Processed: Re: Bug#884209: nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30

2018-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> block 884134 by -1
Bug #884134 [python-rpy] python-rpy: Incompatible with the version of R in 
stretch
884134 was not blocked by any bugs.
884134 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 884134: 884209
> clone -1 -2
Bug #884209 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30
Bug 884209 cloned as bug 886771
884134 was blocked by: 884209
884134 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 884134: 886771
> tags -1 - stretch
Bug #884209 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30
Removed tag(s) stretch.
> retitle -1 nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (sid)
Bug #884209 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (sid)' from 'nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30'.
> tags -2 - sid
Bug #886771 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30
Removed tag(s) sid.
> retitle -2 nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (stretch)
Bug #886771 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (stretch)' from 'nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30'.

-- 
884134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884134
884209: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884209
886771: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#884209: nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30

2018-01-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: block 884134 by -1
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: tags -1 - stretch
Control: retitle -1 nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (sid)
Control: tags -2 - sid
Control: retitle -2 nmu: rpy_1.0.3-30 (stretch)

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu 2 rpy_1.0.3-30 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild against r-base 3.3"
> nmu 3 rpy_1.0.3-30 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against r-base 3.4"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> for fixing #884134 binNMUs for rpy are needed in stretch and sid.
> I hope I got the version skewing correct, since s390x already has +b1.
> 
> rpy is probably going to be removed (there is python3 rpy2 and python2
> rpy2-2.8), there is probably not much point ensuring that it gets proper
> dependencies on the virtual r-abi-xx package (or whatever is needed to
> prevent this bug from showing up again).
> 
> 
> Andreas

This was listed under stable binNMU requests only, plitting into two bugs:
- sid bug that some member of the release team will hopefully schedule soon
- stretch bug to be handled for the next point release

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



Bug#886294: transition: nodejs

2018-01-09 Thread Jérémy Lal
It should be all right on armxx.
However what i believed to be a memory exhaustion bug might be
some problem with v8 and some mips/s390x processors (which is bad news,
but i'm not sure it's the case yet).

Jérémy

2018-01-09 18:55 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler :

> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:43:13 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>  wrote:
> > On 04/01/18 16:28, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-01-04 12:09 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort  > > >:
> > >
> > > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > >
> > > On 04/01/18 02:40, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org 
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > 
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > >
> > > > nodejs 8.9.3 brings the following improvements for debian:
> > > > - a backported openssl 1.1.0 compatibility from nodejs 9.x branch
> > > > - hard-to-debug segmentation faults fix (#878674)
> > > > - it is an upstream LTS branch
> > > >
> > > > Julien Puydt and me checked all direct reverse build-deps and i
> > > > took care of several issues that appeared with the update:
> > > > - test failures caused by the move to openssl 1.1.0
> > > > - failures caused by exception names changes in assert module
> > > > - failures caused by api that was deprecated long ago then
> dropped
> > > >
> > > > There was no major issue with pure javascript modules and
> > > > addons depending on nodejs-abi were rebuilt smoothly after the
> fixes.
> > >
> > > The ongoing nodejs transition to 6.12.0 hasn't been completed yet
> due to a build
> > > failure on mips(el) and those segfaults. Given 8.9/experimental
> seems to fix all
> > > those issues, let's go with that version.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cool. Do you mean i should upload it to unstable now ?
>
> For the record, Jérémy Lal uploaded nodejs a few days ago (although it
> is not built on all archs yet, arm64 and armhf are missing).
>
> Saludos
>


Bug#886294: transition: nodejs

2018-01-09 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:43:13 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
 wrote:
> On 04/01/18 16:28, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-04 12:09 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort  > >:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 04/01/18 02:40, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org 
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > 
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > nodejs 8.9.3 brings the following improvements for debian:
> > > - a backported openssl 1.1.0 compatibility from nodejs 9.x branch
> > > - hard-to-debug segmentation faults fix (#878674)
> > > - it is an upstream LTS branch
> > >
> > > Julien Puydt and me checked all direct reverse build-deps and i
> > > took care of several issues that appeared with the update:
> > > - test failures caused by the move to openssl 1.1.0
> > > - failures caused by exception names changes in assert module
> > > - failures caused by api that was deprecated long ago then dropped
> > >
> > > There was no major issue with pure javascript modules and
> > > addons depending on nodejs-abi were rebuilt smoothly after the fixes.
> >
> > The ongoing nodejs transition to 6.12.0 hasn't been completed yet due 
> > to a build
> > failure on mips(el) and those segfaults. Given 8.9/experimental seems 
> > to fix all
> > those issues, let's go with that version.
> >
> >
> > Cool. Do you mean i should upload it to unstable now ?

For the record, Jérémy Lal uploaded nodejs a few days ago (although it
is not built on all archs yet, arm64 and armhf are missing).

Saludos