Bug#695082: unblock: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package redmine
The migration to wheezy would fix the RC bugs #687449 and #693994.
diff -Nru redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog
redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog
- --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2012-06-18 23:26:08.0
+0200
+++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog2012-11-28 04:57:40.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/control: add dependency on rubygems or recent enough ruby
+(Closes: #693994) [Axel Beckert].
+ * debian/postinst: replace exit status -1 with 2 for shell compatibility
+(e.g. ksh) (Closes: #687449).
+
+ -- Dominik George Sun, 29 Nov 2012 14:18:29 +0200
+
redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Upstream update.
diff -Nru redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/control redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/control
- --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/control2012-05-18 16:36:43.0
+0200
+++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/control 2012-11-24 13:26:41.0 +0100
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
Pre-Depends: debconf
Depends: ruby | ruby-interpreter,
ruby-rails-2.3 (>=2.3.14) | rails (>=2.3.14),
+ rubygems | ruby (>= 4.9),
dbconfig-common,
redmine-sqlite | redmine-mysql | redmine-pgsql,
ruby-rack (>= 1.4.0),
diff -Nru redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/postinst
redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/postinst
- --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/postinst 2012-05-14 10:50:14.0
+0200
+++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/postinst 2012-11-24 13:30:45.0 +0100
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
rake -s db:migrate_plugins
RAILS_ENV=$fRailsEnv X_DEBIAN_SITEID="${lInstance}" VERBOSE=$RAKE_VERBOSE ||
true
else
echo "Error when running rake
db:migrate, check database configuration."
- - exit -1
+ exit 2
fi
else
echo "Redmine instance \"${lInstance}\"
database must be configured manually."
unblock redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.6-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQFOBAEBCAA4BQJQvUXeMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n
cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQWfyOHW8qgAFq0Af/UWbUsInnS23XTmCT41GA
ckw5CJUinMeFFtcWRm/helSWmOAAYd7wxPb/gxa4ribk7V/75tBIpy+HqyP7n3kN
IMpG8QzYlYinUYrPNcJsoqFExh9JtRNDHNkmcjXA4MFMuW2RNCRJojkthBR+6B4z
S+5D7KREDh92ZGdLB2+vXDkur7IeqrcIhmsJw5VubQw/9v/9ELAxHBHhRXCy65Y8
roZiw6GglwGSRc4tq3Wkbf3ieJsWkkU8LfkkkRv8ihAU0zJ7+mRwJCU6mJuO7LAz
4lEAkiFUUFL54R8RU3LzA7cVeu5Wo0B4Ma/7pahL8NI3m1aeJta1uaqjECecRR5s
cA==
=6U+Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121204003752.12476.29738.report...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#692600: Geode 2.11.14 released
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 00:34:54 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > 2012/12/3 Julien Cristau : > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 13:24:50 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > >> Upstream went ahead and released as Geode 2.11.14 what had been pushed > >> over the past few months into Debian/unstable as a patched 2.11.13 > >> source. > >> > >> I've already prepared a 2.11.14-1 package for Debian/unstable. > >> Sponsors are welcome to perform the upload. > >> > > So, err... > > 112 files changed, 18739 insertions(+), 11535 deletions(-) > > > > I'm afraid that's nowhere near suitable for a freeze exception. > > You'll notice that most of this is essentially whitespace cleanup > performed using the standard X-indent macro. In practice, there's very > few changes to the code's functionality itself. > No, I won't notice that, because I'm not even looking at such a diff. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: lockfile-progs 0.1.17 might be candidate for wheezy
Julien Cristau writes: > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:55:53 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > >> >> Please feel free to ignore this, but there were a few bugfixes in >> lockfile-progs 0.1.17 (just uploaded to sid) that I thought might make >> it appropriate for consideration for wheezy: >> > Unblocked. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nk2ae21@trouble.defaultvalue.org
Bug#694862: marked as done (pre-approval for audit/1:1.7.18-2)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:13:51 +0100
with message-id <20121203231351.ga14...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#694862: pre-approval for audit/1:1.7.18-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694862,
regarding pre-approval for audit/1:1.7.18-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694862
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to upload audit 1:1.7.18-2 based on the attached patch, which
fixes #681457.
The patch contains a backport of arm support from a newer upstream version.
However, it seems syscall audit support is not enabled in wheezy arm kernels:
- support for AUDITSYSCALL on arm was introduced after 3.2 (I tested it with a
3.6 kernel)
- AUDITSYSCALL conflicts with OABI_COMPAT, which seems to be enabled on all
debian arm kernels
If you think this change is inappropriate for wheezy, do you think #681457
should be downgraded or tagged wheezy-ignore?
In addition to the change above, the patch also adds an autoreconf script,
based on upstream svn, to get it to build without a large diff in
autogenerated files.
Cheers,
Ivo
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh 2012-11-24 21:51:52.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+# based on autogen.sh in upstream 1.8 svn branch
+
+autoreconf -fv --install
+
+cd system-config-audit
+
+autopoint -f
+# intltool bug: it tries to use $aux_dir/po/Makefile.in.in in older versions
+ln -s ../po admin/po
+# ... and it puts dummy intltool-*.in to ., not to $aux_dir in newer versions
+rm admin/intltool-{extract,merge,update}.in
+touch admin/intltool-{extract,merge,update}.in
+intltoolize --force
+rm admin/po
+
+aclocal -I m4
+autoconf -Wall
+autoheader -Wall
+automake -Wall --add-missing
+
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog 2012-01-31 16:36:25.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog 2012-11-24 23:24:55.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+audit (1:1.7.18-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Set Maintainer to Debian QA Group (cf. #692492).
+ * debian/control: Add Vcs-* fields
+ * Backport patches to enable arm support (Closes: #681457)
+ * Use autoreconf to update generated files with autogen.sh based on upstream
+svn. This is necessary to build with changes in Makefile.am for arm
+support.
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:24:08 +0100
+
audit (1:1.7.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/control audit-1.7.18/debian/control
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/control 2011-07-29 23:22:06.0 +0200
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/control 2012-11-24 21:44:49.0 +0100
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
Source: audit
Priority: extra
-Maintainer: Philipp Matthias Hahn
+Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8),
python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-3~), swig,
automake1.10, autoconf (>= 2.59), libtool, autotools-dev,
intltool, cvs, libprelude-dev, libldap2-dev, libev-dev, chrpath,
- libwrap0-dev, libkrb5-dev
+ libwrap0-dev, libkrb5-dev, dh-autoreconf, autopoint
Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13, automake1.4
Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Section: libs
Homepage: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/
+Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/audit.git
+Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/audit.git
Package: auditd
Section: admin
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff 2012-11-24 23:22:50.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,536 @@
+Description: arm support
+ Backport from trunk of support for arm architecture.
+
+ Please note that upstream calls this 'armeb', but it should work with the arm
+ ports in debian (armel and armhf).
+
+---
+Origin: upstream
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/681457
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 20121124
+
+--- audit-1.7.18.orig/lib/libaudit.h
audit-1.7.18/lib/libaudit.h
+@@ -386,7 +386,8 @@ typedef enum {
+ MACH_PPC,
+ MACH_S390X,
+ MACH_S390,
+-MACH_ALPHA
++ MACH_ALPHA,
++ MACH_ARMEB
+ } machine_t;
+
+ /* These are the valid audit failure tunable enum values */
+--- audit-1.7.18.orig/
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
Am 03.12.2012 22:16, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 21:59:08 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still needed >>> on !linux. >> >> Hm, but hal does not ship an init.d script in current wheezy though, >> so how could that dependency be satisfied even with hal installed? >> > I guess the idea is that dbus automatically starts hal when X tries to > talk to it. Still not sure it's worth removing that for wheezy; in a > partial upgrade situation you might still have old hal that needs to be > started from its init script. Does the Should-Start hurt anything? Well, it doesn't really hurt anything. So if you want to keep it for wheezy, that is probably ok, too. That said, it is not actually kdm which needs hal, but the X server which uses hal for enumeration of the input devices on non-Linux. Julien, does Xorg on non-Linux cope with hal being started after X? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#686369: unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 (pre-approval)
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 Bug #686369 [release.debian.org] unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 (pre-approval) Changed Bug title to 'unblock: grub/0.97-66.1' from 'unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 (pre-approval)' -- 686369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686369 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b686369.13545742876023.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#686369: unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 (pre-approval)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: retitle -1 unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 Hi, Le 01/12/2012 07:33, Julien Cristau a écrit : >> I wonder if we should consider removing the grub dummy package from the >> grub source package. >> > Go ahead. Thanks uploaded, and built on the release architectures. On top of the pre-appoved debdiff, I had to twist the lintian-overrides syntax to perform the package upload, additional tiny change bellow: > --- grub-0.97/debian/rules > +++ grub-0.97/debian/rules > @@ -197,10 +197,10 @@ > rm -rf debian/grub-legacy/usr/lib/grub/tmp/ > > mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy/usr/share/lintian/overrides > - cd $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy && find ./usr/bin/ -name mbchk \ > + cd $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy && find usr/bin/ -name mbchk \ > | sed -e "s%.*%grub-legacy: statically-linked-binary &%g" \ > > $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy/usr/share/lintian/overrides/grub-legacy > - cd $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy && find ./usr/sbin/ -name grub \ > + cd $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy && find usr/sbin/ -name grub \ > | sed -e "s%.*%grub-legacy: statically-linked-binary &%g" \ > >> $(CURDIR)/debian/grub-legacy/usr/share/lintian/overrides/grub-legacy > Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQvSnFAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyORIP/2+Ruv9F9w4QjC+YBpWJ5aGj p78IYteBHbXQnbMD/ENcITdOrQT482Yp+VP2yB0irNZQzcmAm6gzCERlb37agSk6 UFkhsh73DT9dD2GhXorPDMNTUhX9VRj1/XnPyY3zH3ao+20LOUsNbV39J404/mie nS93hE5e2OQ0ghbo+Wa421rd/HcZj8Gz7wsIZWhQatJRezG6hkN7seuCREA7VyVC Ow9NexdFdjoyhAZtS0joT/MHIpKJsLSC6AC1e0C9b1Ny4537xQvRE9afhPZXVPq1 YJ8D4ilFS86exEyUKHMADdLnDrA9PIhgAwHi6yo6zJys0g9rN7i0mB3MJQZg3RK+ 7nLalKvD61TbPnStCF8iML5/qqcKlQGHWADNVyD5KbRbwkN1ET+5ZTshpiMrbrN1 Tj59fDRbJ6+15udD/Z8r2ffJk4VdWcbfTV9Ox95KKSwwD1lDeYjh4xmDexv/47RF 0Oox2pydjCHa0PJnrfW3b0DcHTWxwoweea5bl1eEmqfzd3BQwFTAIsbLrz8gTUGn qfTFhNO44G+RUVZAbO1ZOHUfx3u+/LTC4wZ8tk+0Xdy01LmmTIpSdFzctKzliIJy Fm67P7QiPNLB/2/Kih3FVLEiHm7AQlTgFoOfHC1C3JUnZ09eu3otJd3qv4UI0Ri8 6+UX0Xg5iIay5MsmBLvk =ih5/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bd29c6.50...@debian.org
Bug#692600: Geode 2.11.14 released
2012/12/3 Julien Cristau : > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 13:24:50 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> Upstream went ahead and released as Geode 2.11.14 what had been pushed >> over the past few months into Debian/unstable as a patched 2.11.13 >> source. >> >> I've already prepared a 2.11.14-1 package for Debian/unstable. >> Sponsors are welcome to perform the upload. >> > So, err... > 112 files changed, 18739 insertions(+), 11535 deletions(-) > > I'm afraid that's nowhere near suitable for a freeze exception. You'll notice that most of this is essentially whitespace cleanup performed using the standard X-indent macro. In practice, there's very few changes to the code's functionality itself. Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPZXPQd=kzcxyzmfkqpkhrhjwvvm49ro3x56q6thogrehqz...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
On 2012-12-03 22:51, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi Niels, > > Niels Thykier writes: >> By the looks of it, I think a removal from sid is probably a better >> choice in the long run. If you agree, lets reassign this bug to the >> ftp-masters. Once/if the ftp-masters remove sigit from sid, it will >> probably disappear from testing automatically within a day or two. > Yes, I agree. Please reassign appropriately :). > cloned/reassigned/... as #695070. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bd234c.7030...@thykier.net
Processed: cloning 695065, reassign -1 to ftp.debian.org, reopening -1 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 695065 -1
Bug #695065 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" }
[release.debian.org] RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Bug 695065 cloned as bug 695070
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #695070 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" }
[release.debian.org] RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #695070 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #695070 to the same values
previously set
> reopen -1
Bug #695070 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" }
[ftp.debian.org] RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #695070 to the same values
previously set
> retitle -1 RM: sigit -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy
Bug #695070 [ftp.debian.org] RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: sigit -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy' from 'RM:
sigit/0.3.2-2'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695065
695070: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695070
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135457231525111.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Hi Niels, Niels Thykier writes: > By the looks of it, I think a removal from sid is probably a better > choice in the long run. If you agree, lets reassign this bug to the > ftp-masters. Once/if the ftp-masters remove sigit from sid, it will > probably disappear from testing automatically within a day or two. Yes, I agree. Please reassign appropriately :). -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/x6624ix0sb@midna.zekjur.net
Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
On 2012-12-03 18:37, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated > upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007. > > http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without > reply since 2012-05-18. > Well, it got orphaned 3 days ago (#691724), so I doubt it will get a "maintainer reply" anytime soon. > The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at > least on amd64 (#694976). > > I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I > noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000 > SLOC for rotating signatures… > > I hereby request removal of sigit from testing. > > [...] By the looks of it, I think a removal from sid is probably a better choice in the long run. If you agree, lets reassign this bug to the ftp-masters. Once/if the ftp-masters remove sigit from sid, it will probably disappear from testing automatically within a day or two. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bd198e.4010...@thykier.net
Bug#695065: marked as done (RM: sigit/0.3.2-2)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:23:00 + with message-id <1354569780.23754.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #695065, regarding RM: sigit/0.3.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695065 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007. http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without reply since 2012-05-18. The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at least on amd64 (#694976). I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000 SLOC for rotating signatures… I hereby request removal of sigit from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 18:37 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated > upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007. > > http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without > reply since 2012-05-18. > > The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at > least on amd64 (#694976). > > I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I > noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000 > SLOC for rotating signatures… Removal hint added. Regards, Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
Alle lunedì 3 dicembre 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 21:59:08 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Alle lunedì 3 dicembre 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 00:28:05 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > we would like to upload kde-workspace 4:4.8.4-5, which so far > > > > would provide a number of updates/fixes: > > > > - a minor changelog fix to the previous version > > > > - fix the X session registration, which was off due to a mismatch > > > > between an old debian option and the actual configuration key > > > > (#692730) > > > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the taskbar widget, which would > > > > not unnecessarly notify windows as "demanding attention" > > > > (#685334) > > > > - the backport of an upstream patch to improve a patch backported > > > > already in 4:4.8.4-3 > > > > - the backport of 3 upstream patches to fix the reading of two > > > > configuration files (kwinrc and powermanagementprofilesrc) as > > > > cascading configuration (i.e. so values in configs in global > > > > paths like /u/s/kde4/config and the Debian-specific /e/kde4, > > > > for the local admin, can be used) > > > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the saving of panel launchers of > > > > preferred apps (#686131) > > > > - drop hal from kdm.init (#694021) > > > > - kde-workspace-bin: > > > > - ship a /etc/kde4 directory, so postinst can work (#694253) > > > > - explicitly depend on qdbus, used by startkde > > > > - encoding fixes for the debconf translations of es (#692209) and pl > > > > (#691953) > > > > > > > > Generally, all the proposed changes should be safe; in case, > > > > the upload could be aged to more days to give it more days. > > > > > > Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still > > > needed on !linux. > > > > Hm, but hal does not ship an init.d script in current wheezy > > though, so how could that dependency be satisfied even with hal > > installed? > > Hrm. I seem to remember a conversation with Michael about that, > don't remember what the outcome was. OK, I removed that change for now, let's revise that after Wheezy; the rest will be uploaded soon. Thanks for the review, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007. http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without reply since 2012-05-18. The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at least on amd64 (#694976). I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000 SLOC for rotating signatures… I hereby request removal of sigit from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121203173746.12472.54009.report...@midna.zekjur.net
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 21:59:08 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still needed > > on !linux. > > Hm, but hal does not ship an init.d script in current wheezy though, > so how could that dependency be satisfied even with hal installed? > I guess the idea is that dbus automatically starts hal when X tries to talk to it. Still not sure it's worth removing that for wheezy; in a partial upgrade situation you might still have old hal that needs to be started from its init script. Does the Should-Start hurt anything? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 21:59:08 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Alle lunedì 3 dicembre 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 00:28:05 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > we would like to upload kde-workspace 4:4.8.4-5, which so far would > > > provide a number of updates/fixes: > > > - a minor changelog fix to the previous version > > > - fix the X session registration, which was off due to a mismatch > > > between an old debian option and the actual configuration key > > > (#692730) > > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the taskbar widget, which would > > > not unnecessarly notify windows as "demanding attention" > > > (#685334) > > > - the backport of an upstream patch to improve a patch backported > > > already in 4:4.8.4-3 > > > - the backport of 3 upstream patches to fix the reading of two > > > configuration files (kwinrc and powermanagementprofilesrc) as > > > cascading configuration (i.e. so values in configs in global > > > paths like /u/s/kde4/config and the Debian-specific /e/kde4, for > > > the local admin, can be used) > > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the saving of panel launchers of > > > preferred apps (#686131) > > > - drop hal from kdm.init (#694021) > > > - kde-workspace-bin: > > > - ship a /etc/kde4 directory, so postinst can work (#694253) > > > - explicitly depend on qdbus, used by startkde > > > - encoding fixes for the debconf translations of es (#692209) and pl > > > (#691953) > > > > > > Generally, all the proposed changes should be safe; in case, the > > > upload could be aged to more days to give it more days. > > > > Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still needed > > on !linux. > > Hm, but hal does not ship an init.d script in current wheezy though, > so how could that dependency be satisfied even with hal installed? > Hrm. I seem to remember a conversation with Michael about that, don't remember what the outcome was. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
Alle lunedì 3 dicembre 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 00:28:05 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > we would like to upload kde-workspace 4:4.8.4-5, which so far would > > provide a number of updates/fixes: > > - a minor changelog fix to the previous version > > - fix the X session registration, which was off due to a mismatch > > between an old debian option and the actual configuration key > > (#692730) > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the taskbar widget, which would > > not unnecessarly notify windows as "demanding attention" > > (#685334) > > - the backport of an upstream patch to improve a patch backported > > already in 4:4.8.4-3 > > - the backport of 3 upstream patches to fix the reading of two > > configuration files (kwinrc and powermanagementprofilesrc) as > > cascading configuration (i.e. so values in configs in global > > paths like /u/s/kde4/config and the Debian-specific /e/kde4, for > > the local admin, can be used) > > - the backport of an upstream fix for the saving of panel launchers of > > preferred apps (#686131) > > - drop hal from kdm.init (#694021) > > - kde-workspace-bin: > > - ship a /etc/kde4 directory, so postinst can work (#694253) > > - explicitly depend on qdbus, used by startkde > > - encoding fixes for the debconf translations of es (#692209) and pl > > (#691953) > > > > Generally, all the proposed changes should be safe; in case, the > > upload could be aged to more days to give it more days. > > Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still needed > on !linux. Hm, but hal does not ship an init.d script in current wheezy though, so how could that dependency be satisfied even with hal installed? -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#692600: Geode 2.11.14 released
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 13:24:50 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Upstream went ahead and released as Geode 2.11.14 what had been pushed > over the past few months into Debian/unstable as a patched 2.11.13 > source. > > I've already prepared a 2.11.14-1 package for Debian/unstable. > Sponsors are welcome to perform the upload. > So, err... 112 files changed, 18739 insertions(+), 11535 deletions(-) I'm afraid that's nowhere near suitable for a freeze exception. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694781: marked as done (unblock: spyder/2.1.10-2)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:55:35 +0100
with message-id <20121203205535.ga5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694781: unblock: spyder/2.1.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694781,
regarding unblock: spyder/2.1.10-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package spyder
Hello,
I would like you to consider an unblock for spyder. It fix a nasty bug #678339
this cause some troubles when saving a file. for a python editor which become
quite popular, it seems to me that this should be fixed before wheeze release.
this bug was reported upstream
http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1098
and fix on top of the current 2.1.10-1 version with this commit
http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/source/detail?r=6260313cb49b
this is the same patch which was apply between 2.1.10-1 and 2.1.10-2
since the last upload I had no bug report against spyder.
unblock spyder/2.1.10-2
thanks for your time
Frederic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486
diff -Nru spyder-2.1.10/debian/changelog spyder-2.1.10/debian/changelog
--- spyder-2.1.10/debian/changelog 2012-05-28 08:24:47.0 +0200
+++ spyder-2.1.10/debian/changelog 2012-07-31 22:44:05.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+spyder (2.1.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/pacthes
+- 0003-from-upstream-fix-1098.patch (new) (Closes: #678339)
+
+ -- Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:42:04 +0200
+
spyder (2.1.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Imported Upstream version 2.1.10
diff -Nru spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0001-fix-documentation-installation.patch spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0001-fix-documentation-installation.patch
--- spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0001-fix-documentation-installation.patch 2012-04-01 10:10:27.0 +0200
+++ spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0001-fix-documentation-installation.patch 2012-07-31 22:40:47.0 +0200
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
setup_command.BuildDoc.run(self)
except UnicodeDecodeError:
diff --git a/spyderlib/__init__.py b/spyderlib/__init__.py
-index c8eb4e2..cad8046 100644
+index 8ef9182..eadd49a 100644
--- a/spyderlib/__init__.py
+++ b/spyderlib/__init__.py
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ __forum_url__ = 'http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib'
diff -Nru spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0003-from-upstream-fix-1098.patch spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0003-from-upstream-fix-1098.patch
--- spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0003-from-upstream-fix-1098.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ spyder-2.1.10/debian/patches/0003-from-upstream-fix-1098.patch 2012-07-31 22:40:47.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Picca=20Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric-Emmanuel?=
+Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:40:10 +0200
+Subject: from upstream fix 1098
+
+---
+ spyderlib/plugins/editor.py | 14 +++---
+ spyderlib/widgets/editor.py | 22 +-
+ spyderlib/widgets/tabs.py | 22 +-
+ 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/spyderlib/plugins/editor.py b/spyderlib/plugins/editor.py
+index 58ee269..4054d32 100644
+--- a/spyderlib/plugins/editor.py
b/spyderlib/plugins/editor.py
+@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+-# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
++# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+ #
+ # Copyright © 2009-2010 Pierre Raybaut
+ # Licensed under the terms of the MIT License
+@@ -997,9 +997,9 @@ class Editor(SpyderPluginWidget):
+ self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL('editor_focus_changed()'),
+ self.main.plugin_focus_changed)
+
+-self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL('close_file(long,long)'),
++self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL('close_file(QString,int)'),
+ self.close_file_in_all_editorstacks)
+-self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL('file_saved(long,long)'),
++self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL('file_saved(QString, int)'),
+ self.file_saved_in_editorstack)
+
+ self.connect(editorstack, SIGNAL("create_new_window()"),
+@@ -1052,18 +1052,18 @@ class Editor(SpyderPluginWidget):
+ self.register_widget_shortcuts("Editor", finfo.editor)
+
+ @Slot(int, int)
+-def close_file_in_all_editorst
Bug#695052: marked as done (unblock: xen/4.1.3-5)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:47:24 +0100 with message-id <20121203204724.gz5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#695052: unblock: xen/4.1.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #695052, regarding unblock: xen/4.1.3-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xen/4.1.3-5. It includes several security fixes. xen (4.1.3-5) unstable; urgency=high * Fix state corruption due to incomplete grant table switch. CVE-2012-5510 * Check range of arguments to several HVM operations. CVE-2012-5511 * Check array index before using it in HVM memory operation. CVE-2012-5512 * Check memory range in memory exchange operation. CVE-2012-5513 * Don't allow too large memory size and avoid busy looping. CVE-2012-5515 -- Bastian Blank Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:37:38 +0100 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.6-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 19:50:21 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package xen/4.1.3-5. It includes several security fixes. > Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#694862: pre-approval for audit/1:1.7.18-2
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 14:34:02 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > If you think this change is inappropriate for wheezy, do you think #681457 > should be downgraded or tagged wheezy-ignore? > I think it should be downgraded. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 00:28:05 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > we would like to upload kde-workspace 4:4.8.4-5, which so far would > provide a number of updates/fixes: > - a minor changelog fix to the previous version > - fix the X session registration, which was off due to a mismatch > between an old debian option and the actual configuration key > (#692730) > - the backport of an upstream fix for the taskbar widget, which would > not unnecessarly notify windows as "demanding attention" (#685334) > - the backport of an upstream patch to improve a patch backported > already in 4:4.8.4-3 > - the backport of 3 upstream patches to fix the reading of two > configuration files (kwinrc and powermanagementprofilesrc) as > cascading configuration (i.e. so values in configs in global paths > like /u/s/kde4/config and the Debian-specific /e/kde4, for the local > admin, can be used) > - the backport of an upstream fix for the saving of panel launchers of > preferred apps (#686131) > - drop hal from kdm.init (#694021) > - kde-workspace-bin: > - ship a /etc/kde4 directory, so postinst can work (#694253) > - explicitly depend on qdbus, used by startkde > - encoding fixes for the debconf translations of es (#692209) and pl > (#691953) > > Generally, all the proposed changes should be safe; in case, the upload > could be aged to more days to give it more days. > Ack to all except the hal removal in kdm.init, this is still needed on !linux. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694901: unblock: manpages/3.44-1
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:07:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package manpages, it fixes an important issue in the > Debian-specific part of the package (#691414, see motd.5.diff attached). > The debian/inst changes, and the s/3.42/3.44/g, tend to make me sad. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694919: marked as done (unblock: haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:24:17 +0100 with message-id <20121203202417.gu5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#694919: unblock: haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694919, regarding unblock: haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694919 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: jmilli...@gmail.com Please unblock package haskell-dbus The version currently in testing, 0.10, has two bugs which can cause problems for users who run processes with lifetimes longer than the dbus service: - If the connection to the dbus service is lost, the library enters a loop and causes massive unbounded memory consumption. Fixed in the upstream point release 0.10.2. - If connecting to an address fails, the library will leak a file descriptor. When client code attempts reconnection in a loop, this may cause exhaustion of available file descriptors. Fixed in the upstream point release 0.10.3. There are some minor changes in these releases which are unrelated to those bugs. The unrelated changes are trivial updates to dependency version limits in a build metadata file, and do not affect the Debian package. http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-dbus.html unblock haskell-dbus/0.10.3-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 22:53:38 -0800, John Millikin wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > X-Debbugs-Cc: jmilli...@gmail.com > > Please unblock package haskell-dbus > > The version currently in testing, 0.10, has two bugs which can cause problems > for users who run processes with lifetimes longer than the dbus service: > I guess it's a good thing there's 0 reverse dep so we don't have to rebuild the world... Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#695052: unblock: xen/4.1.3-5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xen/4.1.3-5. It includes several security fixes. xen (4.1.3-5) unstable; urgency=high * Fix state corruption due to incomplete grant table switch. CVE-2012-5510 * Check range of arguments to several HVM operations. CVE-2012-5511 * Check array index before using it in HVM memory operation. CVE-2012-5512 * Check memory range in memory exchange operation. CVE-2012-5513 * Don't allow too large memory size and avoid busy looping. CVE-2012-5515 -- Bastian Blank Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:37:38 +0100 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.6-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121203185021.15630.38608.report...@lumphammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#695032: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1
reopen 694015
kthxbye
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 01:34:24 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: Debian Electronics Team
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please unblock geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1. It'd fix dependency problem during
> upgrade. debdiff is below.
>
>
> diff -Nru geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog
> --- geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2012-10-02 20:07:30.0 +0900
> +++ geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 23:20:31.0 +0900
> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
> +geda-gaf (1:1.6.2-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload (with maintainer's ACK).
> + * debian/control
> +- set "Depends: geda-doc" from Recommends since its documents (including
> + copyright file) is linked to geda-doc. It fixes "geda: copyright file
> + missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) " (Closes: #694015)
> +
> + -- Hideki Yamane Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:00 +0900
> +
> geda-gaf (1:1.6.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* Added glib-single-include.patch: Do not include individual glib headers
> diff -Nru geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control
> --- geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control 2012-10-02 20:07:30.0 +0900
> +++ geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control 2012-11-29 23:15:42.0 +0900
> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
>
> Package: geda
> Architecture: all
> -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist
> -Recommends: geda-gsymcheck, geda-gattrib, geda-doc
> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist, geda-doc
> +Recommends: geda-gsymcheck, geda-gattrib
> Suggests: geda-utils, geda-examples, gerbv, pcb
> Description: GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (metapackage)
> The gEDA project has produced and continues working on a full GPL'd suite
> and
NAK. If you're using symlinked /usr/share/doc directory the dependency
needs to be strictly on the exact same version of the other package.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: lockfile-progs 0.1.17 might be candidate for wheezy
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:55:53 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > > Please feel free to ignore this, but there were a few bugfixes in > lockfile-progs 0.1.17 (just uploaded to sid) that I thought might make > it appropriate for consideration for wheezy: > Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#695034: marked as done (unblock: lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:58:37 +
with message-id <334378c7097ff7ea068aa29cb26c3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695034: unblock: lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695034,
regarding unblock: lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
695034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: lxde-metapacka...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please unblock lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1. It'd fix dependency problem during
upgrade. debdiff between testing and unstable is below.
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog2012-05-18 17:08:23.0
+0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 23:56:39.0
+0900
@@ -1,3 +1,27 @@
+lxde-metapackages (4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * guarantee proper migration from old enviroment to wheezy
+Thanks to Andreas Beckmann for pointing this
+out and patch (Closes: #694061)
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:11:20 +0900
+
+lxde-metapackages (4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switching from gdm3 to lightdm.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:40:30 +0200
+
+lxde-metapackages (3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Adding galculator to lxde depends (Closes: #659577).
+ * Readding back network-manager-gnome which apparently got lost at
+some point.
+ * Updating GPL blurb in copyright file.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:23:15 +0200
+
lxde-metapackages (2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andrew Lee (李健秋) ]
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/control
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control 2012-05-11 14:14:34.0 +0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/control 2012-08-11 05:40:21.0
+0900
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
Package: lxde
Architecture: all
Depends:
- ${misc:Depends}, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
+ ${misc:Depends}, galculator, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
lxde-core, lxde-icon-theme, lxinput,
lxrandr, lxsession-edit, lxshortcut, lxterminal, obconf, xarchiver
Recommends:
- iceweasel | www-browser, gdm3 | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
- lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
+ iceweasel | www-browser, lightdm | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
+ network-manager-gnome, lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
Suggests: lxlauncher, lxtask
Description: LXDE metapackage
LXDE (the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment) is a project aimed
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/copyright
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright2012-04-28 19:05:22.0
+0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/copyright 2012-08-11 05:40:21.0
+0900
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
License: GPL-2+
License: GPL-2+
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
- of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@
GNU General Public License for more details.
.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+ along with this program. If not, see
Bug#695034: unblock: lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: lxde-metapacka...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please unblock lxde-metapackages/4+nmu1. It'd fix dependency problem during
upgrade. debdiff between testing and unstable is below.
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/changelog2012-05-18 17:08:23.0
+0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 23:56:39.0
+0900
@@ -1,3 +1,27 @@
+lxde-metapackages (4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * guarantee proper migration from old enviroment to wheezy
+Thanks to Andreas Beckmann for pointing this
+out and patch (Closes: #694061)
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:11:20 +0900
+
+lxde-metapackages (4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switching from gdm3 to lightdm.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:40:30 +0200
+
+lxde-metapackages (3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Adding galculator to lxde depends (Closes: #659577).
+ * Readding back network-manager-gnome which apparently got lost at
+some point.
+ * Updating GPL blurb in copyright file.
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:23:15 +0200
+
lxde-metapackages (2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andrew Lee (李健秋) ]
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/control
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/control 2012-05-11 14:14:34.0 +0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/control 2012-08-11 05:40:21.0
+0900
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
Package: lxde
Architecture: all
Depends:
- ${misc:Depends}, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
+ ${misc:Depends}, galculator, gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance,
lxde-core, lxde-icon-theme, lxinput,
lxrandr, lxsession-edit, lxshortcut, lxterminal, obconf, xarchiver
Recommends:
- iceweasel | www-browser, gdm3 | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
- lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
+ iceweasel | www-browser, lightdm | x-display-manager, lxmusic, menu-xdg,
+ network-manager-gnome, lxpolkit, xserver-xorg
Suggests: lxlauncher, lxtask
Description: LXDE metapackage
LXDE (the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment) is a project aimed
diff -Nru lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright
lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/copyright
--- lxde-metapackages-2/debian/copyright2012-04-28 19:05:22.0
+0900
+++ lxde-metapackages-4+nmu1/debian/copyright 2012-08-11 05:40:21.0
+0900
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
License: GPL-2+
License: GPL-2+
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
- of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@
GNU General Public License for more details.
.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+ along with this program. If not, see
Bug#695033: unblock: gpsim/0.26.1-2.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: gp...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please unblock gpsim/0.26.1-2.1. It'd fix dependency problem during
upgrade. debdiff is below.
diff -Nru gpsim-0.26.1/debian/changelog gpsim-0.26.1/debian/changelog
--- gpsim-0.26.1/debian/changelog 2012-05-27 05:08:50.0 +0900
+++ gpsim-0.26.1/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 23:41:58.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+gpsim (0.26.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/control
+- add {Breaks,Replaces}: gpsim-lcd-graphic, gpsim-lcd to avoid upgrade
+ failure from old environment. Thanks to Andreas Beckmann
+ (Closes: #693980)
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:41:31 +0900
+
gpsim (0.26.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* applied Ilya Barygin's patch, thanks! Closes: #665542
diff -Nru gpsim-0.26.1/debian/control gpsim-0.26.1/debian/control
--- gpsim-0.26.1/debian/control 2012-05-27 05:08:12.0 +0900
+++ gpsim-0.26.1/debian/control 2012-11-29 23:41:58.0 +0900
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
Package: gpsim
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks: gpsim-lcd-graphic, gpsim-lcd
+Replaces: gpsim-lcd-graphic, gpsim-lcd
Recommends: gputils (>= 0.10.0-1)
Suggests: gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gpsim-lcd, gpsim-doc
Description: Simulator for Microchip's PIC microcontrollers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121202014027.f2435bdb2e7397644ac0f...@debian.or.jp
Bug#695032: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: Debian Electronics Team
Hi,
Please unblock geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1. It'd fix dependency problem during
upgrade. debdiff is below.
diff -Nru geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog
--- geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2012-10-02 20:07:30.0 +0900
+++ geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 23:20:31.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+geda-gaf (1:1.6.2-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload (with maintainer's ACK).
+ * debian/control
+- set "Depends: geda-doc" from Recommends since its documents (including
+ copyright file) is linked to geda-doc. It fixes "geda: copyright file
+ missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) " (Closes: #694015)
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:00 +0900
+
geda-gaf (1:1.6.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Added glib-single-include.patch: Do not include individual glib headers
diff -Nru geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control
--- geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control 2012-10-02 20:07:30.0 +0900
+++ geda-gaf-1.6.2/debian/control 2012-11-29 23:15:42.0 +0900
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
Package: geda
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist
-Recommends: geda-gsymcheck, geda-gattrib, geda-doc
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist, geda-doc
+Recommends: geda-gsymcheck, geda-gattrib
Suggests: geda-utils, geda-examples, gerbv, pcb
Description: GPL EDA -- Electronics design software (metapackage)
The gEDA project has produced and continues working on a full GPL'd suite and
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121202013424.3ea50be3b7283951c72f7...@debian.or.jp
Bug#689698: please unblock gupnp stack
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > The thing is, these updated packages mean rather big diffs, and don't > seem to close any reported bugs, according to the changelogs. So I'm > afraid this isn't a very high priority. If there is anything I can do from my end to make it easier for you, please tell me... Interopability is everything for this kind of software. If I don't hear anything I'll trust you know what's best for our users and simply leave the packages to their destiny. -- Andreas Henriksson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
On 01/12/2012 14:06, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gajim A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0] More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing list: [1] debdif is available here: [2] [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682598 [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/09/msg00042.html [2]: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/gajim-0.15.1.debdiff unblock gajim/0.15.1-1 A few comments: - the source format change is not appropriate It's because it was in format 3.0 previously (Gajim 0.14.4), and for 0.15 I did something wrong that I wanted to repair. Moreover, I need to add a patch for your next point (change to _StreamCB) and it's nicer in format 3.0. If you really want, I can re-do the patch in old format. Yes please. Ok I've gone back to the old patch system in the uploaded gajim-0.15.1-3 package -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bc6507.5000...@lagaule.org
