Bug#794486: release.debian.org: auto transition trackers incorrectly handle addition of suffixes (including GCC 5 related transitions)
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tools Hi, I don't think any of the automatic transition trackers for the libstdcxx / GCC 5 packages are working correctly. Currently cmake has been rebuilt against both the new versions of GCC 5 and libjsoncpp, and shows up good on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html but bad on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html The auto-libjsoncpp ben file contains this: is_affected = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg|libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; is_good = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; Here, packages depending on libjsoncpp0v5 match both the is_good and is_bad regexes so ben marks them as bad. The regexes for is_good and is_bad should probably have ^ and $ inserted before and after each package name to fix this. Thanks, James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#791312: Bug#777972: libsearch-xapian-perl: ftbfs with GCC-5
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 07:42:38 +0100, Olly Betts wrote: Hm, is this simply the effect of compiling libsearch-xapian-perl with gcc5 against xapian from unstable built with gcc4.9? Yes - this means that xapian-core will need a library transition for the GCC 5 transition. Good news: libsearch-xapian-perl builds fine with gcc 5 against libxapian22v5. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: The Dubliners: Nigth visiting song signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#794486: release.debian.org: auto transition trackers incorrectly handle addition of suffixes (including GCC 5 related transitions)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 16:44:32 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tools Hi, I don't think any of the automatic transition trackers for the libstdcxx / GCC 5 packages are working correctly. Currently cmake has been rebuilt against both the new versions of GCC 5 and libjsoncpp, and shows up good on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html but bad on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html The auto-libjsoncpp ben file contains this: is_affected = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg|libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; is_good = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; Here, packages depending on libjsoncpp0v5 match both the is_good and is_bad regexes so ben marks them as bad. I've made a manual tracker for libjsoncpp, see https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libjsoncpp.html Any other broken ones? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#794516: nmu: gnote_3.16.2-1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: riese...@lxtec.de, 794...@bugs.debian.org Hi release team, On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote: Package: gnote Version: 3.16.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to the transition to gcc-5 gnote needs a rebuild against libgcc1. Otherwise it would be removed or substituded by tomboy which blows up installations with mono stuff. Pick up the chance to upgrade to 5.17. nmu gnote_3.16.2-1 . ALL . -m rebuild for gcc-5 transition Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caczd_tdmj+wyb24gli3_kpzamcgggj6zzfiu2jdn6pg0h7s...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: tagging 790979
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 790979 + pending Bug #790979 [release.debian.org] apt: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 790979: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790979 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143863914621916.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#791261: qttools-opensource-src: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 791261 qttools-opensource-src: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition Bug #791261 [src:qttools-opensource-src] qttools-opensource-src: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'qttools-opensource-src: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition' from 'qttools-opensource-src: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' tag 791261 pending Bug #791261 [src:qttools-opensource-src] qttools-opensource-src: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition Added tag(s) pending. block 790756 by 791261 Bug #790756 [release.debian.org] transition: libstdc++6 cxx11 790756 was blocked by: 791262 794517 794518 778096 790756 was blocking: 790979 790987 790988 790990 790994 791013 791014 791019 791030 791031 791034 791042 791045 791047 791050 791051 791067 791106 791114 791116 791125 791131 791132 791138 791141 791157 791166 791205 791215 791231 791245 791266 791268 791289 791312 791329 791332 791356 792013 793909 794474 Added blocking bug(s) of 790756: 791261 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 790756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790756 791261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143865444930337.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#778096: Moreinfo: need data from patch author
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 778096 - moreinfo Bug #778096 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: ftbfs with GCC-5 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. tag 778096 pending Bug #778096 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. retitle 778096 qtwebkit: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition. Bug #778096 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: ftbfs with GCC-5 Changed Bug title to 'qtwebkit: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition.' from 'qtwebkit: ftbfs with GCC-5' block 790756 by 778096 Bug #790756 [release.debian.org] transition: libstdc++6 cxx11 790756 was blocked by: 791262 790756 was blocking: 790979 790987 790988 790990 790994 791013 791014 791019 791030 791031 791034 791042 791045 791047 791050 791051 791067 791106 791114 791116 791125 791131 791132 791138 791141 791157 791166 791205 791215 791231 791245 791266 791268 791289 791312 791329 791332 791356 792013 793909 794474 Added blocking bug(s) of 790756: 778096 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778096 790756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790756 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386485673185.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#794491: marked as done (binNMUs needed for libstdc++6 follow-up transitions (tagcoll2 and libwibble))
Your message dated Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:09:49 +0200 with message-id 20150803220949.gf3...@betterave.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#794491: binNMUs needed for libstdc++6 follow-up transitions (tagcoll2 and libwibble) has caused the Debian Bug report #794491, regarding binNMUs needed for libstdc++6 follow-up transitions (tagcoll2 and libwibble) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 794491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org both tagcoll2 and libwibble build static libraries only, however changing their ABI triggered by the libstdc++6 transition. please - binNUM libwibble (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) - binNUM tagcoll2 (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) and the rebuilt libwibble. btw, shouldn't all reverse dependencies of these packages have a Built-Using attribute? After that, libept then hopefully do it's transition. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Matthias, On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 18:28:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: release.debian.org both tagcoll2 and libwibble build static libraries only, however changing their ABI triggered by the libstdc++6 transition. please - binNUM libwibble (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) - binNUM tagcoll2 (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) and the rebuilt libwibble. jcristau@wuiet:~$ wb nmu libwibble . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with g++ 5.2' --extra-depends 'g++ (= 4:5.2)' jcristau@wuiet:~$ wb nmu tagcoll2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with g++ 5.2' --extra-depends 'g++ (= 4:5.2), libwibble-dev ( 1.1-1)' btw, shouldn't all reverse dependencies of these packages have a Built-Using attribute? Possibly. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
On 2015-08-03 22:11, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 790994 + transition block 790994 by 790756 reassign 790994 release.debian.org tag 790994 + patch tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental thanks On 2015-08-01 13:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2015-07-29 22:05, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07/29/2015 09:35 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ccfits will need a transition. Please find the patch for it below. missing Conflicts/Replaces or Breaks/Replaces Indeed, good catch. Here is an updated debdiff. I have uploaded the package to experimental, to get the NEW processing done faster. Given it doesn't have any build-depends on c++ libraries besides libstdc++-dev and doesn't have any reverse depends, I can upload it to unstable as soon as GCC 5 is the default on all architectures and on buildds. The package in experimental went out of NEW and has been built successfully on all architectures. I made a mistake in the above statement, this package actually has one reverse dependency, luminance-hdr, so a very small transition is needed. I am ready to get the package uploaded to unstable, when I get the green light for that. Yes please. Ok thanks. Just uploaded it to unstable. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixing versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 794517 qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-2 Bug #794517 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition Marked as found in versions qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-2. notfound 794517 qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-3 Bug #794517 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: sourcefull upload required for gcc5 transition The source qt4-x11 and version 4:4.8.7+dfsg-3 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-3. block 790756 by 794517 Bug #790756 [release.debian.org] transition: libstdc++6 cxx11 790756 was blocked by: 778096 791262 790756 was blocking: 790979 790987 790988 790990 790994 791013 791014 791019 791030 791031 791034 791042 791045 791047 791050 791051 791067 791106 791114 791116 791125 791131 791132 791138 791141 791157 791166 791205 791215 791231 791245 791266 791268 791289 791312 791329 791332 791356 792013 793909 794474 Added blocking bug(s) of 790756: 794517 block 790756 by 794518 Bug #790756 [release.debian.org] transition: libstdc++6 cxx11 790756 was blocked by: 791262 794517 778096 790756 was blocking: 790979 790987 790988 790990 790994 791013 791014 791019 791030 791031 791034 791042 791045 791047 791050 791051 791067 791106 791114 791116 791125 791131 791132 791138 791141 791157 791166 791205 791215 791231 791245 791266 791268 791289 791312 791329 791332 791356 792013 793909 794474 Added blocking bug(s) of 790756: 794518 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 790756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790756 794517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794517 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386499529801.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#792013: Is it ok to upload liblog4cxx to sid?
Hi Julien, Am Montag, den 03.08.2015, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 21:59:05 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: Just asking if I should upload the package with the GCC-5 fix to sid, as the transistion has now started? Please let me know! Yes, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien Many thanks, uploaded, and all the buildds are green. zookeeper and roboptim-core needs a binNMU, (the remaining one, solarpowerlog will require an upload and a two other libs fixed first; as I'm the maintainer of it, I'll take care) the syntax should be: nmu zookeeper . ALL . -m Rebuild against liblog4cxx10v5 nmu robotim-core . ALL . -m Rebuild against liblog4cxx10v5 Thanks! -- tobi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: bug 791045 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 791045 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5) Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html' from 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/spatialindex.html' forwarded 791332 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/spatialindex.html Bug #791332 [release.debian.org] transition: spatialindex (GCC 5) Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/spatialindex.html' from 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-spatialindex.html' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791045 791332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386371087975.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: bug 791045 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 791045 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5) Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html' from 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-geos.html' forwarded 791045 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/spatialindex.html Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5) Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/spatialindex.html' from 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos.html' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386369007028.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bits from the Release Team: GCC 5 as default, transitions thereof
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 22:55:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Dear release team, the Debian Haskell Team is eager to start on GHC-7.10 real soon, hopefully before or at DebCamp. Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the GCC 5 transition? I'd rather not have both at the same time, regardless of any entanglement. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#790987: botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing control commands: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. usertag -1 + transition Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. block -1 by 790756 Bug #790987 [src:botan1.10] botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 790987 was not blocked by any bugs. 790987 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 790987: 790756 reassign -1 release.debian.org Bug #790987 [src:botan1.10] botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:botan1.10' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions botan1.10/1.10.8-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #790987 to the same values previously set owner -1 ! Bug #790987 [release.debian.org] botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Owner recorded as Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org. -- 790987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790987 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b790987.143858864626340.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#791014: csound: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #791014 {Done: Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org} [src:csound] csound:
library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions csound/1:6.05~dfsg1-3.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
usertag -1 + transition
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
block -1 by 790756
Bug #791014 [src:csound] csound: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
791014 was not blocked by any bugs.
791014 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 791014: 790756
reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #791014 [src:csound] csound: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:csound' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions csound/6.05~dfsg1-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791014 to the same values
previously set
retitle -1 transition: csound (GCC 5)
Bug #791014 [release.debian.org] csound: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Changed Bug title to 'transition: csound (GCC 5)' from 'csound: library
transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default'
--
791014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b791014.143859784415122.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#791332: transition: spatialindex (GCC 5)
Processing control commands: tags -1 patch Bug #791332 [release.debian.org] transition: spatialindex (GCC 5) Added tag(s) patch. -- 791332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.m791332.143859888120517.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#791332: transition: spatialindex (GCC 5)
Control: tags -1 patch On 03-08-15 12:41, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 21-07-15 01:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 07/03/2015 03:14 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: Like geos (#791045) and basically all other library transitions [1] for the Debian GIS team, I'll be conservative and assume that transition is required. spatialindex (1.8.5-2~exp2) available in experimental is ready for the GCC 5 transition. It includes the library package rename, and symbols file update with GCC 5 on all architectures. Its only reverse dependency is qgis, and that should still work. The attached debdiff can be used to NMU. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 diff -Nru spatialindex-1.8.5/debian/changelog spatialindex-1.8.5/debian/changelog --- spatialindex-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2015-08-02 16:53:24.0 +0200 +++ spatialindex-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2015-08-03 12:44:53.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +spatialindex (1.8.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Move from experimental to unstable. + + -- Bas Couwenberg sebas...@debian.org Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:42:16 +0200 + spatialindex (1.8.5-2~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium * Update symbols for other architectures.
Bug#794458: release.debian.org: boost1.58/icu/gcc5 transition
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: s...@debian.org gcc5, icu are now build with libstdc++11 abi, and so is boost1.58. It's time to switch boost from 1.55 to 1.58. Otherwise libraries that are getting gcc5 soname bump that use boost as well, may get incompatible abi as a whole. I have boost-defaults upload ready, may I upload it? Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9ogybxf@linux.intel.com
Processed: reopen transition issues
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 791312
Bug #791312 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
xapian-core: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791312 to the same values
previously set
reopen 791131
Bug #791131 {Done: Peter Spiess-Knafl d...@spiessknafl.at}
[release.debian.org] libjsoncpp: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791131 to the same values
previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791131
791312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143859307417966.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#791014: csound: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Control: reopen -1 Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 + transition Control: block -1 by 790756 Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org Control: retitle -1 transition: csound (GCC 5) On 3 July 2015 at 10:09, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Package: src:csound Version: 6.05~dfsg1-2 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for BEGIN GCC CXX11 in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag this issue + transition block this issue by 790756 reassign this issue release.debian.org The changed package has been uploaded to experimental, and I have verified the only reverse dep (csoundqt) builds with it. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAfdZj_q8JjGD80o3mh-XcnEevii1fAHqA6=bbhdd64vepu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#791332: transition: spatialindex (GCC 5)
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791332 + transition block 791332 by 790756 reassign 791332 release.debian.org severity 791332 normal retitle 791332 transition: spatialindex (GCC 5) thanks On 21-07-15 01:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 07/03/2015 03:14 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: Like geos (#791045) and basically all other library transitions [1] for the Debian GIS team, I'll be conservative and assume that transition is required. spatialindex (1.8.5-2~exp2) available in experimental is ready for the GCC 5 transition. It includes the library package rename, and symbols file update with GCC 5 on all architectures. Its only reverse dependency is qgis, and that should still work. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55bf4553.7010...@xs4all.nl
Processed: transition: spatialindex (GCC 5)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sebas...@xs4all.nl). usertag 791332 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 791332 by 790756 Bug #791332 [src:spatialindex] spatialindex: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791332 was not blocked by any bugs. 791332 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791332: 790756 reassign 791332 release.debian.org Bug #791332 [src:spatialindex] spatialindex: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:spatialindex' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions spatialindex/1.8.1-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791332 to the same values previously set severity 791332 normal Bug #791332 [release.debian.org] spatialindex: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' retitle 791332 transition: spatialindex (GCC 5) Bug #791332 [release.debian.org] spatialindex: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: spatialindex (GCC 5)' from 'spatialindex: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143859848818530.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reopen xapian-core transition issue and reassign
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was d...@debian.org).
usertag 791312 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
block 791312 by 790756
Bug #791312 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [src:xapian-core]
xapian-core: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
791312 was not blocked by any bugs.
791312 was blocking: 777972
Added blocking bug(s) of 791312: 790756
reassign 791312 release.debian.org
Bug #791312 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [src:xapian-core]
xapian-core: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xapian-core' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions xapian-core/1.2.21-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions xapian-core/1.2.21-1.2.
severity 791312 normal
Bug #791312 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
xapian-core: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14385904123405.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reopen libjsoncpp transition issue and reassign
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was d...@debian.org).
usertag 791131 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
block 791131 by 790756
Bug #791131 {Done: Peter Spiess-Knafl d...@spiessknafl.at} [src:libjsoncpp]
libjsoncpp: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
791131 was not blocked by any bugs.
791131 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 791131: 790756
reassign 791131 release.debian.org
Bug #791131 {Done: Peter Spiess-Knafl d...@spiessknafl.at} [src:libjsoncpp]
libjsoncpp: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libjsoncpp' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions libjsoncpp/0.10.2-4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions libjsoncpp/0.10.5-1.
severity 791131 normal
Bug #791131 {Done: Peter Spiess-Knafl d...@spiessknafl.at}
[release.debian.org] libjsoncpp: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
owner 791131 d...@spiessknafl.at
Bug #791131 {Done: Peter Spiess-Knafl d...@spiessknafl.at}
[release.debian.org] libjsoncpp: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Owner recorded as d...@spiessknafl.at.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143859183010781.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#794491: binNMUs needed for libstdc++6 follow-up transitions (tagcoll2 and libwibble)
Package: release.debian.org both tagcoll2 and libwibble build static libraries only, however changing their ABI triggered by the libstdc++6 transition. please - binNUM libwibble (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) - binNUM tagcoll2 (using g++ (= 4:5.2)) and the rebuilt libwibble. btw, shouldn't all reverse dependencies of these packages have a Built-Using attribute? After that, libept then hopefully do it's transition. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55bf969f.2060...@debian.org
Bug#794486: release.debian.org: auto transition trackers incorrectly handle addition of suffixes (including GCC 5 related transitions)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 17:34:20 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 18:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 16:44:32 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tools Hi, I don't think any of the automatic transition trackers for the libstdcxx / GCC 5 packages are working correctly. Currently cmake has been rebuilt against both the new versions of GCC 5 and libjsoncpp, and shows up good on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html but bad on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html The auto-libjsoncpp ben file contains this: is_affected = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg|libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; is_good = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; Here, packages depending on libjsoncpp0v5 match both the is_good and is_bad regexes so ben marks them as bad. I've made a manual tracker for libjsoncpp, see https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libjsoncpp.html That looks better. I tried one I suggested with ^ and $ and it didn't work properly, so I guess ben applies the regex to the entire Depends line? The automatic solution could be a little more complex than I thought. Right; adding \b instead might work. Any other broken ones? After a quick skim these trackers are probably broken: ccfits csound geos libconfig libdap libgig libmusicbrainz5 libquvi-scripts (not gcc 5) log4cxx spatialindex wxwidgets3.0 Thanks, I've updated those ben files, the html should be fixed in half an hour or so. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#794486: release.debian.org: auto transition trackers incorrectly handle addition of suffixes (including GCC 5 related transitions)
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 18:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 16:44:32 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tools Hi, I don't think any of the automatic transition trackers for the libstdcxx / GCC 5 packages are working correctly. Currently cmake has been rebuilt against both the new versions of GCC 5 and libjsoncpp, and shows up good on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html but bad on this tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html The auto-libjsoncpp ben file contains this: is_affected = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg|libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; is_good = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0v5|libjsoncpp0v5\-dbg/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libjsoncpp0|libjsoncpp0\-dbg/; Here, packages depending on libjsoncpp0v5 match both the is_good and is_bad regexes so ben marks them as bad. I've made a manual tracker for libjsoncpp, see https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libjsoncpp.html That looks better. I tried one I suggested with ^ and $ and it didn't work properly, so I guess ben applies the regex to the entire Depends line? The automatic solution could be a little more complex than I thought. Any other broken ones? After a quick skim these trackers are probably broken: ccfits csound geos libconfig libdap libgig libmusicbrainz5 libquvi-scripts (not gcc 5) log4cxx spatialindex wxwidgets3.0 James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: transition: geos (GCC 5)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sebas...@xs4all.nl). usertag 791045 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 791045 by 790756 Bug #791045 [src:geos] geos: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791045 was not blocked by any bugs. 791045 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791045: 790756 reassign 791045 release.debian.org Bug #791045 [src:geos] geos: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:geos' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions geos/3.4.2-7. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791045 to the same values previously set severity 791045 normal Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] geos: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' retitle 791045 transition: geos (GCC 5) Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] geos: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: geos (GCC 5)' from 'geos: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' tags 791045 + patch Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5) Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143860089131146.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#791045: transition: geos (GCC 5)
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791045 + transition block 791045 by 790756 reassign 791045 release.debian.org severity 791045 normal retitle 791045 transition: geos (GCC 5) tags 791045 + patch thanks On 01-08-15 20:25, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 20-07-15 00:39, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I've pushed a gcc5 branch with changes to append v5 to the library package names, but I don't think I'll upload these changes to experimental soon. geos (3.4.2-8~exp1) was just uploaded to experimental which includes the GCC 5 changes. I'll change this issue into a transition when I've updated the symbols file for the other architectures. The symbols were updated in geos (3.4.2-8~exp1) available in experimental. I don't expect any issues with the reverse dependencies, because the geos version stays the same. The attached debdiff can use used to NMU the package to unstable. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 diff -Nru geos-3.4.2/debian/changelog geos-3.4.2/debian/changelog --- geos-3.4.2/debian/changelog 2015-08-03 12:35:53.0 +0200 +++ geos-3.4.2/debian/changelog 2015-08-03 13:16:00.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +geos (3.4.2-8) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Move from experimental to unstable. + + -- Bas Couwenberg sebas...@debian.org Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:15:44 +0200 + geos (3.4.2-8~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium * Update symbols for other architectures.
Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 790987, severity of 790987 is normal ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 790987 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. severity 790987 normal Bug #790987 [release.debian.org] botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' usertags 791014 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. severity 791014 normal Bug #791014 [release.debian.org] transition: csound (GCC 5) Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' usertags 794458 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 790987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790987 791014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791014 794458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386028298986.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#791132: transition: libkml (GCC 5)
On 03-08-15 00:54, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 01-08-15 16:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: The debdiff in case libkml needs to be NMUed is attached. The debdiff needs to be updated to incorporate the changes for todays libkml 1.3.0~rc0 release, the Debian package in experimental has been updated to 1.3.0~rc0-1~exp1 but the symbols have only been updated for amd64. Due to the icu uninstallability the package cannot be built on the other architectures at the moment. The symbols have been updated and libkml (1.3.0~rc0-1~exp2) should be available in experimental shortly. The updated debdiff for the NMU to unstable is attached. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 diff -Nru libkml-1.3.0~rc0/debian/changelog libkml-1.3.0~rc0/debian/changelog --- libkml-1.3.0~rc0/debian/changelog 2015-08-03 13:57:03.0 +0200 +++ libkml-1.3.0~rc0/debian/changelog 2015-08-03 14:17:22.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libkml (1.3.0~rc0-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Move from experimental to unstable. + + -- Bas Couwenberg sebas...@debian.org Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:17:06 +0200 + libkml (1.3.0~rc0-1~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium * Update symbols for other architectures.
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#791203: mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing control commands: clone -1 -2 Bug #791203 [src:mimetic] mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug 791203 cloned as bug 794474 user release.debian@packages.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. usertag -2 + transition Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. block -2 by 790756 Bug #794474 [src:mimetic] mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 794474 was not blocked by any bugs. 794474 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 794474: 790756 reassign -2 release.debian.org Bug #794474 [src:mimetic] mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:mimetic' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions mimetic/0.9.8-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #794474 to the same values previously set severity -2 normal Bug #794474 [release.debian.org] mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' tag -2 + patch Bug #794474 [release.debian.org] mimetic: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) patch. -- 791203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791203 794474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b791203.143860593627457.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: retitle 791215 to transition: netcdf (GCC 5), retitle 791132 to transition: libkml (GCC 5) ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 791215 transition: netcdf (GCC 5) Bug #791215 [release.debian.org] netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: netcdf (GCC 5)' from 'netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' retitle 791132 transition: libkml (GCC 5) Bug #791132 [release.debian.org] libkml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: libkml (GCC 5)' from 'libkml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' forwarded 791045 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-geos.html Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-geos.html'. forwarded 791332 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-spatialindex.html Bug #791332 [release.debian.org] transition: spatialindex (GCC 5) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-spatialindex.html'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791045 791132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791132 791215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791215 791332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386015432079.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#792013: Is it ok to upload liblog4cxx to sid?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 21:59:05 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: Just asking if I should upload the package with the GCC-5 fix to sid, as the transistion has now started? Please let me know! Yes, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bits from the Release Team: GCC 5 as default, transitions thereof
Dear release team, the Debian Haskell Team is eager to start on GHC-7.10 real soon, hopefully before or at DebCamp. Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the GCC 5 transition? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#791138: libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791138 + transition block 791138 by 790756 block 791138 by 791116 reassign 791138 release.debian.org retitle 791138 transition: libmatroska (GCC 5) severity 791138 normal thanks On 2015-07-03 13:11:42, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:libmatroska Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for BEGIN GCC CXX11 in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag this issue + transition block this issue by 790756 reassign this issue release.debian.org libmatroska requires a transition and needs to go together with libebml. A version with the renamed packages has been uploaded to experimental. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#791138: libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sramac...@debian.org). usertag 791138 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 791138 by 790756 Bug #791138 [src:libmatroska] libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791138 was not blocked by any bugs. 791138 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791138: 790756 block 791138 by 791116 Bug #791138 [src:libmatroska] libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791138 was blocked by: 790756 791138 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791138: 791116 reassign 791138 release.debian.org Bug #791138 [src:libmatroska] libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:libmatroska' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions libmatroska/1.4.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791138 to the same values previously set retitle 791138 transition: libmatroska (GCC 5) Bug #791138 [release.debian.org] libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: libmatroska (GCC 5)' from 'libmatroska: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' severity 791138 normal Bug #791138 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatroska (GCC 5) Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791138: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791138 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386357631307.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#792651: transition: libmusicbrainz5
On 2015-07-18 12:17:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 - confirmed On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:01:46PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 2015-07-18 11:52:47, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:16:33AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: libmusicbrainz5 requires a transition for the gcc 5 transition. A package built with the C++11 ABI and a SONAME bump is available in experimental. Please go ahead. hmm? The gcc 5 version building with the C++11 ABI isn't in unstable yet. Right, sorry. I thought you wanted to complete the rename ahead of that. Let's come back to it later then. The GCC 5 fun has started. I'm ready to upload libmusicbrainz5 at any time. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 790994 + transition block 790994 by 790756 reassign 790994 release.debian.org tag 790994 + patch tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental thanks On 2015-08-01 13:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2015-07-29 22:05, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07/29/2015 09:35 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ccfits will need a transition. Please find the patch for it below. missing Conflicts/Replaces or Breaks/Replaces Indeed, good catch. Here is an updated debdiff. I have uploaded the package to experimental, to get the NEW processing done faster. Given it doesn't have any build-depends on c++ libraries besides libstdc++-dev and doesn't have any reverse depends, I can upload it to unstable as soon as GCC 5 is the default on all architectures and on buildds. The package in experimental went out of NEW and has been built successfully on all architectures. I made a mistake in the above statement, this package actually has one reverse dependency, luminance-hdr, so a very small transition is needed. I am ready to get the package uploaded to unstable, when I get the green light for that. Yes please. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #790994 [release.debian.org] ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 790994: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790994 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b790994.14386362963931.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#791034: flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791034 + transition block 791034 by 790756 reassign 791034 release.debian.org retitle 791034 transition: flac (GCC 5) tags 791034 - help severity 791034 normal thanks On 2015-07-03 13:09:51, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:flac Version: 1.3.1-2 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for BEGIN GCC CXX11 in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag this issue + transition block this issue by 790756 reassign this issue release.debian.org flac needs a transition. A version changing the name of libflac++6 has been uploaded to experimental. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 790994 + transition block 790994 by 790756 reassign 790994 release.debian.org tag 790994 + patch tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental thanks On 2015-08-01 13:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2015-07-29 22:05, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07/29/2015 09:35 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ccfits will need a transition. Please find the patch for it below. missing Conflicts/Replaces or Breaks/Replaces Indeed, good catch. Here is an updated debdiff. I have uploaded the package to experimental, to get the NEW processing done faster. Given it doesn't have any build-depends on c++ libraries besides libstdc++-dev and doesn't have any reverse depends, I can upload it to unstable as soon as GCC 5 is the default on all architectures and on buildds. The package in experimental went out of NEW and has been built successfully on all architectures. I made a mistake in the above statement, this package actually has one reverse dependency, luminance-hdr, so a very small transition is needed. I am ready to get the package uploaded to unstable, when I get the green light for that. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150803194927.gb20...@aurel32.net
Processed: Re: Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was aurel...@aurel32.net). usertag 790994 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 790994 by 790756 Bug #790994 [src:ccfits] ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 790994 was not blocked by any bugs. 790994 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 790994: 790756 reassign 790994 release.debian.org Bug #790994 [src:ccfits] ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:ccfits' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions ccfits/2.4+dfsg-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #790994 to the same values previously set tag 790994 + patch Bug #790994 [release.debian.org] ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) patch. tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental Bug #790994 [release.debian.org] ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) fixed-in-experimental. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 790994: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790994 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386313709889.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#791116: libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sramac...@debian.org). usertag 791116 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 791116 by 790756 Bug #791116 [src:libebml] libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791116 was not blocked by any bugs. 791116 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791116: 790756 reassign 791116 release.debian.org Bug #791116 [src:libebml] libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:libebml' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions libebml/1.3.1-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791116 to the same values previously set retitle 791116 transition: libebml (GCC 5) Bug #791116 [release.debian.org] libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: libebml (GCC 5)' from 'libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' severity 791116 normal Bug #791116 [release.debian.org] transition: libebml (GCC 5) Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791116 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143863403024184.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#791034: flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sramac...@debian.org). usertag 791034 + transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. block 791034 by 790756 Bug #791034 [src:flac] flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default 791034 was not blocked by any bugs. 791034 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 791034: 790756 reassign 791034 release.debian.org Bug #791034 [src:flac] flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reassigned from package 'src:flac' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions flac/1.3.1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791034 to the same values previously set retitle 791034 transition: flac (GCC 5) Bug #791034 [release.debian.org] flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: flac (GCC 5)' from 'flac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default' tags 791034 - help Bug #791034 [release.debian.org] transition: flac (GCC 5) Removed tag(s) help. severity 791034 normal Bug #791034 [release.debian.org] transition: flac (GCC 5) Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14386308897636.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#791116: libebml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791116 + transition block 791116 by 790756 reassign 791116 release.debian.org retitle 791116 transition: libebml (GCC 5) severity 791116 normal thanks On 2015-07-03 13:11:19, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:libebml Version: 1.3.1-3 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for BEGIN GCC CXX11 in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag this issue + transition block this issue by 790756 reassign this issue release.debian.org libebml requires a transition. I've uploaded a version with the new package name to experimental. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
