Processed (with 2 errors): Merge duplicates

2017-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 850973 src:shogun
Bug #850973 [src:python-shogun] python-shogun: FTBFS: build-dependency not 
installable: libshogun-dev (>= 3.2.0~)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-shogun' to 'src:shogun'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-shogun/3.2.0-5.2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #850973 to the same values 
previously set
> forcemerge 809290 850973
Bug #809290 [src:shogun] shogun: FTBFS with Eigen 3.3
Bug #850973 [src:shogun] python-shogun: FTBFS: build-dependency not 
installable: libshogun-dev (>= 3.2.0~)
Failed to forcibly merge 809290: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.

> affects src:python-shogun
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 850977 src:wand
Bug #850977 [src:willow] willow: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: 
python-wand
Bug reassigned from package 'src:willow' to 'src:wand'.
No longer marked as found in versions willow/0.3.1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #850977 to the same values 
previously set
> reassign 850975 src:wand
Bug #850975 [src:sorl-thumbnail] sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS: unsatisfiable 
build-dependencies: python-wand, python3-wand
Bug reassigned from package 'src:sorl-thumbnail' to 'src:wand'.
No longer marked as found in versions sorl-thumbnail/12.3+git20160928-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #850975 to the same values 
previously set
> forcemerge 850815 850975 850977
Bug #850815 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [src:wand] wand: please 
update dependency on imagemgick
Bug #850815 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [src:wand] wand: please 
update dependency on imagemgick
Added tag(s) stretch and sid.
Bug #850977 [src:wand] willow: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: 
python-wand
849218 was blocked by: 848264 844357 847371 844558 844464 850815 844227 847527
849218 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 849218: 850977
Marked Bug as done
Marked as fixed in versions wand/0.4.4-1.1.
Marked as found in versions wand/0.4.4-1.
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #850975 [src:wand] sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: 
python-wand, python3-wand
849218 was blocked by: 844227 850815 850977 844464 844357 847371 848264 847527 
844558
849218 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 849218: 850975
Marked Bug as done
Marked as fixed in versions wand/0.4.4-1.1.
Marked as found in versions wand/0.4.4-1.
Added tag(s) patch.
Merged 850815 850975 850977
> affects 850815 src:willow src:sorl-thumbnail
Bug #850815 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [src:wand] wand: please 
update dependency on imagemgick
Bug #850975 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [src:wand] 
sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python-wand, 
python3-wand
Bug #850977 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [src:wand] willow: 
FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-wand
Added indication that 850815 affects src:willow and src:sorl-thumbnail
Added indication that 850975 affects src:willow and src:sorl-thumbnail
Added indication that 850977 affects src:willow and src:sorl-thumbnail
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
809290: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809290
849218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849218
850815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850815
850973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850973
850975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850975
850977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko 

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > d'oh -- I should have noted that it wasn't in testing -- somehow
> > I was under impression (saw "jessie" -- thought "stretch")  that it was
> > in testing at that point.
> …
> > Thanks Mattia for the patience with my silly questions ;)

> Remember that I'm not from the Release Team; if they want to make an
> exception it's entirely up to them, I was just replying to explain why
> this didn't migrate when you expected it to do.

double thanks then ;)

I will leave it up to release team to decide if they are still reading
this report.

Cheers,
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834   Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:54:51PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> d'oh -- I should have noted that it wasn't in testing -- somehow
> I was under impression (saw "jessie" -- thought "stretch")  that it was
> in testing at that point.
…
> Thanks Mattia for the patience with my silly questions ;)

Remember that I'm not from the Release Team; if they want to make an
exception it's entirely up to them, I was just replying to explain why
this didn't migrate when you expected it to do.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#851300: marked as done (unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1)

2017-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:54:51 -0500
with message-id <20170113205451.j5mglnj5m2cm7...@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #851300,
regarding unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
851300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851300
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package utopia-documents

It was uploaded in time to propagate to testing before the freeze point but we
haven't spotted that  there was some custom Extra-Depends set for previous
version binnmu (but buildd ppl, not us) which lead to "BD-Uninstallable
(Extra-Depends: libglew1.13)"... yesterday that was fixed and all the relevant
archs binaries were built just fine so it is ready for migration into
testing RC

(include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
irrelevant

unblock utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 
'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Could you please clarify, since this package was in testing already and 
> > wasn't kicked out, why it can't migrate now?

> ahem, the package was removed more than one year ago�, and until that
> upload had 3 RC bugs (+1�).

> � https://tracker.debian.org/news/726692
> � https://bugs.debian.org/825703

> > Jan 5: soft freeze
> >  Deadline for: 
> > * New (source) packages in stretch 
> > * Letting packages re-enter stretch (if they have been removed) 
> > Updates to existing packages in stretch will continue as normal.

> Except that this was not an update to an existing package, it's NEW in
> stretch.

d'oh -- I should have noted that it wasn't in testing -- somehow
I was under impression (saw "jessie" -- thought "stretch")  that it was
in testing at that point.  pity, but oh well -- our fault.  I should
have uploaded ~rc's earlier to reserve a spot in testing :-/

FTR -- backports for jessie, stretch and recent ubuntus all available
from neurodebian:  http://neuro.debian.net/pkgs/utopia-documents.html
if someone needs

Thanks Mattia for the patience with my silly questions ;)
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834   Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik--- End Message ---

Bug#842177: Bug#847974: xmds2: FTBFS in stretch

2017-01-13 Thread Adrian Bunk 
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:42:37PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:xmds2
> Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> Dear maintainer:
> 
> I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
> but it failed:
>...
> warning: the size of octave_hdf5_id is smaller than the size of HDF5 hid_t
> warning: called from
> lorenz.m at line 2 column 3
> HDF5-DIAG: Error detected in HDF5 (1.10.0-patch1) thread 140615878277440:
>   #000: ../../../src/H5G.c line 464 in H5Gopen2(): not a location
> major: Invalid arguments to routine
> minor: Inappropriate type
>   #001: ../../../src/H5Gloc.c line 253 in H5G_loc(): invalid object ID
> major: Invalid arguments to routine
> minor: Bad value
> HDF5-DIAG: Error detected in HDF5 (1.10.0-patch1) thread 140615878277440:
>   #000: ../../../src/H5Gdeprec.c line 796 in H5Gget_num_objs(): not a 
> location ID
> major: Invalid arguments to routine
> minor: Inappropriate type
>   #001: ../../../src/H5Gloc.c line 253 in H5G_loc(): invalid object ID
> major: Invalid arguments to routine
> minor: Bad value
> HDF5-DIAG: Error detected in HDF5 (1.10.0-patch1) thread 140615878277440:
>   #000: ../../../src/H5G.c line 725 in H5Gclose(): not a group
> major: Invalid arguments to routine
> minor: Inappropriate type
>...
> The build history I keep is like this:
> 
> Status: successful  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161118T125207Z
> Status: successful  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161123T025916Z
> Status: successful  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161128T001945Z
> Status: successful  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161202T231309Z
> Status: failed  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161207T065906Z
> Status: failed  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161208T214652Z
> Status: failed  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161208T214639Z
> Status: failed  xmds2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20161208T214702Z
> 
> Something happened in stretch between 2016-12-02 and 2016-12-07
> that made this package to FTBFS.

What happened was the hdf5 transition.

Gilles, you seem to have somehow missed xmds2 in your transition 
planning?

> Please tell me if you need a full build log, and I will attach it.
> 
> (Using sbuild on a single CPU virtual machine, it always fails for me,
> on different machines, so it should be easy to reproduce).
> 
> Thanks.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:24:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Could you please clarify, since this package was in testing already and 
> wasn't kicked out, why it can't migrate now?

ahem, the package was removed more than one year ago¹, and until that
upload had 3 RC bugs (+1²).

¹ https://tracker.debian.org/news/726692
² https://bugs.debian.org/825703

> Jan 5: soft freeze
>  Deadline for: 
> * New (source) packages in stretch 
> * Letting packages re-enter stretch (if they have been removed) 
> Updates to existing packages in stretch will continue as normal.

Except that this was not an update to an existing package, it's NEW in
stretch.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko 
On January 13, 2017 2:22:43 PM EST, Mattia Rizzolo  wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 02:11:03PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> Please unblock package utopia-documents
>> 
>> It was uploaded in time to propagate to testing before the freeze
>point
>
>It wasn't.
>It was uploaded the 29th Dec, 3 days too late (last good day was the
>26th, so 10 days later would have been the 5th of Jan, day of the
>freeze).

Could you please clarify, since this package was in testing already and wasn't 
kicked out, why it can't migrate now?

Jan 5: soft freeze
 Deadline for: 
* New (source) packages in stretch 
* Letting packages re-enter stretch (if they have been removed) 
Updates to existing packages in stretch will continue as normal.

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 02:11:03PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Please unblock package utopia-documents
> 
> It was uploaded in time to propagate to testing before the freeze point

It wasn't.
It was uploaded the 29th Dec, 3 days too late (last good day was the
26th, so 10 days later would have been the 5th of Jan, day of the
freeze).

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#851300: unblock: utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

2017-01-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package utopia-documents

It was uploaded in time to propagate to testing before the freeze point but we
haven't spotted that  there was some custom Extra-Depends set for previous
version binnmu (but buildd ppl, not us) which lead to "BD-Uninstallable
(Extra-Depends: libglew1.13)"... yesterday that was fixed and all the relevant
archs binaries were built just fine so it is ready for migration into
testing RC

(include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
irrelevant

unblock utopia-documents/3.0.0-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 
'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Re: Debian 8.7 and Tomcat 8.5 support

2017-01-13 Thread Niels Thykier 
dpawluk:
> Hello,
> I would like to ask, if Debian 8.7 release supports Apache 8.5.x?
> 

Hi,

Debian 8.7 will /not/ have Apache Tomcat 8.5, but it is available from
jessie-backports (which has 8.5.9-1~bpo8+1 at the moment).

Thanks,
~Niels

Bug#851283: nmu: pdf2djvu_0.9.4-1, undertaker_1.6.1-4

2017-01-13 Thread Eugene Seliverstov 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello.

There is a new release of a headers-only library libpstreams-dev.
This package should be rebuilt against a new package.

nmu pdf2djvu_0.9.4-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new version of headers-only 
libpstreams-dev"
dw pdf2djvu_0.9.4-1 . ANY . -m "libpstreams-dev (>= 1.0.0-1)"

nmu undertaker_1.6.1-4 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new version of headers-only 
libpstreams-dev"
dw undertaker_1.6.1-4 . ANY . -m "libpstreams-dev (>= 1.0.0-1)"


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable'), (99, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Bug#851262: jessie-pu: package transmissionrpc/0.11-1

2017-01-13 Thread Ondřej Nový 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Binary packages python{,3} is missing deps to python{,3}-six. See #851247

Package: https://ondrej.org/debian/transmissionrpc_0.11-1+deb8u1/

Please allow me to upload, patch attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/changelog 
transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/changelog
--- transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/changelog   2013-11-01 12:22:28.0 
+0100
+++ transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/changelog   2017-01-13 14:01:18.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+transmissionrpc (0.11-1+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add dependency to python{3,}-six (Closes: #851247)
+
+ -- Ondřej Nový   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:01:18 +0100
+
 transmissionrpc (0.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/control 
transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/control
--- transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/control 2013-11-01 12:22:19.0 +0100
+++ transmissionrpc-0.11/debian/control 2017-01-13 14:01:18.0 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 
 Package: python-transmissionrpc
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${python:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${python:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python-six
 Suggests: transmission-daemon (>= 1.31)
 Description: Transmission RPC client module for Python
  transmissionrpc is a Python module implementing the JSON-RPC client protocol
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 
 Package: python3-transmissionrpc
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${python3:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${python3:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python3-six
 Suggests: transmission-daemon (>= 1.31)
 Description: Transmission RPC client module for Python 3
  transmissionrpc is a Python module implementing the JSON-RPC client protocol

Bug#851250: transition: mysql-5.7

2017-01-13 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
On 2017-01-13 12:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> That tracker is bad. We already have:
> 
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mariadb.html

Ideally that tracker would go all-green at some point and the proposed
mysql-5.7 tracker would be empty (except for mysql-x.y) in that case.
But as it was discussed there might be packages explicitly requiring the
oracle implementation - they would always be red in the mariadb tracker
without distinguishing between good (-5.7) and bad (-5.6).


Andreas

Bug#851250: transition: mysql-5.7

2017-01-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 13/01/17 12:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> please set up a tracker for the mysql-5.6 to mysql-5.7 transition. Even
> if mysql-5.7 won't go to testing, it will be good to see if mysql-5.6
> (and thus libmysqlclient18) can be removed from unstable.
> 
> Ben file:
> 
> title = "mysql-5.7";
> is_affected = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient[12]/;
> is_good = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient20/;
> is_bad = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient1/;

That tracker is bad. We already have:

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mariadb.html

and

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pkg-mysql-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=default-mysql

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#851250: transition: mysql-5.7

2017-01-13 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

please set up a tracker for the mysql-5.6 to mysql-5.7 transition. Even
if mysql-5.7 won't go to testing, it will be good to see if mysql-5.6
(and thus libmysqlclient18) can be removed from unstable.

Ben file:

title = "mysql-5.7";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient[12]/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient20/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient1/;

Andreas

Debian 8.7 and Tomcat 8.5 support

2017-01-13 Thread dpawluk 

Hello,
I would like to ask, if Debian 8.7 release supports Apache 8.5.x?

Bug#851237: nmu: murasaki_1.68.6-6

2017-01-13 Thread Eugene Seliverstov 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello.

There is a new release of a headers-only library libpstreams-dev.
This package should be rebuilt against a new package.

nmu murasaki_1.68.6-6 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new version of headers-only 
libpstreams-dev"
dw murasaki_1.68.6-6 . ANY . -m "libpstreams-dev (>= 1.0.0-1)"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable'), (99, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)