Processed: unarchiving 711345, forcibly merging 711345 737244, closing 737244
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 711345
Bug #711345 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: cyrus-sasl2
Unarchived Bug 711345
forcemerge 711345 737244
Bug #711345 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: cyrus-sasl2
Bug #737244 [release.debian.org] transition: cyrus-sasl2
Marked Bug as done
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Merged 711345 737244
close 737244
Bug #737244 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: cyrus-sasl2
Bug #711345 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: cyrus-sasl2
Bug 737244 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
711345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711345
737244: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737244
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139159575324230.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#731261: transition: Qt5 switching qreal == double for all platforms
On Monday 03 February 2014 19:23:19 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Status update: - qgo and fcitx-qt5 are ready. - pyqt5 has been recently uploaded and only needs to get built in armhf. - We are still waiting for pokerth - and qtwebkit in armhf needs to get rebuilt. pyqt5 and pokerth already built. We only need to wait for qtwebkit to be rebuilt in armhf (currently ongoing) and the full stack to properly age and we are done :) Thanks a lot guys! -- http://www.tiraecol.net/modules/comic/comic.php?content_id=162 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#726165: mumble +b1 with protobuf 2.5.0-8 works
Chris Knadle wrote: On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote: I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's available at your mirror? (I suspect that it will, but just want to make sure.) Yes, the existing 1.2.4-0.1+b1 in Unstable works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8. OK, I've uploaded -9 to unstable. libprotobuf8's .so is byte identical, at least on amd64. Can you check that mumble still works? (I would be surprised if it did not.) -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140205164916.ga24...@mycre.ws
BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable
Hi BTS people and UDD, We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains #710069 and #710357. Both of these were tagged wheezy-ignore on the 28th of November. Currently, UDD's bug view[2] claims that Wheezy has ~400 RC bugs where as the BTS summary page[3] thinks the number is ~500 RC bugs. Interestingly enough, according to UDD only ~50 RC bugs are tagged wheezy-ignore[4], so I suspect the problem is not just limited to bugs tagged wheezy-ignore. I would greatly appreciate if the two trackers could agree on these numbers. On a related note, I am unsure whether there are any issues for Squeeze as the BTS does not seem to have a summary for oldstable. Thank you in advance, ~Niels PS: I believe that some of this may have been reported over IRC - but honestly I lost track of who knows what at this point, so here it is per mail. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/stable.html [2] http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezymerged=ignfnewerval=7flastmodval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=asc [3] http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ [4] http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=anyrtwheezy-ignore=onlyfnewerval=7flastmodval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f27a6f.9030...@thykier.net
Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable
Hi Niels, On 05/02/14 at 18:52 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi BTS people and UDD, We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains #710069 and #710357. Both of these were tagged wheezy-ignore on the 28th of November. Currently, UDD's bug view[2] claims that Wheezy has ~400 RC bugs where as the BTS summary page[3] thinks the number is ~500 RC bugs. The BTS lists e.g. #710310, which is wheezy-ignore. So it seems that the BTS ignores wheezy-ignore. The following bugs are listed by the BTS, but not by UDD: 706649 737055 733762 731720 732656 Those are filed against pseudo-packages (installation-reports, ftp.debian.org, cdrom). I'm not sure if they should be considered as affecting wheezy in the UDD listing. (It might be non-trivial to change). It seems that all bugs where the BTS and UDD disagree are either involving wheezy-ignore, or pseudo-packages. Interestingly enough, according to UDD only ~50 RC bugs are tagged wheezy-ignore[4], so I suspect the problem is not just limited to bugs tagged wheezy-ignore. No, actually, there are more bugs than that tagged 'wheezy-ignore'. The problem is that 'release=any' means (in UDD) 'id in (select id from bugs where status!=\'done\')'. There's no easy way to get all wheezy-ignore bugs using bugs.cgi. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140205202817.ga8...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#729289: transition: openscenegraph
On 2014-02-04 14:33, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: choreonoid is now fixed (thanks to Andreas for sponsorship), which just leaves getting simgear through NEW and uploading flightgear/fgrun. simgear went through NEW today; looks like it FTBFS on mips due to a test failing (haven't checked it) and we are still waiting for a few architectures to finish their builds. ~Niels PS: Markus, are you subscribed to pkg-fgfs-crew? I have been CC'ing you along with pkg-fgfs-crew but if you are subscribed to that list adn prefer only getting one copy, let me know and I will drop your explicit CC. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f2a333.1000...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#730856: transition: libtasn1-6
Processing control commands: tags -1 pending Bug #730856 [release.debian.org] transition: libtasn1-6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 730856: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b730856.139163376111765.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#730856: transition: libtasn1-6
Control: tags -1 pending On 2014-02-01 13:30, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2014-01-31 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: On 2014-01-05 13:48, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] The new -bin package is already unversioned (libtasn1-bin instead of libtasn1-6-bin). Great; assuming I haven't messed something, I think we are ready to start. Hello, Splendid. I have uploaded libtasn1-6 3.4-3 to unstable, it has not been built on all archs yet, though. Thanks, Afaict binNMUs should start with packages with direct b-d on libtasn1-3-dev. The rebuilds should be triggered in three stages, with stage #2 only starting after #1 has completed and #3 after that. Noted #1 nmu gnutls26_2.12.23-10 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' #2 nmu libimobiledevice_1.0.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' I think you mean libimobiledevice_1.1.5-2 ? 1.0.2-3 would be somewhere between oldstable and stable. nmu shishi_1.0.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' nmu gcr_3.8.2-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' Scheduled to here. #3 nmu gnome-keyring_3.8.2-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' thanks, cu Andreas ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f2a558.7050...@thykier.net
Bug#729289: transition: openscenegraph
On 02/05/2014 09:46 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: simgear went through NEW today; looks like it FTBFS on mips due to a test failing (haven't checked it) and we are still waiting for a few architectures to finish their builds. Also note that a copyright popped up: #737733. PS: Markus, are you subscribed to pkg-fgfs-crew? I have been CC'ing you along with pkg-fgfs-crew but if you are subscribed to that list adn prefer only getting one copy, let me know and I will drop your explicit CC. I'm subscribed to that list. And to many others. So CC'ing me increases chances to get a timely answer. ;-) Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#728919: freebsd-libs transition
Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers haven't responded so far. What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f2b30e.9070...@debian.org
qlandkartegt stable fix bug 736550
Hi, I am maintainer of qlandkartegt I would like to fix following bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736550 This issue happened because of behavior change of Openstreetmap servers. In attachment is a patch which I already used to fix in unstable. I can confirm patch is fixing problem. I newer uploaded for stable before so please let me know should be done in next step. best regards mira 02-set_user_agent.patch Description: Binary data
Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 05/02/14 at 18:52 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi BTS people and UDD, We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains #710069 and #710357. Both of these were tagged wheezy-ignore on the 28th of November. Currently, UDD's bug view[2] claims that Wheezy has ~400 RC bugs where as the BTS summary page[3] thinks the number is ~500 RC bugs. The BTS lists e.g. #710310, which is wheezy-ignore. So it seems that the BTS ignores wheezy-ignore. Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com I cannot find rest Because I am powerless To amend a broken world. -- Guy Gavriel Kay _Under Heaven_ p295 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140206011325.gf5...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
Bug#726165: mumble +b1 with protobuf 2.5.0-9 works
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:49:16 Robert Edmonds wrote: Chris Knadle wrote: On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote: I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's available at your mirror? (I suspect that it will, but just want to make sure.) Yes, the existing 1.2.4-0.1+b1 in Unstable works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8. OK, I've uploaded -9 to unstable. libprotobuf8's .so is byte identical, at least on amd64. Can you check that mumble still works? (I would be surprised if it did not.) Yep, mumble 1.2.4-0.1+b1 works fine with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-9. Thanks. There are other fixes for mumble pending requiring a new upload so I'm glad to have the protobuf transition done. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2729161.Tl8zacaL8u@trelane
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
在 2014年1月21日，下午9:51，Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org 写道： On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 16.01.2014 13:31, schrieb Aníbal Monsalve Salazar: For mips/mipsel, I - fix toolchain issues together with other developers at ImgTec It is nice to see such a commitment, however in the past I didn't see any such contributions. Hello doko, At my current job, we are working on fixing mips* bugs including possible compiler errors. As an example, I recently run tests to try to find tool chain errors for packages that on non-Debian distro were failing to build. So, at least so far, I'm working on that. Regards, Aníbal Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For mipsel/mips64el and maybe mips/mips64, I - test most packages on this architecture - fix toolchain issues - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs - maintaining rebuild test I am a DM Yunqiang Su signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Bug#731261: transition: Qt5 switching qreal == double for all platforms
On Wednesday, 5. February 2014 13:29:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
We only need to wait for [...] and the full stack to properly age and
we are done :)
Please check qgis, that did FTBFS on arm* with
deduced conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('double' and 'qreal {aka
float}')
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qgis
This could have been bad timing and a give-back might be sufficient.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201402060351.47821.a...@debian.org
Bug#731261: transition: Qt5 switching qreal == double for all platforms
Please check qgis, that did FTBFS on arm* with
deduced conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('double' and 'qreal {aka
float}')
qgis seems to be using qt4. The qreal==double on all platforms switch
was only for qt5 (it's way too late to make such a change in qt4 now).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f328a1.6050...@p10link.net
Re: Testing promotion of libunwind
On 2014-02-02 12:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 11:05 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2014-02-02 02:27, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] If my understanding is right, the transition can be completed quickly once linux-tools is updated. Please confirm whether this is the case. Apparently, I missed google-perftools. But fortunately, Daigo seems to have taken care of that in sid. Otherwise, as upstream support for Linux 3.12 will end soon, I would prefer to get 3.13 into testing before making a change which could result in linux-tools waiting a long time. Ben. Noted. I believe your assertion to be correct and that only linux-tools need an upload. From there linux-tools, google-perftools and julia need to migrate to testing and we should be done. OK, I've uploaded linux-tools (3.12.6-2) with the build-dependency changed. Ben. Great. :) In other news, libunwind migrated last night (mail about is due in about 10 hours or so). The transition is still waiting for julia and linux-tools, which (at first glance) should migrate tonight and tomorrow assuming nothing shows up (e.g. a new RC bug). ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f32f46.30...@thykier.net
