NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_s390x.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_s390.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_amd64+buildd.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.31-2+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT
Bug#819282: wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 07:31 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote: > >On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>Any news on the upload? > > > >None from me. Awaiting a response from my sponsor (CCed). > > The package has been uploaded now. Thanks, Luca! Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#819282: wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #819282 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 819282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819282 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#823335: transition: gdal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.0. There is no SONAME bump as for 2.0, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol changes. All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.1.0 from experimental. libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.1.0 version will be uploaded to unstable instead. The initial upload to experimental is currently in NEW awaiting FTP master review. Ben file: title = "gdal"; is_affected = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-0-2" | .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-1-0"; is_good = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-1-0"; is_bad = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-0-2"; Transition: gdal libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-5) -> libgdal20 (2.1.0+dfsg-1) gdal-abi-2-0-2 -> gdal-abi-2-1-0 The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-5)OK fiona (1.6.3-2) OK gazebo(7.0.0+dfsg-2) OK gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-4) OK imposm(2.6.0+ds-2)OK libcitygml(2.0-2) OK liblas(1.8.0-9) OK libosmium (2.6.1-1) OK mapcache (1.4.1-2) OK mapnik(3.0.11+ds-1) OK mapserver (7.0.1-3) OK merkaartor(0.18.2-7) OK mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK ncl (6.3.0-8) OK node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK openscenegraph(3.2.3+dfsg1-1) OK osmium(0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1)OK pdal (1.2.0-2) OK postgis (2.2.2+dfsg-1) OK pprepair (0.0~20151110-28dca91-1)OK prepair (0.7-5) OK qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-5)OK qmapshack (1.6.1-2) OK rasterio (0.34.0-1) OK saga (2.2.4+dfsg-1) OK sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-3)OK thuban(1.2.2-10) OK vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-11.1 / 6.3.0+dfsg1-1~exp2) OK / OK xastir(2.0.6-4) OK grass (7.0.4-1) OK osgearth (2.7.0+dfsg-1) OK osmcoastline (2.1.3-1) OK pktools (2.6.6-1) OK pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK libgdal-grass (2.0.2-2 / 2.1.0-1~exp1)FTBFS / OK qgis (2.14.1+dfsg-2 / 2.14.2+dfsg-1~exp1)OK / OK Kind Regards, Bas
Bug#819282: wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
On Tuesday, May 03, 2016 07:31:29 AM Ryan Tandy wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote: > >On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>Any news on the upload? > > > >None from me. Awaiting a response from my sponsor (CCed). > > The package has been uploaded now. Thanks, Luca! This was sitting in my pending queue for some time, sorry for the delay :( Ciao, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S.| lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG: 0xBB1A3A854F3BBEBF `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#819282: wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote: On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Any news on the upload? None from me. Awaiting a response from my sponsor (CCed). The package has been uploaded now. Thanks, Luca!
Processed: Re: Bug#823034: transition: rrdtool
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #823034 [release.debian.org] transition: rrdtool Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 823034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#823034: transition: rrdtool
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 30/04/16 10:21, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-rrdtool-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hello dear release team > > rrdtool bumped its soname for 4 to 8 in version 1.6. The library is now > thead safe, so that librrd_th.so is gone. Regular librrd.so should be > used whether thread safety is required or not. > Inside this library, the symbol removal does not affect any of Debian > architectures. Only non-posix ones are impacted. > > rrdtool version 1.6 is now in experimental. The "auto-rrdtool > transition" [1] lists the 10 packages that will need to be bin-nmu'd: > > title = "rrdtool"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "librrd4" | .depends ~ "librrd8"; > is_good = .depends ~ "librrd8"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "librrd4"; > > Library packages are co-installable. > > All 8 packages that built from source still do with version 1.6. I don't > expect any trouble. > The only bug I could find is about collectd, currently FTBFS, that will > display a bogus message during compilation, and will performed > its own mutex locking at runtime. See #823012 and #822397. > > Please tell me when it's ok to upload to unstable. Go ahead. Cheers, Emilio
