Processed: Re: Bug#800006: Tested patches for Jessie and Wheezy
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #801201 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 801201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#801318: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #801318 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 801318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801318 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 801201 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 801201 + pu There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: pu. > retitle 801201 wheezy-pu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u6 Bug #801201 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6 Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u6' from 'jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 801201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#800881: jessie-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/340.93-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 16:53 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Second PU request for fixing CVE-2015-5950. > > This requires a new upstream release, too, that is two or three releases > ahead of what is currently in jessie. > > The proposed changes are all already included and tested in sid. > This includes changes from several uploads to sid (up to 340.76-4) that > are a new upstream release and several bugfixes and minor features that > I consider appropriate for jessie. > The big changes done in sid 340.76-5 onwards are excluded, instead the > changes needed for jessie were cherry-picked into 340.93-0+deb8u1. Please go ahead. > Regarding the version number, 340.93-1 was uploaded to sid (before the > CVE was made public), so we need to use 340.93-0+deb8u1 this time (or > would 340.93-0 be ok?). (A shorter version number reduces version string > inflation when rebuilding nvidia-graphics-modules.) -0+deb8u1 would be clearer, but I wouldn't object terribly to -0. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#800877: wheezy-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.128-1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #800877 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.128-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 800877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#800877: wheezy-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.128-1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 15:35 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > CVE-2015-5950 in the non-free nvidia-graphics-drivers shall be fixed via > PU, there won't be a DSA for this. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spice_0.12.5-1+deb8u2_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spice_0.12.5-1+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spice_0.12.5-1+deb8u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tzdata_2015g-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: zendframework_1.12.9+dfsg-2+deb8u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u2_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spice_0.11.0-1+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spice_0.11.0-1+deb7u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tzdata_2015g-0+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: zendframework_1.11.13-1.1+deb7u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT
Bug#797462: jessie-pu: package whois/5.2.10
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 22:15 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I think it is time for a whois stable update, are there any objections? fwiw, this appears not to have made it to debian-release. > These are all data changes, plus a little debian/rules cleanup. None of those cleanups appear to have ever been mentioned in the changelog. The diff as provided also doesn't include the changelog stanza for the proposed upload - assuming that a rebuild on jessie exactly matches the diff you attached other than that, please go ahead as 5.2.10~deb8u1. Regards, Adam
Bug#800006: jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:19:53AM +, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >>> i wonder if #795227 warrants an upload to jessie-pu (and maybe also to >>> wheezy-pu) to be fixed with the next point release. We run into that >>> issue at work, when we want to effectivly publish static IP addresses in >>> cloud environments. >> >> Can you please take a look at this update request and yell if you have >> problems with fixing this in stable and oldstable. > > Where is the debdiff? Nevermind, I just looked at the bug log. Looks fine to me also, maybe state that this is an NMU with maintainer approval? Best wishes, Mike
Bug#800006: Tested patches for Jessie and Wheezy
Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2015-10-07 10:36, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Hi > > > > Attached are tested diffs for Jessie and Wheezy. > > Please go ahead. Uploaded and flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Bug#800793: jessie-pu: package netcfg/1.131+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 18:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 18:44 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I would like to fix netcfg in stable and allow KVM on s390x to boot the > > installer with working networking. The simple patch is this and is > > already in testing. > > > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > > index 8dc90b9..4f2d3bc 100644 > > --- a/debian/changelog > > +++ b/debian/changelog > > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > > +netcfg (1.131+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium > > + > > + * Fix is_layer3_qeth on s390x to avoid bailing out if the network > > +driver is not qeth. (Closes: #798376) > > Please go ahead. Uploaded and flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#800793: jessie-pu: package netcfg/1.131+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #800793 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package netcfg/1.131+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 800793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#800006: Tested patches for Jessie and Wheezy
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #86 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 86: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=86 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#801318: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 17:25 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > postgresql-9.1 (9.1.19-0+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium > > * New upstream version, relevant PL/Perl change: > + Fix plperl to handle non-ASCII error message texts correctly. Flagged for acceptance, thanks. Regards, Adam
Bug#800664: jessie-pu: package wxmaxima/13.04.2-4+b1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 15:51 +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote: > Then thanks a lot for your help! > > > The debdiff with the corrected version number is attached to this > mail. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#800664: jessie-pu: package wxmaxima/13.04.2-4+b1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #800664 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package wxmaxima/13.04.2-4+b1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 800664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800664 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#798028: jessie-pu: package pykerberos/1.1.5-0.1+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:41 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > I'd like to fix CVE-2015-3206 (a loack (missing KDC authenticity > verification) for jessie via a point release. The debdiff is > attached. The bug is fixed in unstable as well as squeeze-lts already. > > As in squeeze-lts the KDC check is disabled by default to not break existing > installations. +++ b/debian/NEWS @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ [...] s/ordner/order/ Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#798028: jessie-pu: package pykerberos/1.1.5-0.1+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #798028 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package pykerberos/1.1.5-0.1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 798028: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798028 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#801095: jessie-pu: package uqm/0.6.2.dfsg-9.1~deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:35 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > uqm FTBFS in jessie due to a missing -lm (#792920). Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#801095: jessie-pu: package uqm/0.6.2.dfsg-9.1~deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #801095 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package uqm/0.6.2.dfsg-9.1~deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 801095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801095 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: jessie-pu: package whois/5.2.10
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #797462 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package whois/5.2.10 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 797462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797462 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#799758: jessie-pu: package apt-dater-host/1.0.0-2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #799758 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package apt-dater-host/1.0.0-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 799758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#799758: jessie-pu: package apt-dater-host/1.0.0-2
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 10:20 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > could I upload this package for the next jessie-pu? It fixes #794630 Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Bug#801317: wheezy-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 17:21 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > postgresql-9.1 (9.1.19-0+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium > > * New upstream version. > > + Fix contrib/pgcrypto to detect and report too-short crypt() salts > (Josh Kupershmidt) > > Certain invalid salt arguments crashed the server or disclosed a few > bytes of server memory. We have not ruled out the viability of attacks > that arrange for presence of confidential information in the disclosed > bytes, but they seem unlikely. (CVE-2015-5288) This appears to have been rejected by dak: adsb@franck:~$ cat queue/reject/postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb7u1_source.changes.reason postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb7u1.dsc: Refers to non-existing file 'postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb7u1.debian.tar.gz' Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#801317: wheezy-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #801317 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 801317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801317 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#799033: jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #799033 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 799033: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799033 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#799033: jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:16 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > for the next jessie point relase, I'd like to upload a new version > of the file package, in order to fix the bug described in > > https://bugs.debian.org/798410 > http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/file/2015/001777.html > > Short version: The handling of file's --parameter command line option > is broken, the program segfaults upon every usage. Additionally, > --parameter has no effect when used with --files-from. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Bug#801100: jessie-pu: package tangerine-icon-theme/0.26.debian-3.1~deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > tangerine-icon-theme has a flaw in its build system that can cause a race > between internal cleanup (running in the background) and removal of the > build chroot which results in hanging processes blocking the pty. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#800881: jessie-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/340.93-0+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #800881 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/340.93-0+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 800881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800881 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: FTBFS with OCaml 4.02.3
Processing control commands: > block 789133 by -1 Bug #789133 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 4.02.3 789133 was blocked by: 789614 789619 789403 790062 789402 789354 789133 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 789133: 801458 -- 789133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789133 801458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: block 789133 with 801459
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 789133 with 801459 Bug #789133 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 4.02.3 789133 was blocked by: 789614 789402 789403 789619 790062 789354 801458 789133 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 789133: 801459 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 789133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789133 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#800006: jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:19:53AM +, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> i wonder if #795227 warrants an upload to jessie-pu (and maybe also to >> wheezy-pu) to be fixed with the next point release. We run into that >> issue at work, when we want to effectivly publish static IP addresses in >> cloud environments. > > Can you please take a look at this update request and yell if you have > problems with fixing this in stable and oldstable. Where is the debdiff? Best wishes, Mike
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.5.2-3+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT
Bug#801098: jessie-pu: package human-icon-theme/0.28.debian-3.4~deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:02 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > human-icon-theme has a flaw in its build system that can cause a race > between internal cleanup (running in the background) and removal of the > build chroot which results in hanging processes blocking the pty. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#801100: jessie-pu: package tangerine-icon-theme/0.26.debian-3.1~deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #801100 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package tangerine-icon-theme/0.26.debian-3.1~deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 801100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801100 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#801098: jessie-pu: package human-icon-theme/0.28.debian-3.4~deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #801098 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package human-icon-theme/0.28.debian-3.4~deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 801098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_s390.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT
Bug#793044: marked as done (transition: libvigraimpex)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:43:30 +0200 with message-id <56199492.2040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#793044: transition: libvigraimpex has caused the Debian Bug report #793044, regarding transition: libvigraimpex to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 793044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 792696 Hello release team, I would like to upload (resp. get uploaded) libvigraimpex/1.10.0+dfsg-9 to unstable, which would start a transition. Currently in experimental is libvigraimpex/1.10.0+dfsg-8. I've test build the reverse deps, which resulted in: 3dpict/0.0.18-2 -- o.k. enblend-enfuse/4.1.3+dfsg-2 -- o.k. gamera/3.4.2+svn1435-1 -- o.k. hugin/2015.0.0~rc2+dfsg-1 -- o.k. libreoffice/1:4.4.4-1 -- o.k. saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1+b1 -- FTBFS, #792696 (patch provided) This transition already took place in Ubuntu. The new package features some changes, * deb/control: + updated Maintainer and Uploaders (packaged moved to Debian Science). + added Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git. * deb/copyright: + updated Source: (upstream moved to Github). * deb/rules: + run dh_numpy w/o script (deb/dh_numpy dropped) [Andreas Tille]. * added docs-no-footer-timestamp.diff (Closes: #783230). * added symbols control file deb/libvigraimpex5.symbols. please say if it would be better to upload it again to experimental, first. Thanks, Daniel Stender Ben file: title = "libvigraimpex"; is_affected = .build_depends ~ "libvigraimpex-dev"; is_good = .depends ~ "libvigraimpex5"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libvigraimpex4"; -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This transition is over. Emilio--- End Message ---
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_s390x.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT
Bug#801434: transition: armadillo
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:30:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 10/10/15 05:57, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi. > > > > Please consider permitting me to upload the latest armadillo. The > > soname has become 6, and I have verified that all the rdepends build > > and work, so a binNMU should be sufficient. > > Ack. Uploaded. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_sparc.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT
Bug#794736: marked as done (libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:44:09 +0200 with message-id <561994b9.8060...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Processed: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default has caused the Debian Bug report #794736, regarding libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 794736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794736 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:libvigraimpex Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch confirmed User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 [ confirmed, for both 1.10.0+dfsg-9 in experimental and 1.9.0+dfsg-10 in unstable ] Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This is done. Emilio--- End Message ---
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u7_mipsel.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.3.1-6+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netcfg_1.131+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.19-0+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT
Processed: Re: Bug#801434: transition: armadillo
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #801434 [release.debian.org] transition: armadillo Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 801434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801434 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#801434: transition: armadillo
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/10/15 05:57, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi. > > Please consider permitting me to upload the latest armadillo. The > soname has become 6, and I have verified that all the rdepends build > and work, so a binNMU should be sufficient. Ack. Cheers, Emilio
Processed: Re: Bug#801441: jessie-pu: package bcfg2/1.3.5-1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #801441 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package bcfg2/1.3.5-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 801441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801441 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#801441: jessie-pu: package bcfg2/1.3.5-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 09:43 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: > I would like to update bcfg2 in stable to match the version currently in > testing to enable it to work with Django 1.7 (bug #755645). To do this I would > add the attached patch, which looks much worse than it is due to the db > migration files being moved around. That is rather noisy, yes. :-( Is there any chance we could have an interdiff of the before-and-after patches, to highlight the actual differences between them? In any case we'd need a full debdiff of a package built and tested on jessie before giving a definite ack. Regards, Adam
