NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7bav-0003oc...@franck.debian.org



NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gmime2.2_2.2.25-2+squeeze1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7zin-0004ua...@franck.debian.org



NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7ymi-0004tz...@franck.debian.org



Bug#699395: unblock: mednafen/0.8.D.3-6

2013-02-18 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:44:12 +, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:09:20AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Would it be possible to unblock mednafen? It fixes #699143 which I
> > consider important (I replaced the version of libvorbisidec provided
> > in the mednafen source code with a dependency on libvorbisidec-dev in
> > Debian, but it doesn't work for audio CD playback).
> 
> Unblocked. Please ensure the security team is aware of the embedded library
> (they may already be).

Thanks! I notified the security team at the end of January, and the
information has been added to
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/embedded-code-copies?view=markup

Regards,

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7yji-0007b3...@franck.debian.org



NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7y5f-0004e8...@franck.debian.org



lvm2 and grub2 udeb unblocks

2013-02-18 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Cyril,

grub2 and lvm2 in sid fix RC bugs, can I haz an ack for their
unblock-udebs?

Thanks,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


pixman udeb unblock

2013-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi,

pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a udeb.
Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1361222392.9538.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Bug#697764: marked as done (unblock: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-5)

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:55:40 +0100
with message-id <20130218205540.gd5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697764: unblock: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #697764,
regarding unblock: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
697764: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697764
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package glib2.0

It fixes two RC bugs.
Related to #676485 is the pu request for gdm3/squeeze [1],[2].

glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Take into account multiarch when removing the cache files in postrm:
Remove /usr/lib/gio/modules/giomodule.cache only for the native
architecture for which this cache file was created.
After removing /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled on purge,
run dpkg-trigger explicitly, so in case libglib2.0-0 is installed for
other architectures, the cache file is re-created. (Closes: #696389)
  * Drop the various Breaks from libglib2.0-0. Those are causing APT to fail
on a dist-upgrade from squeeze to wheezy. (Closes: #676485)

 -- Michael Biebl   Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:30:04 +0100

Full debdiff is attached.

In case you are wondering, why the gvfs Breaks was kept: We noticed in
our upgrade tests, that only packages with an (indirect) dependency on
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 were causing problems. So only those were dropped.


Cheers,
Michael

unblock glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-4

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697751
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/12/msg00778.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/changelog glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/changelog
--- glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/changelog	2012-10-24 11:51:16.0 +0200
+++ glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/changelog	2013-01-08 23:30:05.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Take into account multiarch when removing the cache files in postrm:
+Remove /usr/lib/gio/modules/giomodule.cache only for the native
+architecture for which this cache file was created.
+After removing /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled on purge,
+run dpkg-trigger explicitly, so in case libglib2.0-0 is installed for
+other architectures, the cache file is re-created. (Closes: #696389)
+  * Drop the various Breaks from libglib2.0-0. Those are causing APT to fail
+on a dist-upgrade from squeeze to wheezy. (Closes: #676485)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl   Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:30:04 +0100
+
 glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Team upload
diff -Nru glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control
--- glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control	2012-10-24 12:33:11.0 +0200
+++ glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control	2013-01-08 23:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -38,14 +38,7 @@
  ${shlibs:Depends}
 Recommends: libglib2.0-data,
 shared-mime-info
-Breaks: gvfs (<< 1.8),
-gnome-control-center (<< 1:3),
-gnome-session (<< 3.0.0-3),
-gdm3 (<< 3.0.3),
-libgtk-3-0 (<< 3.0.12),
-emacs23 (<< 23.4+1-3),
-eog (<< 3.2.2-3),
-gwaei (<< 3.2.0b1-2)
+Breaks: gvfs (<< 1.8)
 Replaces: libglib2.0-dev (<< 2.23.2-2)
 Multi-Arch: same
 Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
diff -Nru glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control.in glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control.in
--- glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control.in	2012-09-23 09:31:12.0 +0200
+++ glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.4/debian/control.in	2013-01-08 08:00:23.0 +0100
@@ -38,14 +38,7 @@
  ${shlibs:Depends}
 Recommends: @DATA_PKG@,
 shared-mime-info
-Breaks: gvfs (<< 1.8),
-gnome-control-center (<< 1:3),
-gnome-session (<< 3.0.0-3),
-gdm3 (<< 3.0.3),
-libgtk-3-0 (<< 3.0.12),
-emacs23 (<< 23.4+1-3),
-eog (<< 3.2.2-3),
-gwaei (<< 3.2.0b1-2)
+Breaks: gvfs (<< 1.8)
 Replaces: @DEV_PKG@ (<< 2.23.2-2)
 Multi-Arch: same

Bug#691710: marked as done (unblock: mdadm/3.2.5-5)

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:54:37 +0100
with message-id <20130218205437.gc5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691710: unblock: mdadm/3.2.5-4 (pre-upload)
has caused the Debian Bug report #691710,
regarding unblock: mdadm/3.2.5-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691710: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691710
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

This is a "pre-upload unblock request" for mdadm/3.2.5-4.

Recently, upstream released a new version of mdadm, v3.2.6,
which contains only bugfixes or documentation improvements.

I'm cherry-picking only the most important changes from this
version.  These changes fixes a number of important bugs, each
of which is not of RC severity, but important enough to be
included into wheezy in my point of view.

Each of the bug has relatively low impact or probability, or
can be seen in only very specific configurations, but once you
hit it, it might be difficult to recover the data which was
on the raid array in question.  This is why I consider these
to be good candidates for wheezy.

This "unblock request" consists of two parts.  First, the "main"
part, which talks about several bugfixes:

Here are the list of changelog entries of this nature:

  * Fix 'enough' function for RAID10, to prevent starting of a RAID10
array which does not have required minimum of component devices.
(Closes: #691668).

  * fix segfaults in Detail() - mdadm --detail may segfault if a drive
has been removed from the array (Closes: #691670)

  * super0: do not override uuid with homehost.  The bug prevented
re-creating an array with v0.90 superblock with the specified uuid
when homehost is also specified.  (Closes: #686703)

Each of the above 3 patches fixes specific bugs relevant to data stability,
so to say.

  * several fixes for mdmon argument processing (Closes: #691671):
- allow --takeover when original was started with --offroot
- fix arg parsing.
- fix arg processing for -a

The last series - mdmon argument processing fixes - is not directly
relevant for version of the package currently in wheezy, since mdmon
utility there is not used right now.  For this reason, the fixes above
are of zero risk for configurations which are directly supported by
mdadm debian package infrastructure.  However, mdmon is required to
support raid arrays with "external" metadata, which are all the
"fakeraid" arrays (ahci and other in-chipset implementations), found
in almost all modern motherboards or PCs.  These tiny bugfixes allows
usage of such arrays in saner way.  More about mdmon is below.

While at it, I'm also fixing 2 minor issues with packaging which were
slipped in - one debian/changelog typo and an inverse logic in
`/etc/init.d/mdadm status' handling (#686100).

Debdiff between current version in wheezy (3.2.5-3) and the proposed
release attached in file named mdadm_3.2.5-4.debdiff.

Whole packaging is done in git, and each change is visible in the
git repository on git.debian.org, maybe this one is easier to review:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=shortlog;h=master


And second, there's a second part, which talks especially about mdmon
and usage of arrays with external metadata.

There's one bugreport of RC severity, filed by Miquel van Smoorenburg,
who requested a new feature: adding support for raid arrays with
"external" metadata.  It is #684708.

First, a little explanation.

mdadm utility is used to manage raid arrays.  For native linux arrays,
only 2 components are necessary: mdadm utility to start/stop/etc, and
the kernel to handle all the rest.  However, for arrays with non-native
formats/metadata, metadata updates are handled by external program,
kernel sends events affecting metadata to userspace and expects an
external program to udpate the metadata using whatever format it is in.
This external program is mdmon.  Kernel refuses to make the device
read-write unless such external prgram is running for the array in
question.

When mdadm is asked to assemble such a non-native array, it tries to
execute mdmon automatically.  Once running, it will handle metadata
updates from kernel, and the array becomes fully operational.  No
additional actions are necessary, mdadm does it all internally.

If such non-native arrays are assembled from initramfs, mdmon should
be in the initramfs too, because else, say, ext4 journal replay
(which is done even on a

Bug#698976: unblock: libssh/0.5.4-1

2013-02-18 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:37:22 +,
Jonathan Wiltshire  a écrit :

Hi,

> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:24:24PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > retitle 698976 unblock: libssh/0.5.4-1
> > thanks
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I've uploaded the package into unstable.
> 
> Sorry for the delay. The error in the error message is still present,
> was that intentional?

I've added that patch
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/libssh/0.5.4-1/0003-fix-typo.patch
so that should be OK I guess?

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#699492: unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2

2013-02-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:55:41PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Please, unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2.
> > This is change in major version, but this will fix situation, that we
> > ship in wheezy different versions of package and documentation (package
> > 5.2.6 and docs for 5.0.2).

I also meant to say that debian/copyright claims the license is GFDL,
Wheezy's upstream headers claim GPL and sid's upstream headers claim AGPL.
That needs sorting out, preferably with a complete audit and update of
debian/copyright.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#700807: tpu: package unbound/1.4.17-3

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #700807 [release.debian.org] tpu: package unbound/1.4.17-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
700807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b700807.136121853415767.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#700807: tpu: package unbound/1.4.17-3

2013-02-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + confirmed

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:24:40PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: tpu
> 
> i'd like to upload unbound 1.4.17-3 with an updated D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
> hint to testing/testing-proposed-updates to fix #697351.  unstable has a
> newer upstream release (1.4.19-1) so the update will need to go via tpu.
> debdiff is attached.

Please go ahead.

Thanks,


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#699492: unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #699492 [release.debian.org] unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
699492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b699492.136121791811088.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#699492: unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2

2013-02-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Please, unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2.
> This is change in major version, but this will fix situation, that we
> ship in wheezy different versions of package and documentation (package
> 5.2.6 and docs for 5.0.2).

Whilst I agree that we should have same versions of the package and
documentation, and I'd be more leniant that usual given that it's "just"
documentation, there are problems that mean I'm not prepared to unblock
this version.

> +bacula-doc (5.2.6-2) unstable; urgency=low

You aren't listed in Uploaders or Maintainers, so this should be an NMU
version number and have a note in the changelog.

> +bacula-doc (5.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> +  [ Alexander Golovko ]
> +  * debian/patches/remove-config-generated-file-in-source.patch, 
> +debian/patches/series, debian/rules, debian/source.lintian-overrides:
> ++ change method for remove config.{log,status} from sources.

Why? Apart from the ick of using quilt to remove this file, you now have to
update that patch every time the file changes, which is probably every
upstream release. Was there a problem caused by the previous behaviour?

> +  * Bump standards to 3.9.4 (no changes).
> +  * debian/compat: bump to 9.
> +debian/control: set dpendency debhelper to >9.

These are a definite 'no' (although I realise the dependency was reverted).



-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze7_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7vyx-00078c...@franck.debian.org



Bug#699395: marked as done (unblock: mednafen/0.8.D.3-6)

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:44:12 +
with message-id <20130218184412.gb10...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#699395: unblock: mednafen/0.8.D.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #699395,
regarding unblock: mednafen/0.8.D.3-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
699395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Would it be possible to unblock mednafen? It fixes #699143 which I
consider important (I replaced the version of libvorbisidec provided
in the mednafen source code with a dependency on libvorbisidec-dev in
Debian, but it doesn't work for audio CD playback).

The debdiff is as follows:


diff -Nru mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/changelog mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/changelog
--- mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/changelog   2012-06-18 01:01:23.0 +0200
+++ mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/changelog   2013-01-29 23:41:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mednafen (0.8.D.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Build using the provided libvorbisidec source; mednafen doesn't work
+correctly with the version currently in Debian (closes: #699143).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt   Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:40:10 +0100
+
 mednafen (0.8.D.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Use ${source:Package} with dpkg-query to retrieve only the package
diff -Nru mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/patches/series 
mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/patches/series
--- mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/patches/series  2012-06-17 23:16:13.0 
+0200
+++ mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/patches/series  2013-01-29 23:38:48.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-use-system-tremor.patch
 hardening-fixes.patch
 zlib-1.2.6-fix.patch
diff -Nru mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/rules mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/rules
--- mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/rules   2012-06-17 23:16:13.0 +0200
+++ mednafen-0.8.D.3/debian/rules   2013-01-29 23:39:07.0 +0100
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
cp src/compress/minilzo.h src/compress/minilzo.h.orig
cp /usr/share/lzo/minilzo/*.[ch] src/compress
 
-   # Move bundled source code for external packages out of the way
-   mv src/tremor src/tremor.orig
-
dh_auto_build
 
 override_dh_auto_clean:
@@ -30,9 +27,6 @@
[ ! -f src/compress/minilzo.c.orig ] || mv src/compress/minilzo.c.orig 
src/compress/minilzo.c
[ ! -f src/compress/minilzo.h.orig ] || mv src/compress/minilzo.h.orig 
src/compress/minilzo.h
 
-   # Restore bundled source code
-   [ ! -d src/tremor.orig ] || mv src/tremor.orig src/tremor
-
dh_auto_clean
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:



unblock mednafen/0.8.D.3-6

Thanks in advance,

Stephen


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:09:20AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Would it be possible to unblock mednafen? It fixes #699143 which I
> consider important (I replaced the version of libvorbisidec provided
> in the mednafen source code with a dependency on libvorbisidec-dev in
> Debian, but it doesn't work for audio CD playback).

Unblocked. Please ensure the security team is aware of the embedded library
(they may already be).

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#698976: unblock: libssh/0.5.4-1

2013-02-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:24:24PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> retitle 698976 unblock: libssh/0.5.4-1
> thanks
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've uploaded the package into unstable.

Sorry for the delay. The error in the error message is still present, was
that intentional?


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#700872: unblock: dh-make-drupal/1.3-1

2013-02-18 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package dh-make-drupal

I received a bug report/pull request via GitHub¹ explaining that
drupal.org no longer serves requests lacking a User-Agent string. This
version fixes that problem and adds more descriptive error reporting,
and a very simple modification allowing it to be run in Squeeze
systems (debhelper >> 8.0.0 to >= 8.0.0).

¹ https://github.com/gwolf/dh-make-drupal/pull/2

Full diff between 1.2-1 and 1.3-1 follows.

diff --git a/changelog.txt b/changelog.txt
index 017964c..7294924 100644
--- a/changelog.txt
+++ b/changelog.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+1.3 (2013-02-18)
+ * Thanks to Stefan Kangas - This release is basically a pull request
+   of his work (https://github.com/gwolf/dh-make-drupal/pull/2)
+ * Provide a User-Agent to keep working despite drupal.org's new
+   restrictions
+ * Show the OpenURI::HTTPError exception reasons
+ * Fix the generated Build-Depends to work correctly on Squeeze
+
 1.2 (2012-08-13)
  * "Switch '-d' (Drupal version) was not accepting its needed argument.
Fixed, thanks  to Matthew Gabeler-Lee for the report
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 66b44c7..dc3f979 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+dh-make-drupal (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Merging Stefan Kangas' pull request - Thanks!
+  * Provide a User-Agent to keep working despite drupal.org's new
+restrictions
+  * Show the OpenURI::HTTPError exception reasons
+  * Fix the generated Build-Depends to work correctly on Squeeze
+
+ -- Gunnar Wolf   Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:02 -0600
+
 dh-make-drupal (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Switch '-d' (Drupal version) was not accepting its needed argument -
diff --git a/dh-make-drupal b/dh-make-drupal
index b011b18..650e967 100755
--- a/dh-make-drupal
+++ b/dh-make-drupal
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 #
 # Creates Debian packages from Drupal projects (modules, themes, translations).
 
-Version = '1.0'
+Version = '1.3'
 Author = 'Gunnar Wolf '
 Copyright = <' % [@maint_name, @maint_mail],
- 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 8.0.0)',
+ 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0)',
  'Standards-Version: 3.9.3',
  'Homepage: %s' % @project.url,
  '',
@@ -648,9 +648,9 @@ module DrupalProject
   auth = self.new
 
   begin
-doc = Hpricot(open(url))
+doc = Hpricot(open(url, 'User-Agent' => "dh-make-drupal %s" % 
[Version]))
   rescue OpenURI::HTTPError
-raise IOError, "Could not open author information site at #{url}"
+raise IOError, "Could not open author information site at #{url}: " + 
$!
   end
   auth.info_url = url
   auth.name = doc.search('dd.profile-profile_full_name').inner_text
@@ -671,9 +671,9 @@ module DrupalProject
   Logger.instance.debug "Fetching project information from #{@url}"
 
   begin
-@html = Hpricot(open(@url))
+@html = Hpricot(open(@url, 'User-Agent' => "dh-make-drupal %s" % 
[Version]))
   rescue OpenURI::HTTPError
-raise IOError, "Could not open #{name} project website at #{@url}"
+raise IOError, "Could not open #{name} project website at #{@url}: " + 
$!
   end
 
   # Get the project description. Fetch only the first paragraph -
@@ -883,9 +883,10 @@ module DrupalProject
   raise Errno::EEXIST, "Destination filename for source tarball "+
 "(#{dest_file}) already exists. Cannot continue."
 end
-File.open(dest_file, 'w') {|f| f.write open(url).read}
+File.open(dest_file, 'w') {|f|
+  f.write open(url, 'User-Agent' => "dh-make-drupal %s" % 
[Version]).read}
   rescue OpenURI::HTTPError
-Logger.instance.error "Requested URI #{url} could not be retreived"
+Logger.instance.error "Requested URI #{url} could not be retreived: " 
+ $!
   end
 end
 


unblock dh-make-drupal/1.3-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130218181645.24330.84966.report...@mosca.iiec.unam.mx



NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7uny-0005vm...@franck.debian.org



Bug#699696: pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2

2013-02-18 Thread Jonathan Niehof
Thank you Adam (and Jonathan Wiltshire for sponsoring the upload.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/canqxixnosnzkyzg8cvxqhay4yez8ma3neplghv7dolfu1nk...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#694378: please allow up-to-date apt-cacher-ng in wheezy

2013-02-18 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi,

again (cf. #683803) I was bitten by (apt-cacher-ng  0.7.6-1):

Sun Feb 17 11:47:50 
2013|http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/popt/libpopt0_1.16-7_i386.deb storage 
error [301 Moved Permanently], last errno: Operation now in progress
Sun Feb 17 11:56:55 
2013|http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcap2/libcap2_2.22-1.2_i386.deb 
storage error [301 Moved Permanently], last errno: Operation now in progress

This happens rarely, but even with "RedirMax: 0", and it spoils the debian-lan 
setup.

So please consider the fixed package for wheezy.  Offering a fixed package 
in backports doesn't make Debian better, because either you use the package from
backports which will not be better by being in backports or you don't use acng 
at all - which will not need a fixed package.  And it causes extra work  
to include backport repositories, especially for debian-lan.

Best regards,

Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130218174724.GA12095@fuzi



Processed: Re: Bug#700864: pu: package dbus-glib/0.88-2.1+squeeze1

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending squeeze
Bug #700864 [release.debian.org] pu: package dbus-glib/0.88-2.1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and pending.

-- 
700864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700864
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b700864.13612089118834.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#699696: pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #699696 [release.debian.org] pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
699696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b699696.13612089789244.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#700864: pu: package dbus-glib/0.88-2.1+squeeze1

2013-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + pending squeeze

On 18.02.2013 16:05, Simon McVittie wrote:
Moritz asked me to upload dbus-glib to squeeze for #700638 
(CVE-2013-0292).
I've already uploaded it, with permission from adsb, since the 6.0.7 
point

release is imminent. Debdiff below.


Flagged for acceptance; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/e1b8425e41f9a124a2598a11adaee...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#699696: pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2

2013-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + pending

On 15.02.2013 18:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 13:33 -0700, Jonathan Niehof wrote:

The diff is a minimal change for this bug only. It is identical to
0.9.2-3.3 in testing, with the exception of targeting stable.


+pam-shield (0.9.2-3.3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low

The version needs to be /smaller/ than what's currently in testing /
unstable; please use "0.9.2-3.3~squeeze1". With that change, and
assuming that the resulting package has been tested on a squeeze 
system

please go ahead; thanks.


Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1987c5c06a2daee509a2ed71207f5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#700864: pu: package dbus-glib/0.88-2.1+squeeze1

2013-02-18 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Moritz asked me to upload dbus-glib to squeeze for #700638 (CVE-2013-0292).
I've already uploaded it, with permission from adsb, since the 6.0.7 point
release is imminent. Debdiff below.

Regards,
S

diffstat for dbus-glib_0.88-2.1 dbus-glib_0.88-2.1+squeeze1

 dbus-glib-0.88/debian/changelog
|8 +
 debian/patches/0001-CVE-2013-0292-dbus-gproxy-Verify-sender-of-NameOwner.patch 
|   52 ++
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff -u dbus-glib-0.88/debian/changelog dbus-glib-0.88/debian/changelog
--- dbus-glib-0.88/debian/changelog
+++ dbus-glib-0.88/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dbus-glib (0.88-2.1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Apply patch from upstream 0.100.1 to fix insufficient checking
+leading to authentication bypass in pam_fprintd (CVE-2013-0292)
+(Closes: #700638)
+
+ -- Simon McVittie   Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:58:34 +
+
 dbus-glib (0.88-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
dbus-glib-0.88.orig/debian/patches/0001-CVE-2013-0292-dbus-gproxy-Verify-sender-of-NameOwner.patch
+++ 
dbus-glib-0.88/debian/patches/0001-CVE-2013-0292-dbus-gproxy-Verify-sender-of-NameOwner.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+From 166978a09cf5edff4028e670b6074215a4c75eca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Colin Walters 
+Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:19:34 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2013-0292: dbus-gproxy: Verify sender of
+ NameOwnerChanged signals to be o.f.DBus
+
+Anyone can hop on the bus and emit a signal whose interface is
+o.f.DBus; it's expected at the moments that clients (and notably DBus
+libraries) check the sender.
+
+This could previously be used to trick a system service using dbus-glib
+into thinking a malicious signal came from a privileged source, by
+claiming that ownership of the privileged source's well-known name had
+changed from the privileged source's real unique name to the attacker's
+unique name.
+
+[altered to be NULL-safe so it won't crash on peer connections -smcv]
+Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie 
+Reviewed-by: Simon McVittie 
+---
+ dbus/dbus-gproxy.c |7 ---
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/dbus/dbus-gproxy.c b/dbus/dbus-gproxy.c
+index 2fc52f9..c3ae9ec 100644
+--- a/dbus/dbus-gproxy.c
 b/dbus/dbus-gproxy.c
+@@ -1250,8 +1250,11 @@ dbus_g_proxy_manager_filter (DBusConnection
*connection,
+   GSList *tmp;
+   const char *sender;
+ 
++  sender = dbus_message_get_sender (message);
++
+   /* First we handle NameOwnerChanged internally */
+-  if (dbus_message_is_signal (message,
++  if (g_strcmp0 (sender, DBUS_SERVICE_DBUS) == 0 &&
++dbus_message_is_signal (message,
+ DBUS_INTERFACE_DBUS,
+ "NameOwnerChanged"))
+   {
+@@ -1280,8 +1283,6 @@ dbus_g_proxy_manager_filter (DBusConnection
*connection,
+   }
+   }
+ 
+-  sender = dbus_message_get_sender (message);
+-
+   /* dbus spec requires these, libdbus validates */
+   g_assert (dbus_message_get_path (message) != NULL);
+   g_assert (dbus_message_get_interface (message) != NULL);
+-- 
+1.7.10.4
+


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130218160535.ga31...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk



Re: [Pkg-mediawiki-devel] Bug#700595: mediawiki: Upstream bug: Bug 39635 - PostgreSQL LOCK IN SHARE MODE option is a syntax error

2013-02-18 Thread Hans Spaans

Thorsten Glaser schreef op 2013-02-18 10:31:

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Hans Spaans wrote:


Please apply upstream patch r32085 from bugreport 39635[1] to make
Mediawiki 1.19.3-1 work on Debian again.


Indeed, I had already applied it, as a cow-orker spotted
the same issue last week, but not yet uploaded to Debian,
which I just did.

If you’ll want this in wheezy, please take this up with
the Release Team.


I saw I quoted the wrong patchset, it should be "Gerrit change #21606" 
and I have the patch now running on multiple installations. But as this 
affects the running of mediawiki on PostgreSQL I included the Release 
Team in this e-mail to give them a notice.


As a notice in advance I'm also preparing another bugreport as the 
upgrade statements for PostgreSQL are incomplete as it look now. But I 
need to confirm that the patchset I may propose is correct and I expect 
to finish that one coming weekend so it is correct in one go.


Hans


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/3aed5b788f46dd47ca72a2904fe10...@imap-proxy.nexit.nl



NEW changes in stable-new

2013-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.59+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.64+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.76+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.99+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.63+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.56+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.31+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.76+squeeze9_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.31+squeeze9_multi.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7nnl-000396...@franck.debian.org



Bug#698647: unblock: ejabberd/2.1.10-3.1

2013-02-18 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:20:47 +0100
root  wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please approve package ejabberd for unblocking:
> 
> Please consider #660186 release-critical: in many environment,
> JPEG photos are used in Jabber, and in companies, these usually
> come from the LDAP. This bug effectively prevents such environ-
> ments from using ejabberd, or upgrading to the wheezy version.
> 
> The patch to fix this is a one-liner, apparently some forgotten
> escape, and does its job well.
> 
> I’ve prepared a locally patched package with that and would like
> to ask the Release Team hereby for a pre-upload approval, and
> then either the package maintainers to upload a fixed version to
> sid which can migrate, or I will do an NMU. The patch is attached.

As I've just prepared fixes [2] for the three important bugs including
#660186 and asked Rhonda for upload (see the attachment), I'm now
interested in how exactly to handle this NMU request.
As I gather from the upload history in [1], this NMU did not happen,
and I also think I did not see any messages from the archive software
regarding it.  I think I did not see any messages from the release ream
as well.

So what do you propose?  I might re-do the commit
30784fb0a9bc9ca75a229406bf5b2bc21df5ffc2 to acknowledge the NMU but if
it has not actually happened, it doesn't feel quite right to me.

1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/ejabberd.html
2. http://git.deb.at/w/pkg/ejabberd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/wheezy
--- Begin Message ---
I have prepared and pushed fixes for

#691125 package installation creates /root/.erlang.cookie
#660186 mod_vcard_ldap Broken JPEG Photo in 2.1.10
#698309 broken shared roster group support, only support 30 users max

into the "wheezy" branch at git.deb.at.

The first two are rather trivial, the last one required a bit of
tweaking (but nothing special).

I was only able to verify the first patch (through several install --
`logrotate -f` -- purge) runs.  I also checked that application of the
third patch did not break HTTPS (by setting up a TLS-protected web_admin
listener and messing with it using my browser). Can't test the second
(JPEG photos via LDAP) patch myself (it's doable but deploying slapd
and populating it with the user data is an uphill battle -- I did that
once in some now lost sandbox, and I recall that required much
hair-pulling and cursing along the way).

In any case I propose to build 2.1.10-4 from the tip of the
"wheezy" branch from and upload it to unstable so I could prod the
relevant bug reporters asking them to test this upload and ask the
release team for wheezy exclusion.
--- End Message ---


Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

2013-02-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
> 
> My view as a user:
> 
> I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
> available on September 9, 2013 :-)
> 
> Oracle has announced that no more new public updates of Java SE 6 will
> be made available after February 2013:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
> 
> OpenJDK6 therefore should be considered obsolete when Wheezy is released.
> 
> Is there any collaboration with other distributions and/or the OpenJDK
> project on this ?

Andrew from RedHat said that OpenJDK will still be maintained after that:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/02/msg5.html

Sylvestre


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5121dfc9.3000...@debian.org