NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_sparc.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_amd64.changes REJECT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT
Processed: block 822336 with 819758
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 822336 with 819758 Bug #822336 [src:perl] perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3 822336 was not blocked by any bugs. 822336 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 822336: 819758 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 822336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_amd64.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ext4magic_0.3.2-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT
Processed: Re: Bug#818906: wheezy-pu: package dpkg/1.16.18
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #818906 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package dpkg/1.16.18 Added tag(s) pending. -- 818906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#818906: wheezy-pu: package dpkg/1.16.18
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 00:23 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:36:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 12:07 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 18:07:46 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 16:36:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Here's a proposed dpkg 1.16.18, with cherry picked fixes from master > > > > > (already in unstable). These include fixes for regressions, memory > > > > > leaks, > > > > > segmentation faults, portability and interaction with tools such as > > > > > GNU tar or the system shell. [...] > > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Please go ahead. > > No problem! Uploaded now. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.6.20+dfsg-0+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u4_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tardiff_0.1-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tardiff_0.1-2+deb8u2_allonly.changes ACCEPT
Processed: Re: Bug#818908: jessie-pu: package dpkg/1.17.27
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #818908 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dpkg/1.17.27 Added tag(s) pending. -- 818908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818908 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#819284: jessie-pu: package ext4magic/0.3.2-2
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-04-30 at 14:47 -0300, Giovani Ferreira wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:10:55 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:40:37PM -0300, Giovani Augusto Ferreira wrote: > > > The ext4magic has a misinterpretation of the physical block addresses and > > > block lengths of ext4 inode. > > > The error is permanent and 100% reproducible (also on i386) > > > The upstream provides a patch to fix this problem and this problem has > > > been fixed en unstable/testing. > > > > Please go ahead. > > Uploaded. Thanks! Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#819284: jessie-pu: package ext4magic/0.3.2-2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #819284 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ext4magic/0.3.2-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 819284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#818908: jessie-pu: package dpkg/1.17.27
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 00:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:34:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Apologies for the delays in getting back to you. Please go ahead. > > No problem! Uploaded now too. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Re: transition of cgal to testing
On 02/05/16 18:25, Joachim Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cgal says: > > 7 days old (needed 5 days) > old binaries left on armhf: libcgal-qt5-11, libcgal-qt5-dev (from 4.7-4) (but > ignoring cruft, so nevermind) > Valid candidate > > (It is intended that these two binary packages are no longer built for armhf.) > > Why does the package not transition to testing? Is maybe "ignoring cruft, so > nevermind" not correct? Do I need to do something to these two binary packages > removed first? You need to get the package decrufted. You can file a RM bug against ftp.debian.org for that. Cheers, Emilio
transition of cgal to testing
Hi, https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cgal says: 7 days old (needed 5 days) old binaries left on armhf: libcgal-qt5-11, libcgal-qt5-dev (from 4.7-4) (but ignoring cruft, so nevermind) Valid candidate (It is intended that these two binary packages are no longer built for armhf.) Why does the package not transition to testing? Is maybe "ignoring cruft, so nevermind" not correct? Do I need to do something to these two binary packages removed first? Joachim P.S.: Please CC: me on replies.
Bug#823204: marked as done (nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4)
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 13:47:46 +0200 with message-id <57273e62.3010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823204: nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #823204, regarding nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 823204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823204 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu polymake_3.0r1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libbliss2" bliss 0.73-1 started a mini-transition, only polymake is affected. Andreas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 02/05/16 10:01, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu polymake_3.0r1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libbliss2" > > bliss 0.73-1 started a mini-transition, only polymake is affected. Scheduled. (Normally I'd have caught this myself as it's in the transition tracker, but I had a busy weekend). Cheers, Emilio--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#823002: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 7.5
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #823002 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 7.5 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 823002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#823002: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 7.5
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 29/04/16 22:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Forwarded: > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nvidia-cuda-toolkit.html > > Hi, > > the next release of nvidia-cuda-toolkit/non-free has arrived in > experimental and is ready for upload to unstable. > > eztrace-contrib, hwloc-contrib and pycuda are fine and just need a > binNMU (maintainer-uploaded since this involves non-free). > > starpu-contrib needs a sourceful upload to switch from gcc-4.9 to gcc-5 > (the previous toolkit version didn't support gcc-5). Samuel will do this > quickly. Ack. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#823206: marked as done (gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1)
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 13:28:28 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#823206: gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823206, regarding gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 823206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823206 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it on debomatic from the same source: http://debomatic-armhf.debian.net/distribution#unstable/kodi/16.1+dfsg1-1/buildlog Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package. gb kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 . armhf Thanks, Balint --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Adam, 2016-05-02 13:08 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt : > On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 10:17 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu > [...] >> Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it >> on debomatic from the same source: >> http://debomatic-armhf.debian.net/distribution#unstable/kodi/16.1+dfsg1-1/buildlog >> >> Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package. >> >> gb kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 . armhf > > "Usertags: binnmu" > > As explained previously: > > That's not a binNMU, it's a give-back - hence "gb". Please don't use > binNMU requests for wanna-build actions that aren't binNMUs - other > actions should be directed to $arch@buildd.d.o or > debian-wb-team@lists.d.o, as per > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/03/msg00096.html Sorry, closing this bug. Thanks, Balint--- End Message ---
Bug#823206: gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1
On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 10:17 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu [...] > Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it > on debomatic from the same source: > http://debomatic-armhf.debian.net/distribution#unstable/kodi/16.1+dfsg1-1/buildlog > > Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package. > > gb kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 . armhf "Usertags: binnmu" As explained previously: That's not a binNMU, it's a give-back - hence "gb". Please don't use binNMU requests for wanna-build actions that aren't binNMUs - other actions should be directed to $arch@buildd.d.o or debian-wb-team@lists.d.o, as per http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/03/msg00096.html Regards, Adam
Bug#823206: gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it on debomatic from the same source: http://debomatic-armhf.debian.net/distribution#unstable/kodi/16.1+dfsg1-1/buildlog Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package. gb kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1 . armhf Thanks, Balint
Bug#823204: nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu polymake_3.0r1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libbliss2" bliss 0.73-1 started a mini-transition, only polymake is affected. Andreas
Bug#821440: marked as done (transition: ntfs-3g)
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 09:14:20 +0200 with message-id <5726fe4c.2040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#821440: transition: ntfs-3g has caused the Debian Bug report #821440, regarding transition: ntfs-3g to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 821440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821440 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition ntfs-3g previously used a virtual library[1] that caused problems with packages depending on it. I've created a normal, binNMU safe library package which currently sits in experimental. Tested the affected packages: - partclone - testdisk - wimlib All three build fine and seem to be correct with the new ntfs-3g package. May I upload the it with the new upstream release to Sid? Mentioned packages will need to be binNMUed. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=79 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 20/04/16 08:05, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 18/04/16 20:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: >>> All three build fine and seem to be correct with the new ntfs-3g >>> package. May I upload the it with the new upstream release to Sid? >>> Mentioned packages will need to be binNMUed. >> >> Sure, go ahead. > Uploaded and built on all primary architectures. Fails on kFreeBSD > ones due to a non-existing (Linux only) errno on them, working on it. > You can issue the binNMUs. This just migrated last night. Cheers, Emilio--- End Message ---
