Processed: retitle 757799 to wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6+deb7u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 757799 wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6+deb7u1 Bug #757799 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1 Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6+deb7u1' from 'wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 757799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757799 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140834371611863.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#758492: RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #758492 [release.debian.org] RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 758492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b758492.140833873013673.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#758492: RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2014-08-18 05:30, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > Severity: normal > > Please remove src:lcms from testing. Some reverse dependencies still > need to be migrated to lcms2 (see #717928). > > Best wishes, > Mike > > Are we (really) ready for this? Removal of lcms in testing would break several packages including gimp and libmagickcore-dev[1] ~Niels [1] $ dak rm -nR -s testing lcms [...] Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: devil: libdevil1c2 foo2zjs: printer-driver-foo2zjs gimp: gimp imagemagick: libmagickcore-dev # Broken Build-Depends: foo2zjs: liblcms1-dev Dependency problem found. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f18b1d.4020...@thykier.net
Bug#757799: wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1
Hey Adam, On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 06:15:36PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:42 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > +xdg-utils (1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1) wheezy; urgency=low > > + > > + * Non-maintainer upload. > > + * Add fix-bashism-use-of-echo.patch patch. > > +Instead of using echo -e in xdg-email use directly /bin/echo. Fixes > > +bashism use of echo and fixes opening of composer window in > > Thunderbird. > > +(Closes: #685078, #691182) > > Any particular reason for -6.1 rather than -6+deb7u1? Other than that, > please go ahead; thanks. No, simply a mistake on my side when updating the changelog. Sorry about that, will upload with -6+deb7u1. Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140818043654.ga14...@lorien.valinor.li
Bug#758492: RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Please remove src:lcms from testing. Some reverse dependencies still need to be migrated to lcms2 (see #717928). Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNPz+XSrojFgcO6tSK+7UpvnFcpCDaxTxWs2RMhK=y...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758265: nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:52:55AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 17/08/14 22:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 16/08/14 02:55, James McCoy wrote: > >> “apxs2 -q CC” currently reports i486-linux-gnu-gcc on i386, but binutils > >> no longer ships that. This is causing the rebuild of subversion for > >> Perl 5.20 to fail on i386. > > > > Thanks for the analysis. apache2 binNMUed, and subversion given back with a > > dep-wait on apache. > > And the binNMU failed. Sorry. It seems that there's a similar issue with apr affecting apache2's build. So it looks like apr needs to be rebuilt first, then apache2, then subversion. nmu apr_1.5.1-2 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet, i586-linux-gnu" nmu apache2_1.5.1-2 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet, i586-linux-gnu" dw apache2_2.4.10-1 . i386 . -m 'apr (>= 1.5.1-2+b1)' dw subversion_1.8.10-1 . i386 . -m 'apache2-dev (>= 2.4.10-1+b1)' Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140818032138.ga1...@freya.jamessan.com
Bug#758265: nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1
On 17/08/14 22:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 16/08/14 02:55, James McCoy wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> >> nmu apache2_2.4.10-1 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet, >> i586-linux-gnu" >> >> apache2-dev provides the apxs/apxs2 binaries which packages building >> Apache modules can use to determine what tools were used to build >> Apache. >> >> “apxs2 -q CC” currently reports i486-linux-gnu-gcc on i386, but binutils >> no longer ships that. This is causing the rebuild of subversion for >> Perl 5.20 to fail on i386. > > Thanks for the analysis. apache2 binNMUed, and subversion given back with a > dep-wait on apache. And the binNMU failed. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f13247.8050...@debian.org
Bug#758265: marked as done (nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:06:24 +0200 with message-id <53f10b40.1060...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#758265: nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #758265, regarding nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 758265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758265 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu apache2_2.4.10-1 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet, i586-linux-gnu" apache2-dev provides the apxs/apxs2 binaries which packages building Apache modules can use to determine what tools were used to build Apache. “apxs2 -q CC” currently reports i486-linux-gnu-gcc on i386, but binutils no longer ships that. This is causing the rebuild of subversion for Perl 5.20 to fail on i386. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 16/08/14 02:55, James McCoy wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu apache2_2.4.10-1 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet, > i586-linux-gnu" > > apache2-dev provides the apxs/apxs2 binaries which packages building > Apache modules can use to determine what tools were used to build > Apache. > > “apxs2 -q CC” currently reports i486-linux-gnu-gcc on i386, but binutils > no longer ships that. This is causing the rebuild of subversion for > Perl 5.20 to fail on i386. Thanks for the analysis. apache2 binNMUed, and subversion given back with a dep-wait on apache. Regards, Emilio--- End Message ---
Bug#740495: Moreinformation about imagemagick transition
Hi, About imagemagick transition: a. I have tried to compile every dependency [1] in pbuilder b. Every package work except: 1. gnudatalanguage has a dependency problem due to a virtual package (b-d uninstable) 2. [pythonmagick] FTBFS with new (experimental) imagemagick version BUT a newer version is waiting from maintainer and will be uploaded when newer imagemagick hit unstable 3. libtuxcap does not work but is not on dependency list and I have carried a patch (does not use imagemagick only at configure time) 4. virtuoso-opensource FTBFS but work with a patch 5. nip2 FTBFS. I have not patches but I have found one non distributable file (lena) and one non free icc file trying to patch it. I could not do a NMU due to these problems 6. ruby-rmagick FTBFS but will be likely fixed by my imagmagick comaintener and ruby-rmagick maintainer vincent (here in cc). So i think it near green light for imagemagick Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAb_WYZ2h2zMsnQT5rLpoAEQz30NCh=67H+VpNq=nn_...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: [virtuoso-opensource] FTBFS with newer imagemagick
Processing control commands: > block 740495 by -1 Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick 740495 was blocked by: 747857 758435 758001 747907 746228 747908 758443 740495 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758459 -- 740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740495 758459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140830023924500.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#755212: closed by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (Re: Bug#755212: transition: protobuf-c)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 755212 + pending Bug #755212 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf-c Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 755212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14082969205853.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#754446: wheezy-pu: fix #609457 in supervisor package
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #754446 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: fix #609457 in supervisor package Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 754446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754446 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b754446.140829604732173.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#754446: wheezy-pu: fix #609457 in supervisor package
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:42 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > The init script of supervisor in wheezy is broken (I tend to call > the package unusable for any system that includes automated > configuration management and monitoring), see #609457 > > The init script from the current package version of jessie/unstable > works fine so I think this change could go towards wheezy(-updates). > debdiff supervisor_3.0a8-1.1.dsc supervisor_3.0a8-1.1+deb7u1.dsc > is attached. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1408296039.30174.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#757799: wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:42 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > +xdg-utils (1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1) wheezy; urgency=low > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * Add fix-bashism-use-of-echo.patch patch. > +Instead of using echo -e in xdg-email use directly /bin/echo. Fixes > +bashism use of echo and fixes opening of composer window in Thunderbird. > +(Closes: #685078, #691182) Any particular reason for -6.1 rather than -6+deb7u1? Other than that, please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1408295736.30174.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#757799: wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #757799 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 757799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757799 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b757799.140829574630309.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#756078: transition: gnat
On 11/08/14 09:44, Reto Buerki wrote: > Hi Emilio > > On 08/10/2014 04:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> The last blockers are #756081 and #755076. Can someone from debian-ada take a >> look at those? > > Thanks for the ping. I will transition all my packages to gnat-4.9 this > week (hopefully). anet was done, dbusada hasn't been transitioned yet. Would be great to get that done soon as it's one of the last blockers for the transition. Thanks, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f0ceff.3030...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#757574: apq: FTBFS almost everywhere
Processing control commands: > block 756078 by -1 Bug #756078 [release.debian.org] transition: gnat 4.9 756078 was blocked by: 755014 756081 755016 755076 755009 753955 753957 756078 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 756078: 757574 -- 756078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756078 757574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757574 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b757574.140829047030725.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: [nip2] FTBFS with new (experimental version) of imagemagick
Processing control commands: > block 740495 by -1 Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick 740495 was blocked by: 758435 747857 758001 747907 746228 747908 740495 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758443 -- 740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740495 758443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758443 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140828861319748.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: squaremap: Please update to use wxpython3.0
Processing control commands: > block 755757 by -1 Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0 755757 was blocked by: 757308 757755 757306 757431 757434 734799 757429 757304 757886 757289 757313 757299 758204 755757 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 755757: 758436 -- 755757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755757 758436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140828526431439.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: [ruby-rmagick] FTBFS with newer imagemagick
Processing control commands: > block 740495 by -1 Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick 740495 was blocked by: 747857 758001 747907 746228 747908 740495 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758435 -- 740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740495 758435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758435 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.140828520930688.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#758417: nmu: proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3+b4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3+b4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1" Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140817111500.9218.99328.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758416: nmu: proftpd-mod-clamav_0.10-1+b3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-clamav_0.10-1+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1" Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140817111301.9080.74293.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758415: nmu: proftpd-mod-case_0.7-1+b2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-case_0.7-1+b2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against proftpd-basic 1.3.5-1" Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2014081716.8882.12794.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758414: nmu: proftpd-mod-autohost_0.4-1+b3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-autohost_0.4-1+b3 . ALL . -m "rebuild against proftpd-basic 1.3.5-1" proftpd-mod-autohost still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140817110748.8675.90891.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#757917: transition: libav11
On 2014-08-16 16:54:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Ah, and one more: > > On 2014-08-13 21:07:42, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > amarok build deps uninstallable > > Looks like a consequence of #747536. I've uploaded a NMU fixing #747536. After fixing #758412 in amarok, it build fines against libav 11. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#758282: postgresql-9.3: FTBFS on sparc: 1 of 136 tests failed
severity 758282 important unblock 753529 with 758282 thanks On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 02:30:15PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Niko Tyni 2014-08-16 <20140816092217.GA2953@estella.local.invalid> > > Package: postgresql-9.3 > > Version: 9.3.4-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > Rebuilding this package against Perl 5.20 failed on the sparc buildd, > > apparently due to a regression test failure. > > > block 753529 with 758282 758283 Whoops, looks like sparc is no longer a release architecture so this is not an issue for the Perl 5.20 transition. Downgrading + unblocking. Sorry for the noise. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140817093444.GA11765@estella.local.invalid
Processed: Re: Bug#758282: postgresql-9.3: FTBFS on sparc: 1 of 136 tests failed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 758282 important Bug #758282 [postgresql-9.3] postgresql-9.3: FTBFS on sparc: 1 of 136 tests failed Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > unblock 753529 with 758282 Bug #753529 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.20 753529 was blocked by: 758127 758283 758282 757754 757571 758270 753529 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 753529: 758282 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 753529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753529 758282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758282 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140826812428919.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
[Patch] britney.py: Fix a regression in nuninst counting for hints
Hi,
Find attached patch that fixes a minor regression introduced in commit
a46dd88 by yours truly. I intend to merge into master in a couple of
days if no one beats me to it. I have added a new test case
(regression-a46dd88) for the particular patch.
The regression causes certain (unlikely) hints (easy or hint-hints) to
fail, where Britney2 prior to commit a46dd88 would have accepted them.
I consider these to be unlikely because:
* They must involve an uninstallability trade[1] during the "init" run
(i.e. the "non-recurse" run)
- The "recurse run" is unaffected by this bug.
* They must be removing uninstallable packages and use said removal to
complete the uninstallability trade.
- Only removals of uninstallable packages could cause this.
- *NB*: The binary had to disappear from testing. If it was simply
upgraded, it would not trigger the bug.
The regression was caused by Britney failing to remove packages from
"nuninst", when they were removed from testing. For hints removing an
uninstallable package without using uninstallability trading, Britney
simply presents a slightly inflated nuninst counter until the end of the
run.
~Niels
[1] "uninstallability trade" being trading one uninstallability package
for another.
>From 97fcba644c250e84e6a0ea2164a0e886d946ada9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 23:15:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] britney.py: Fix a regression in nuninst counting for hints
In the rare case that a hint removed an uninstallable binary, the
binary could still be included in the nuninst counter.
Regression introduced in a46dd88.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier
---
britney.py | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/britney.py b/britney.py
index da0f158..6c0a26d 100755
--- a/britney.py
+++ b/britney.py
@@ -2147,8 +2147,7 @@ class Britney(object):
nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches.split()
binaries_t = self.binaries['testing']
check_packages = partial(self._check_packages, binaries_t)
-# Deep copy nuninst (in case the hint is undone)
-nuninst = {k:v.copy() for k,v in self.nuninst_orig.iteritems()}
+nuninst = {}
for item in hinted_packages:
@@ -2165,6 +2164,16 @@ class Britney(object):
if lundo is not None:
lundo.append((undo,item))
+# deep copy nuninst (in case the hint is undone)
+# NB: We do this *after* updating testing and we have to filter out
+# removed binaries. Otherwise, uninstallable binaries that were
+# removed by the hint would still be counted.
+for arch in self.options.architectures:
+nuninst_arch = self.nuninst_orig[arch]
+nuninst_arch_all = self.nuninst_orig[arch + '+all']
+nuninst[arch] = set(x for x in nuninst_arch if x in binaries_t[arch])
+nuninst[arch + '+all'] = set(x for x in nuninst_arch_all if x in binaries_t[arch])
+
for arch in self.options.architectures:
if arch not in nobreakall_arches:
skip_archall = True
--
2.1.0.rc1
