Bug#701002: nmu: fpgatools_0.0+201212-1

2013-02-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu fpgatools_0.0+201212-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean Debian sid 
environment.

libfpga0/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (= 2.14)

Once again a package built on Ubuntu (or experimental) was uploaded to
sid ...


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130220101125.24758.94087.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de



Bug#701005: unblock: fonts-hanazono/20120421-1.1

2013-02-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package fonts-hanazono

fonts-hanazono does not clean up old ttf-japanese-*.ttf alternatives on
upgrades from squeeze.

  * ttf-hanazono.preinst: Unregister the ttf-japanese-mincho.ttf alternative.
  * fonts-hanazono.preinst: Clean up the ttf-japanese-mincho.ttf alternative
set up by ttf-hanazono in squeeze. This needs to be done in fonts-hanazono
as well since there is no guarantee that the transitional ttf-hanazono
package was installed and did clean this up. Since new installations of
fonts-hanazono cannot be distinguished from upgrades from ttf-hanazono
this needs to be run on new installations, too.  (Closes: #700058)

unblock fonts-hanazono/20120421-1.1
diffstat for fonts-hanazono-20120421 fonts-hanazono-20120421

 changelog  |   13 +
 fonts-hanazono.preinst |9 +
 ttf-hanazono.preinst   |   13 +
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff -Nru fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/changelog fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/changelog
--- fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/changelog	2012-05-29 10:59:35.0 +0200
+++ fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/changelog	2013-02-11 14:57:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+fonts-hanazono (20120421-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * ttf-hanazono.preinst: Unregister the ttf-japanese-mincho.ttf alternative.
+  * fonts-hanazono.preinst: Clean up the ttf-japanese-mincho.ttf alternative
+set up by ttf-hanazono in squeeze. This needs to be done in fonts-hanazono
+as well since there is no guarantee that the transitional ttf-hanazono
+package was installed and did clean this up. Since new installations of
+fonts-hanazono cannot be distinguished from upgrades from ttf-hanazono
+this needs to be run on new installations, too.  (Closes: #700058)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org  Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:56:52 +0100
+
 fonts-hanazono (20120421-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/fonts-hanazono.preinst fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/fonts-hanazono.preinst
--- fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/fonts-hanazono.preinst	2012-03-06 00:23:39.0 +0100
+++ fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/fonts-hanazono.preinst	2013-02-11 14:57:43.0 +0100
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 
 set -e
 
+OLD_ALT_NAME=ttf-japanese-mincho
+OLD_FONT_ENTRY=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/hanazono/hanazono.ttf
+
 PKG=ttf-hanazono
 PKG_VERSION_DEFOMA=20090909-1
 
@@ -34,6 +37,12 @@
 rm_conffile $PKG $FILE
   fi
 
+	# do this on new installations, too, as these could be upgrades
+	# from ttf-hanazono
+	if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 20120421-1.1~; then
+		update-alternatives --remove $OLD_ALT_NAME.ttf $OLD_FONT_ENTRY
+	fi
+
 esac
 
 #DEBHELPER#
diff -Nru fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/ttf-hanazono.preinst fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/ttf-hanazono.preinst
--- fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/ttf-hanazono.preinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ fonts-hanazono-20120421/debian/ttf-hanazono.preinst	2013-02-11 14:57:54.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+OLD_ALT_NAME=ttf-japanese-mincho
+OLD_FONT_ENTRY=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/hanazono/hanazono.ttf
+
+if [ $1 = install ] || [ $1 = upgrade ]; then
+	if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 20120421-1.1~; then
+		update-alternatives --remove $OLD_ALT_NAME.ttf $OLD_FONT_ENTRY
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#


Bug#701006: unblock: fonts-takao/003.02.01-7.1

2013-02-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package fonts-takao

fonts-takao dos not clean up obsolete ttf-japanese-*.tff alternatives on
upgrades from squeeze.

  * fonts-takao-mincho.preinst: Fix OTF alternative cleanup.
  * ttf-takao-*.preinst: Unregister the ttf-japanese-*.ttf alternatives.
  * fonts-takao-*.preinst: Clean up the ttf-japanese-*.ttf alternatives set up
by ttf-takao-* in squeeze. This needs to be done in fonts-takao-* as well
since there is no guarantee that the transitional ttf-takao-* packages
were installed and did clean this up. Since new installations of
fonts-takao-* cannot be distinguished from upgrades from ttf-takao-*
this needs to be run on new installations, too.  (Closes: #700054)

Andreas

unblock fonts-takao/003.02.01-7.1
diffstat for fonts-takao-003.02.01 fonts-takao-003.02.01

 changelog  |   14 ++
 fonts-takao-gothic.preinst |8 ++--
 fonts-takao-mincho.preinst |   12 +++-
 ttf-takao-gothic.preinst   |   13 +
 ttf-takao-mincho.preinst   |   13 +
 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -Nru fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/changelog fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/changelog
--- fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/changelog	2012-06-12 21:14:12.0 +0200
+++ fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/changelog	2013-02-11 14:37:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+fonts-takao (003.02.01-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * fonts-takao-mincho.preinst: Fix OTF alternative cleanup.
+  * ttf-takao-*.preinst: Unregister the ttf-japanese-*.ttf alternatives.
+  * fonts-takao-*.preinst: Clean up the ttf-japanese-*.ttf alternatives set up
+by ttf-takao-* in squeeze. This needs to be done in fonts-takao-* as well
+since there is no guarantee that the transitional ttf-takao-* packages
+were installed and did clean this up. Since new installations of
+fonts-takao-* cannot be distinguished from upgrades from ttf-takao-*
+this needs to be run on new installations, too.  (Closes: #700054)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org  Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:36:53 +0100
+
 fonts-takao (003.02.01-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules
diff -Nru fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-gothic.preinst fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-gothic.preinst
--- fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-gothic.preinst	2011-09-23 06:47:55.0 +0200
+++ fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-gothic.preinst	2013-02-11 14:37:20.0 +0100
@@ -7,9 +7,10 @@
 OLD_ALT_NAME=ttf-japanese-gothic
 FONT_ENTRY_OTF=/usr/share/fonts/opentype/takao/TakaoPGothic.otf
 
-CHECK_VERSION=003.02.01-5
+CHECK_VERSION=003.02.01-7.1
 FONT_ENTRY=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/takao/TakaoPGothic.ttf
 
+
 check_broken_ttf_japanese_gothic()
 {
 update-alternatives --remove \
@@ -17,13 +18,16 @@
  $FONT_ENTRY_OTF
 }
 
+
 case $1 in
 install|upgrade)
 	if [ -f $FONT_ENTRY_OTF ]; then
 	  check_broken_ttf_japanese_gothic
 	fi
 
-if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl $CHECK_VERSION; then
+# do this on new installations, too, as these could be upgrades
+# from ttf-takao-gothic
+if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt $CHECK_VERSION~; then
   update-alternatives --remove $OLD_ALT_NAME.ttf $FONT_ENTRY
 fi
 
diff -Nru fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-mincho.preinst fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-mincho.preinst
--- fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-mincho.preinst	2011-09-23 06:47:55.0 +0200
+++ fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/fonts-takao-mincho.preinst	2013-02-11 14:37:39.0 +0100
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
 OLD_ALT_NAME=ttf-japanese-mincho
 FONT_ENTRY_OTF=/usr/share/fonts/opentype/takao/TakaoPMincho.otf
 
-CHECK_VERSION=003.02.01-5
-FONT_ENTRY=/usr/share/fonts/opentype/takao/TakaoPMincho.ttf
+CHECK_VERSION=003.02.01-7.1
+FONT_ENTRY=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/takao/TakaoPMincho.ttf
 
 
 check_broken_ttf_japanese_mincho()
@@ -19,16 +19,18 @@
 }
 
 
-
 case $1 in
 install|upgrade)
-	if [ -f $FONT_ENTRY ]; then
+	if [ -f $FONT_ENTRY_OTF ]; then
 	  check_broken_ttf_japanese_mincho
 	fi
 
-if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl $CHECK_VERSION; then
+# do this on new installations, too, as these could be upgrades
+# from ttf-takao-mincho
+if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt $CHECK_VERSION~; then
   update-alternatives --remove $OLD_ALT_NAME.ttf $FONT_ENTRY
 fi
+
 ;;
 
 abort-upgrade)
diff -Nru fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/ttf-takao-gothic.preinst fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/ttf-takao-gothic.preinst
--- fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/ttf-takao-gothic.preinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ fonts-takao-003.02.01/debian/ttf-takao-gothic.preinst	2013-02-11 14:37:53.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+OLD_ALT_NAME=ttf-japanese-gothic

Bug#701008: unblock: nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3

2013-02-20 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception


Please unblock package nagvis

I uploaded a backport with wrong version to squeeze-backports, so upgrades
from squeeze+squeeze-backports to wheezy are broken. The easiest fix is to
bump the version in the sid/wheezy package to be higher again, so as
discussed in #debian-release I uploaded a new package.

The debdiff is:

$ debdiff nagvis_1.6.6+dfsg.1-2.dsc nagvis_1.6.6+dfsg.1-3.dsc
diff -Nru nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog 
nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog
--- nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog2012-06-11 18:45:44.0 
+0200
+++ nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog2013-02-20 11:40:40.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nagvis (1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Bump version number to allow smooth upgrades from squeeze-backports
+(Containing a backport versioned 1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3~bpo60+1 by mistake)
+
+ -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org  Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:46:07 
+0200
+
 nagvis (1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ The missed upload by 12 minutes release ]

unblock nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130220110131.27939.92737.report...@iara.alphamar.org



Bug#701008: marked as done (unblock: nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3)

2013-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:21:00 +0100
with message-id 5124b19c.70...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#701008: unblock: nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #701008,
regarding unblock: nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
701008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception


Please unblock package nagvis

I uploaded a backport with wrong version to squeeze-backports, so upgrades
from squeeze+squeeze-backports to wheezy are broken. The easiest fix is to
bump the version in the sid/wheezy package to be higher again, so as
discussed in #debian-release I uploaded a new package.

The debdiff is:

$ debdiff nagvis_1.6.6+dfsg.1-2.dsc nagvis_1.6.6+dfsg.1-3.dsc
diff -Nru nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog 
nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog
--- nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog2012-06-11 18:45:44.0 
+0200
+++ nagvis-1.6.6+dfsg.1/debian/changelog2013-02-20 11:40:40.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nagvis (1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Bump version number to allow smooth upgrades from squeeze-backports
+(Containing a backport versioned 1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3~bpo60+1 by mistake)
+
+ -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org  Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:46:07 
+0200
+
 nagvis (1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ The missed upload by 12 minutes release ]

unblock nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2013-02-20 12:01, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: freeze-exception
 
 
 Please unblock package nagvis
 
 I uploaded a backport with wrong version to squeeze-backports, so upgrades
 from squeeze+squeeze-backports to wheezy are broken. The easiest fix is to
 bump the version in the sid/wheezy package to be higher again, so as
 discussed in #debian-release I uploaded a new package.
 
 The debdiff is:
 
 [...]
  
[ The missed upload by 12 minutes release ]
 
 unblock nagvis/1:1.6.6+dfsg.1-3
 
 [...]

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels---End Message---


cleanup of incorrect update-alternatives handling

2013-02-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi,

I've now cleaned up most of the incorrect alternatives handling in
wheezy and squeeze-wheezy updates, and most of these fixes have already
migrated to wheezy or are unblocked. Thanks for this!

There are a few packages left that cannot be fixed via unstable, a fix
would have to go via TPU - should I try this?

tucnak2 #668442
  (fixed in unstable, but unstable has a new upstream release,
   that does FTBFS on everything but the maintainers machine)
0m28.6s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/bin/tucnak2 - /etc/alternatives/tucnak
  /etc/alternatives/tucnak - /usr/bin/tucnak
(does not remove the alternative on package removal)

fonts-vlgothic #699905
  (not fixed in unstable, patch available
   unstable has new upstream release)
0m54.7s INFO: Warning: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/alternatives/ttf-japanese-gothic.ttf -
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/vlgothic/VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf not owned
  /usr/share/fonts/  owned by: fonts-vlgothic
  /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ owned by: fonts-vlgothic
  /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-japanese-gothic.ttf -
/etc/alternatives/ttf-japanese-gothic.ttfnot owned
(does not clean up obsolete alternatives on upgrades from squeeze)

and of course openjdk-6-jre #685185
1m37.1s INFO: Warning: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/alternatives/javaws -
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/javaws   not owned
  /etc/alternatives/javaws.1.gz -
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/man/man1/javaws.1.gz not owned
  /etc/alternatives/pluginappletviewer -
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/pluginappletviewer   not owned
  /usr/bin/javaws - /etc/alternatives/javawsnot owned
  /usr/bin/pluginappletviewer - /etc/alternatives/pluginappletviewer   
not owned
  /usr/share/man/man1/javaws.1.gz - /etc/alternatives/javaws.1.gz   not
owned
(does not clean up obsolete alternatives on upgrades from squeeze)
A patch is attached to the bug, I verified that this works properly, but
there is no way that I'd NMU/TPU this package :-)
That needs to be done by the maintainers.
More than 300 packages seem to be affected by this on squeeze-wheezy
updates, making it hard to spot packages that hav ebad alternatives
handling on their own.
But I'm afraid that still does not qualify to raise the severity to RC -
or is leaving broken symlinks in /usr/bin RC?


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5124bb8d.1090...@debian.org



Bug#700956: RM: djmount/0.71-5

2013-02-20 Thread Dario Minnucci

Hi All,

On 02/19/2013 05:32 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: rm
 Severity: normal
 
 Please remove djmount (it has no reverse dependencies).  It embeds
 libupnp, which has an incredibly large number of security issues,
 which aren't being fixed in a timely manner in this package (bug
 #699561).
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 
 

djmount is always built using --with-external-libupnp and 
--with-external-talloc arguments to ensure
is using libs provided by libtalloc-dev and libupnp-dev debian packages.

Regards.

[0]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/djmount.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=7683551167bd3fe00699b8fa7fd8d05b8324c55c;hb=62fbae304ac64ad51495818382269f700d6b3598

-- 
 Dario Minnucci mid...@debian.org
 Phone: +34 902884117 | Fax: +34 902024417 | Support: +34 80745
 Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457  D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: 6.0.7 planning

2013-02-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 07:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 15:36 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
  Agreed; and I think I was unclear. I was taking for granted that we
  *will* do a 46squeeze2 now w/ the CVE-2013-0871 fix and bypass
  46squeeze1. 46squeeze2 would provide the security-only option.
  
  The question was whether or not we should try and fix p-u by getting a
  -49 into -stable now w/ the CVE-2013-0871 fix, or just make sure
  there's a 48squeeze1 in security for after. Ah - but maybe the point
  you're making is that a 48squeeze1 in security would make 46squeeze2
  harder to find/install - if so, I can understand that point.
 
 What's the current thinking here?
[...]

Dann identified and backported a large series of older changes as
dependencies for the recent fix.  Given that this is very tricky code
and we don't have any particular experience with it, I think it's too
much of a risk to apply these before the point release.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#700956: RM: djmount/0.71-5

2013-02-20 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-02-20 15:03, Dario Minnucci wrote:
 
 Hi All,
 
 On 02/19/2013 05:32 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: rm
 Severity: normal

 Please remove djmount (it has no reverse dependencies).  It embeds
 libupnp, which has an incredibly large number of security issues,
 which aren't being fixed in a timely manner in this package (bug
 #699561).

 Thanks,
 Mike


 
 djmount is always built using --with-external-libupnp and 
 --with-external-talloc arguments to ensure
 is using libs provided by libtalloc-dev and libupnp-dev debian packages.
 
 Regards.
 
 [...]
 

Why have you (still) not mentioned this in the bug log of #699561 ?

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/512501c6.70...@thykier.net



Bug#697589: unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-7

2013-02-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:15:11PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
  On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
   Le vendredi 25 janvier 2013 à 13:52 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : 
Le lundi 07 janvier 2013 à 11:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : 
 gnome-menus (3.4.2-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * gnome-menus.postinst: clean up the desktop files once upon 
 upgrades, 
 in order to get rid of files generated by a buggy script.

Ping?
  
  Sorry you've been waiting. On the basis that Julien downgraded #696530 to
  normal this isn't strictly RC; conversely, menu-xdg has considerable
  popcon.
  
  As I understand it the problem shows up when update-menus is run as a user.
  Bill, is that an unusual thing to do or would you expect it from many
  users?
 
 I would says this is rather unusual for GNOME users.

I like to add that if they do not like the result of running update-menus, they
can revert it by running update-menus --remove, or they can configure menu not
to use menu-xdg by doing mkdir ~/.menu-methods

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. ballo...@debian.org

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130220173951.GC21084@yellowpig



Bug#700956: RM: djmount/0.71-5

2013-02-20 Thread Dario Minnucci

Hi Niels,

On 02/20/2013 06:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
 On 2013-02-20 15:03, Dario Minnucci wrote:

 Hi All,

 On 02/19/2013 05:32 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: rm
 Severity: normal

 Please remove djmount (it has no reverse dependencies).  It embeds
 libupnp, which has an incredibly large number of security issues,
 which aren't being fixed in a timely manner in this package (bug
 #699561).

 Thanks,
 Mike



 djmount is always built using --with-external-libupnp and 
 --with-external-talloc arguments to ensure
 is using libs provided by libtalloc-dev and libupnp-dev debian packages.

 Regards.

 [...]

 
 Why have you (still) not mentioned this in the bug log of #699561 ?
 
 ~Niels
 


Oops, I wasn't aware of #699561.

I'll update and downgrade it in a minute.

Sorry and thanks for the pointer.

Regards,

-- 
 Dario Minnucci mid...@debian.org
 Phone: +34 902884117 | Fax: +34 902024417 | Support: +34 80745
 Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457  D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Fixing lucky 13 CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28

2013-02-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Le dimanche 10 février 2013 16:26:40, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
  PS: My first idea was to simply pull gnutls28, providing guile-gnutls
  and gnutls-bin from gnutls26 again. However there is a reverse
  dependency (pan) on libgnutls28 in testing nowadays. Pan is not
  distributable currently http://bugs.debian.org/699892
  but that might still be fixed in time for the release.

I've fixed the license bug by dropping SSL support from pan. pan no longer 
depends on any libgnutls.

All the best

Dominique


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#701037: unblock: pan/0.139-2

2013-02-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package pan

This new version fixes Bug#699892 (pan: Incompatible license: GPLv2
binary linked against LGPLv3+ library) by dropping SSL support.

I've also added a missing copyright entry in debian/copyright.

See attached debdiff

All the best

unblock pan/0.139-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
$ debdiff pan_0.139-1.dsc  pan_0.139-2.dsc
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/changelog pan-0.139/debian/changelog
--- pan-0.139/debian/changelog  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/changelog  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+pan (0.139-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * copyright: added missing copyright statement
+  * rules: removed support of gnutls (Closes: #699892)
+  * control: removed build depend on libgnutls
+  * updated NEWS to warn about SSL/TLS drop
+
+ -- Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org  Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:35:51 +0100
+
 pan (0.139-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Imported Upstream version 0.139
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/control pan-0.139/debian/control
--- pan-0.139/debian/control2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/control2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
libgmime-2.6-dev,
libgtk2.0-dev,
libgtkspell-dev,
-   libgnutls28-dev,
libnotify-dev,
libgnome-keyring-dev,
libdbus-1-dev
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/copyright pan-0.139/debian/copyright
--- pan-0.139/debian/copyright  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/copyright  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -203,6 +203,19 @@
 misrepresented as being the original software.
  3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.
 
+Files: uulib/fptools.*
+Copyright: Unknown
+License: GPL-1
+Comment: No copyright owner is specified in the files. Only the license is mentioned.
+
+License: GPL-1
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; version 1, February 1989
+ .
+ On Debian systems, the complete text of version 1 of the GNU General
+ Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-1'.
+
 License: GPL-2
  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/NEWS pan-0.139/debian/NEWS
--- pan-0.139/debian/NEWS   2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/NEWS   2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+pan (0.139-2)  unstable; urgency=low
+
+TLS/SSL support was removed due to license incompatiblities
+(bug #699892). TLS/SSL support will be enabled once the license
+issues are resolved upstream. You will have to rework your news 
+server setup if you are currently using SSL.
+
+ -- Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org  Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:32:51 +0100
+
 pan (0.139-1)  unstable; urgency=low
 
 gnome-keyring support is still compiled in pan for Debian. But it
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/rules pan-0.139/debian/rules
--- pan-0.139/debian/rules  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/rules  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -12,5 +12,6 @@
 %:
dh $@  --with autotools-dev
 
+# --with-gnutls is forbidden until pan goes to license GPL-2+ (#699892)
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --with-gnutls --enable-gkr --enable-silent-rules --enable-libnotify --with-dbus
+   dh_auto_configure -- --enable-gkr --enable-silent-rules --enable-libnotify --with-dbus



Bug#701037: marked as done (unblock: pan/0.139-2)

2013-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:16:25 +
with message-id 1361387785.1011.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#701037: unblock: pan/0.139-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #701037,
regarding unblock: pan/0.139-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
701037: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701037
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package pan

This new version fixes Bug#699892 (pan: Incompatible license: GPLv2
binary linked against LGPLv3+ library) by dropping SSL support.

I've also added a missing copyright entry in debian/copyright.

See attached debdiff

All the best

unblock pan/0.139-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
$ debdiff pan_0.139-1.dsc  pan_0.139-2.dsc
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/changelog pan-0.139/debian/changelog
--- pan-0.139/debian/changelog  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/changelog  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+pan (0.139-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * copyright: added missing copyright statement
+  * rules: removed support of gnutls (Closes: #699892)
+  * control: removed build depend on libgnutls
+  * updated NEWS to warn about SSL/TLS drop
+
+ -- Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org  Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:35:51 +0100
+
 pan (0.139-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Imported Upstream version 0.139
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/control pan-0.139/debian/control
--- pan-0.139/debian/control2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/control2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
libgmime-2.6-dev,
libgtk2.0-dev,
libgtkspell-dev,
-   libgnutls28-dev,
libnotify-dev,
libgnome-keyring-dev,
libdbus-1-dev
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/copyright pan-0.139/debian/copyright
--- pan-0.139/debian/copyright  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/copyright  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -203,6 +203,19 @@
 misrepresented as being the original software.
  3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.
 
+Files: uulib/fptools.*
+Copyright: Unknown
+License: GPL-1
+Comment: No copyright owner is specified in the files. Only the license is mentioned.
+
+License: GPL-1
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; version 1, February 1989
+ .
+ On Debian systems, the complete text of version 1 of the GNU General
+ Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-1'.
+
 License: GPL-2
  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/NEWS pan-0.139/debian/NEWS
--- pan-0.139/debian/NEWS   2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/NEWS   2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+pan (0.139-2)  unstable; urgency=low
+
+TLS/SSL support was removed due to license incompatiblities
+(bug #699892). TLS/SSL support will be enabled once the license
+issues are resolved upstream. You will have to rework your news 
+server setup if you are currently using SSL.
+
+ -- Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org  Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:32:51 +0100
+
 pan (0.139-1)  unstable; urgency=low
 
 gnome-keyring support is still compiled in pan for Debian. But it
diff -Nru pan-0.139/debian/rules pan-0.139/debian/rules
--- pan-0.139/debian/rules  2012-06-30 18:15:52.0 +0200
+++ pan-0.139/debian/rules  2013-02-19 19:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -12,5 +12,6 @@
 %:
dh $@  --with autotools-dev
 
+# --with-gnutls is forbidden until pan goes to license GPL-2+ (#699892)
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --with-gnutls --enable-gkr --enable-silent-rules --enable-libnotify --with-dbus
+   dh_auto_configure -- --enable-gkr --enable-silent-rules --enable-libnotify --with-dbus

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, 2013-02-20 

Bug#700968: release.debian.org: pre-approval unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-3 recommends typo fix

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Gevers
On 19-02-13 23:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
 It's a regression and a trivial fix, so you can go ahead with this change.
 Please ping this bug when it's uploaded.

Ping.

(Only difference with the previous debdiff, is that I now had a bug
number [1] to close).

Paul
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/700999



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#700956: marked as done (RM: djmount/0.71-5)

2013-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:49:01 +0100
with message-id 512544cd.1010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#700956: RM: djmount/0.71-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #700956,
regarding RM: djmount/0.71-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
700956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Please remove djmount (it has no reverse dependencies).  It embeds
libupnp, which has an incredibly large number of security issues,
which aren't being fixed in a timely manner in this package (bug
#699561).

Thanks,
Mike
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2013-02-20 19:20, Dario Minnucci wrote:
 
 Hi Niels,
 
 On 02/20/2013 06:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
 On 2013-02-20 15:03, Dario Minnucci wrote:
 [...]

 djmount is always built using --with-external-libupnp and 
 --with-external-talloc arguments to ensure
 is using libs provided by libtalloc-dev and libupnp-dev debian packages.

 Regards.

 [...]


 [...]
 
 
 Oops, I wasn't aware of #699561.
 
 I'll update and downgrade it in a minute.
 
 Sorry and thanks for the pointer.
 
 Regards,
 

Thanks for following up to #699561, I have taken the liberty of closing
it[1] along with this request so both will be removed from our TODO list.

~Niels

[1] Due to Yves-Alexis Perez's suggestion to do so and because it is
currently still of RC severity.---End Message---


Bug#700968: marked as done (release.debian.org: pre-approval unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-3 recommends typo fix)

2013-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:04:40 +
with message-id 20130220220440.ga7...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#700968: release.debian.org: pre-approval unblock: 
cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-3 recommends typo fix
has caused the Debian Bug report #700968,
regarding release.debian.org: pre-approval unblock: cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-3 
recommends typo fix
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
700968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

After cacti/0.8.8a+dfsg-2 migrated to testing it turned out [1] that I had a 
typo
in the recommends, thus under normal circumstances creating the regression in
cacti that we wanted to prevent (bug: 694850, [2]).

The fix is trivial, but I believe that normally the bug would not qualify for an
unblock. I ask anyway because it was introduced with the previous approved
solution for the license issue in cacti. But feel free to reject this report
immediately.

Debdiff attached.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679980#54
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694850

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRI9z/AAoJEJxcmesFvXUKzw0IALdQrMwHddquelO5/vspDMPc
G6yIDPiqkSPsRyc5/qOddgjCotZL9olq4nC3wN4nWNYfOLGE8XwCOd9DbCyu2HuA
mCXvvEKaC2XD5Nb3kGEp/KJ+nm3LklnYIjSF6VOgxBek+FE5EoripQPp8nQbuZJ5
YQRD6LfX2EWncb+vuMEKk96Ac3bgsJr1QVcVrEcYFaBaDo46GC6YfrFXQfzuh3hA
U1ZvvoIFtXDuYCGqYc3ifJW6iir/7TkS30m6cOr+AdqKudMrUfwkvkIRFqg5h/RA
OEEsGSnJw0WKUvDnHuxf+52y1v5FVyje8PkBuh0aUkjEWr+Sw5/5TxKaIjPt7Tc=
=Vuou
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/changelog cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/changelog	2013-01-29 20:43:50.0 +0100
+++ cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/changelog	2013-02-19 20:51:06.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fixed typo in recommends libjs-jquery* i.s.o. libjs-query
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org  Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:33:20 +0100
+
 cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Upload to unstable after acknowledge by the RT, see #694850.
diff -Nru cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/control cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/control
--- cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/control	2012-12-10 21:49:51.0 +0100
+++ cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/control	2013-02-19 20:25:51.0 +0100
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
 Recommends: apache2 | lighttpd | nginx | httpd,
 inetutils-ping | iputils-ping,
 logrotate,
-libjs-query,
-libjs-query-cookie,
+libjs-jquery,
+libjs-jquery-cookie,
 mysql-server
 Suggests: php5-ldap,
 	  moreutils,
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:21:56PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
 On 19-02-13 23:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
  It's a regression and a trivial fix, so you can go ahead with this change.
  Please ping this bug when it's uploaded.
 
 Ping.
 
 (Only difference with the previous debdiff, is that I now had a bug
 number [1] to close).
 
 Paul
 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/700999
 

Thanks, unblocked.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3

2013-02-20 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
  I've attached an updated proposed patch, which also fixes #698582 (and
  consequentially #700363).
  File attached.
 Really attached this time ...

 thanks. Please go ahead.

Uploaded.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mp96aou1rtudivm2cjbfijj+g_z5dqfpszgfcj+ftz...@mail.gmail.com