copyright files) as package metadata, I think the only remaining things that would need to happen if the project agreed that's the right path would be: * Change apt-listchanges to use «dpkg-deb -I pkg changelog» to try to get the package changelog. * Change the “website” to use «dpkg-deb -I pkg changelog» to try to get the package changelog (and possibly copyright). * Change policy to allow packages to ship changelogs (and possibly copyright) as package metadata instead of «/use/share/doc/pkg/». * Change lintian per the above. * Change dh_installchangelogs to install the changelog in the DEBIAN/ dir instaed of «/use/share/doc/pkg/». * Progressively change any remaning package not using debhelper to store these under DEBIAN/. We should then probably open a bug against debian-policy. I'm doing it now. We can then discuss there whether we need to find a solution so that we're never in situation where neither the direct access nor the command can be trusted to work. For the /usr/doc transition we created symlinks for this purpose but it has been a painful transition due to this. Discussion shall continue in #681289. I know that in the long term you're in favor of moving the changelog in the package metadata and I agree with this plan. But IMO we must find an interim solution in the mean time. First, I don't see why we _must_, it's been a known limitation of the Right, I should have said IMO we should find. 2/ we modify dpkg to allow co-installation of M-A: same packages which share the same source version regardless of the binary version As I've said before, this right here seems unacceptable. This implies at least: * loosing the binNMU changelog entry, with a version in the changelog not matching the one on the dpkg db (in possibly both directions). * making installed file contents flip-flop depending on what package got installed last. * making dpkg unable to detect different generated file contents on different binary rebuilds. There's a mis-understanding here. I was not telling to drop the check that ensures that the files are identical between the various arches. Instead I'm just saying that we must change the check that ensures that all package are at the same version to use the source version and not the binary version. And this is required even if we move the changelog to control.tar. Otherwise the release team will still have to bin-nmu all arches at the same time, which is what they would like to avoid. 3/ we modify sbuild to add the required binary-only=yes in the binNMU changelog entries. Here's a sample header line: ftplib (3.1-1-9+b1) unstable; urgency=low, binary-only=yes This could be done regardless if the buildd people agree to it, and that was the idea when I added this. Filed a bug for this. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712065938.gb22...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Bug#681299: unblock: netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netsniff-ng, reasons are below:
1. netsniff-ng in unstable is 12 days old [1].
2. With version, 0.5.6-2, It only aimed for amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc
arches [2].
3. But, migration is on hold due to briteny is looking for it for other arches.
Please do needful or do I need to poke someone from buildd side?
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netsniff-ng.html
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=netsniff-ng
unblock netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#681287: marked as done (unblock: imageshack-uploader/2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:20:08 +0200
with message-id 20120712082008.gm7...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681287: unblock:
imageshack-uploader/2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681287,
regarding unblock: imageshack-uploader/2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package imageshack-uploader
Fixes RC bug #672084,
unblock imageshack-uploader/2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1
diff -Nru imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/changelog imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/changelog
--- imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 01:41:49.0 -0400
+++ imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 01:05:55.0 -0400
@@ -1,9 +1,24 @@
+imageshack-uploader (2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Restore previous NMU for GCC 4.7 compatiblity that was inadvertently
+reverted in the last maintainer upload (Closes: #672084) (again)
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:04:20 -0400
+
imageshack-uploader (2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Re-enable uploading with new Qt versions. (LP: #995300)
-- Luke Faraone lfara...@debian.org Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:41:33 -0700
+imageshack-uploader (2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build ailure with GCC 4.7. Closes: #672084.
+
+ -- Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Tue, 22 May 2012 23:11:28 +
+
imageshack-uploader (2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Correct error in debian/rules which prevented the installation of
diff -Nru imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/g++-4.7.patch imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/g++-4.7.patch
--- imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/g++-4.7.patch 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/g++-4.7.patch 2012-07-12 01:02:31.0 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Index: imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/qtsingleapplication/qtlocalpeer.cpp
+===
+--- imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428.orig/qtsingleapplication/qtlocalpeer.cpp 2010-04-20 20:51:25.0 +
imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/qtsingleapplication/qtlocalpeer.cpp 2012-05-22 23:11:17.965909142 +
+@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
+ #if defined(Q_OS_UNIX)
+ #include time.h
+ #endif
++#include unistd.h
+
+ namespace QtLP_Private {
+ #include qtlockedfile.cpp
diff -Nru imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/series imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/series
--- imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/series 2012-06-03 01:41:49.0 -0400
+++ imageshack-uploader-2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428/debian/patches/series 2012-07-12 01:03:18.0 -0400
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
1001-fix-ffmpeg-6.0.diff
1002-fix-FTBFS-libav-0.7.diff
1003-fix-login-failure.diff
+g++-4.7.patch
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 01:15:53 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package imageshack-uploader
Fixes RC bug #672084,
The relevant debdiff is the one between the wheezy and sid versions,
rather than just the last upload. Anyway, unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
freeze exception for systemd integration of atop?
Hi, the systemd community in Debian is a loud and persistent one. Would a version of atop that has systemd integration added to the package be a candidate for a freeze exception at this time of the freeze, or is this post-wheezy material? Greetings Marc P.S.: http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/atop.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679983 -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 31958061 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 31958062 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712083256.gb26...@torres.zugschlus.de
Re: BinNMU changelog handling for Multi-Arch: same packages
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:59:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Guillem Jover wrote: On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 2/ we modify dpkg to allow co-installation of M-A: same packages which share the same source version regardless of the binary version As I've said before, this right here seems unacceptable. This implies at least: * loosing the binNMU changelog entry, with a version in the changelog not matching the one on the dpkg db (in possibly both directions). * making installed file contents flip-flop depending on what package got installed last. * making dpkg unable to detect different generated file contents on different binary rebuilds. There's a mis-understanding here. I was not telling to drop the check that ensures that the files are identical between the various arches. Instead I'm just saying that we must change the check that ensures that all package are at the same version to use the source version and not the binary version. And this is required even if we move the changelog to control.tar. Otherwise the release team will still have to bin-nmu all arches at the same time, which is what they would like to avoid. In the interim till this is solved properly, and this might be from till wheezy up to as long as wheezy+1 if things go bad, may I suggest the following: * For the instability of a package from different architectures the source version counts. A bin-NMU version does not conflict with a normal version. * Frontends put a high value on trying to match versions. If arch1 is updated to a bin-NMU then arch2 will be updated to the same bin-NMU too where available. Those two will have to happen, as Raphael says, no matter what the changelog solution will eventually be to allow the release team to only bin-NMU some archs for MA packages. So we might as well do that now. * File conflicts in /usr/share/doc/package/ between packages of the same source version are ignored. This could be even further limited to changelogs. Yes, this is huge hack, a violation of layering, yada yada yada. But it is simply the easiest quick fix. And since programs must not rely on /usr/share/doc/package to be available any inconsistencies there will be harmless. It also preserves the changelog entries in packages so apt-listchanges can display it and has no efect on non-multiarch systems. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712084455.GB25594@frosties
Re: freeze exception for systemd integration of atop?
On 12.07.2012 10:32, Marc Haber wrote: Hi, the systemd community in Debian is a loud and persistent one. Would a version of atop that has systemd integration added to the package be a candidate for a freeze exception at this time of the freeze, or is this post-wheezy material? Greetings Marc P.S.: http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/atop.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679983 Please don't merge the patch in it's current form. There are several bugs in it (if you are interested we can discuss this of list, I don't think this is relevant for debian-release). There is no rush getting packages updated for systemd, especially for wheezy and not that late in the cycle, anyway. We need to work on a packaging policy for packages shipping native systemd service files. Hacking all sorts of systemctl calls into the maintainers scripts as the patch does is not something I would recommend. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#681314: unblock: yp-svipc/0.14-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock source package yp-svipc.
It builds the following binary packages:
- python-svipc
- python3-svipc
- yorick-svipc
I attach a debdiff and explain the changes below.
1- Hardening flags release goal:
http://bugs.debian.org/680216
Fixed for python*-svipc by putting CPPFLAGS in CFLAGS, for yorick-svipc by
passing Y_LDFLAGS etc. to make.
2- 0.14-1 failed to build on kfreebsd-any:
http://bugs.debian.org/679919
Portability code for *BSD and Darwin is erroneously activated on GNU/kFreeBSD,
which doesn't need it.
Fixed for python*-svipc by patching setup.py; for yorick-svipc by passing
PKG_CFLAGS explicitly to make.
3- the yorick-full meta-package (src:yorick), already unblocked, is waiting for
yorick-svipc to build on kfreebsd-* before it can migrate.
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=yorick
Fixing the above-mentioned FTBFS takes us halfway through to letting yorick
migrate (Yorick is also waiting for yorick-gyoto, I'm working on it).
Kind regards, Thibaut.
unblock yp-svipc/0.14-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
diff -Nru yp-svipc-0.14/debian/changelog yp-svipc-0.14/debian/changelog
--- yp-svipc-0.14/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 11:25:24.0 +0200
+++ yp-svipc-0.14/debian/changelog 2012-07-11 13:41:39.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+yp-svipc (0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Bug fix: don't rely on yorick to pass the fortified build flags
+(Closes: #680216).
+ * Bug fix: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64: conflicting
+types for semtimedop (Closes: #679919). Involves a patch for the
+Python modules (fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS) and passing PKG_CFLAGS when
+building the Yorick plug-in.
+
+ -- Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:41:39 +0200
+
yp-svipc (0.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #668841)
diff -Nru yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS
--- yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS 2012-07-11 13:58:53.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Description: fix 679919 FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
+ upstream provides an implementation of semtimedop which they use on FreeBSD
+ and MacOS. It is eroneously used also under GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU/Hurd.
+ This patch disables it altogether for the python modules.
+Author: Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679919
+Forwarded: no
+Last-Update: 2012-07-11
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+--- a/setup.py
b/setup.py
+@@ -32,10 +32,8 @@
+('SVIPC_NOSEGFUNC', None),
+]
+
+ platform=uname()[0]
+-if platform != 'Linux':
+- define_macros.append(('SVIPC_HACKS', None))
+
+ extra_compile_args=[
+#'-g3',
+#'-ggdb3'
diff -Nru yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/series yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/series
--- yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ yp-svipc-0.14/debian/patches/series 2012-07-11 14:08:11.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS
diff -Nru yp-svipc-0.14/debian/rules yp-svipc-0.14/debian/rules
--- yp-svipc-0.14/debian/rules 2012-06-22 11:25:06.0 +0200
+++ yp-svipc-0.14/debian/rules 2012-07-11 14:17:49.0 +0200
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
# This has to be exported to make some magic below work.
export DH_OPTIONS
+CFLAGS += $(CPPFLAGS)
%:
dh $@ --with python2 \
@@ -23,7 +24,10 @@
set -ex; for python in $(shell py3versions -r); do \
$$python setup.py build; \
done;
- cd yorick; make
+ cd yorick; make COPT_DEFAULT= \
+ Y_CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) \
+ Y_LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) \
+ PKG_CFLAGS=-I ../common
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install
please unblock typo3-src for wheezy
Hello there, please unblock typo3-src 4.5.17+dfsg1-1 from freeze. It is a upstream bugfix only release and contains a fix that prevents the backend of the CMS to work properly if the build-in js/css compressor is acitivated. There are no packages that depend on typo3-src so nothing will break. -- MfG, Christian Welzel GPG-Key: pub 4096R/5117E119 2011-09-19 Fingerprint: 3688 337C 0D3E 3725 94EC E401 8D52 CDE9 5117 E119 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ffe984c.9010...@camlann.de
Bug#681325: unblock: modsecurity-crs/2.2.5-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package modsecurity-crs A change in the license went unnoticed. Just debian/copyright was updated. debdiff attached. unblock modsecurity-crs/2.2.5-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/changelog modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/changelog --- modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/changelog 2012-06-18 11:44:46.0 +0200 +++ modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/changelog 2012-07-02 17:19:01.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +modsecurity-crs (2.2.5-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Update debian/copyright with right license. + + -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:18:35 +0200 + modsecurity-crs (2.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/copyright modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/copyright --- modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/copyright 2012-03-16 18:01:44.0 +0100 +++ modsecurity-crs-2.2.5/debian/copyright 2012-07-02 17:22:10.0 +0200 @@ -3,22 +3,13 @@ Source: http://www.modsecurity.org Files: * -Copyright: (c) 2006-2011 Trustwave -License: GPL-2 - This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License. +Copyright: (c) 2006-2012 Trustwave Holdings, Inc. +License: ASLv2 + The ModSecurity Core Rule Set is provided to you under the terms and + conditions of Apache Software License Version 2 (ASLv2). . - This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. - . - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ - . - On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General - Public License version 2 can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. + On Debian systems, the complete text of the Apache Software License + Version 2 can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0. Files: debian/* Copyright: 2011 Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org
unblock request for fcitx
Hi, I would like to upload an update of fcitx to unstable, applying several of upstream stable branch patches, changes are committed to git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/fcitx.git;a=commitdiff;h=7da4de754cafa4c683ba74ebe43e152493369787 Several bugs have been fixed in this version, this includes Debian Bug #681070, #681071 and several important issues found by code review (mostly about causing crashes under certain conditions). Please comment if I can upload this version to unstable, thanks! -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w6SZn8uVP=1r3xaUDyL4w_W-X6Zu8SdVpFmPW=nl7d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#681327: unblock: modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package modsecurity-apache A change in the license went unnoticed. Just debian/copyright was updated. debdiff attached. unblock modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog --- modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog 2012-06-15 13:22:03.0 +0200 +++ modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog 2012-07-02 17:23:28.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +modsecurity-apache (2.6.6-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Updated debian/copyright with right license. + + -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:23:08 +0200 + modsecurity-apache (2.6.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -Nru modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright --- modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright 2012-03-16 13:23:17.0 +0100 +++ modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright 2012-07-02 17:21:53.0 +0200 @@ -1,163 +1,31 @@ -This package was debianized by -Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org on Mon, 6 Nov 2006 - -It was downloaded from http://www.modsecurity.org - -Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Breach Security, Inc. (http://www.breach.com) - -Copyright: - - This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. - - This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. - - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software - Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, - MA 02110-1301, USA. - -On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General -Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'. - - -MODSECURITY LICENSING EXCEPTION -=== - -Version 1.0, 29 July 2008 - -As a special exception (Exception) to the terms and conditions of version 2 -of the GPL, Breach Security, Inc. hereby grants you the rights described -below, provided you agree to the terms and conditions in this Exception, -including its obligations and restrictions on use. - - -Exception Intent - - -We want specified Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) programs to be -able to use ModSecurity (the Program) despite the fact that not all FLOSS -licenses are compatible with version 2 of the GNU General Public License (the -GPLv2). - - -Legal Terms and Conditions -== - -You are free to distribute a Derivative Work that is formed entirely from the -Program and one or more works (each, a FLOSS Work) licensed under one or -more of the licenses listed below in section 1, as long as all of the -following conditions are met: - - 1. You obey the GPLv2 in all respects for the Program and the Derivative - Work, except for identifiable sections of the Derivative Work which are - - 1. not derived from the Program, and - - 2. are not designed to interact with the Program, and - - 3. which can reasonably be considered independent and separate works in -themselves. - - 2. All such identifiable sections of the Derivative Work are - - 1. distributed subject to one of the FLOSS licenses listed below, and - - 2. the object code or executable form of those sections are accompanied -by the complete corresponding machine-readable source code for those -sections on the same medium and under the same FLOSS license as the -corresponding object code or executable forms of those sections. - - 3. Any works which are aggregated with the Program or with a Derivative Work - on a volume of a storage or distribution medium in accordance with the - GPLv2, can reasonably be considered independent and separate works in - themselves which are not derivatives of either the Program, a Derivative - Work or a FLOSS Work, and are not designed to interact with the Program. - -If the above conditions are not met, then the Program may only be copied, -modified, distributed or used under the terms and conditions of the GPLv2 -or another valid licensing option from Breach Security, Inc. - - -FLOSS License List -== - -License name
Bug#680951: unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-9
On 2012-07-11 22:46, Neil McGovern wrote: | On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: | | +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi | | 1.3-9 has been uploaded to unstable with this change. | | | Ok, looking at the actual diff, I also see: | -45-libpng15 Thanks for noticing. This is mistake. I have no explanation why the patch line got deleted. It contains important libpng transition support. | +50-buildflags.patch This was added to improve 2012-03-24 and I had forgetten to list it. The patch enables CPPFLAGS, thus making full use of hardened build flags (hardening=+all) added in 1.3-8. I'll upload 1.3-10 with these fixes, Jari signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#681327: unblock: modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2
On 2012-07-12 12:21, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package modsecurity-apache A change in the license went unnoticed. Just debian/copyright was updated. debdiff attached. unblock modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash + [...]; either version 2 of the License. Did you mean either version 2 or (at your choice any) later version of the License? (or however it is written...) According to your copyright file, any Debian patches will be under GPL-2 and cannot be applied. However, the Apache2 license is not compatible with GPL-2 (it seems to be with GPL-3)[1]. [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible with GPL version 2, citing the patent termination and indemnification provisions as restrictions not present in the older GPL license. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ffeab64.2050...@thykier.net
Bug#681327: unblock: modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48:04PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2012-07-12 12:21, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package modsecurity-apache A change in the license went unnoticed. Just debian/copyright was updated. debdiff attached. unblock modsecurity-apache/2.6.6-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash + [...]; either version 2 of the License. Did you mean either version 2 or (at your choice any) later version of the License? (or however it is written...) According to your copyright file, any Debian patches will be under GPL-2 and cannot be applied. However, the Apache2 license is not compatible with GPL-2 (it seems to be with GPL-3)[1]. [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible with GPL version 2, citing the patent termination and indemnification provisions as restrictions not present in the older GPL license. Hi Niels, Thanks for noticing. I just uploaded 2.6.6-3 with debian/* files licensed as ASLv2. Hope that's enough. Attached debdiff. Cheers, Alberto -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta| Formación, consultoría y soporte técnico agi@(inittab.org|debian.org)| en GNU/Linux y software libre Encrypted mail preferred| http://inittab.com Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9 0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3 diff -Nru modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog --- modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog 2012-06-15 13:22:03.0 +0200 +++ modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 13:06:12.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +modsecurity-apache (2.6.6-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Relicense debian/* files to ASLv2 to avoid conflicts with upstream +license. + + -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:05:20 +0200 + +modsecurity-apache (2.6.6-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Updated debian/copyright with right license. + + -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:23:08 +0200 + modsecurity-apache (2.6.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -Nru modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright --- modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright 2012-03-16 13:23:17.0 +0100 +++ modsecurity-apache-2.6.6/debian/copyright 2012-07-12 13:03:53.0 +0200 @@ -1,163 +1,22 @@ -This package was debianized by -Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org on Mon, 6 Nov 2006 - -It was downloaded from http://www.modsecurity.org - -Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Breach Security, Inc. (http://www.breach.com) - -Copyright: - - This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. - - This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. - - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software - Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, - MA 02110-1301, USA. - -On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General -Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'. - - -MODSECURITY LICENSING EXCEPTION -=== - -Version 1.0, 29 July 2008 - -As a special exception (Exception) to the terms and conditions of version 2 -of the GPL, Breach Security, Inc. hereby grants you the rights described -below, provided you agree to the terms and conditions in this Exception, -including its obligations and restrictions on use. - - -Exception Intent - - -We want specified Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) programs to be -able to use ModSecurity (the Program) despite the fact that not all FLOSS -licenses are compatible with version 2 of the GNU General Public License (the -GPLv2). - - -Legal Terms and Conditions -== - -You are free to distribute a Derivative Work that is formed entirely from the -Program and one or more works (each, a FLOSS Work) licensed under one or -more of the licenses listed below in section 1, as long as all of the -following conditions are met: - - 1. You obey the GPLv2 in all respects for the Program and the Derivative - Work, except for identifiable
Bug#681331: unblock: mono-tools/2.10-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hiya,
We just got #681320 in mono-tools. It's a postinst trigger failure,
which will kill upgrades so is RC imho.
It turned out we were calling the wrong command here
(gac-package-install which should have been gac-install). I've fixed
this specific problem in -5 and also added some more guards against
failure. It's difficult to do anything as robustly as I'd like since
I've never been able to construct a reproducer scenario for this trigger
failure.
Diff attached. Please consider unblocking it.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
diff -Nru mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog
--- mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog2012-06-26 19:09:09.0 +0100
+++ mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog2012-07-12 11:54:26.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+mono-tools (2.10-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * [f5fdaf0] Ignore failures in the postinst trigger. It's difficult to
+guarantee what's going to be available when the trigger is run. We might
+as well not fail if running any of the commands fails, since that's no
+worse than not registering the packages.
+ * [8817190] Call gac-install instead of gac-package-install to install mono
+gac-package-install is for installing /packages/ into the GAC.
+gac-install is for initialising the gac itself. It wasn't right to call
+gac-package-install here. Also, check that required files exist before
+proceeding. (Closes: #681320)
+
+ -- Iain Lane la...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:53:48 +0100
+
mono-tools (2.10-4) unstable; urgency=low
* [51d46c9] When triggered, manually install mono bits. This is to work
diff -Nru mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst
mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst
--- mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst 2012-06-26
19:09:09.0 +0100
+++ mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst 2012-07-12
11:54:26.0 +0100
@@ -18,19 +18,24 @@
# Try to register stuff manually (these commands are idempotent, so
# it'll be fine when the real postinst is run later on)
+
+# We ignore all failures here. Either the stuff can be registered now—
+# in which case we'll do it—or it can't, in which case we cannot
+# proceed anyway. Failure isn't harmful.
mono_gac_status=`dpkg-query -f '${Status}' -W mono-gac`
if [ $mono_gac_status != install ok installed -a \
--x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-install ]; then
-/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install mono
+-x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-install -a \
+-e /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono ]; then
+/usr/share/cli-common/gac-install mono || true
fi
libgtk_cil_status=`dpkg-query -f '${Status}' -W libgtk2.0-cil`
if [ $libgtk_cil_status != install ok installed -a \
--x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install ]; then
-/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install libgtk2.0-cil
+-x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install -a \
+-e /usr/share/cli-common/packages.d/libgtk2.0-cil.installcligac ];
then
+/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install libgtk2.0-cil || true
fi
-# Now don't fail; we've done the best we can.
/usr/bin/update-monodoc || true
;;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#681331: marked as done (unblock: mono-tools/2.10-5)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:25:18 +0200
with message-id 4ffec22e.9000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681331: unblock: mono-tools/2.10-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #681331,
regarding unblock: mono-tools/2.10-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681331
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hiya,
We just got #681320 in mono-tools. It's a postinst trigger failure,
which will kill upgrades so is RC imho.
It turned out we were calling the wrong command here
(gac-package-install which should have been gac-install). I've fixed
this specific problem in -5 and also added some more guards against
failure. It's difficult to do anything as robustly as I'd like since
I've never been able to construct a reproducer scenario for this trigger
failure.
Diff attached. Please consider unblocking it.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
diff -Nru mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog
--- mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog2012-06-26 19:09:09.0 +0100
+++ mono-tools-2.10/debian/changelog2012-07-12 11:54:26.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+mono-tools (2.10-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * [f5fdaf0] Ignore failures in the postinst trigger. It's difficult to
+guarantee what's going to be available when the trigger is run. We might
+as well not fail if running any of the commands fails, since that's no
+worse than not registering the packages.
+ * [8817190] Call gac-install instead of gac-package-install to install mono
+gac-package-install is for installing /packages/ into the GAC.
+gac-install is for initialising the gac itself. It wasn't right to call
+gac-package-install here. Also, check that required files exist before
+proceeding. (Closes: #681320)
+
+ -- Iain Lane la...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:53:48 +0100
+
mono-tools (2.10-4) unstable; urgency=low
* [51d46c9] When triggered, manually install mono bits. This is to work
diff -Nru mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst
mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst
--- mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst 2012-06-26
19:09:09.0 +0100
+++ mono-tools-2.10/debian/monodoc-browser.postinst 2012-07-12
11:54:26.0 +0100
@@ -18,19 +18,24 @@
# Try to register stuff manually (these commands are idempotent, so
# it'll be fine when the real postinst is run later on)
+
+# We ignore all failures here. Either the stuff can be registered now—
+# in which case we'll do it—or it can't, in which case we cannot
+# proceed anyway. Failure isn't harmful.
mono_gac_status=`dpkg-query -f '${Status}' -W mono-gac`
if [ $mono_gac_status != install ok installed -a \
--x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-install ]; then
-/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install mono
+-x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-install -a \
+-e /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono ]; then
+/usr/share/cli-common/gac-install mono || true
fi
libgtk_cil_status=`dpkg-query -f '${Status}' -W libgtk2.0-cil`
if [ $libgtk_cil_status != install ok installed -a \
--x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install ]; then
-/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install libgtk2.0-cil
+-x /usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install -a \
+-e /usr/share/cli-common/packages.d/libgtk2.0-cil.installcligac ];
then
+/usr/share/cli-common/gac-package-install libgtk2.0-cil || true
fi
-# Now don't fail; we've done the best we can.
/usr/bin/update-monodoc || true
;;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 12/07/12 13:23, Iain Lane wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hiya,
We just got #681320 in mono-tools. It's a postinst trigger failure,
which will kill upgrades so is RC imho.
It turned out we were calling the wrong command here
(gac-package-install which should have been gac-install).
Bug#681342: unblock (pre-approval): cupt/2.5.7
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hello,
Please pre-approve cupt/2.5.8 (proposed debdiff attached), which
contains the fix for the important bug #681340, discovered
(unfortunately) only today.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'),
(500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru cupt-2.5.7/cpp/lib/src/internal/versionparsemacro.hpp cupt-2.5.8~/cpp/lib/src/internal/versionparsemacro.hpp
--- cupt-2.5.7/cpp/lib/src/internal/versionparsemacro.hpp 2012-06-28 14:04:53.0 +0300
+++ cupt-2.5.8~/cpp/lib/src/internal/versionparsemacro.hpp 2012-07-12 15:48:31.0 +0300
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
})
#define PARSE_OTHERS \
- if (Version::parseOthers) \
+ if (Version::parseOthers || (Version::parseInfoOnly tagName.equal(BUFFER_AND_SIZE(Description-md5 \
{ \
if (!tagName.equal(BUFFER_AND_SIZE(Package)) !tagName.equal(BUFFER_AND_SIZE(Status))) \
{ \
diff -Nru cupt-2.5.7/debian/changelog cupt-2.5.8~/debian/changelog
--- cupt-2.5.7/debian/changelog 2012-06-28 14:04:53.0 +0300
+++ cupt-2.5.8~/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 15:48:31.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+cupt (2.5.8~) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * lib:
+- cache/binaryversion:
+ - 'parseFromFile': the field 'Description-md5' should be parsed together
+with info-only fields even if Version::parseOthers is off.
+(Closes: #681340)
+
+ -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:14:02 +0300
+
cupt (2.5.7) unstable; urgency=low
* lib:
Bug#681178: marked as done (unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:25:02 -0600 with message-id 20120712142502.ga9...@spike.0x539.de and subject line Re: Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #681178, regarding unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 681178: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681178 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, [ please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed to -release ] I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4, which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet uploaded libburn 1.2.2-2, so this is a request for upload to sid and unblock. Both, Thomas Schmitt and I agree we want them in wheezy. Our test suite found in libisoburn/releng, which tries to cover most of the libburn, libisofs, libisoburn functionality reveals no regressions. Full debdiff attached, changelog follows inline: libburn (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680910) 01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause: CD SAO sessions with data tracks was started by an audio pause. Affected is an old Sony CD burner, refusing to burn SAO. * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680911) 02_sao-2-sectors-short-fix: CD tracks are perceived 2 sectors too short. A correclty burnt CD media in SAO mode, will not be recognized as correct burn by xorriso inspection, which believes that the track size is two sectors shorter, where it is not. * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680968) 03_cdrskin-sigsegv-track-source-added-no-drive-available cdrskin could SIGSEGV if track source was added when no drive was available. -- George Danchev danc...@spnet.net Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:47:15 +0200 unblock libburn/1.2.2-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -Nru libburn-1.2.2/debian/changelog libburn-1.2.2/debian/changelog --- libburn-1.2.2/debian/changelog 2012-04-03 15:24:18.0 +0200 +++ libburn-1.2.2/debian/changelog 2012-07-10 17:42:31.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@ +libburn (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680910) +01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause: +CD SAO sessions with data tracks was started by an audio pause. +Affected is an old Sony CD burner, refusing to burn SAO. + * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680911) +02_sao-2-sectors-short-fix: +CD tracks are perceived 2 sectors too short. +A correclty burnt CD media in SAO mode, will not be recognized +as correct burn by xorriso inspection, which believes that the +track size is two sectors shorter, where it is not. + * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680968) +03_cdrskin-sigsegv-track-source-added-no-drive-available +cdrskin could SIGSEGV if track source was added when no drive +was available. + + -- George Danchev danc...@spnet.net Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:47:15 +0200 + libburn (1.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause libburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause --- libburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/01_sao-tracks-started-by-audio-pause 2012-07-10 17:42:31.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +Description: CD SAO sessions with data tracks was started by an audio pause. + Affected is an old Sony CD burner, refusing to burn SAO. +Author: Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net +Origin: upstream, http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/4744 +Bug: none +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/680910 +Forwarded: not-needed +Reviewed-By: George Danchev danc...@spnet.net +Last-Update: 2012-07-10 + +--- libburn-1.2.2.orig/doc/cookbook.txt libburn-1.2.2/doc/cookbook.txt +@@ -296,8 +296,9 @@ A pre-gap of 2 seconds is mandatory only + post-gap may be needed with further tracks if they have neighbors with + different DATA FORM values. (Such mixing is not yet supported by libburn.) + +-DATA FORM is 00h for audio payload, 01h for audio pause, 10h for data, +-41h for CD-TEXT in Lead-in. ++DATA FORM is 00h for audio payload, 01h for audio pause (Lead-in and Lead-out), ++10h for data, 14h for data pause
Bug#681352: unblock: amd64-microcode/1.20120117-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package amd64-microcode
Version 1.20120117-2 has extremely important functionality which was not
fully tested at the time 0.20120117-1 was uploaded, so I had to take a more
conservative approach, and missed the freeze deadline.
The new version in unstable is capable of updating processor microcode
automatically on boot, by including the microcode inside the initramfs.
This is important, as the earlier the microcode is updated, the better.
It was independently tested by some helpful people in #debian-devel.
The version currently in testing requires manual action by the user to work,
and an oversight caused it to lack documentation explaining this, so it is
of very limited use.
I will attach the debdiff output for your convenience.
Thank you!
unblock amd64-microcode/1.20120117-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (990, 'proposed-updates'), (990, 'stable'), (500,
'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.36+ (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
diff -Nru amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/changelog
amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/changelog
--- amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/changelog 2012-06-10 12:22:13.0
-0300
+++ amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/changelog 2012-07-09 21:53:40.0
-0300
@@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
+amd64-microcode (1.20120117-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: priority of this package should be standard,
+not extra. All AMD-based X86 boxes should install this package
+ * debian/control: update package description
+
+ -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:50:35
-0300
+
+amd64-microcode (1.20120117-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update ABI (first component of package version) to 1, to match
+the ABI of intel-microcode packages with /lib/firmware support
+ * Update online processor cores and the initramfs image on package
+upgrade and the initramfs on package removal
+ * Install initramfs-tools helpers to handle boot-time microcode
+updates
+ * README.Debian: describe supported mod/built-in configs
+
+ -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:31:47
-0300
+
amd64-microcode (0.20120117-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* AMD microcode release 20120117:
diff -Nru amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/control
amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/control
--- amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/control 2012-06-10 11:31:17.0
-0300
+++ amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/control 2012-07-09 21:50:28.0
-0300
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Source: amd64-microcode
Section: non-free/admin
-Priority: extra
+Priority: standard
Maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org
Uploaders: Giacomo Catenazzi c...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7)
@@ -12,13 +12,9 @@
Architecture: i386 amd64
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
Description: Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
- The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode
- definitions for all AMD AMD64 processors. AMD releases microcode
- updates to correct processor behavior as documented in the
- respective processor revision guides. While the regular
- approach to getting this microcode update is via a BIOS upgrade,
- AMD realizes that this is an administrative hassle; the Linux
- Operating System has a mechanism to update the microcode after
- booting the OS.
+ This package contains microcode patches for all AMD AMD64
+ processors. AMD releases microcode patches to correct
+ processor behavior as documented in the respective processor
+ revision guides.
.
For Intel processors, please refer to the intel-microcode package.
diff -Nru amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/initramfs.hook
amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/initramfs.hook
--- amd64-microcode-0.20120117/debian/initramfs.hook1969-12-31
21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ amd64-microcode-1.20120117/debian/initramfs.hook2012-07-09
15:09:39.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# amd64-microcode initramfs-tools hook script
+# Copyright (C) 2012 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br
+# Released under the GPL v2 or later license
+#
+# Generates a copy of the minimal microcode for the current system if
+# possible, and installs it in the initramfs.
+#
+
+PREREQ=
+
+prereqs()
+{
+ echo $PREREQ
+}
+
+case $1 in
+prereqs)
+ prereqs
+ exit 0
+ ;;
+esac
+
+. /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
+
+verbose()
+{
+ if [ ${verbose} = y ] ; then
+ echo amd64-microcode: $@
+ fi
+ :
+}
+
Re: BinNMU changelog handling for Multi-Arch: same packages
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:59:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 3/ we modify sbuild to add the required binary-only=yes in the binNMU changelog entries. Here's a sample header line: ftplib (3.1-1-9+b1) unstable; urgency=low, binary-only=yes This could be done regardless if the buildd people agree to it, and that was the idea when I added this. Filed a bug for this. Where to? I can't seem to find it for buildd.debian.org. (We don't currently use the buildd package from the archive.) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680951: marked as done (unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-9)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:51:18 -0600 with message-id 20120712145118.gc4...@halon.org.uk and subject line Re: Bug#680951: unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #680951, regarding unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680951: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680951 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ace-of-penguins Target bug to fix: A crash happens for all games when F1 is pressed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679875 The cause Happens only on systems where 100dpi font package is not installed The Fix Add required font package to debian/control::Depends Comment: Please consider letting 1.3-9 go through once it has been uploaded. unblock ace-of-penguins/1.3-9 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 01:39:04PM +0300, jaalto wrote: I'll upload 1.3-10 with these fixes, Please open a new bug with the actual debdiff between testing and the new package once you have done so. Thanks, Neil signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Freeze exception for latex-make 2.1.18-2
Hi, Can you allow a freeze exception for latex-make 2.1.18-2 that has just been uploaded? latex-make 2.1.18-1 currently in wheezy is missing a call of dh_installtex when building the package. The consequence is that texhash is not called at install/remove of the package. Hence, the software does not work until another TeX package (or the administrator) calls texhash. (See #681300) The debdiff is added in this message. Regards, Vincent -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main diff -Nru latex-make-2.1.18/debian/changelog latex-make-2.1.18/debian/changelog --- latex-make-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2012-06-09 22:35:13.0 +0200 +++ latex-make-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 14:33:23.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +latex-make (2.1.18-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * ensure dh_installtex is called when building the package (Closes: #681300) + + -- Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:28:30 +0200 + latex-make (2.1.18-1) unstable; urgency=low * Fix subfig generation (Closes: #676737) diff -Nru latex-make-2.1.18/debian/rules latex-make-2.1.18/debian/rules --- latex-make-2.1.18/debian/rules 2012-06-09 22:35:13.0 +0200 +++ latex-make-2.1.18/debian/rules 2012-07-12 14:33:23.0 +0200 @@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ override_dh_install: dh_install --fail-missing + dh_installtex
Bug#681299: marked as done (unblock: netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:53:05 -0600
with message-id 20120712145305.gb12...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#681299: unblock: netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681299,
regarding unblock: netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netsniff-ng, reasons are below:
1. netsniff-ng in unstable is 12 days old [1].
2. With version, 0.5.6-2, It only aimed for amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc
arches [2].
3. But, migration is on hold due to briteny is looking for it for other arches.
Please do needful or do I need to poke someone from buildd side?
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netsniff-ng.html
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=netsniff-ng
unblock netsniff-ng/0.5.7-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 01:36:51PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netsniff-ng, reasons are below:
1. netsniff-ng in unstable is 12 days old [1].
2. With version, 0.5.6-2, It only aimed for amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc
arches [2].
3. But, migration is on hold due to briteny is looking for it for other
arches.
Please do needful or do I need to poke someone from buildd side?
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netsniff-ng.html
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=netsniff-ng
You'll need to request a partial binary removal by filing a bug against
ftp.debian.org to get rid of the old obsolete binaries. Nothing we can
do about that.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
Re: BinNMU changelog handling for Multi-Arch: same packages
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:59:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 3/ we modify sbuild to add the required binary-only=yes in the binNMU changelog entries. Here's a sample header line: ftplib (3.1-1-9+b1) unstable; urgency=low, binary-only=yes This could be done regardless if the buildd people agree to it, and that was the idea when I added this. Filed a bug for this. Where to? I can't seem to find it for buildd.debian.org. (We don't currently use the buildd package from the archive.) #681292 against sbuild. Feel free to clone it if necessary. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712151116.ga28...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Re: BinNMU changelog handling for Multi-Arch: same packages
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 05:11:16PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:59:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 3/ we modify sbuild to add the required binary-only=yes in the binNMU changelog entries. Here's a sample header line: ftplib (3.1-1-9+b1) unstable; urgency=low, binary-only=yes This could be done regardless if the buildd people agree to it, and that was the idea when I added this. Filed a bug for this. Where to? I can't seem to find it for buildd.debian.org. (We don't currently use the buildd package from the archive.) #681292 against sbuild. Feel free to clone it if necessary. I just verified a build in stable and get a bunch of these: dpkg-source --after-build hello-2.6 parsechangelog/debian: warning: hello-2.6/debian/changelog(l1): unknown key-value Binary-only LINE: hello (2.6-1+b1) unstable; urgency=low, binary-only=yes parsechangelog/debian: warning: unknown information field 'Binary-Only' in input data in parsed version of changelog dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included) If we add that, dpkg in all supported suites should at least do the right thing and ignore it. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Freeze-exception for beast-mcmc possible? (Was: beast-mcmc_1.6.2-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:59:56PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I think we're trying to avoid introducing new packages at this point… That's fair. Anyway, it has out-of-date binaries almost everywhere, so it's not even remotely a candidate. However, this is actually not correct to my perception. I guess you are refering to http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc but from my perception these are false positives. As far as I know these issues are only blocking reasons if a package was available for those architectures formerly but this is not the case. The problem is that we would need to manually build for those architectures because of the one non-free dependency we were not able to get rid of. This is no try to ask you to reconsider your decision I just think that the package in principle could migrate. Thanks for your work anyway Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712153432.gi11...@an3as.eu
Re: Freeze-exception for beast-mcmc possible? (Was: beast-mcmc_1.6.2-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 17:34:32 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:59:56PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Anyway, it has out-of-date binaries almost everywhere, so it's not even remotely a candidate. However, this is actually not correct to my perception. I guess you are refering to http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc but from my perception these are false positives. As far as I know these issues are only blocking reasons if a package was available for those architectures formerly but this is not the case. What are you talking about? beast-mcmc-lib |1.6.2-1 | unstable/contrib | armel, armhf, ia64, powerpc, s390x The package *is* available on those archs in an out of date version, so it's not considered for migration. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gosa update for s-p-u (highly relevant for the Debian Edu blend)
Hi Cyril,
On Di 03 Jul 2012 18:36:50 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de (03/07/2012):
The next Debian Edu release 6.0.5+r1 depends on a security fix in
GOsa² (src:package gosa):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665950
A new squeeze compliant version of gosa (2.6.11-3+squeeze2) has now
been provided by the gosa maintainer.
I see the squeeze source package has a series file, which doesn't get
updated by this debdiff. Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but that
makes me wonder whether you have actually tested the updated package.
Indeed, only the patch itself, but not the packages have been tested.
I apologize for that. This has now been fixed and I hope it is ok to
ask again for allowance of uploading gosa 2.6.11-3+squeeze2 to s-p-u.
The debdiff is attached inline below and also as a patch file.
Thanks for your time and apology for the inconvenience before,
Mike
diff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog2012-02-06 13:43:11.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog2012-07-09 20:44:47.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gosa (2.6.11-3+squeeze2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport shellvar escaping code. Closes: #665950.
+
+ -- Cajus Pollmeier ca...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:44:30 +0200
+
gosa (2.6.11-3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* Fix DHCP host removal. Closes: #650258
diff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch
gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch 2012-07-09
20:39:36.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Description: Allow passwords to contain special chars and still work
with hook scripts
+Author: Fabian Hickert hick...@gonicus.de
+--- a/gosa-core/include/functions.inc
b/gosa-core/include/functions.inc
+@@ -3066,8 +3066,8 @@
+
+ if ($command != ){
+ /* Walk through attribute list */
+-$command= preg_replace(/%userPassword/, $password, $command);
+-$command= preg_replace(/%dn/, $dn, $command);
++$command= preg_replace(/%userPassword/,
escapeshellarg($password), $command);
++$command= preg_replace(/%dn/, escapeshellarg($dn), $command);
+
+ if (check_command($command) || TRUE){
+ @DEBUG (DEBUG_SHELL, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, __FILE__,
$command, Execute);
diff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series 2012-01-30 13:42:10.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series 2012-07-03 19:25:03.0 +0200
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
11_dep_filter_sub_xml.patch
12_dhcphost-removal.patch
13_transliterate_idgen.patch
+14_escape.patch
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148
GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfbdiff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog2012-02-06 13:43:11.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/changelog2012-07-09 20:44:47.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gosa (2.6.11-3+squeeze2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport shellvar escaping code. Closes: #665950.
+
+ -- Cajus Pollmeier ca...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:44:30 +0200
+
gosa (2.6.11-3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* Fix DHCP host removal. Closes: #650258
diff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/14_escape.patch 2012-07-09 20:39:36.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Description: Allow passwords to contain special chars and still work with hook scripts
+Author: Fabian Hickert hick...@gonicus.de
+--- a/gosa-core/include/functions.inc
b/gosa-core/include/functions.inc
+@@ -3066,8 +3066,8 @@
+
+ if ($command != ){
+ /* Walk through attribute list */
+-$command= preg_replace(/%userPassword/, $password, $command);
+-$command= preg_replace(/%dn/, $dn, $command);
++$command= preg_replace(/%userPassword/, escapeshellarg($password), $command);
++$command= preg_replace(/%dn/, escapeshellarg($dn), $command);
+
+ if (check_command($command) || TRUE){
+ @DEBUG (DEBUG_SHELL, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, __FILE__, $command, Execute);
diff -Nru gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series
--- gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series 2012-01-30 13:42:10.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.6.11/debian/patches/series 2012-07-03 19:25:03.0 +0200
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
11_dep_filter_sub_xml.patch
12_dhcphost-removal.patch
13_transliterate_idgen.patch
+14_escape.patch
Re: Freeze exception for latex-make 2.1.18-2
On 12.07.2012 15:55, Vincent Danjean wrote: Can you allow a freeze exception for latex-make 2.1.18-2 that has just been uploaded? latex-make 2.1.18-1 currently in wheezy is missing a call of dh_installtex when building the package. The consequence is that texhash is not called at install/remove of the package. Hence, the software does not work until another TeX package (or the administrator) calls texhash. (See #681300) Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/686a20b8c2288dba744fbe4fc681d...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: unblock request for fcitx
On 12.07.2012 11:24, Aron Xu wrote: I would like to upload an update of fcitx to unstable, applying several of upstream stable branch patches, changes are committed to git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/fcitx.git;a=commitdiff;h=7da4de754cafa4c683ba74ebe43e152493369787 Please could we have a full debdiff between the source package currently in testing and the new package you're proposing to upload to unstable? From the above URL, renaming patches as part of an unblock request is also not particularly helpful for review purposes. :( Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ab96fec91a2f788d75bc3ef49fac1...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: freeze exception for systemd integration of atop?
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: We need to work on a packaging policy for packages shipping native systemd service files. Hacking all sorts of systemctl calls into the maintainers scripts as the patch does is not something I would recommend. Yes, please! I'd love to start shipping systemd service files with my packages. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vchtszfx@windlord.stanford.edu
Bug#681290: unblock: spice-gtk/0.12-4
On 12.07.2012 07:47, Liang Guo wrote: Please unblock spice-gtk. I upload 0.12-3 to unstable at 29th Jun, and find a bug[1] which forbit other package to compile. Then I uploaded 0.12-4 at 9th July, and this cause 0.12-3 cannot automatically migrate to testing The difference between 0.12-3 and 0.12-4 is slight, just copy .version and .tarball-version to build directory. for the build script use the version information in .tarball-version to determine the version it is building. Testing currently has 0.12-1, so the changes which are relevant are everything after that, not just those in -4. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/dfaba6edead30f33718974bc90bbf...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#681332: unblock: dpkg/1.16.7
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:44:36 +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dpkg The version 1.16.5/1.16.6 introduced several important changes that we wanted to have in Wheezy: - the support of dpkg-query --control-show and dpkg-query --control-list to prepare for the move of changelog and copyright into the package metadata - dpkg-buildflags --status - several improvements in the 3.0 (quilt) format - an SE linux fix - many translations updates Because I'm going to upload 1.16.8 pretty shortly with new translation updates, less than 10 days have passed (but even if 10 had passed that would be too short) and I was planning to request an unblock later on once there's been enough time for any other regressions to show up, I'd just disregard this request. But we had to re-upload after the freeze to fix #679959 so the automatic unblock no longer matches. Please update it to match. unblock dpkg/1.16.7 The debdiff is thus rather huge but most changes are translation updates or short string updates. I attach a diff where I filter po files and man page updates (filterdiff -x '*.po' -x '*.pot' -x '*/man/*'). $ git diff --stat 1.16.4.3..1.16.7 [...] 212 files changed, 77626 insertions(+), 59263 deletions(-) In addition because the automatic freeze exception was for 1.16.5, which would have gone in anyway, I don't see the point in asking the release team to review the diff starting from the testing version. I think it makes more sense to use a diff from 1.16.5.. onwards, but obviously the release team might disagree with that. guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712182909.ga18...@gaara.hadrons.org
Bug#681377: unblock: libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package libpdfbox-java.
- -2 fixes the (at least) important bug #680778, the only change is is
an added dependency. Full debdiff attached.
unblock libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2
Thanks in advance,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=MdWe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-01 19:52:38.0 -0600
+++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 12:20:19.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libpdfbox-java (1:1.7.0+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: add dependency on libfontbox-java to libpdfbox-java.
+Thanks to Tom Parker for the bug report. (Closes: #680778)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:20:11 -0600
+
libpdfbox-java (1:1.7.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control
--- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control 2012-06-01 19:52:38.0 -0600
+++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control 2012-07-12 12:20:19.0 -0600
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Package: libpdfbox-java
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libfontbox-java
Breaks: jabref ( 2.7~beta1+ds-4)
Description: PDF library for Java
The Apache PDFBox library is an open source Java tool for working with PDF
Bug#664681: transition: KDE's 4.8 release of platform, applications and workspace
On 04.07.2012 21:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 10:35 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: here it is a recap of the status of the various bits currently ongoing so far. 5) split of kdeutils the monolithic kdeutils source has been replaced in KDE 4.8 with the following sources: ark filelight kcalc kcharselect kdf kfloppy kgpg kremotecontrol ktimer kwallet superkaramba printer-applet sweeper the only binaries lost is the monolithic kdeutils-dbg (as expected); this would need to hint the old source away from testing - this is not ready to migrate yet kfloppy, kgpg, kremotecontrol, printer-applet and superkaramba appear to be the sources still to migrate. They should all be ready on Friday night, left to their own devices. Indeed, those all seem to have migrated now. Is there anything remaining for 4.8, or could we declare this done now? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f948a5c5dc529c16f2e06857aca4...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#681332: unblock: dpkg/1.16.7
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 20:29:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: In addition because the automatic freeze exception was for 1.16.5, which would have gone in anyway, I don't see the point in asking the release team to review the diff starting from the testing version. I think it makes more sense to use a diff from 1.16.5.. onwards, but obviously the release team might disagree with that. They do. 1.16.5 wasn't going to go in because 1.16.5 was broken. 1.16.4.3 isn't, AFAIK, so you're going to have to explain why the new version should be considered instead. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#681384: unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Release Team:
I would like to request a freeze exception/unblock for tomcat7_7.0.28-2.
The package contains fixes for 2 severity important bugs, #680844 (FTBFS
when user home dir doesn't exist) and #681160 (fix to always generate
MD5SUM in postrm; prior to this, the source package upload contained the
postrm with the calculated sum and thus subsequent builds wouldn't
regenerate it).
Thank you,
tony
unblock tomcat7/7.0.28-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=xP3c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+tomcat7 (7.0.28-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Jakub Adam ]
+ * Ensure webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib exists before files are
+copied there.
+ * Fix FTBFS when user home dir doesn't exist (Closes: #680844).
+
+ [ tony mancill ]
+ * Fix build to generate postrm from postrm.in (Closes: #681160)
+
+ -- tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:29:30 -0700
+
tomcat7 (7.0.28-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Miguel Landaeta ]
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From: Jakub Adam jakub.a...@ktknet.cz
+Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:53:38 +
+Subject: 0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home
+
+---
+ build.xml |1 -
+ 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/build.xml b/build.xml
+index 14340db..ae86842 100644
+--- a/build.xml
b/build.xml
+@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@
+ !-- Property that determines if manifests need updating --
+ uptodate property=manifests.uptodate
+ targetfile=${tomcat.manifests}/default.manifest
+- srcfiles file=${user.home}/build.properties /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.properties /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.properties.default /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.xml /
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
0010-debianize-build-xml.patch
0011-fix-classpath-lintian-warnings.patch
0012-java7-compat.patch
+0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
build-stamp:
dh_testdir
ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
+ mkdir -p webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib
cp /usr/share/java/jstl1.1.jar webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/jstl.jar
cp /usr/share/java/standard.jar webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/standard.jar
$(ANT_INVOKE) deploy test
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
rm -rf output/
rm -rf webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/*.jar
rm -f build-stamp modules/jdbc-pool/output/resources/MANIFEST.MF
+ rm -f debian/tomcat7.postrm
dh_clean
mh_clean
@@ -163,7 +165,7 @@
# update the checksum for the root webapp
unset rwmd5sum \
rwmd5sum=`cat $(RWFILES) | md5sum - 2/dev/null | cut -d -f1` \
- sed -i s/\@ROOT_WEBAPP_MD5SUM\@/$$rwmd5sum/ debian/tomcat7.postrm
+ sed s/\@ROOT_WEBAPP_MD5SUM\@/$$rwmd5sum/ debian/tomcat7.postrm.in debian/tomcat7.postrm
jh_manifest
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/tomcat7.postrm tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/tomcat7.postrm
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/tomcat7.postrm 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/tomcat7.postrm 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
@@ -1,80 +0,0
Bug#664681: transition: KDE's 4.8 release of platform, applications and workspace
Alle giovedì 12 luglio 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: On 04.07.2012 21:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 10:35 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: here it is a recap of the status of the various bits currently ongoing so far. 5) split of kdeutils the monolithic kdeutils source has been replaced in KDE 4.8 with the following sources: ark filelight kcalc kcharselect kdf kfloppy kgpg kremotecontrol ktimer kwallet superkaramba printer-applet sweeper the only binaries lost is the monolithic kdeutils-dbg (as expected); this would need to hint the old source away from testing - this is not ready to migrate yet kfloppy, kgpg, kremotecontrol, printer-applet and superkaramba appear to be the sources still to migrate. They should all be ready on Friday night, left to their own devices. Indeed, those all seem to have migrated now. Is there anything remaining for 4.8, or could we declare this done now? All the split bits have finally migrated, so I can now file a RM for src:kdeutils. I think we can consider this bug done, yes (there's kde-l10n still at 4.7, but that's waiting for a fixed tasksel to migrate). Thanks for all your patience, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#681377: unblock: libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2
On 2012-07-12 20:24, gregor herrmann wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libpdfbox-java. -2 fixes the (at least) important bug #680778, the only change is is an added dependency. Full debdiff attached. unblock libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2 Thanks in advance, gregor I notice it does not add a class-path change in the Jar file; is this class-path entry already present? According to the reporter, he also added a class-path for it to work. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fff260c.7090...@thykier.net
Bug#681387: unblock: resiprocate
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Short summary of request: please give authorization to a) upload resiprocate 1.8.4-1 source package to unstable b) for unblocking 1.8.4-1 to wheezy Long summary: - I am both upstream and package maintainer - wheezy currently has 1.8.2 - 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 were created from a stable branch upstream, only including essential fixes - test cases are part of the upstream project - these test cases have been run by myself on Debian for the 1.8.4 tarball - the Debian source package only includes a trivial fix for a non-RC bug in postrm http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675273 - this is a new package, it has only been in the archive for about 2 months - there are currently no other packages in the archive which depend on resiprocate (no other package will fail because of this change) - one of the changes in 1.8.3 corrects an issue in the binary package sipdialer: without the fix, users will have to create per-home-directory config files in the old/broken format, and will have to manually change their per-home-directory config files whenever they upgrade from wheezy - wheezy+1 (this is only for sipdialer.deb - does not impact any of the other binary packages) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fff27ff.8090...@pocock.com.au
Bug#681384: marked as done (unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-2)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:44:32 +0200
with message-id 4fff2920.1010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681384: unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681384,
regarding unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Release Team:
I would like to request a freeze exception/unblock for tomcat7_7.0.28-2.
The package contains fixes for 2 severity important bugs, #680844 (FTBFS
when user home dir doesn't exist) and #681160 (fix to always generate
MD5SUM in postrm; prior to this, the source package upload contained the
postrm with the calculated sum and thus subsequent builds wouldn't
regenerate it).
Thank you,
tony
unblock tomcat7/7.0.28-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=xP3c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/changelog 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+tomcat7 (7.0.28-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Jakub Adam ]
+ * Ensure webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib exists before files are
+copied there.
+ * Fix FTBFS when user home dir doesn't exist (Closes: #680844).
+
+ [ tony mancill ]
+ * Fix build to generate postrm from postrm.in (Closes: #681160)
+
+ -- tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:29:30 -0700
+
tomcat7 (7.0.28-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Miguel Landaeta ]
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From: Jakub Adam jakub.a...@ktknet.cz
+Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:53:38 +
+Subject: 0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home
+
+---
+ build.xml |1 -
+ 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/build.xml b/build.xml
+index 14340db..ae86842 100644
+--- a/build.xml
b/build.xml
+@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@
+ !-- Property that determines if manifests need updating --
+ uptodate property=manifests.uptodate
+ targetfile=${tomcat.manifests}/default.manifest
+- srcfiles file=${user.home}/build.properties /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.properties /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.properties.default /
+ srcfiles file=${basedir}/build.xml /
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/patches/series 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
0010-debianize-build-xml.patch
0011-fix-classpath-lintian-warnings.patch
0012-java7-compat.patch
+0013-dont-look-for-build-properties-in-user-home.patch
diff -Nru tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules
--- tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules 2012-06-22 07:07:39.0 -0700
+++ tomcat7-7.0.28/debian/rules 2012-07-10 22:13:47.0 -0700
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
build-stamp:
dh_testdir
ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
+ mkdir -p webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib
cp /usr/share/java/jstl1.1.jar webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/jstl.jar
cp /usr/share/java/standard.jar webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/standard.jar
$(ANT_INVOKE)
Bug#681395: unblock smarty-gettext
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Package smarty-gettext 1.0b1-6 got broken by changing from smarty 3.0 to smarty 3.1. A patch against upstream 1.0b1 has been uploaded to SID with smarty-gettext 1.0b1-7. The fixed bug is documented here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680754 Please unblock transition of smarty-gettext. Thanks a lot for your work, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgpbAN0cWQUN1.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
Bug#681396: unblock slbackup-php
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Upstream slbackup-php 0.3 (as currently in wheezy: 0.3-3) is smarty2 compliant and does not work with smarty3. slbackup-php as is not completely unusable in wheezy. The issue is documented here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646537 Upstream has released a smarty3 compliant version of slbackup-php (0.4.3) that today got uploaded as 0.4.3-1 to SID. Please consider unblocking slbackup-php. Thanks a lot, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgpxhhFw0YWZK.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
Bug#681387: unblock: resiprocate
On 12.07.2012 20:39, Daniel Pocock wrote: Short summary of request: please give authorization to a) upload resiprocate 1.8.4-1 source package to unstable b) for unblocking 1.8.4-1 to wheezy Please could you provide a debdiff between the current source package in wheezy and the proposed 1.8.4-1 package? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a82d1e20894ddd525bf3d672e5b39...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
please unblock klavaro 1.9.4-2
Hello,
Please unblock klavaro 1.9.4-2. This package fixes one important bug, 675386.
Debdiff attached.
Regards,
Bart Martens
diff -Nru klavaro-1.9.4/debian/changelog klavaro-1.9.4/debian/changelog
--- klavaro-1.9.4/debian/changelog 2012-05-08 20:50:27.0 +
+++ klavaro-1.9.4/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 19:45:26.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+klavaro (1.9.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/patches/blinking_cursor_fix.diff: Added. Closes: #675386.
+
+ -- Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:00:51 +
+
klavaro (1.9.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/blinking_cursor_fix.diff klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/blinking_cursor_fix.diff
--- klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/blinking_cursor_fix.diff 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/blinking_cursor_fix.diff 2012-07-12 19:44:32.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+From: Felipe Castro fef...@gmail.com
+Subject: Re: Bug#675386: klavaro: (Blinking) cursor lags makes klavaro difficult to use
+Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:27:23 -0300
+
+diff -b -B -u -r klavaro-1.9.4/src/cursor.c klavaro-1.9.5/src/cursor.c
+--- klavaro-1.9.4/src/cursor.c 2011-07-03 12:30:30.0 -0300
klavaro-1.9.5/src/cursor.c 2012-06-02 21:15:47.0 -0300
+@@ -222,9 +222,9 @@
+ gtk_text_buffer_get_iter_at_mark (buf, end, gtk_text_buffer_get_insert (buf));
+ gtk_text_iter_forward_char (end);
+ if (tutor_get_correcting ())
+- gtk_text_buffer_apply_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
+- else
+ gtk_text_buffer_remove_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
++ else
++ gtk_text_buffer_apply_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
+ }
+
+ /**
+@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
+ gtk_text_buffer_get_iter_at_mark (buf, end, gtk_text_buffer_get_insert (buf));
+ gtk_text_iter_forward_char (end);
+ if (tutor_get_correcting ())
+- gtk_text_buffer_remove_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
+- else
+ gtk_text_buffer_apply_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
++ else
++ gtk_text_buffer_remove_tag_by_name (buf, cursor_blink, start, end);
+ }
+diff -b -B -u -r klavaro-1.9.4/src/tutor.c klavaro-1.9.5/src/tutor.c
+--- klavaro-1.9.4/src/tutor.c 2011-12-23 22:35:08.0 -0200
klavaro-1.9.5/src/tutor.c 2012-06-02 21:24:36.0 -0300
+@@ -574,21 +575,23 @@
+ }
+ else
+ {
+- cursor_on (NULL);
+-
+ switch (tutor.type)
+ {
+ case TT_BASIC:
++ cursor_on (NULL);
+ hints_update_from_char (cursor_get_char ());
+ tutor_speak_char ();
+ return;
+ case TT_ADAPT:
++ cursor_on (NULL);
+ tutor_speak_char ();
+ return;
+ case TT_VELO:
++ cursor_on (NULL);
+ tutor_speak_word ();
+ return;
+ case TT_FLUID:
++ cursor_off (NULL);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
diff -Nru klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/series klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/series
--- klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/series 2012-05-08 21:12:38.0 +
+++ klavaro-1.9.4/debian/patches/series 2012-07-12 19:44:46.0 +
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
02_en_C.diff
+blinking_cursor_fix.diff
Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-5, was Re: Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-4
Hello Philipp, On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:15:17AM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 02:45:43PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: However, the road was a little bumpy, thus 3.0.1-4 closes an RC bug (namely #679554). It has (finally) build on all architectures. | + # Due to bug #679554 / 679552 | +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),i386) | + docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.en.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | po4a -v -f debian/po4a.cfg | # po4a-translate is broken, c.f. #280882 | perl -i -p -e 's# refentrytitle\dhucpackage;#\dhucpackage;#ms' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | perl -i -p -e 's#^\s*/refentrytitle##' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | recode latin1..utf8 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +else | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1.de debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +endif What kind of fix is that? If it builds on your machine use docbook-to-man, on the buildds use pregenerated stuff? Sorry, but no. As you said it's probably not goobox's fault so it needs to be fixed somewhere else. It turned out to be a dpkg issue (cf. #675613). Some buildds had a older dpkg (older than current wheezy, where this is fixed) and thus the build failed. I removed the above hack (i.e. the relevant rules file now reads again: docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.en.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 po4a -v -f debian/po4a.cfg # po4a-translate is broken, c.f. #280882 perl -i -p -e 's# refentrytitle\dhucpackage;#\dhucpackage;#ms' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml perl -i -p -e 's#^\s*/refentrytitle##' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 recode latin1..utf8 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 on all architectures. I uploaded this as goobox 3.0.1-5. After all buildds updated to a recent enough dpkg (i.e. the one from wheezy or sid) goobox built again without problems on all architectures. I attached the debdiff to the current version in Testing (i.e. debdiff goobox_3.0.1-1.dsc goobox_3.0.1-5.dsc) where I removed the language updates themselves. unblock goobox/3.0.1-5 Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog --- goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-04-20 20:37:30.0 +0200 +++ goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 11:28:48.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,51 @@ +goobox (3.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix (3rd try) + * Build man pages again on all architectures. It looks like the build + failure (avoided in 3.0.1-4) was caused not by sp itself but rather by + dpkg (cf. dpkg bug #675613, closed in dpkg 1.16.4). + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:22:30 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix (2nd try) + * Until sp is fixed generate man pages only on build machine (currently i386 +chroot) and ship pregenerated ones otherwise. closes: #679554. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:05:12 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix + * Until sp is fixed on mipsel (see 679552), ship pregenerated translated +man pages for mipsel, closes: #679554. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:46:19 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Revert broken NMU, closes: #679313. + * This reopens: #677246. Since no bug report until just before the release +happend, people requiring this fix will need to backport goobox after the +release of Wheezy. Sorry. + * po/fr.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * help/es/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/pl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/sl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:35:53 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update to use libmusicbrainz5. Rework packaging to preserve +upstream configure and aclocal.m4 files during build process. +Closes: #677246. + + -- Jon Dowland j...@debian.org Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:42:47 +0100 + goobox (3.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru goobox-3.0.1/debian/copyright
Bug#681395: unblock smarty-gettext
On 12.07.2012 21:09, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package smarty-gettext 1.0b1-6 got broken by changing from smarty 3.0 to smarty 3.1. A patch against upstream 1.0b1 has been uploaded to SID with smarty-gettext 1.0b1-7. What's this change about? + * debian/install, debian/links: ++ Install as /usr/bin/tsmarty2c (without extension) and drop the symlink + of the same name that used to refer to /usr/bin/tsmarty2c.php. There doesn't appear to be any documentation or rationale beyond the above; furthermore, the change appears to be broken: --- smarty-gettext-1.0b1/debian/install 2012-05-10 18:59:25.0 + +++ smarty-gettext-1.0b1/debian/install 2012-07-08 13:07:48.0 + @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ block.t.php usr/share/php/smarty3/plugins/ -tsmarty2c.php usr/bin/ +tsmarty2c.php usr/bin/ \ No newline at end of file Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0d03bf5553a533f180e2b2be35f14...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy
2012/7/11 Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org: Hi, We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an upload based on testing's source package and targeting testing-proposed-updates. But for this specific case, I'm not sure what would the best step forward as you seem not interested in fixing #674386 (cf. [1]). Since the package has not been part of any previous stable release, one solution could be to remove this package from testing. What do you think? Regards, [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674386#10 Hi - On closer inspection, #654506 is already fixed in wheezy's version 1:3.4.5-1 -- the waf file was removed by upstream. There is still a wscript file but it contains no binary code and is not used in the build process. So I don't think we need any repack. I've created a git branch 3.4debianfixes with the fix for #674386 in. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/3.4debianfixes I don't have a machine with the right arch to test for sure, however. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canuikkp6v0nd7yowc87zb2zppzectbnlfd5beryrwu5qso5...@mail.gmail.com
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.37-1~squeeze+1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nvidia-graphics-modules_195.36.31+3_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: yaws_1.88-2+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: puppet_2.6.2-5+squeeze6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxslt_1.1.26-6+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze3_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mono_2.6.7-5.1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spsa7-0007zm...@franck.debian.org
Bug#681398: release.debian.org: maintainer (both Debian and upstream lost intrest) see #627174
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist The Debian/upstream maintainer says: SD has fallen from my priorities, and to have it be worth keeping in Debian at this point, I think someone else will need to step up and work on maintenance upstream. I've asked in #debian-perl but noone has expressed an interest so I propose removing it. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712204601.14646.86270.reportbug@taylor.periapt
Please give-back Mono on SPARC
Hi, Mono 2.10.8.1-5 (a security upload) failed to build on SPARC. The failure appears to be the fault of a misconfigured buildd (I had no trouble building on the SPARC porterbox) so I don't see any need to make changes to the package to make it build. gb mono_2.10.8.1-5 . sparc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fff644d.8080...@apebox.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: extplorer_2.1.0b6+dfsg.2-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sptke-0005ec...@franck.debian.org
Bug#681405: unblock: tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package tor. Tor's new upstream verison 0.2.3.19-rc fixes a long-standing bug in how Tor maintains its window (as in similar to TCP-windows) values. AIUI this bug could be responsible for connections or circuits being dropped in cases where the values go out of sync between peers. Additionally, this release reverts to an older, saner geoip database, fixes a windows-only compilation issue, and fixes a minor port range parsing issue. I think we should use 0.2.3.19-rc over .18 in our next release. unblock tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1 Thanks, weasel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712211242.ga32...@valiant.palfrader.org
Bug#678806: pu: package yaws/1.88-2+squeeze1
tags 678806 + pending thanks On 07.07.2012 08:35, Sergei Golovan wrote: On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Then the changelog shouldn't say stable-security... With that changed, please go ahead. Done. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9aa251c928de7f1bbea611bfd587b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#679224: pu: package tor/0.2.2.37
tags 679224 + pending thanks On 06.07.2012 21:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: tags 679224 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 11:56 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: I would like to update the Tor in stable from 0.2.2.35 to 0.2.2.37. This is an update on Tor's stable tree (instead of its development tree) and the changes are thus rather conservative. [...] Tor versions 0.2.2.36 and .37 have been in unstable and testing for a few weeks now and I am reasonably confident that 0.2.2.37 is fit for being included in the next point release of squeeze. May I prepare and upload a 0.2.2.37-1~squeeze1 tor package? Please go ahead; thanks. For the record, this was uploaded and I've flagged it for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84a1041816b49882cd8b86b629285...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#680388: pu: package nvidia-graphics-modules/195.36.31+3
tags 680388 + pending thanks On 06.07.2012 21:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote: tags 680388 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 16:29 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: This is a rebuild of the kernel modules against the fixed nvidia-kernel-source 195.36.31-6squeeze1 in s-p-u, see #668780. Please go ahead; thanks. For the record, this was uploaded and I've flagged it for acceptance in to p-u. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/16fddf5aec03358e1f15f7d0d633b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#680490: pu: package libxslt/1.1.26-6+squeeze1
tag 680490 + squeeze pending thanks On 06.07.2012 14:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com (06/07/2012): I'd like to upload an update version of libxslt to squeeze in order to fix three CVEs: - CVE-2011-1202, Bug #617413. - CVE-2011-3970, Bug #660650. - CVE-2012-2825, Bug #679283. debdiff is attached. Doesn't look insane to me, I think you can go ahead with an upload, thanks. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/15ca260ef8d2c98b6199a35dc526a...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#681274: pu: package clamav/0.97.3+dfsg-1~squeeze1
tags 681274 + squeeze pending thanks On 11.07.2012 21:43, Scott Kitterman wrote: Multiple security issues fixed, but too minor for a DSA, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668273#25 I probably grumbled on IRC already, but filing the bug before the upload is generally appreciated. Also the usual desire to keep clamav current to that A/V capability doesn't atrophy in the stable release. As a bonus, fixes some long standing packaging bugs (including one RC). The diff attached is of the Debian directory. Upstream diff is a bit painful. It doesn't actually seem as bad as I feared based on that description :-) - particularly once the build system and translation noise is removed. I've tested in a stable chroot that all the packages are installable, clamd and freshclam still run and work and that all the clamav testfiles are still detected. The clamav-milter starts and runs as well, but I don't use it so I've got no good way to test it. Thanks. I've just flagged the package for acceptance in to proposed-updates; we can potentially look at releasing it via stable-updates as well once it's had chance to build everywhere (and possibly after some more testing). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/83591585f9e03113184c529fad719...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#681398: release.debian.org: maintainer (both Debian and upstream lost intrest) see #627174
On 12.07.2012 21:46, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist reportbug has an option for removal bugs. Please use it when filing them using reportbug. ;-) The Debian/upstream maintainer says: SD has fallen from my priorities, and to have it be worth keeping in Debian at this point, I think someone else will need to step up and work on maintenance upstream. I've asked in #debian-perl but noone has expressed an interest so I propose removing it. If no-one cares about keeping it in Debian, then it should be removed from unstable and this report should be reassigned to ftp.d.o. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cd3492a016486efa514eb4454275a...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: clamav_0.97.5+dfsg-3~squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spuve-0001pb...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#680490: pu: package libxslt/1.1.26-6+squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 680490 + squeeze pending Bug #680490 [release.debian.org] pu: package libxslt/1.1.26-6+squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 680490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134214183931384.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#681274: pu: package clamav/0.97.3+dfsg-1~squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 681274 + squeeze pending Bug #681274 [release.debian.org] pu: package clamav/0.97.3+dfsg-1~squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134214184431469.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#680388: pu: package nvidia-graphics-modules/195.36.31+3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 680388 + pending Bug #680388 [release.debian.org] pu: package nvidia-graphics-modules/195.36.31+3 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 680388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680388 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134214184531543.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#679224: pu: package tor/0.2.2.37
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 679224 + pending Bug #679224 [release.debian.org] pu: package tor/0.2.2.37 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 679224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679224 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134214185031714.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#678806: pu: package yaws/1.88-2+squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678806 + pending Bug #678806 [release.debian.org] pu: package yaws/1.88-2+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134214185031716.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Please unblock automake1.11, automake1.10, automake1.9, automake1.7
Hello, I've updated all of the automake packages in the subject to fix CVE-2012-3386. It looks like an update to automake1.4 will not be necessary but I'm awaiting confirmation and will respond back if it is. It would be good for these (admittedly mild) fixes to make it into Wheezy so please unblock these packages. -- Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#681414: unblock: libpng/1.2.49-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception unblock libpng/1.2.49-2 Please unblock libpng (with udeb binary package). Upstream released libpng 1.2.50 to fix CVE-2012-3386 recently. I extracted the relevant change. The debdiff is below. debdiff libpng_1.2.49-1.dsc libpng_1.2.49-2.dsc diff -Nru libpng-1.2.49/debian/changelog libpng-1.2.49/debian/changelog --- libpng-1.2.49/debian/changelog 2012-04-09 12:14:09.0 +1000 +++ libpng-1.2.49/debian/changelog 2012-07-13 12:33:03.0 +1000 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libpng (1.2.49-2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Change a+w to u+w in Makefile.in to fix CVE-2012-3386 +Add 02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch +Closes: #681408 + + -- Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:31:39 +1000 + libpng (1.2.49-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream version 1.2.49 diff -Nru libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch --- libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch 1970-01-01 10:00:00.0 +1000 +++ libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch 2012-07-13 12:30:58.0 +1000 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +http://bugs.debian.org/681408 +http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-3386 +https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-3386 + +Change a+w to u+w in Makefile.in to fix CVE-2012-3386 + +diff -urNp libpng-1.2.49/Makefile.in libpng-1.2.50/Makefile.in +--- a/Makefile.in 2012-03-29 15:47:09.0 +1100 b/Makefile.in 2012-07-10 10:37:13.0 +1000 +@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ distcheck: dist + *.zip*) \ + unzip $(distdir).zip ;;\ + esac +- chmod -R a-w $(distdir); chmod a+w $(distdir) ++ chmod -R a-w $(distdir); chmod u+w $(distdir) + mkdir $(distdir)/_build + mkdir $(distdir)/_inst + chmod a-w $(distdir) diff -Nru libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/series libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/series --- libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/series 2012-04-09 12:07:32.0 +1000 +++ libpng-1.2.49/debian/patches/series 2012-07-13 12:33:17.0 +1000 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ 01-legacy.patch +02-681408-CVE-2012-3386-Makefile.in.patch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120713030324.ga5...@debian.org
Bug#681416: unblock: reprepro/4.12.4-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package reprepro:
It fixes an unclean abort when told to generate only .bz2 index files,
avoids to stop on some unterminated line marker in .diff files
and fixes a typo in the manpage.
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
unblock reprepro/4.12.4-1
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog
reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog 2012-06-24 23:13:38.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 15:35:27.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+reprepro (4.12.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * new bugfix release
+ - fix assert() triggering when requesting only .bz2 indicies
+ - fix typo in manpage (Closes: 681105)
+ - don't stop on no-newline warnings when parsing .diff.gz files
+(Closes: 676519)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:30:12 +0200
+
reprepro (4.12.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new bugfix release
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/ChangeLog reprepro_4.12.4-1/ChangeLog
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/ChangeLog 2012-06-24 22:53:10.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/ChangeLog 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2012-07-11
+ * fix bug in checking old unchanged {Packages/Sources}.bz2
+ files for existance. (Triggering even an assertion when
+ only .bz2 index files are requested).
+ * ignore diff comments about unterminated lines
+ when parsing .diff files
+
2012-06-24
* support http-method's extended 103 redirect status
* actually set REPREPRO_CONFIG_DIR in hooks as
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/NEWS reprepro_4.12.4-1/NEWS
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/NEWS 2012-06-24 22:58:01.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/NEWS 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Updates between 4.12.3 and 4.12.4:
+- fix bug when only generating .bz2 indices
+- ignore diff comments about unterminated lines when parsing .diff files
+
Updates between 4.12.2 and 4.12.3:
- actually set REPREPRO_CONFIG_DIR in hooks as documented in manpage
- support 103 redirect message from apt's http method.
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/release.c reprepro_4.12.4-1/release.c
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/release.c 2012-06-07 22:57:13.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/release.c 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -525,17 +525,20 @@
}
bool release_oldexists(struct filetorelease *file) {
- if (file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename != NULL) {
- if (file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename != NULL) {
- return
isregularfile(file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename)
-
isregularfile(file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename);
- } else {
- return
isregularfile(file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename);
+ enum indexcompression ic;
+ bool hadanything = false;
+
+ for (ic = ic_uncompressed ; ic ic_count ; ic++) {
+ char *f = file-f[ic].fullfinalfilename;
+
+ if (f != NULL) {
+ if (isregularfile(f))
+ hadanything = true;
+ else
+ return false;
}
- } else {
- assert (file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename != NULL);
- return isregularfile(file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename);
}
+ return hadanything;
}
static retvalue openfile(const char *dirofdist, struct openfile *f) {
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/docs/reprepro.1
reprepro_4.12.4-1/docs/reprepro.1
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/docs/reprepro.1 2012-06-24 22:53:10.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/docs/reprepro.1 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@
packages were still missing and now want to copy it to those architectures were
they are unlikely to break something (because a newbinary is already
available).
.TP
-.B unusedsource \fR[\fP\fIdistributions\fP\fR]\fP
+.B unusedsources \fR[\fP\fIdistributions\fP\fR]\fP
List all source packages for which no binary package build from them is found.
.TP
.B sourcemissing \fR[\fP\fIdistributions\fP\fR]\fP
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/sourceextraction.c
reprepro_4.12.4-1/sourceextraction.c
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/sourceextraction.c2012-06-07 22:57:13.0
+0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/sourceextraction.c2012-07-12 15:26:52.0
+0200
@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@
return RET_OK;
}
}
+ if (memcmp(p, \\ No newline at end of file, 27) == 0) {
+ if (!u_getline()) {
+ /* nothing found successfully */
+ *found_p = false;
+ return RET_OK;
+ }
+ }
if
Bug#681377: (Fwd) Re: Bug#681377: unblock: libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2
- Forwarded message from Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net - From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net To: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org, 681...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#681377: unblock: libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:31:24 +0200 On 2012-07-12 20:24, gregor herrmann wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libpdfbox-java. -2 fixes the (at least) important bug #680778, the only change is is an added dependency. Full debdiff attached. unblock libpdfbox-java/1:1.7.0+dfsg-2 Thanks in advance, gregor I notice it does not add a class-path change in the Jar file; is this class-path entry already present? According to the reporter, he also added a class-path for it to work. ~Niels Hello Niels, Mea culpa (again). I misled Gregor regarding whether the classpath warning should be addressed for this upload. I have prepared an update for the package - debdiff attached - but not yet uploaded. Gregor, I have pushed this commit into the packaging repo, but wanted to hold off on the upload until you had a chance to take a look at it [1]. Cheers, tony [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/libpdfbox-java.git;a=commitdiff;h=c64e01bf82430d2b0a9b8eb6d17d6c703c652c81 diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog --- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 18:23:43.0 + +++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-07-13 04:18:35.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libpdfbox-java (1:1.7.0+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/libpdfbox-java.classpath: add libfontbox-java to manifest + * debian/control: add javahelper to build-depends + + -- tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:27:17 -0700 + libpdfbox-java (1:1.7.0+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: add dependency on libfontbox-java to libpdfbox-java. diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control --- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control2012-07-12 18:23:43.0 + +++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/control2012-07-13 04:18:35.0 + @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ libcommons-beanutils-java, libcommons-logging-java, libicu4j-java, - liblucene2-java + liblucene2-java, + javahelper Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Homepage: http://pdfbox.apache.org/ Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/libpdfbox-java.git diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/libpdfbox-java.classpath libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/libpdfbox-java.classpath --- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/libpdfbox-java.classpath 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/libpdfbox-java.classpath 2012-07-13 04:18:35.0 + @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +usr/share/java/pdfbox.jar /usr/share/java/fontbox.jar diff -Nru libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/rules libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/rules --- libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/rules 2012-07-12 18:23:43.0 + +++ libpdfbox-java-1.7.0+dfsg/debian/rules 2012-07-13 04:18:35.0 + @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ dh_auto_build -- -buildfile pdfbox/build.xml pdfbox.package fontbox.package jempbox.package pdfbox.javadoc fontbox.javadoc jempbox.javadoc +override_dh_link: + dh_link -O--buildsystem=ant + jh_classpath + override_dh_installchangelogs: dh_installchangelogs $(CURDIR)/RELEASE-NOTES.txt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock automake1.11, automake1.10, automake1.9, automake1.7
On 13.07.2012 03:24, Eric Dorland wrote: I've updated all of the automake packages in the subject to fix CVE-2012-3386. It looks like an update to automake1.4 will not be necessary but I'm awaiting confirmation and will respond back if it is. It would be good for these (admittedly mild) fixes to make it into Wheezy so please unblock these packages. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a25e6dd407a69449862e8b0b500...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#681405: marked as done (unblock: tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:18:59 +0100 with message-id 3d9dc418ef2928bec1480951b2f91...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#681405: unblock: tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #681405, regarding unblock: tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 681405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package tor. Tor's new upstream verison 0.2.3.19-rc fixes a long-standing bug in how Tor maintains its window (as in similar to TCP-windows) values. AIUI this bug could be responsible for connections or circuits being dropped in cases where the values go out of sync between peers. Additionally, this release reverts to an older, saner geoip database, fixes a windows-only compilation issue, and fixes a minor port range parsing issue. I think we should use 0.2.3.19-rc over .18 in our next release. unblock tor/0.2.3.19-rc-1 Thanks, weasel ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 12.07.2012 22:12, Peter Palfrader wrote: Please unblock package tor. Tor's new upstream verison 0.2.3.19-rc fixes a long-standing bug in how Tor maintains its window (as in similar to TCP-windows) values. AIUI this bug could be responsible for connections or circuits being dropped in cases where the values go out of sync between peers. Additionally, this release reverts to an older, saner geoip database, fixes a windows-only compilation issue, and fixes a minor port range parsing issue. I think we should use 0.2.3.19-rc over .18 in our next release. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#681416: marked as done (unblock: reprepro/4.12.4-1)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:16:07 +0100
with message-id ee77c8300452717ac9717811b9a60...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681416: unblock: reprepro/4.12.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681416,
regarding unblock: reprepro/4.12.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681416: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681416
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package reprepro:
It fixes an unclean abort when told to generate only .bz2 index files,
avoids to stop on some unterminated line marker in .diff files
and fixes a typo in the manpage.
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
unblock reprepro/4.12.4-1
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog
reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog 2012-06-24 23:13:38.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog 2012-07-12 15:35:27.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+reprepro (4.12.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * new bugfix release
+ - fix assert() triggering when requesting only .bz2 indicies
+ - fix typo in manpage (Closes: 681105)
+ - don't stop on no-newline warnings when parsing .diff.gz files
+(Closes: 676519)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:30:12 +0200
+
reprepro (4.12.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new bugfix release
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/ChangeLog reprepro_4.12.4-1/ChangeLog
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/ChangeLog 2012-06-24 22:53:10.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/ChangeLog 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2012-07-11
+ * fix bug in checking old unchanged {Packages/Sources}.bz2
+ files for existance. (Triggering even an assertion when
+ only .bz2 index files are requested).
+ * ignore diff comments about unterminated lines
+ when parsing .diff files
+
2012-06-24
* support http-method's extended 103 redirect status
* actually set REPREPRO_CONFIG_DIR in hooks as
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/NEWS reprepro_4.12.4-1/NEWS
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/NEWS 2012-06-24 22:58:01.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/NEWS 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Updates between 4.12.3 and 4.12.4:
+- fix bug when only generating .bz2 indices
+- ignore diff comments about unterminated lines when parsing .diff files
+
Updates between 4.12.2 and 4.12.3:
- actually set REPREPRO_CONFIG_DIR in hooks as documented in manpage
- support 103 redirect message from apt's http method.
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/release.c reprepro_4.12.4-1/release.c
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/release.c 2012-06-07 22:57:13.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/release.c 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -525,17 +525,20 @@
}
bool release_oldexists(struct filetorelease *file) {
- if (file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename != NULL) {
- if (file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename != NULL) {
- return
isregularfile(file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename)
-
isregularfile(file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename);
- } else {
- return
isregularfile(file-f[ic_uncompressed].fullfinalfilename);
+ enum indexcompression ic;
+ bool hadanything = false;
+
+ for (ic = ic_uncompressed ; ic ic_count ; ic++) {
+ char *f = file-f[ic].fullfinalfilename;
+
+ if (f != NULL) {
+ if (isregularfile(f))
+ hadanything = true;
+ else
+ return false;
}
- } else {
- assert (file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename != NULL);
- return isregularfile(file-f[ic_gzip].fullfinalfilename);
}
+ return hadanything;
}
static retvalue openfile(const char *dirofdist, struct openfile *f) {
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/docs/reprepro.1
reprepro_4.12.4-1/docs/reprepro.1
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/docs/reprepro.1 2012-06-24 22:53:10.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/docs/reprepro.1 2012-07-12 15:26:52.0 +0200
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@
packages were still missing and now want to copy it to those architectures were
they are unlikely to break something (because a newbinary is already
available).
.TP
-.B unusedsource \fR[\fP\fIdistributions\fP\fR]\fP
+.B unusedsources \fR[\fP\fIdistributions\fP\fR]\fP
List
Freeze exception for python-distutils-extra 2.34-1
Hello release team, please consider a freeze exception for http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-distutils-extra/news/20120709T093222Z.html python-distutils-extra (2.34-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Martin Pitt ] * debian/rules: Run Python3 tests under C locale, to expose more unicode errors. * auto.py: Fix *.ui detection to be robust for non-ASCII files. (LP: #1017468) [ Didier Roche ] * auto.py: Fix a regression with python2 if files have some utf-8 directives (LP: #1021969) The first change http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~python-distutils-extra-hackers/python-distutils-extra/debian/revision/292 just makes the test suite stricter, and has no impact on runtime behaviour whatsoever. The second change (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1017468) http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~python-distutils-extra-hackers/python-distutils-extra/debian/revision/293 fixes a crash when encountering non-ASCII *.ui files. The crash is reproduced by the changed tests, and the tests ensure that it's still working. The third change (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1021969) http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~python-distutils-extra-hackers/python-distutils-extra/debian/revision/295 reverts a change from 2.33 which was necessary for Python 3, but broke Python 2, so it now conditionalizes the fix from 2.33 for Python 3 only. Again, the added test reproduces the problem (the tests are run for both Python 2 and 3), and ensures that the functionality is still working. Thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120713054253.gd2...@piware.de
Is it possible to upload texmacs?
Dear Release Managers, I got a bug #666482 and it seems texmacs could be a block for removal of rsvg. On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:39:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Would be great to have a fixed package in wheezy. I'm not sure how this is important but if you will allow me to upload a fixed version, I'm ready to do so. Its changelog is as follows: texmacs (1:1.0.7.15-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix a bug on removal of rsvg. (Closes: #666482) -- Atsuhito KOHDA ko...@debian.org Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:42:28 +0900 and modifies only rsvg - rsvg-convert in a file init-images.scm Thanks for your work. Best regards, 2012-7-13(Fri) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda kohda AT debian.org Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120713.144532.344855258.ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp
Re: asterisk
On 11/07/12 23:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote: On 11/07/12 21:31, Nicholas Bamber wrote: On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished building asterisk should be built again. You need to give more details for such requests. What architectures are affected? What was the mistake, and how can we check if other packages were also affected? Cheers, Julien I think it was just asterisk. But to be sure can we grep the build logs? Julien, The following are the only affected for asterisk: asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_i386.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_mipsel.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_s390.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_s390x.log The full list of affected packages/arches is: asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_i386.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_mipsel.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_s390.log asterisk_1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1_s390x.log gambas3_3.1.1-2+b1_amd64.log gambas3_3.1.1-2+b1_mips.log gambas3_3.1.1-2+b1_s390.log mysql-ocaml_1.1.1-1_armel.log mysql-ocaml_1.1.1-1_mips.log -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fffb8ee.7040...@periapt.co.uk
