Uploading linux (4.15.4-1)

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi

I intend to upload linux 4.15.4-1 to unstable possibly tomorrow
(sunday).

As this is a new upstream release, there will be an ABI bump.

There is at least one problem: The armel/marvell kernel size is
growing to large and the compressed image is over the limit. Given the
armel architecture will most likely not be part of buster, we
(temporarily) disabled the image build at least for now.

Cf. https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2018/01/msg00278.html and
following.

Regards,
Salvatore


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#890204: transition: ppp

[Chris Boot]

On 17/02/18 08:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 11/02/18 22:04, Chris Boot wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hi release team folks,
>>
>> I have just uploaded a new version of ppp to experimental. That upload
>> requires packages that build pppd plugins to be rebuilt due to a change
>> in the pppd ABI. I would like to upload that package to sid as soon as
>> feasible.
[snip]
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded. Note that connman just got in today before me so that'll need
a binNMU now as well.

Cheers,
Chris

-- 
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#868484: marked as done (transition: bullet)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:58:09 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: transition: bullet
has caused the Debian Bug report #868484,
regarding transition: bullet
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
868484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I would like to request a transition slot for Bullet 2.86 which is
already available in experimental.

The affected reverse-dependencies are:

kido
hkl
gazebo
cyphesis-cpp
openmw
ros-geometry
ros-geometry-experimental

Except for hkl (#868481), a test is failing now, all packages build fine with
the new version.

Regards,

Markus

Ben file:

title = "bullet";
is_affected = .depends ~ 
/libbulletcollision2\.83\.7|libbulletdynamics2\.83\.7|libbulletfileloader2\.83\.7|libbulletsoftbody2\.83\.7|libbulletworldimporter2\.83\.7|libbulletxmlworldimporter2\.83\.7|libconvexdecomposition2\.83\.7|libgimpactutils2\.83\.7|libhacd2\.83\.7|liblinearmath2\.83\.7/
 | .depends ~ /libbullet2\.86|libbullet-extras2\.86/;

is_good = .depends ~ /libbullet2\.86|libbullet-extras2\.86/;

is_bad = .depends ~ 
/libbulletcollision2\.83\.7|libbulletdynamics2\.83\.7|libbulletfileloader2\.83\.7|libbulletsoftbody2\.83\.7|libbulletworldimporter2\.83\.7|libbulletxmlworldimporter2\.83\.7|libconvexdecomposition2\.83\.7|libgimpactutils2\.83\.7|libhacd2\.83\.7|liblinearmath2\.83\.7/;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The transition was successful. I am going to close this bug report now.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#885179: marked as done (transition: bullet)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:57:29 +0100
with message-id <3d18bd84-ee7c-41b2-cdc2-c2d8cb2bb...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: transition: bullet
has caused the Debian Bug report #885179,
regarding transition: bullet
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
885179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I would like to request a transition slot for Bullet 2.87 which is
already available in experimental.

The affected reverse-dependencies are:

kido
hkl
gazebo
cyphesis-cpp
openmw
ros-geometry
ros-geometry2

The packages hkl, cpyhesis-cpp and openmw are already affected by RC
bugs and FTBFS. Only the hkl build failure is related to Bullet. The
rest builds fine with version 2.87.

Regards,

Markus

Ben file:

title = "bullet";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libbullet2\.86|libbullet-extras2\.86/;

is_good = .depends ~ /libbullet2\.87|libbullet-extras2\.87/;

is_bad = .depends ~ /libbullet2\.86|libbullet-extras2\.86/;



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The transition was successful. I am going to close this bug report now.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#890249: transition: libvpx

[Ondrej Novy]

Uploaded.

Thanks.

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5  6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

Re: wanna-build access for binNMUs

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Sorry for the delay,

On 11/02/18 14:28, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Philipp Kern  wrote:
> 
>> On 02/10/2018 09:26 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 20:45:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
 On 30/01/18 08:54, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> This would also be very helpful for fixing security issue #888777.

 You need to talk to the wanna-build team if you want to be able to
>> schedule
 binNMUs for your language rebuilds, just like the ocaml and haskell
>> teams do.

>>> FWIW I disagree, I think this is something the wanna-build team has
>>> essentially delegated to release, so getting people on board is a shared
>>> thing between those two teams rather than solely a w-b thing.  It
>>> happens once every few years though so there isn't really a process to
>>> vet people.
>>
>> So can we have an opinion on the current proposal, which is a single DD
>> (stapelberg)? As far as I know DSA's ticket is currently blocked on this.
>>
> 
> nit: there’s no blocked ticket, but rather, once debian-release is okay
> with the proposal, someone would need to file a ticket on my behalf. See my
> other reply upthread:
> 
>> Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should
> give their okay before the PostgreSQL account can be created. This should
> be done by way of the release team filing the Debian RT ticket on my
> behalf, preferable as an inline signed email.
> 
> If I understand https://www.debian.org/intro/organization correctly,
> then pochu@ should be able to make this call. Given that no objections have
> been voiced by anyone involved within the last two weeks since I asked for
> access, may I suggest to go ahead? Thank you!

As I said on IRC: please provide an automated list of required binNMUs, like the
haskell one, so that if at some point you can't handle them for some time,
others (e.g. me) can easily schedule them.

Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#890204: transition: ppp

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #890204 [release.debian.org] transition: ppp
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
890204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#890204: transition: ppp

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 11/02/18 22:04, Chris Boot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi release team folks,
> 
> I have just uploaded a new version of ppp to experimental. That upload
> requires packages that build pppd plugins to be rebuilt due to a change
> in the pppd ABI. I would like to upload that package to sid as soon as
> feasible.
> 
> This is the first opportunity we've had to try my new plugin ABI
> tracking technique. I've given the ben file below a try myself and I
> think it does the right thing, but I would appreciate any comments you
> might have about it.
> 
> I have manually rebuilt all affected packages and all build fine so
> binNMUs should be the only thing required for all of them.
> 
> Note that connman seems to be a package to newly depend on ppp-dev and
> builds a pppd plugin but it doesn't use my dh_ppp helper. I will be
> filing a bug against that package (including a patch) shortly. Even
> without said patch a binNMU is sufficient (and required) for binary
> compatibility with the new ppp upload.

Please go ahead.

Emilio

Bug#872998: marked as done (transition: php7.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:58:02 +0100
with message-id <5ecf120c-9f23-0ebc-2257-02d12586a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#872998: transition: php7.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #872998,
regarding transition: php7.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

this is request for PHP 7.0 to PHP 7.1 transition.  In fact, I could
make this a "soft" transition and build the PECL extensions for both
PHP 7.0 and 7.1 for now, so the extensions are not immediately broken
for people using PHP 7.0.  But I have no idea how to express that using
Ben file syntax as it has to be something like:

is_bad = .depends ~ "phpapi-20151012" & ! .depends ~ "phpapi-20160303";

Thanks,
Ondrej

Ben file:

title = "php7.1";
is_affected = .depends ~ "phpapi-20151012" | .depends ~ "phpapi-20160303";
is_good = .depends ~ "phpapi-20160303";
is_bad = .depends ~ "phpapi-20151012";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (800, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), 
(500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_DK:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 28/01/18 14:19, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Yes, please, go ahead, and I will fix any eventual build failures as it goes.

This is done now. Closing.

I guess the next step is to drop support for php7.0 and 7.1 from php-defaults
and rebuilding the modules so they no longer depend on those versions and we can
remove them. Please open a new transition bug for that as this is getting long.

Thanks,
Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#890101: marked as done (transition: libopenraw)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:56:24 +0100
with message-id <306138d1-44f7-34f0-4b42-31dab3e21...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#890101: transition: libopenraw
has caused the Debian Bug report #890101,
regarding transition: libopenraw
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
890101: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

libopenraw is now uploaded to unstable.  The only package needing a binNMU is
tumbler.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/02/18 09:46, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> libopenraw is now uploaded to unstable.  The only package needing a binNMU is
> tumbler.

That happened and libopenraw has migrated. Closing.

Emilio--- End Message ---