Bug#690357: unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52

2012-10-13 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package hddtemp

This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.

Even though this is not a release critical bug per se, the fix is very
simple and the impact of the bug is quite wide (for instance, as the
said debconf question is less translated than D-I, it brings
untranslated material in the middle of fully localized installs).

unblock hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121013072645.32497.25590.report...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org



Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
> 
>  Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
>  As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll
>  terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move forward to 17.0.x. And its date
>  seems to be around Wheezy release. It means Iceweasel/Icedove will be
>  EOL before/after soon Wheezy release.
> 
>  Will Iceweasel/Icedove be upgrade to 17.0.x after 10.0.x EOL?

No. It has too many reverse dependencies for this to be possible, even
if it were allowed (Debian doesn't usually bump software versions on a
stable release)

That being said, 17 is going to be released in 6 weeks, so presumably,
one would think it's possible to push it for wheezy. But really, it's
not. First, because of the same reverse dependencies. I doubt many of
them would survive the version bump. Another problem is that it won't
reach a releaseable state in a short time frame. Look at the build logs
of iceweasel 16:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=iceweasel&suite=experimental
Besides actual code problems on kfreebsd, it crashes on armel, ia64,
powerpc, s390, and sparc. 17 is likely to break in other ways (for
instance, ia64 just broke on 16, it was ok on 15). There are also a lot
of failures in the test suites that need to be addressed (there are also
such failures on 10, but there are less of them)

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121013074108.gb9...@glandium.org



Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
> > 
> >  Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
> >  As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll
> >  terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move forward to 17.0.x. And its date
> >  seems to be around Wheezy release. It means Iceweasel/Icedove will be
> >  EOL before/after soon Wheezy release.
> > 
> >  Will Iceweasel/Icedove be upgrade to 17.0.x after 10.0.x EOL?
> 
> No. It has too many reverse dependencies for this to be possible, even
> if it were allowed (Debian doesn't usually bump software versions on a
> stable release)
> 
> That being said, 17 is going to be released in 6 weeks, so presumably,
> one would think it's possible to push it for wheezy. But really, it's
> not. First, because of the same reverse dependencies. I doubt many of
> them would survive the version bump. Another problem is that it won't
> reach a releaseable state in a short time frame. Look at the build logs
> of iceweasel 16:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=iceweasel&suite=experimental
> Besides actual code problems on kfreebsd, it crashes on armel, ia64,
> powerpc, s390, and sparc. 17 is likely to break in other ways (for
> instance, ia64 just broke on 16, it was ok on 15). There are also a lot
> of failures in the test suites that need to be addressed (there are also
> such failures on 10, but there are less of them)

That being said, I think we should actively advise people to use
backports for iceweasel. Making that statement part of the release notes
might be a good idea. Possibly with a working pinning setup.

Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an
idea.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121013074348.gc9...@glandium.org



Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Michael Biebl
On 13.10.2012 09:43, Mike Hommey wrote:

> That being said, I think we should actively advise people to use
> backports for iceweasel. Making that statement part of the release notes
> might be a good idea. Possibly with a working pinning setup.
> 
> Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
> iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
> automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an
> idea.

Sounds interesting. I'd love to see ESR 17 (or any later ESR version)
easily accessible in wheezy.
Maybe d-i could even generate a proper backports configuration in
sources.list but commented out by default?

Seeing that backports are now an official part of the archive and
promoted more actively, that would make sense imo.

Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#683730: unblock: cups/1.5.3-2+wheezy0

2012-10-13 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le vendredi, 12 octobre 2012 13.17:30, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > What's your take there ? The above modprobe is currently in unstable but
> > we can either a) drop it completely; b) make it modprobe -b.
> 
> Either works for me, with a slight preference for option a.

Uploaded, with b), as 1.5.3-2.3 

Cheers,

OdyX


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#690357: marked as done (unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:34:19 +0100
with message-id <30e50ed778fd1b63c8df254889e73...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690357: unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
has caused the Debian Bug report #690357,
regarding unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package hddtemp

This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.

Even though this is not a release critical bug per se, the fix is very
simple and the impact of the bug is quite wide (for instance, as the
said debconf question is less translated than D-I, it brings
untranslated material in the middle of fully localized installs).

unblock hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 13.10.2012 08:26, Christian Perrier wrote:

Please unblock package hddtemp

This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.

Even though this is not a release critical bug per se, the fix is 
very

simple and the impact of the bug is quite wide (for instance, as the
said debconf question is less translated than D-I, it brings
untranslated material in the middle of fully localized installs).


It also includes an undocumented change to debian/rules to use 
dpkg-buildflags. :-(


Meh; unblocked.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#690348: marked as done (unblock: gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:37:17 +0100
with message-id <3f0faa8f66149084f02f2050197b1...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690348: unblock: gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690348,
regarding unblock: gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package gtkmm3.0

gtkmm3.0 3.4.2 is a new upstream release but it's only bug fixes and
documentation tweaks.

Debian wise the changes include the switch to xz (gtkmm is in the set
of GNOME packages via gnome-system-monitor) and a small fix which
excludes the doxygen tags files from being compressed, since doxygen
can't handle those and thus creates broken cross references.

I've split the debian specific changes from the upstream specific
changes into two separate debdiffs.
>From the upstream debdiff I excluded the usual autotools generated
jitter, the differences in the generated doc files caused by upstream
using a newer doxygen version and I've also excluded an upstream commit
[1] which basically is a massive white space cleanup but has no
functional changes.

The package has been in unstable for 2 weeks without a bug report.

Cheers,
Michael


unblock gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1

[1]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/commit/?h=gtkmm-3-4&id=13e15723b01f5792bbb7d2b8a0e5b3da5b82b8a6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(Revision 35827)
+++ debian/changelog	(Revision 35844)
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-gtkmm3.0 (3.4.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+gtkmm3.0 (3.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream stable release.
+  * Don't compress doxygen tag files since doxygen can't handle those.
   * Enable xz compression for binary packages.
 
- -- Michael Biebl   Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:16:55 +0200
+ -- Michael Biebl   Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:36:51 +0200
 
 gtkmm3.0 (3.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
Index: debian/rules
===
--- debian/rules	(Revision 35827)
+++ debian/rules	(Revision 35844)
@@ -19,5 +19,8 @@
 DEB_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_libgtkmm-3-doc = examples
 DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_$(SHARED_PKG) += -V"$(SHARED_PKG) (>= $(SHVER))"
 
-# Use xz compression.
+# Don't compress doxygen tag files
+DEB_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE = .tag
+
+# Use xz compression
 DEB_DH_BUILDDEB_ARGS ?= -- -Zxz
 ChangeLog|   19 +++
 NEWS |4 
 configure.ac |2 +-
 gtk/src/applicationwindow.hg |   40 +++-
 gtk/src/fontselection.hg |2 +-
 gtk/src/iconview.hg  |2 --
 gtk/src/targetlist.hg|2 +-
 gtk/src/textview.hg  |2 +-
 gtk/src/treemodelfilter.hg   |4 +++-
 9 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index a10f42e..21204a8 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+3.4.2:
+
+2012-09-27  Murray Cumming  
+
+ApplicationWindow: Add class documentation.
+
+* gtk/src/applicationwindow.hg: Add class overview documentation
+	based on the GTK+ documentation.
+
+2012-09-18  Kjell Ahlstedt  
+
+	Improve the use of _IGNORE.
+
+	* gtk/src/fontselection.hg:
+	* gtk/src/targetlist.hg:
+	* gtk/src/textview.hg: Correct an _IGNORE.
+	* gtk/src/iconview.hg: Remove _IGNORE(gtk_tree_view_get_tooltip_context).
+	* gtk/src/treemodelfilter.hg: Remove _IGNORE(gtk_tree_model_filter_new).
+
 3.4.1:
 
 2012-08-29  Kjell Ahlstedt  
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index ad60673..1f55533 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+3.4.2 (stable):
+
+* Minor documentation improvements.
+
 3.4.1 (stable):
 
 Gtk:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a61c74c..06d6c40 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 ## You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
 ## along with this library.  If not, see .
 
-AC_INIT([gtkmm], [3.4.1],
+AC_INIT([gtkmm], [3.4.2],
 [http:/

Bug#689698: unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 05.10.2012 10:34, Andreas Henriksson wrote:

Please unblock packages in the gupnp stack

The upstream stable series bugfix updates has been sitting in
unstable for over a month now without a single bug reported.
The updates improves interopability with DLNA devices on
the market and is for some users essential fixes.


What's the rationale behind the debhelper compat bumps in gupnp-vala 
and gssdp? They're not really great changes to be making during a freeze 
unless there's some specific reason for it (and even then there's often 
a more suitable way of solving the issue).


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ea2360bc2a696c574ae36056e440c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#689698: unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689698 [release.debian.org] unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689698.135012750614037.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690196: Bug #690196: unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.6.1-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 11.10.2012 03:49, Nathan Handler wrote:

Please unblock package udj-desktop-client

udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-2 is currently in testing. Upstream has
released a new API and prepared an updated version of 
udj-desktop-client
to use this new API. They are currently working on phasing out 
support
for the old API (that is used by 0.5.1-2). This means that if we do 
not

update the version in testing to 0.6.1-1, the applicatin will become
unusable most likely shortly after the erlease of wheezy. If this


It looks like this mail never made it to the list, possibly because of 
the diff size.


request is not approved, I will probably file a removal request to 
have

udj-desktop-client removed from testing (since it will soon become
unusable). The diff for this upload is (unfortunately) quite large. 
This
is partially due to it containing some code for windows/mac that is 
not
actually used in Debina. You can find the full debdiff between 
0.5.1-2

(currently in testing) and 0.6.1-1 (new release) attached.


Could we possibly have a filtered version of the diff which doesn't 
include the Windows / Mac-specific changes?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/59b0acec08523bc989ff65d5f06d9...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Bug #690196: unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.6.1-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690196 [release.debian.org] unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.6.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
690196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b690196.135012819718372.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 689147

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 689147 + moreinfo
Bug #689147 [release.debian.org] unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135012934025599.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690146: marked as done (unblock: typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:05:27 +0100
with message-id <2d7da2e17c22abaa1b3e5e4b1fb61...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690146: unblock: typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690146,
regarding unblock: typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package typo3-src

The package in testing has an important bug, that prevents the administrator
of a newly installed TYPO3 installation to login into the backend of the CMS.
This only affects new installations and is caused by wrong file permissions
of the main config file (localconf.php) (not readable by the www-data user)
and some missing TYPO3 extensions.
The new version fixes this.

debdiff:

gawain@laptop:build-area$ debdiff typo3-src_4.5.19+dfsg1-1.dsc 
typo3-src_4.5.19+dfsg1-2.dsc
diff -Nru typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/changelog 
typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2012-08-18 07:23:37.0 
+0200
+++ typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2012-10-10 15:22:46.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+typo3-src (4.5.19+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Added rsaauth and saltedpasswords to the list of installed extensions and
+change owner and permissions of generated localconf.php in postinst.
+(Closes: 689329)
+
+ -- Christian Welzel   Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:09:57 +0200
+
 typo3-src (4.5.19+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high

   * New upstream release:
diff -Nru typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/patches/dummy-defaults.patch 
typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/patches/dummy-defaults.patch
--- typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/patches/dummy-defaults.patch  2012-08-18 
07:23:37.0 +0200
+++ typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/patches/dummy-defaults.patch  2012-10-10 
15:22:46.0 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  $TYPO3_CONF_VARS['BE']['installToolPassword'] = 
'bacb98acf97e0b6112b1d1b650b84971';
  
 -$TYPO3_CONF_VARS['EXT']['extList'] = 
'info,perm,func,filelist,about,version,tsconfig_help,context_help,extra_page_cm_options,impexp,sys_note,tstemplate,tstemplate_ceditor,tstemplate_info,tstemplate_objbrowser,tstemplate_analyzer,func_wizards,wizard_crpages,wizard_sortpages,lowlevel,install,belog,beuser,aboutmodules,setup,taskcenter,info_pagetsconfig,viewpage,rtehtmlarea,css_styled_content,t3skin,t3editor,reports,felogin';
-+$TYPO3_CONF_VARS['EXT']['extList'] = 
'cms,lang,sv,em,fal,list,tsconfig_help,context_help,extra_page_cm_options,impexp,sys_note,tstemplate,tstemplate_ceditor,tstemplate_info,tstemplate_objbrowser,tstemplate_analyzer,func_wizards,wizard_crpages,wizard_sortpages,lowlevel,install,belog,beuser,aboutmodules,setup,taskcenter,info_pagetsconfig,viewpage,rtehtmlarea,css_styled_content,t3skin,t3editor,reports,info,perm,func,filelist,about,cshmanual,opendocs,recycler,scheduler,linkvalidator,pagetree';
++$TYPO3_CONF_VARS['EXT']['extList'] = 
'cms,lang,sv,em,fal,list,tsconfig_help,context_help,extra_page_cm_options,impexp,sys_note,tstemplate,tstemplate_ceditor,tstemplate_info,tstemplate_objbrowser,tstemplate_analyzer,func_wizards,wizard_crpages,wizard_sortpages,lowlevel,install,belog,beuser,aboutmodules,setup,taskcenter,info_pagetsconfig,viewpage,rtehtmlarea,css_styled_content,t3skin,t3editor,reports,info,perm,func,filelist,about,cshmanual,opendocs,recycler,scheduler,linkvalidator,pagetree,rsaauth,saltedpasswords';
  
  $typo_db_extTableDef_script = 'extTables.php';
  
diff -Nru typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/typo3-dummy.postinst 
typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/typo3-dummy.postinst
--- typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/typo3-dummy.postinst  2012-08-18 
07:23:37.0 +0200
+++ typo3-src-4.5.19+dfsg1/debian/typo3-dummy.postinst  2012-10-10 
15:22:46.0 +0200
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
 # genarate a random encryption key and set in into localconf.php
 KEY=$(tr -cd '[:alnum:]' < /dev/urandom | fold -w 96 | head -n 1)
 sed -i 's/###ENCKEY###/'$KEY'/g' /etc/typo3-dummy/localconf.php
+chown www-data:www-data /etc/typo3-dummy/localconf.php
+chmod 0600 /etc/typo3-dummy/localconf.php
 fi
 
 # do database handling
gawain@laptop:build-area$




unblock typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 

Bug#689674: unblock: mediathekview/3.0.0-1

2012-10-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Philipp,

On Sat, 13. Oct 13:55 Philipp Kern  wrote:
> I just added a removal hint for the following reason:
> 
> # 20121013
> # The version in wheezy is unusable (#681680), the new version's diff is too
> # huge. It should instead be shipped via backports and be kept up-to-date
> # there.
> remove mediathekview/2.4.0-4

Ok, that's not surprising. The idea with backports sounds reasonable.

> Futhermore the diff really is too large to consider at this point of the
> freeze, I'm sorry. Also such such large diffs (you sent it
> uncompressed!) do not make it to our mailing list. Hence I was not aware
> of the unblock request until after I added the hint.

Sorry. Good point. I will be more careful in the future.

Regards,
Markus Koschany


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690042: marked as done (unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-2)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:11:38 +0100
with message-id <3373c7814569e823f1c0598020ae0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690042: unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690042,
regarding unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ardour

The upload fixes #690001, a follow-up bug to #684610. 1:2.8.14-1 was
supposed to fix LV2 GUIs, but the libsuil-dev build dependency was
missing. The -2 upload now adds this dependency.

unblock ardour/1:2.8.14-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.6.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru ardour-2.8.14/debian/changelog ardour-2.8.14/debian/changelog
--- ardour-2.8.14/debian/changelog	2012-08-11 21:08:10.0 +0200
+++ ardour-2.8.14/debian/changelog	2012-10-09 13:56:40.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ardour (1:2.8.14-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Bump policy to 3.9.4
+  * Build-depend on libsuil-dev to enable LV2 GUIs (Closes: #690001)
+
+ -- Adrian Knoth   Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:55:59 +0200
+
 ardour (1:2.8.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Imported Upstream version 2.8.14 (Closes: #684610)
diff -Nru ardour-2.8.14/debian/control ardour-2.8.14/debian/control
--- ardour-2.8.14/debian/control	2012-06-25 17:14:41.0 +0200
+++ ardour-2.8.14/debian/control	2012-10-09 13:54:11.0 +0200
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
  Free Ekanayaka ,
  Jaromír Mikeš ,
  Jonas Smedegaard 
-Build-Depends: autotools-dev,
- cdbs (>= 0.4.72~),
+Build-Depends: cdbs,
+ autotools-dev,
  devscripts,
  debhelper,
  dh-buildinfo,
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
  libaubio-dev,
  libjack-dev,
  liblo-dev,
+ libsuil-dev,
  libsamplerate0-dev,
  libslv2-dev (>= 0.6.6-7),
  libsndfile1-dev,
@@ -44,7 +45,7 @@
  lv2-dev,
  liblilv-dev,
  vamp-plugin-sdk (>=2.1)
-Standards-Version: 3.9.3
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
 Homepage: http://www.ardour.org/
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/ardour.git
diff -Nru ardour-2.8.14/debian/control.in ardour-2.8.14/debian/control.in
--- ardour-2.8.14/debian/control.in	2012-06-25 16:48:03.0 +0200
+++ ardour-2.8.14/debian/control.in	2012-10-09 13:53:11.0 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  Jaromír Mikeš ,
  Jonas Smedegaard 
 Build-Depends: @cdbs@
-Standards-Version: 3.9.3
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
 Homepage: http://www.ardour.org/
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/ardour.git
diff -Nru ardour-2.8.14/debian/rules ardour-2.8.14/debian/rules
--- ardour-2.8.14/debian/rules	2012-06-25 17:20:18.0 +0200
+++ ardour-2.8.14/debian/rules	2012-10-09 13:48:16.0 +0200
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@
 	  libaubio-dev,\
 	  libjack-dev,\
 	  liblo-dev,\
+	  libsuil-dev,\
 	  libsamplerate0-dev,\
 	  libslv2-dev (>= 0.6.6-7),\
 	  libsndfile1-dev,\
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 09.10.2012 13:33, Adrian Knoth wrote:

Please unblock package ardour

The upload fixes #690001, a follow-up bug to #684610. 1:2.8.14-1 was
supposed to fix LV2 GUIs, but the libsuil-dev build dependency was
missing. The -2 upload now adds this dependency.


It also drops the version constraint from a build-dependency without 
documenting it and updates Standards-Version to 3.9.4 when the policy 
maintainers specifically asked for that *not* to be done. Unblocked, but 
please don't do that for any future unblocks.


Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#681717: unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 16:29:21 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Julien Cristau  wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 20:34:08 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> So, the -dbg issue has to do with way in which debug files are
> >> compared betwen different arch m-a:same packages.  At compat level 9
> >> hashes of the paths are used vs. actual file contents at lower compt
> >> levels.  Consequently, debug packages cannot be m-a:same at lower
> >> compat levels.
> >>
> > debug packages for a multiarch library have different paths on each
> > arch.  The bug here IMO is to include debug symbols for the tools in
> > libopenjpeg2-dbg.
> 
> Yes, of course that would work, but what about when someone wants to
> debug one of the tools.  We would need a separate package for that,
> but creating a new debug package just for the tools is an intrusive
> change at this point.
> 
Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging
the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug
version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug).  So I don't
think this is a problem.

> So, since compat 9 is off the table, I think it best to just not
> multiarch the debug package, which lets the user select the right
> package for the arch that they're interested in debugging.
> 
*shrug*

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:

> Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
> iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
> automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an
> idea.
> 
What does that even mean?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690134: unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 10.10.2012 11:42, xavier wrote:

Please unblock package polyorb

There is a bug against libpolyorb3 (#688299) in version 
2.8~20110207-4.
Version 2.8~20110207-5 remove the diversion and the manpage that was 
diverted

and this solve the bug.


For the record, it looks like the solution has a couple of issues. 
Please get back to us once that's resolved.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/e9757bae8768e75c8ef0a6da09c70...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#690134: unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690134 [release.debian.org] unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
690134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b690134.13501312666424.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#686604: unblock (pre-approval): ipython 0.13.1

2012-10-13 Thread Julian Taylor
On 10/11/2012 08:20 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep  3, 2012 at 20:01:12 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> ipython upstream is going to release a bugfix only release soon which
>> fixes a couple important and many minor bugs. I would like to have this
>> release in wheezy if you allow it.
>> Attached a debdiff of the current 0.13.1 branch which is likely not
>> going change much until the release.
>>
> Looks fine to me.
> 
> [...]
>> When the final release is done I will ping you again with the changes
>> since this request.
>>
> I take it this hasn't happened yet?
> 
> Cheers,
> Julien
> 

not yet but the plan is this or next weekend.
attached the change debdiff and associated upstream git log. No major
changes upstream, just a matplotlib 1.2 compatibility addition, a
ipcluster bugfix and a windows only fix.
debian package gained a build dependency on libc-bin >= 2.13-1~ for the
C.UTF-8 locale used in tests.
diff -Nru ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/changelog 
ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/changelog
--- ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/changelog2012-09-03 19:42:05.0 
+0200
+++ ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/changelog2012-10-13 14:20:03.00000 
+0200
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
-ipython (0.13.1~20120903-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ipython (0.13.1~20121013-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 
-  * snapshot of 0.13.1 branch, 59eda2908a
+  * snapshot of 0.13.1 branch, 41d1bc18429
   * refresh patches, drop applied except-shadows-builtin-fix.patch
   * depend on libjs-jquery >= 1.7 (Closes: #685986)
   * drop build depends on dh-linktree and libjs-jquery-ui (Closes: #685985)
 - needs to be added again when we can use the packaged jquery-ui
   * drop LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 from build and install, not required anymore
   * override dh_python[23] to work around #683108
+  * build depend on libc-bin (>= 2.13-1~) for C.UTF-8 locale used in tests
 
- -- Julian Taylor   Sat, 01 Sep 2012 13:56:37 
+0200
+ -- Julian Taylor   Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:41:20 
+0200
 
 ipython (0.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
diff -Nru ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/control 
ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/control
--- ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/control  2012-09-03 19:42:05.0 
+0200
+++ ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/control  2012-10-13 14:20:03.0 
+0200
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Julian Taylor 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.3.13)
 Build-Depends-Indep: graphviz,
+ libc-bin (>= 2.13-1~),
  python-all (>= 2.6.6-3~),
  python-argparse,
  python-configobj,
diff -Nru ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/ipython-notebook-common.install 
ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/ipython-notebook-common.install
--- ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/ipython-notebook-common.install  
2012-09-03 19:42:05.0 +0200
+++ ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/ipython-notebook-common.install  
2012-10-13 14:20:03.0 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-IPython/frontend/html/notebook/static usr/share/ipython/notebook
 IPython/external/js usr/share/ipython/notebook
+IPython/frontend/html/notebook/static usr/share/ipython/notebook
diff -Nru ipython-0.13.1~20120903/docs/source/parallel/parallel_task.txt 
ipython-0.13.1~20121013/docs/source/parallel/parallel_task.txt
--- ipython-0.13.1~20120903/docs/source/parallel/parallel_task.txt  
2012-09-03 19:29:09.0 +0200
+++ ipython-0.13.1~20121013/docs/source/parallel/parallel_task.txt  
2012-10-12 01:09:17.0 +0200
@@ -386,19 +386,20 @@
 Greedy Assignment
 -
 
-Tasks are assigned greedily as they are submitted. If their dependencies are
+Tasks can be assigned greedily as they are submitted. If their dependencies are
 met, they will be assigned to an engine right away, and multiple tasks can be
 assigned to an engine at a given time. This limit is set with the
-``TaskScheduler.hwm`` (high water mark) configurable:
+``TaskScheduler.hwm`` (high water mark) configurable in your
+:file:`ipcontroller_config.py` config file, with:
 
 .. sourcecode:: python
 
 # the most common choices are:
-c.TaskSheduler.hwm = 0 # (minimal latency, default in IPython ≤ 0.12)
+c.TaskSheduler.hwm = 0 # (minimal latency, default in IPython < 0.13)
 # or
-c.TaskScheduler.hwm = 1 # (most-informed balancing, default in > 0.12)
+c.TaskScheduler.hwm = 1 # (most-informed balancing, default in ≥ 0.13)
 
-In IPython ≤ 0.12,the default is 0, or no-limit. That is, there is no limit to 
the number of
+In IPython < 0.13, the default is 0, or no-limit. That is, there is no limit 
to the number of
 tasks that can be outstanding on a given engine. This greatly benefits the
 latency of execution, because network traffic can be hidden behind computation.
 However, this means that workload is assigned without knowledge of how long
@@ -406,10 +407,10 @@
 submitting a collection

Re: Bug#689578: sysklogd modifies /etc/syslog.conf with helper script

2012-10-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Biebl dixit:

>A better approach imho would be to simply remove sysklogd from the
>archive.

Please no!

//mirabilos (still ill)
-- 
 Dann mach ich git annex copy --to shore und fertig ist das
 das ist ja viel cooler als ownCloud ...
 sag ich doch
 ja wieso stimmt das denn immer was du sagst ...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1210131304320.4...@herc.mirbsd.org



Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:

Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc

Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, 
gcj

and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf.


Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious 
connection with the package?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/73216d13763a66cb63176d89fcd82...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689726 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689726.135013821517201.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#689727: unblock: gcc-4.7-doc/4.7.2-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 05.10.2012 16:55, Guo Yixuan wrote:

Please unblock package gcc-4.7-doc

GCC needs updated documents, but it can only be distributed in 
non-free,

not in src:gcc-4.7. So I wish this package to go into wheezy. This
package contains document for gcc-4.7, with all Debian patches in
gcc-4.7: 4.7.2-2.


Same question as for gcc-4.6-doc - why is the package's Maintainer 
field set to someone who has no obvious connection with the package?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/a8ebecb1b43bf70a13f506af62174...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#689727: unblock: gcc-4.7-doc/4.7.2-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689727 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.7-doc/4.7.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689727.135013826917360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 12.10.2012 01:52, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:

Please unblock package file-mmagic

Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it.
The follwing is diff (really small changes):
http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286&r2=279


The upstream diff for that particular fix might be really small and 
targeted. What you're asking us to unblock is quite a bit more than 
that.


Aside from the upstream changes including more changes, to do with 
"content hooks" and some others, the packaging also includes a change to 
short-form dh and source format 3.0 (quilt); neither of those are 
appropriate things to be doing during a freeze (at least for packages 
you expect to transition).


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/fd9ee5b6017285f39c597fac54713...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690281 [release.debian.org] unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
690281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b690281.13501408102148.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690074: wpa will not migrate, upload to tpu?

2012-10-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi,

wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
unstable and hence cannot migrate.

One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but the feasibility of this I
leave up to the release team.

The other solution is an upload to tpu; I've just taken all changes from
unstable since they were already unblocked and hence deemed acceptable for
wheeze. See attached debdiff. If this is the preferred solution, let me
know so I can actually upload.


Cheers,
Thijsdiff -Nru wpa-1.0/debian/changelog wpa-1.0/debian/changelog
--- wpa-1.0/debian/changelog	2012-05-13 20:39:47.0 +
+++ wpa-1.0/debian/changelog	2012-10-13 14:58:25.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+wpa (1.0-2+wheezy1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Rebuild for wheezy.
+
+  [ Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ]
+  * ship forgotten README-P2P.
+  * revert to GNU readline for wpa_cli, instead of using the internal readline
+implementation added in wpa 1~. Prefer libreadline-gplv2-dev, because libnl
+is GPL-2 (only) - switching back to the internal readline implementation is
+targeted for wheezy+1 (Closes: #677993, #678077).
+  * Fix DoS via specially crafted EAP-TLS messages with longer message
+length than TLS data length (CVE-2012-4445, DSA 2557-1, Closes: #689990).
+
+ -- Thijs Kinkhorst   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:48:08 +
+
 wpa (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Really enable hardened build flags, thanks Simon Ruderich
diff -Nru wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/kfreebsd wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/kfreebsd
--- wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/kfreebsd	2012-04-13 23:13:49.0 +
+++ wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/kfreebsd	2012-10-08 16:32:27.0 +
@@ -238,11 +238,11 @@
 # When building a wpa_cli binary for distribution, please note that these
 # libraries are licensed under GPL and as such, BSD license may not apply for
 # the resulting binary.
-#CONFIG_READLINE=y
+CONFIG_READLINE=y
 
 # Include internal line edit mode in wpa_cli. This can be used as a replacement
 # for GNU Readline to provide limited command line editing and history support.
-CONFIG_WPA_CLI_EDIT=y
+#CONFIG_WPA_CLI_EDIT=y
 
 # Remove debugging code that is printing out debug message to stdout.
 # This can be used to reduce the size of the wpa_supplicant considerably
diff -Nru wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/linux wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/linux
--- wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/linux	2012-04-13 23:13:49.0 +
+++ wpa-1.0/debian/config/wpasupplicant/linux	2012-10-08 16:32:27.0 +
@@ -237,11 +237,11 @@
 # When building a wpa_cli binary for distribution, please note that these
 # libraries are licensed under GPL and as such, BSD license may not apply for
 # the resulting binary.
-#CONFIG_READLINE=y
+CONFIG_READLINE=y
 
 # Include internal line edit mode in wpa_cli. This can be used as a replacement
 # for GNU Readline to provide limited command line editing and history support.
-CONFIG_WPA_CLI_EDIT=y
+#CONFIG_WPA_CLI_EDIT=y
 
 # Remove debugging code that is printing out debug message to stdout.
 # This can be used to reduce the size of the wpa_supplicant considerably
diff -Nru wpa-1.0/debian/control wpa-1.0/debian/control
--- wpa-1.0/debian/control	2012-04-14 00:57:03.0 +
+++ wpa-1.0/debian/control	2012-06-21 22:42:59.0 +
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  libnl-genl-3-dev (>= 3.2.3-2~) [linux-any],
  libpcap-dev [kfreebsd-any],
  libbsd-dev [kfreebsd-any],
+ libreadline-gplv2-dev,
  pkg-config,
  qt4-qmake,
  docbook-to-man,
diff -Nru wpa-1.0/debian/patches/EAP-TLS-server_fix-TLS-Message-length-validation.patch wpa-1.0/debian/patches/EAP-TLS-server_fix-TLS-Message-length-validation.patch
--- wpa-1.0/debian/patches/EAP-TLS-server_fix-TLS-Message-length-validation.patch	1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ wpa-1.0/debian/patches/EAP-TLS-server_fix-TLS-Message-length-validation.patch	2012-10-08 15:34:24.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: Jouni Malinen 
+Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 17:06:29 + (+0300)
+Subject: EAP-TLS server: Fix TLS Message Length validation
+X-Git-Url: http://w1.fi/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=hostap.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=586c446e0ff42ae00315b014924ec669023bd8de
+
+EAP-TLS server: Fix TLS Message Length validation
+
+EAP-TLS/PEAP/TTLS/FAST server implementation did not validate TLS
+Message Length value properly and could end up trying to store more
+information into the message buffer than the allocated size if the first
+fragment is longer than the indicated size. This could result in hostapd
+process terminating in wpabuf length validation. Fix this by rejecting
+messages that have invalid TLS Message Length value.
+
+This would affect cases that use the internal EAP authentication server
+in hostapd either directly with IEEE 802.1X or when using hostapd as a
+RADIUS authentication server and when receiving an incorrectly
+constructed 

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Guo Yixuan

于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:

Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc

Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf.


Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious
connection with the package?


This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year ago, 
and I just updated it to match current gcc version and fixed some 
problems. However, he didn't managed to upload this package to sid (eg. 
by asking a sponsor), and didn't replied me about the maintenance of 
this package. I've been waiting for his reply for two weeks.


FYI, Samuel's work is avaible at github[1].

[1] https://github.com/SamB/debian-gcc-doc

Is it appropriate to just take over maintenance in this case? If so, I 
will change the maintainer field to myself and remove Samuel, then 
upload a 4.6.3-2 version.


Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently, 
neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA 
field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission 
interface (after I become a DM).


Regards,

Guo Yixuan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507987b0.3000...@gmail.com



Bug#689698: unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello!

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:24:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> What's the rationale behind the debhelper compat bumps in gupnp-vala
> and gssdp? They're not really great changes to be making during a
> freeze unless there's some specific reason for it (and even then
> there's often a more suitable way of solving the issue).

First... updating gupnp-vala is not strictly needed. It doesn't really
bring anything, just drops off stuff no longer needed. We can
skip gupnp-vala if you prefer.

Maybe I should have avoided bumping the dh compat for gssdp. On the
other hand I knew it was compatible already and I'm very confident
it's not going to cause any problems. My intention was that it was
going to prepare for hardening the packages. IIRC I did not have a
better reason for it than that + the rest of the gupnp stack was
already at version 9. The change was sitting in pkg-vcs (git)
for a long time so I was just to lazy to back it out
(but it was a while ago so my memory is not 100% up to date).

Please trust me that I will take full responsibility for any breakage
and will be available to quickly fix issues if any should show up.

-- 
Andreas Henriksson


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121013153819.gb4...@amd64.fatal.se



Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:

于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no 
obvious

connection with the package?


This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year
ago, and I just updated it to match current gcc version and fixed 
some

problems. However, he didn't managed to upload this package to sid
(eg. by asking a sponsor), and didn't replied me about the 
maintenance

of this package. I've been waiting for his reply for two weeks.

FYI, Samuel's work is avaible at github[1].

[1] https://github.com/SamB/debian-gcc-doc

Is it appropriate to just take over maintenance in this case? If so,
I will change the maintainer field to myself and remove Samuel, then
upload a 4.6.3-2 version.


Well, you could keep him in uploaders if you think he's likely to 
contribute further to the package in the archive. Having him listed as 
maintainer seems somewhat strange, at least imo.


I'd also suggest mentioning in the changelog that you used his 
packaging as a base.



Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently,
neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA
field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission
interface (after I become a DM).


The DMUA field is in the process of being deprecated, as you mentioned. 
It's certainly not appropriate to be setting it where none of the people 
involved are DMs; it's not really worth adding to new packages in any 
case. Uploading a new source with DMUA set is also a little unusual.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/75b12b121ea539aad075059f3e845...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 13.10.2012 16:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo


ftr, the submitter's email bounces:

 k...@knok.daionet.gr.jp
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT 
TO::
host daio.daionet.gr.jp [61.194.16.210]: 554 5.7.1 
:

Relay access denied

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/805170d31ea6b0a45471b0e8d5848...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#690074: wpa will not migrate, upload to tpu?

2012-10-13 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi

On Saturday 13 October 2012, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
> unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
> unstable and hence cannot migrate.
> 
> One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but the feasibility of this I
> leave up to the release team.
> 
> The other solution is an upload to tpu; I've just taken all changes from
> unstable since they were already unblocked and hence deemed acceptable for
> wheeze. See attached debdiff. If this is the preferred solution, let me
> know so I can actually upload.
[…]

That would be great, please feel free to do that :)

Thanks a lot
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)

2012-10-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, October 11, 2012 10:07, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, October 10, 2012 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 22:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>>> > Can someone from the release team please confirm that you would
>>> consider
>>> > unblocking such an upload of gnupg, knowing that a udeb is involved
>>> too?
>>>
>>> After a chat with KiBi the proposed changes shouldn't have any effect
>>> on
>>> the content / behaviour of the udeb, so please go ahead.
>>
>> Ping?
>
> There was some confusion about who would actually make the upload, but
> this has been cleared up and I will do so this week.

Uploaded now.


Thijs


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/3968ab0fbee802fd1e0d1aa7eee058aa.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl



Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 01.10.2012 12:30, Holger Levsen wrote:

On Samstag, 29. September 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote:

Would you consider to give gnunet 0.9.3-4 a freeze exception ?

This version is not yet uploaded to unstable, my sponsor is waiting 
for

your approval.


fwiw, the diff looks good to me, but as there as some not 100%
straightforwards bits in it, I'd too like to see the release teams
ack before uploading.


+  * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875, 
#687881,

+#687883).

What happens if a user has the broken version installed already and 
then upgrades to -4? As far as I can tell, nothing in the new diff helps 
resolve the issues which have already occurred, as opposed to stopping 
them recurring.


+  * Change default option UNIX_MATCH_UID as suggested by Daniel 
Dehennin,

+patch picked from upstream (Closes: #686238).

What does the option actually do? :)

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/97bfef6f97d1bcd0de6f0fbbabf76...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689154 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689154.13501456683233.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690389: unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3

2012-10-13 Thread David Prévot
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package phpbb3, it fixes an important regression,
#678544, preventing to setup a remote mysql server, and add a new
debconf translation.

The attached debdiff excludes the PO file.

Thanks in advance, regards

David

unblock phpbb3/3.0.10-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru --exclude po phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog
--- phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog	2012-02-04 19:44:19.0 -0400
+++ phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog	2012-10-06 11:40:47.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+phpbb3 (3.0.10-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New Brazilian Portuguese debconf translation by J.S.Júnior
+   (closes: #663496).
+  * debian/dbapps-lib: Correct handling of dbc_dbserver when configuring mysql
+connection parameters, thanks to Liam Young for the patch (the #613060 fix
+was not correct, LP: #997782, closes: #678544).
+
+ -- David Prévot   Sat, 06 Oct 2012 11:40:37 -0400
+
 phpbb3 (3.0.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Update Czech translation (closes: #658650).
diff -Nru --exclude po phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib
--- phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib	2011-03-06 23:05:17.0 -0400
+++ phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib	2012-10-06 11:34:02.0 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
 ERR=
 case $dbc_dbtype in
 mysql )
-echo $sql | mysql ${dbc_dbserver:+-h $dbc_dbserver} ${dbc_dbserver:--h localhost} ${dbc_dbport:+--port $dbc_dbport} -u $dbc_dbuser -p$dbc_dbpass $dbc_dbname -s || run_sql_fail $dbc_dbtype
+l_dbc_dbserver=${dbc_dbserver:- localhost}
+echo $sql | mysql -h ${l_dbc_dbserver} ${dbc_dbport:+--port $dbc_dbport} -u $dbc_dbuser -p$dbc_dbpass $dbc_dbname -s || run_sql_fail $dbc_dbtype
 ;;
 pgsql )
 if [ -z "${dbc_dbserver}" ]; then


Bug#690389: marked as done (unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:46:20 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#690389: unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #690389,
regarding unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690389: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690389
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package phpbb3, it fixes an important regression,
#678544, preventing to setup a remote mysql server, and add a new
debconf translation.

The attached debdiff excludes the PO file.

Thanks in advance, regards

David

unblock phpbb3/3.0.10-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru --exclude po phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog
--- phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog	2012-02-04 19:44:19.0 -0400
+++ phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/changelog	2012-10-06 11:40:47.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+phpbb3 (3.0.10-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New Brazilian Portuguese debconf translation by J.S.Júnior
+   (closes: #663496).
+  * debian/dbapps-lib: Correct handling of dbc_dbserver when configuring mysql
+connection parameters, thanks to Liam Young for the patch (the #613060 fix
+was not correct, LP: #997782, closes: #678544).
+
+ -- David Prévot   Sat, 06 Oct 2012 11:40:37 -0400
+
 phpbb3 (3.0.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Update Czech translation (closes: #658650).
diff -Nru --exclude po phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib
--- phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib	2011-03-06 23:05:17.0 -0400
+++ phpbb3-3.0.10/debian/dbapps-lib	2012-10-06 11:34:02.0 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
 ERR=
 case $dbc_dbtype in
 mysql )
-echo $sql | mysql ${dbc_dbserver:+-h $dbc_dbserver} ${dbc_dbserver:--h localhost} ${dbc_dbport:+--port $dbc_dbport} -u $dbc_dbuser -p$dbc_dbpass $dbc_dbname -s || run_sql_fail $dbc_dbtype
+l_dbc_dbserver=${dbc_dbserver:- localhost}
+echo $sql | mysql -h ${l_dbc_dbserver} ${dbc_dbport:+--port $dbc_dbport} -u $dbc_dbuser -p$dbc_dbpass $dbc_dbname -s || run_sql_fail $dbc_dbtype
 ;;
 pgsql )
 if [ -z "${dbc_dbserver}" ]; then
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 13.10.2012 17:32, David Prévot wrote:

Please unblock package phpbb3, it fixes an important regression,
#678544, preventing to setup a remote mysql server, and add a new
debconf translation.


Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#689260: marked as done (unblock: binfmt-support/2.0.12)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:06:42 +0100
with message-id <7f951d8a892173ddb536b8b2444b8...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689260: unblock: binfmt-support/2.0.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #689260,
regarding unblock: binfmt-support/2.0.12
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock   

 

I've just uploaded binfmt-support 2.0.12, which fixes what I think is a
clear bug in a new feature I added a while back (post-squeeze).  I'd
like to have this fixed in wheezy.

The full debdiff follows.  I had to add some extra code to support the
test suite; the meat of the change is in src/find.c.  There was already
one upload between wheezy and sid, which was just to defend against a
build failure with future glibc versions; that should be safe for wheezy
too, although I hadn't previously asked for it to be unblocked since it
isn't necessary in itself.

diff -Nru binfmt-support-2.0.10/Makefile.am binfmt-support-2.0.12/Makefile.am
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/Makefile.am   2011-11-20 15:58:40.0 +
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/Makefile.am   2012-09-17 23:49:38.0 +0100
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 EXTRA_DIST = \
.bzrignore \
autogen.sh \
+   gnulib/gets.patch \
gnulib/lib/argp-parse.patch \
gnulib/m4/gnulib-cache.m4 \
gnulib/m4/gnulib-tool.m4
diff -Nru binfmt-support-2.0.10/Makefile.in binfmt-support-2.0.12/Makefile.in
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/Makefile.in   2012-07-30 10:30:23.0 +0100
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/Makefile.in   2012-09-17 23:50:11.0 +0100
@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@
 GNULIB_GETLOGIN = @GNULIB_GETLOGIN@
 GNULIB_GETLOGIN_R = @GNULIB_GETLOGIN_R@
 GNULIB_GETPAGESIZE = @GNULIB_GETPAGESIZE@
-GNULIB_GETS = @GNULIB_GETS@
 GNULIB_GETSUBOPT = @GNULIB_GETSUBOPT@
 GNULIB_GETUSERSHELL = @GNULIB_GETUSERSHELL@
 GNULIB_GL_UNISTD_H_GETOPT = @GNULIB_GL_UNISTD_H_GETOPT@
@@ -930,6 +929,7 @@
 EXTRA_DIST = \
.bzrignore \
autogen.sh \
+   gnulib/gets.patch \
gnulib/lib/argp-parse.patch \
gnulib/m4/gnulib-cache.m4 \
gnulib/m4/gnulib-tool.m4
diff -Nru binfmt-support-2.0.10/autogen.sh binfmt-support-2.0.12/autogen.sh
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/autogen.sh2012-06-26 00:08:49.0 +0100
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/autogen.sh2012-09-17 23:48:45.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-#! /bin/sh -e
+#! /bin/sh
+set -e
 
 # Copyright (C) 2010 Colin Watson.
 #
@@ -12,5 +13,6 @@
 
 if type gnulib-tool >/dev/null 2>&1; then
gnulib-tool --update >/dev/null
+   patch -s -p1 &5
 $as_echo_n "checking whether $gl_func is declared without a macro... " >&6; }
diff -Nru binfmt-support-2.0.10/debian/changelog 
binfmt-support-2.0.12/debian/changelog
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/debian/changelog  2012-07-30 10:37:01.0 
+0100
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/debian/changelog  2012-09-30 22:25:13.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+binfmt-support (2.0.12) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix ineffective --find test.
+  * Don't show disabled formats in --find output (closes: #689247).
+
+ -- Colin Watson   Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:25:11 +0100
+
+binfmt-support (2.0.11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Backport Gnulib commit 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 to stop
+assuming gets.
+
+ -- Colin Watson   Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:05:32 +0100
+
 binfmt-support (2.0.10) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * If a binary format is already enabled according to the kernel, which can
diff -Nru binfmt-support-2.0.10/gnulib/gets.patch 
binfmt-support-2.0.12/gnulib/gets.patch
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/gnulib/gets.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/gnulib/gets.patch 2012-09-17 22:03:43.0 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+commit 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348
+Author: Eric Blake 
+Date:   Thu Mar 29 13:30:41 2012 -0600
+
+stdio: don't assume gets any more
+
+Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11
+and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning
+any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous
+interface.
+
+* m4/stdio_h.m4 (gl_STDIO_H, gl_STDIO_H_DEFAUL

beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
tags 687402 + patch
tags 687402 + pending
thanks

Dear RMs,

Please consider the attached patch for beanstalkd to fix
RC bug #687402 (FTBFS, test failure). It must go through TPU.

Hi Serafeim: this also serves as notice to NMU through
DELAYED/2, please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
diff -Nru beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/changelog beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/changelog
--- beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/changelog	2011-08-14 14:50:22.0 +0100
+++ beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/changelog	2012-10-13 17:59:02.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+beanstalkd (1.4.6-3.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Cherry-pick upstream patch for newer FIU version output parsing
+(Closes: #687402)
+
+ -- Jonathan Wiltshire   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:53:25 +0100
+
 beanstalkd (1.4.6-3) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Patch sh-tests/common.functions to randomise the listener port during
diff -Nru beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/newer-fiu.diff beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/newer-fiu.diff
--- beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/newer-fiu.diff	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/newer-fiu.diff	2012-10-13 17:43:03.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+Description: Fix for new FIU version in tests
+ (output parsing changes)
+Origin: https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/commit/3176e28
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687402
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wiltshire 
+Last-Update: 2012-10-13
+
+Index: beanstalkd-1.4.6/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh
+===
+--- beanstalkd-1.4.6.orig/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh	2010-05-22 22:23:16.0 +0100
 beanstalkd-1.4.6/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh	2012-10-13 17:40:55.159542634 +0100
+@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
+ }
+ 
+ # Make beanstalkd think the disk is full now.
+-fiu-ctrl -e posix/io/oc/open -i $ENOSPC $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'enable name=posix/io/oc/open' -i $ENOSPC $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
+ test ! -e "$logdir"/binlog.1 || fail First binlog file is still there
+ 
+ # Now make beanstalkd think the disk once again has space.
+-fiu-ctrl -d posix/io/oc/open $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'disable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+Index: beanstalkd-1.4.6/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull.sh
+===
+--- beanstalkd-1.4.6.orig/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull.sh	2010-05-22 22:23:16.0 +0100
 beanstalkd-1.4.6/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull.sh	2012-10-13 17:40:55.159542634 +0100
+@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
+ start_beanstalkd $logdir "-s $size" "fiu-run -x"
+ 
+ # Make beanstalkd think the disk is full now.
+-fiu-ctrl -e posix/io/oc/open -i $ENOSPC $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'enable name=posix/io/oc/open' -i $ENOSPC $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
+ test "$res" -eq 0 || exit $res
+ 
+ # Now make beanstalkd think the disk once again has space.
+-fiu-ctrl -d posix/io/oc/open $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'disable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
diff -Nru beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/series beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/series
--- beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/series	2011-08-14 14:36:47.0 +0100
+++ beanstalkd-1.4.6/debian/patches/series	2012-10-13 17:38:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 rename-dprintf.diff
 randomise-port.diff
+newer-fiu.diff


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689425 [release.debian.org] unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689425.135014863223285.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 02.10.2012 14:29, Aron Xu wrote:

This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from
the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These
changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing
fcitx main program. Even when known issues in fcitx has already been
fixed, it would be good to make fcitx-googlepinyin safer.


Could you expand on what you mean by "limiting the input and install 
icons", please?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/5da96ae0d5714dc791b11f90dd2bc...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 06.10.2012 00:03, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:12:17 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:


The package was removed from testing back in May as part of the last
TeXLive transition. Is there a particular justification for trying 
to

re-add it now?


At TeXLive transition, I thought wrongly that this was obsolete
and unnecessary.  But I notice, after getting Bug#688253 and
reviewing the package, that this is necessary even now to use
complete set of morisawa fonts.


Thanks for the explanation.

Looking through the diff, there's an undocumented bump of the debhelper 
compat level from 4 to 6. What's the rationale for that?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/f5160a15b7121cfb773be73288f66...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Re: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 13.10.2012 18:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

Please consider the attached patch for beanstalkd to fix
RC bug #687402 (FTBFS, test failure). It must go through TPU.

Hi Serafeim: this also serves as notice to NMU through
DELAYED/2, please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.


Looks okay to me; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/853559fec2c3976a8d3b6e4ce1ce0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#688084: marked as done (Please consider tagging #612918 wheezy-ignore)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:22:20 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#688084: Please consider tagging #612918 wheezy-ignore
has caused the Debian Bug report #688084,
regarding Please consider tagging #612918 wheezy-ignore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688084: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688084
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: release.debian.org
severity: normal

Bug #612918 involves a violation of the FHS (using a file in /etc as a
state file), thus violating debian policy.  Apparently there was going
to be some involved upstream work to correct the problem, but after
over a year, that appears not to have happened.  Given that and the
fact that practically speaking, its only really problematic in a
read-only /etc environment, and users in that situation can choose a
different network manager anyway, I think it would be appropriate to
ignore it for wheezy until that upstream work actually gets done.

Best wishes,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 19.09.2012 07:52, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Bug #612918 involves a violation of the FHS (using a file in /etc as 
a
state file), thus violating debian policy.  Apparently there was 
going

to be some involved upstream work to correct the problem, but after
over a year, that appears not to have happened.


Further activity in #612918 suggests this isn't actually an issue any 
more, and that bug is now closed; therefore doing the same with this 
one.


Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 pending d-i

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 18:15:16 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

> On Thu, October 11, 2012 10:07, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Wed, October 10, 2012 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 22:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> >>> > Can someone from the release team please confirm that you would
> >>> consider
> >>> > unblocking such an upload of gnupg, knowing that a udeb is involved
> >>> too?
> >>>
> >>> After a chat with KiBi the proposed changes shouldn't have any effect
> >>> on
> >>> the content / behaviour of the udeb, so please go ahead.
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >
> > There was some confusion about who would actually make the upload, but
> > this has been cleared up and I will do so this week.
> 
> Uploaded now.
> 
Unblock added, unblock-udeb pending d-i approval.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)

2012-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending d-i
Bug #685960 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) d-i and pending.

-- 
685960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685960
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b685960.135015288220263.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Bug#689578: sysklogd modifies /etc/syslog.conf with helper script

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 00:41:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:

> A better approach imho would be to simply remove sysklogd from the
> archive. It's dead upstream, apparently no longer properly maintained in
> Debian, and there are enough more then suitable alternatives.
> With rsyslog we even have a drop-in replacement.
> 
I've added a hint to remove it from wheezy.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690074: wpa will not migrate, upload to tpu?

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:08:33 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
> unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
> unstable and hence cannot migrate.
> 
> One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but the feasibility of this I
> leave up to the release team.
> 
> The other solution is an upload to tpu; I've just taken all changes from
> unstable since they were already unblocked and hence deemed acceptable for
> wheeze. See attached debdiff. If this is the preferred solution, let me
> know so I can actually upload.
> 
The third solution is to fix libpcsclite1.symbols to not lie about the
needed version, and then rebuild wpa.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Thanks Jonathan.

Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's also
deprecated, and adding VCS headers).

Thanks,
sez


diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index df8d3cd..4e560e6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+beanstalkd (1.4.6-4) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Add fiu-fix.diff (upstream commit 3176e28) to fix FTBFS due to
+fiu-ctrl silently ignoring obsolete command line arguments
+(Closes: #687402)
+  * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4
+- Add Vcs-* headers in debian/control
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas   Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:57:43 +0200
+
 beanstalkd (1.4.6-3) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Patch sh-tests/common.functions to randomise the listener port during
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 0eacaeb..ad2d77e 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ Maintainer: Serafeim Zanikolas 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, libtool,
libevent-dev (>= 1.4.1), fiu-utils (>=0.13-3), procps,
net-tools, python-minimal
-Standards-Version: 3.9.2
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 Homepage: http://xph.us/software/beanstalkd/
+Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/beanstalkd.git
+Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/beanstalkd.git
 
 Package: beanstalkd
 Architecture: any
diff --git a/debian/patches/fiu-fix.diff b/debian/patches/fiu-fix.diff
new file mode 100644
index 000..dcc2b7d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/fiu-fix.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Description: correct fiu-ctrl arguments for 0.90
+# Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687402
+# Author: Keith Rarick 
+# Last-Update: 2012-10-08
+--- a/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh
 b/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh
+@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
+ 
+ . "$SRCDIR/sh-tests/common.functions"
+ 
+-ENOSPC=28
+ server=localhost
+ tmpdir="$TMPDIR"
+ size=1000
+@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@
+ }
+ 
+ # Make beanstalkd think the disk is full now.
+-fiu-ctrl -e posix/io/oc/open -i $ENOSPC $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'enable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+@@ -138,7 +137,7 @@
+ test ! -e "$logdir"/binlog.1 || fail First binlog file is still there
+ 
+ # Now make beanstalkd think the disk once again has space.
+-fiu-ctrl -d posix/io/oc/open $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'disable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+--- a/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull.sh
 b/sh-tests/binlog-diskfull.sh
+@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
+ 
+ . "$SRCDIR/sh-tests/common.functions"
+ 
+-ENOSPC=28
+ server=localhost
+ tmpdir="$TMPDIR"
+ size=1000
+@@ -39,7 +38,7 @@
+ start_beanstalkd $logdir "-s $size" "fiu-run -x"
+ 
+ # Make beanstalkd think the disk is full now.
+-fiu-ctrl -e posix/io/oc/open -i $ENOSPC $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'enable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
+@@ -70,7 +69,7 @@
+ test "$res" -eq 0 || exit $res
+ 
+ # Now make beanstalkd think the disk once again has space.
+-fiu-ctrl -d posix/io/oc/open $bpid
++fiu-ctrl -c 'disable name=posix/io/oc/open' $bpid
+ 
+ # Insert enough jobs to create another binlog file
+ $nc $server $port < "$out1"
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index e47659f..f30298a 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
+fiu-fix.diff
 rename-dprintf.diff
 randomise-port.diff

-- 
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690400: unblock: swi-prolog/5.10.4-4

2012-10-13 Thread Євгеній Мещеряков
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package swi-prolog

The new version fixes an rc bug #689583 (incorrect dependencies on
amd64, this causes build failures for depending packages).

Changes in this version:

  * Build-conflict with libncursesw5-dev, so it will not be used during build
instead of lincurses5-dev. This should make dependencies of swi-prolog-nox
consistent across architectures (closes: #689583)
  * debian/gbp.conf - change debian-branch to wheezy-updates
  * Urgency medium because of fix for an RC bug

debdiff output attached.
 
unblock swi-prolog/5.10.4-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/changelog swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/changelog
--- swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/changelog	2011-12-16 00:06:47.0 +0100
+++ swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/changelog	2012-10-08 21:55:23.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+swi-prolog (5.10.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Build-conflict with libncursesw5-dev, so it will not be used during build
+instead of lincurses5-dev. This should make dependencies of swi-prolog-nox
+consistent across architectures (closes: #689583)
+  * debian/gbp.conf - change debian-branch to wheezy-updates
+  * Urgency medium because of fix for an RC bug
+
+ -- Євгеній Мещеряков   Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:54:54 +0200
+
 swi-prolog (5.10.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Chris Lamb ]
diff -Nru swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/control swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/control
--- swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/control	2011-12-16 00:06:47.0 +0100
+++ swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/control	2012-10-08 21:55:23.0 +0200
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Євгеній Мещеряков 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autoconf, autotools-dev, libncurses5-dev, libreadline-dev, libgmp-dev, libjpeg-dev, libx11-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, x11proto-core-dev, chrpath, unixodbc-dev, openjdk-6-jdk [alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc], libxft-dev, libxext-dev, libice-dev, libxinerama-dev
+Build-Conflicts: libncursesw5-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/swi-prolog.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/swi-prolog.git
diff -Nru swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/gbp.conf swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/gbp.conf
--- swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/gbp.conf	2011-12-16 00:06:47.0 +0100
+++ swi-prolog-5.10.4/debian/gbp.conf	2012-10-08 21:55:23.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # the default branch for upstream sources:
 upstream-branch = upstream
 # the default branch for the debian patch:
-debian-branch = master
+debian-branch = wheezy-updates
 # the default tag formats used:
 upstream-tag = upstream/%(version)s
 debian-tag = debian/%(version)s


Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's 
also

deprecated, and adding VCS headers).


On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However:


+  * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4


The d-d-a mail announcing the release of policy 3.9.4 specifically 
asked people *not* to do that.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/b8764ebfd2338d69dbd7a92c23bc1...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Possible solutions for scim-anthy, scim-prime & scim in Wheezy

2012-10-13 Thread Neil Williams
I can't see any way for the release team to approve the unblock scim for
the following reasons:

0: it's a new upstream release which is deemed a "significant change"

1: the packaging system has changed to compat 9, another significant
change.

2: new binary packages have been introduced, a further "significant
change"

3: there is no RC bug fixed in scim itself by this upload

4: the RC bug which does exist (#687401) is, in my estimation,
artificial because there appears to be no functional reason for the
change in the build-dependency other than to work with a -dev package
which was converted to MultiArch unnecessarily. (There is no
specification for how to manage -dev packages for MultiArch currently,
only shared libraries and changing only the shared library would not
have caused problems with the reverse dependencies.) scim-anthy *could*
build against the version of scim already in testing if the special
handling for the multiarch'd libscim-dev package was removed from
debian/rules. So this upload doesn't fix the RC bug, it merely matches
what the RC buggy package was instructed to expect in order to meet the
changes in the scim package.

I have gone through the debdiff between the version of scim in wheezy
and the version in sid and I can't see how this meets the Wheezy Freeze
Policy [0] either. It fails Rule #1 - there are no bug fixes directly
within scim other than one RC bug introduced by the new upstream version
itself (#679724). It fails Rule #5 with three different levels of
significant changes. The new upstream release contains very large
amounts of new code, adding support for libraries and systems not
previously support by scim. A release freeze is *not* the time to test
such large changes within Debian.

I've checked through the one remaining option of using the versions in
Squeeze too. I've tried to build the version of scim-anthy in Squeeze
within Wheezy but it fails due to GTK3 issues (libscim-dev in Wheezy
requires libgtk3-dev. This raises a separate issue that some reverse
dependencies of libscim8c2a which is built from scim are linked against
libgtk2.0-0 when libscim8c2a itself is linked against libgtk-3-0 - a
situation which the Gtk maintainers warn will cause seg faults. This
arises partially because libscim-dev Depends on both libgtk2.0-dev and
libgtk-3-dev which itself is wrong.)

One of the packages affected by this is scim-prime but although there is
a fix in unstable, the NMU for scim-prime is *also* unsuitable for an
unblock due to substantial changes to the package including 3.0 quilt,
removal of dpatch and rewriting all of the existing patches. scim-prime
will also need to be removed from wheezy.

This rules out the slim option of rolling back to a point before all
these changes started by introducing an epoch based on the current scim
and scim-anthy packages in squeeze and reintroducing those through
unstable with suitable unblocks.

The only solution which I can see is that scim-anthy and scim-prime have
to be removed from testing and then introduced via wheezy-backports once
that becomes available. This will allow users to upgrade and receive the
extra hooks for gir*, gtk3 & Qt related packages. scim would not be
unblocked and would also have to be updated via backports.

[0] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpmhSSTouymH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#690403: RM: scim-anthy/1.2.7-5

2012-10-13 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

scim-anthy is RC buggy and out of all the possible fixes, the
only sensible choice is to remove scim-anthy from testing and 
reintroduce it via wheezy-backports once that becomes available.

The reasons for this removal are that scim-anthy requires an updated
version of scim which cannot be reasonably unblocked for migration
into wheezy due to substantial changes in the new upstream version.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687401#22

Please remove scim-anthy from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121013205623.13296.7970.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#690402: RM: scim-prime/1.0.0-4

2012-10-13 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

scim-prime is RC buggy in wheezy but the NMU uploaded
to unstable contains significant changes including replacing
the dpatch build-dependency with source format 3.0 quilt -
including rewriting all the old patches and moving to compat 9.

As part of the fix for #687401, please remove scim-prime from
wheezy so that the fixed version can be uploaded to wheezy-backports
once that becomes available after the wheezy release.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687401#22

Please remove scim-prime from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121013205608.13750.19671.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#681717: unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4

2012-10-13 Thread Michael Gilbert
> Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging
> the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug
> version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug).  So I don't
> think this is a problem.

Please review the attached patch, and let me know if it is ok to
upload to unstable.  The security issue is fixed, and the tool
binaries are now not excluded from the -dbg package.

Best wishes,
Mike


openjpeg.patch
Description: Binary data


Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> >Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as
> >it's also
> >deprecated, and adding VCS headers).
> 
> On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However:
> 
> >+  * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4
> 
> The d-d-a mail announcing the release of policy 3.9.4 specifically
> asked people *not* to do that.

oh sorry about that; will upload with S-V set to 3.9.3 then.

thanks,

-- 
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#685597: unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8

2012-10-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary 
> > is
> > not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in 
> > other
> > packages are needed.
> Has it been verified that they build correctly against a multi-arched
> libppl?

Both have built successfully on zelenka against the following libppl:

ii libppl-c4:s390   0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (C interface)
ii libppl0.11-dev:s390  0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (development)
ii libppl9:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (runtime library)

HTH
Philipp Kern


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121013223004.ga32...@hub.kern.lc



Bug#687779: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1

2012-10-13 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
tags 679966 + patch
tags 679966 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

RMs: please clear for an upload to t-p-u, thanks.



Regards.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
diff -Nru ksh-93u+/debian/changelog ksh-93u+/debian/changelog
--- ksh-93u+/debian/changelog	2012-04-24 23:36:58.0 +0100
+++ ksh-93u+/debian/changelog	2012-10-13 22:58:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ksh (93u+-1.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix handling of cd ../../.. and similar
+(cddotdot.patch, Closes: #679966)
+
+ -- Jonathan Wiltshire   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 22:53:44 +0100
+
 ksh (93u+-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.3
diff -Nru ksh-93u+/debian/patches/cddotdot.patch ksh-93u+/debian/patches/cddotdot.patch
--- ksh-93u+/debian/patches/cddotdot.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ ksh-93u+/debian/patches/cddotdot.patch	2012-10-13 23:18:24.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+Description: fix handling of cd ../../.. etc
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679966
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Author: Jonathan Wiltshire , Adam D. Barratt 
+Last-Update: 2012-10-13
+
+Index: ksh-93+/src/cmd/ksh93/bltins/cd_pwd.c
+===
+--- ksh-93+.orig/src/cmd/ksh93/bltins/cd_pwd.c	2012-10-13 23:14:07.0 +0100
 ksh-93+/src/cmd/ksh93/bltins/cd_pwd.c	2012-10-13 23:18:14.522450133 +0100
+@@ -116,14 +116,17 @@
+ 			dp++;
+ 		if(*dp==0 || *dp=='/')
+ 		{
+-			struct stat statb;
+ 			if((dp-dir)==2)
+ 			{
+-sfprintf(shp->strbuf,oldpwd);
+-dp = sfstruse(shp->strbuf);
+-*strrchr(dp,'/')=0;
++char *sp;
++sfputr(shp->strbuf,oldpwd,0);
+ if(*dp)
+-	dir = (char*)dp;
++	sfputr(shp->strbuf,dp+1,0);
++sp = sfstruse(shp->strbuf);
++*(dir=strrchr(sp,'/'))=0;
++if(*dp)
++	strcpy(dir,dp);
++dir = (char*)sp;
+ 			}
+ 			cdpath = 0;
+ 		}
+@@ -202,8 +205,6 @@
+ 	if(*dir != '/')
+ 		return(0);
+ 	nv_putval(opwdnod,oldpwd,NV_RDONLY);
+-	if(oldpwd)
+-		free(oldpwd);
+ 	flag = strlen(dir);
+ 	/* delete trailing '/' */
+ 	while(--flag>0 && dir[flag]=='/')
+@@ -214,6 +215,8 @@
+ 	nv_scan(shp->track_tree,rehash,(void*)0,NV_TAGGED,NV_TAGGED);
+ 	path_newdir(shp,shp->pathlist);
+ 	path_newdir(shp,shp->cdpathlist);
++	if(oldpwd)
++		free(oldpwd);
+ 	return(0);
+ }
+ 
diff -Nru ksh-93u+/debian/patches/series ksh-93u+/debian/patches/series
--- ksh-93u+/debian/patches/series	2012-04-24 23:33:36.0 +0100
+++ ksh-93u+/debian/patches/series	2012-10-13 22:54:37.0 +0100
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 cleanup-man-title.patch
 no-rpath.patch
 handle-removed-working-dir.patch
+cddotdot.patch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690411: unblock: scim-chewing/0.3.4-1.2

2012-10-13 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package scim-chewing

The RC bug #676009 was closed in unstable but then
further uploads were made with unrelated packaging changes
and another RC bug filed for the same issue (#684854),
now merged.

I've prepared an NMU (diff attached) for testing-proposed-updates
as 0.3.4-1.2 which simply pulls the gtk patch out of the
unstable changes and makes no other changes.

Please confirm that this is OK to upload to t-p-u.


unblock scim-chewing/0.3.4-1.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/changelog scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/changelog
--- scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/changelog	2012-04-03 06:51:46.0 +
+++ scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/changelog	2012-10-13 23:36:14.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+scim-chewing (0.3.4-1.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Apply gtk.patch from unstable upload without extraneous
+changes. Fixes FTBFS: scim_color_button.cpp
+(Closes: #684854). Thanks Tz-Huan Huang 
+from upstream.
+
+ -- Neil Williams   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 23:25:01 +
+
 scim-chewing (0.3.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/patches/gtk.patch scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/patches/gtk.patch
--- scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/patches/gtk.patch	1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ scim-chewing-0.3.4/debian/patches/gtk.patch	2012-10-13 23:19:11.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,859 @@
+commit 3cbe332e6b15ed674513d0b28e1966ff2bae1b45
+Author: Andrew Lee (李健秋) 
+Date:   Fri Jul 6 01:22:55 2012 +0800
+
+Import upstream snapshot.
+
+diff --git a/src/scim_chewing_imengine_setup.cpp b/src/scim_chewing_imengine_setup.cpp
+index 75a9f51..c14eb74 100644
+--- a/src/scim_chewing_imengine_setup.cpp
 b/src/scim_chewing_imengine_setup.cpp
+@@ -165,7 +165,10 @@ static GList *selKey_type_list = 0;
+ static GList *selKey_num_list = 0;
+ static GList *chieng_mode_list = 0;
+ // static GtkWidget* __widget_show_candidate_comment= 0;
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2, 12, 0)
++#else
+ static GtkTooltips  * __widget_tooltips  = 0;
++#endif
+ 
+ static KeyboardConfigData __config_keyboards[] =
+ {
+@@ -322,7 +325,11 @@ static GtkWidget *create_options_page()
+ {
+ 	GtkWidget *vbox;
+ 
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(3, 0, 0)
++	vbox = gtk_box_new (GTK_ORIENTATION_VERTICAL, 0);
++#else
+ 	vbox = gtk_vbox_new (FALSE, 0);
++#endif
+ 	gtk_widget_show (vbox);
+ 
+ 	__widget_add_phrase_forward =
+@@ -336,9 +343,15 @@ static GtkWidget *create_options_page()
+ 			G_CALLBACK( on_default_toggle_button_toggled ),
+ 			&__config_add_phrase_forward );
+ 
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2, 12, 0)
++	gtk_widget_set_tooltip_text(
++			__widget_add_phrase_forward,
++			_( "Whether to add Phrase forward or not." ));
++#else
+ 	gtk_tooltips_set_tip(
+ 			__widget_tooltips, __widget_add_phrase_forward,
+ 			_( "Whether to add Phrase forward or not." ), NULL );
++#endif
+ 
+ 	__widget_phrase_choice_rearward =
+ 		gtk_check_button_new_with_mnemonic( _( "_Rearward phrase choice" ) );
+@@ -351,9 +364,15 @@ static GtkWidget *create_options_page()
+ 			G_CALLBACK( on_default_toggle_button_toggled ),
+ 			&__config_phrase_choice_rearward );
+ 
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2, 12, 0)
++	gtk_widget_set_tooltip_text(
++			__widget_phrase_choice_rearward,
++			_( "The behavior for phrase choice to be rearward or not." ));
++#else
+ 	gtk_tooltips_set_tip(
+ 			__widget_tooltips, __widget_phrase_choice_rearward,
+ 			_( "The behavior for phrase choice to be rearward or not." ), NULL );
++#endif
+ 
+ 	__widget_auto_shift_cursor =
+ 		gtk_check_button_new_with_mnemonic( _( "_Automatically shift cursor" ) );
+@@ -366,9 +385,15 @@ static GtkWidget *create_options_page()
+ 			G_CALLBACK( on_default_toggle_button_toggled ),
+ 			&__config_auto_shift_cursor );
+ 
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2, 12, 0)
++	gtk_widget_set_tooltip_text(
++			__widget_auto_shift_cursor,
++			_( "Automatically shift cursor after selection." ));
++#else
+ 	gtk_tooltips_set_tip(
+ 			__widget_tooltips, __widget_auto_shift_cursor,
+ 			_( "Automatically shift cursor after selection." ), NULL );
++#endif
+ 
+ 	__widget_esc_clean_all_buffer =
+ 		gtk_check_button_new_with_mnemonic(_( "_Esc key to clean all buffer" ) );
+@@ -381,9 +406,15 @@ static GtkWidget *create_options_page()
+ 			G_CALLBACK( on_default_toggle_button_toggled ),
+ 			&__config_esc_clean_all_buffer );
+ 
++#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2, 12, 0)
++	gtk_widget_set_tooltip_text(
++			__widget_esc_clean_all_buffer,
++			_( "Assign Esc key to clean all keyboard buffer or not." )

RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

2012-10-13 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi,

Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
incomplete copyright files.  Some examples:
http://bugs.debian.org/690394
http://bugs.debian.org/690371
http://bugs.debian.org/690370

Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness
is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from
various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the
archive affected.  So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion
concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to
important to avoid further delaying wheezy?

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MMW3Sej3Zb1-OLy_YcWyoN-ZFfUBQOnyoHkBZ4u=qq...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1

2012-10-13 Thread Aron Xu
Hi,

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt
 wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 02.10.2012 14:29, Aron Xu wrote:
>>
>> This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from
>> the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These
>> changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing
>> fcitx main program. Even when known issues in fcitx has already been
>> fixed, it would be good to make fcitx-googlepinyin safer.
>
>
> Could you expand on what you mean by "limiting the input and install icons",
> please?
>

"limiting the input" means limiting how many alphabets a user can
input in one shot. Doing such is because there isn't such a check in
libgooglepinyin and the upstream of the library won't fix it (it's
forked from Google Android), so we have to workaround it by adding the
limit in wrapper program. It's reproducible that when a users types
many alphabets in a very quick manner (for example, press a key and
hold for 60 seconds), the program will crash. Relevant upstream
changeset: 
https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-googlepinyin/commit/4d92fc61c535b26509ec0fb45f65a57420bc06b9

"install icons" means adding an icon for this input engine, this is
just another workaround of libgooglepinyin. Because of copyright
problems we cannot use the original icon from Google, so when being
forked the icon was removed. This triggered a bug in some previous
versions of fcitx, though the bug is fixed in current version, it's
not a bad thing to be safe. This icon is drawn by upstream of fcitx.


--
Regards,
Aron Xu

-- 
Regards,
Aron Xu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w4unzjypnova8xhnwayedy1v2n2rlyfz_rsxcg9rxf...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

2012-10-13 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:21:19PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
> incomplete copyright files.  Some examples:
> http://bugs.debian.org/690394
> http://bugs.debian.org/690371
> http://bugs.debian.org/690370
> 
> Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness
> is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from
> various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the
> archive affected.  So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion
> concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to
> important to avoid further delaying wheezy?

I don't speak for the Release Team, but with my DD hat on I think the bugs
should keep severity "serious" and I hope that the Release Team won't tag the
bugs wheezy-ignore.  The bugs are not so difficult to fix, so I don't see much
additional delay for wheezy.  Actually I appreciate Jakub Wilk's effort of
filing these bugs.

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014054324.gb...@master.debian.org