Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#931245: unblock: encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # missing release > tags 931245 buster Bug #931245 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ? Added tag(s) buster. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 931245: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931245 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#931245: unblock: encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 931245
Bug #931245 {Done: Paul Gevers } [release.debian.org]
unblock: rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #931245 to the same values
previously set
> retitle 931245 buster-pu: package rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ?
Bug #931245 [release.debian.org] unblock: rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ?'
from 'unblock: rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2'.
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was elb...@debian.org).
> usertags 931245 - unblock
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 931245 pu
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pu.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
931245: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931245
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#931358: release.debian.org: buster-pu (pre-approval): musescore/2.3.2+dfsg2-7~deb10u1
Hi again, sorry for bothering, but… … in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931040#10 it was indicated this should go into the first point release, and https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html indicates that that will be done in little more than a weel, so… >On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 06:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> and target would indeed be "buster". Please attach a debdiff of the >> proposed upload to this report (but do not upload it at this stage). > >Is it OK to upload now? TIA, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
Bug#932684: buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1
On Sun 2019-07-21 15:55:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 > > The version of GnuPG in debian buster (2.2.12-1) has a number of > outstanding bugs related to OpenPGP certificate management and network > access. Many of these concerns are addressed in some of the patches > in upstream's STABLE-BRANCH-2-2 series. > > The debdiff (attached) is basically a slew of bugfix, documentation, > stability, and efficiency patches cherry-picked from upstream, plus > some additional changes to reduce the exposure of debian users to > malicious attack on the SKS keyserver network, and some improvements > in the continuous integration test suite. ping on this? i'd appreciate any feedback about its prospects for fixing problems for users of debian buster. --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#931386: stretch-pu: package fribidi/0.19.7-1.1
Jonathan Wiltshire, le sam. 27 juil. 2019 20:36:00 -0300, a ecrit: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > As reported on #917909, the text-based debian installer support for > > right-to-left languages is completely broken, only due to a path > > mismatch. This was fixed in Buster in January with the attached change, > > which I have uploaded to stretch as 0.19.7-1.1, could you accept it? > > That's an unusual version; did you mean to +deb9u1 it instead? Oops, sorry about this. I have reuploaded it as 0.19.7-1+deb9u1 with the attached changes. Samuel diff -Nru fribidi-0.19.7/debian/changelog fribidi-0.19.7/debian/changelog --- fribidi-0.19.7/debian/changelog 2015-08-12 07:32:03.0 +0200 +++ fribidi-0.19.7/debian/changelog 2019-06-08 22:39:38.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +fribidi (0.19.7-1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * libfribidi0-udeb: Fix right-to-left output in textual version of +d-i by installing the shared library files into a multi-arch libdir +(Closes: #917909). + + -- Samuel Thibault Sat, 08 Jun 2019 22:39:38 +0200 + fribidi (0.19.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru fribidi-0.19.7/debian/libfribidi0-udeb.install fribidi-0.19.7/debian/libfribidi0-udeb.install --- fribidi-0.19.7/debian/libfribidi0-udeb.install 2015-08-12 07:32:03.0 +0200 +++ fribidi-0.19.7/debian/libfribidi0-udeb.install 2019-06-08 22:39:38.0 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -usr/lib/*/libfribidi.so.* lib +usr/lib/*/libfribidi.so.*
Bug#933043: Acknowledgement (nmu: petsc_3.10.5+dfsg1-1)
On 2019-07-26 08:57, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 933043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933043. I missed the name of sundials in the second set of binNMUs with slepc: nmu petsc_3.10.5+dfsg1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against hypre 2.16.0" and after that, nmu slepc_3.10.2+dfsg1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against hypre 2.16.0" nmu sundials_3.1.2+dfsg-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against hypre 2.16.0" Drew
Bug#931245: unblock: encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
reopen 931245 retitle 931245 buster-pu: package rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ? user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 931245 - unblock usertags 931245 pu thanks On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 08:44:16 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I think you just can recycle this one (and update the bug metadata to > > match those for a buster-pu update). There will need to be a rebuild > > for buster versioned as 0.8.15-2~deb10u1 of rust-encoding-rs which > > should work. > > > > [Disclaimer, I'm not part of the release team, so just take this as > > some informal comment, if SRM say to fill a new bug instead just > > follow that] > > or given #931245 is closed, just fill with reportbug a new buster-pu > update request for rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1. I have recycled the unblock bug, so it already shows up in the SRM overview. Please use this if/when you have more info to share. Paul
Re: Same procedure as every year: GCC defaults change (GCC 9)
On Jul 28 2019, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The two MIPS libffi patches have been accepted upstream (i.e. in the > libffi git repository) 1.5 years ago for one and 4 years ago for the > other. I know there hasn't been any recent libffi release, so what can > be done to sync the gcc repository? Would it be possible to stop using > that outdated embedded copy and use the debian libffi package instead? The gcc copy of libffi accepts backports. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."
