Bug#1032073: marked as done (unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2023 09:32:15 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1032073: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032073,
regarding unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1032073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: sc...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:scipy
Please unblock package scipy
This is a prerequest, before uploading.
[ Reason ]
scipy is central tool for numerical computation using python, used by
many packaged. We made the decision in January to allow the latest
release scipy 1.10.0 into bookworm, which was helpful for supporting
upgrades for other packages.
scipy 1.10.1 is now released, providing some bug fixes and stability
improvements and no new features compared to 1.10.0. Release notes
are found at https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/release.1.10.1.html
I recommend we allow scipy 1.10.1 into bookworm (assuming it passes 10
day freeze testing as normal). I'm filing this bug to check if you
agree that's a good idea before building and uploading to unstable.
[ Impact ]
If not permitted, then bookworm will have scipy 1.10.0 without the bug
fixes provided in 1.10.1
[ Tests ]
debci tests will run and are expected to pass over the 10-day waiting
period as normal
[ Risks ]
debci tests of scipy 1.10.0 are passing. Upstream tests have already
passed. This is a bug-fix release only with no new features, risks are
minimal.
[ Checklist ] (TBD)
[ ] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[ ] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach UPSTREAM diff against the package in testing
TBD:
unblock scipy/1.10.1-1
diff --git a/.github/workflows/macos.yml b/.github/workflows/macos.yml
index 89342de7f01..0d093bee397 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/macos.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/macos.yml
@@ -90,4 +90,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Test SciPy
run: |
export
LIBRARY_PATH="$LIBRARY_PATH:/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/lib"
-SCIPY_USE_PYTHRAN=`test ${{ matrix.python-version }} != 3.9; echo $?`
python -u runtests.py -- --durations=10 --timeout=60
+export SCIPY_USE_PYTHRAN=1
+python setup.py install
+cd /tmp
+python -m pytest --pyargs scipy --durations=10 --timeout=80 -n 3
diff --git a/.github/workflows/wheels.yml b/.github/workflows/wheels.yml
index bb1fcf8f2b6..e8513831c5f 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/wheels.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/wheels.yml
@@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ jobs:
CIBW_ARCHS: ${{ matrix.buildplat[2] }}
CIBW_ENVIRONMENT_PASS_LINUX: RUNNER_OS
+ # MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET is set because of
+ # https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/issues/1419. Once that
+ # is closed and meson-python==0.13 is available, then
+ # that environment variable can be removed.
+ CIBW_ENVIRONMENT_MACOS: >
+MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.9
+MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.9
+_PYTHON_HOST_PLATFORM=macosx-10.9-x86_64
+
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
path: ./wheelhouse/*.whl
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index af11468a0a0..9cdd5f715d1 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ Bhavika Tekwani bhavikat
Blair Azzopardi bsdz
Blair Azzopardi Blair Azzopardi
Brandon David brandondavid
+Brett Graham Brett
Brett R. Murphy brettrmurphy
Brian Hawthorne brian.hawthorne
Brian Newsom Brian Newsom
@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ Fukumu Tsutsumi levelfour
G Young gfyoung
G Young gfyoung
Gagandeep Singh czgdp1807
+Ganesh Kathiresan ganesh-k13
Garrett Reynolds Garrett-R
Gaël Varoquaux Gael varoquaux
Gavin Zhang GavinZhang
@@ -231,6 +233,7 @@ Jacob Vanderplas Jake Vanderplas
Jacob Vanderplas Jake Vanderplas
Jacob Vanderplas Jake Vanderplas
Jacob Vanderplas Jacob Vanderplas
+Jacopo Tissino Jacopo
Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaimefrio
Jaime Fernandez del Rio Jaime
Jaime Fernandez del Rio Jaime Fernandez
@@ -483,6 +486,7 @@ Todd Goodall Todd
Todd Jennings Todd
Tom Waite tom.waite
Tom Donoghue TomDonoghue
+Tomer Sery Tomer.Sery
Tony S. Yu tonysyu
Tony S. Yu Tony S Yu
Toshiki Kataoka Toshiki Kataoka
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 27f872630bf..bd106039369 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-.. i
Bug#1031927: Handling the libsgutils2-2 #994758 bookworm-ignore
That solved it for me. Thank you!! > The upgrade needs to install new packages and remove an old one. I > suspect you will need an `apt full-upgrade` instead. 11 Mar 2023, 1:16 pm by sramac...@debian.org: > On 2023-03-10 10:22:14 +0100, Andreas M wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just tried to upgrade my Bookworm using software centre and get the >> following error: >> >> "Unable to download updates: >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> libsgutils2-1.46-2: Breaks: libsgutils2-2 (=1.46-1) but 1.46-1 is to be >> installed" >> >> I then in terminal did: "sudo apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs" which worked, >> and when I now do "sudo apt upgrade" I get: >> >> "The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer >> required: >> dctrl-tools dh-dkms libmpdec3 libpcre3 >> Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them. >> The following packages have been kept back: >> libgpod-common" >> > > The upgrade needs to install new packages and remove an old one. I > suspect you will need an `apt full-upgrade` instead. > > Cheers > >> >> The software centre still gives the first error described further above. >> >> My system info: >> >> Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid >> 64-bit >> GNOME version: 43.3 >> Windowing system: wayland >> >> >> >> I searched for a fix to this and found this bug - sorry if it's not related. >> >> Thanks! >> Andreas >> > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher >
Bug#1031927: Handling the libsgutils2-2 #994758 bookworm-ignore
On 2023-03-10 10:22:14 +0100, Andreas M wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to upgrade my Bookworm using software centre and get the > following error: > > "Unable to download updates: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libsgutils2-1.46-2: Breaks: libsgutils2-2 (=1.46-1) but 1.46-1 is to be > installed" > > I then in terminal did: "sudo apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs" which worked, > and when I now do "sudo apt upgrade" I get: > > "The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer > required: > dctrl-tools dh-dkms libmpdec3 libpcre3 > Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them. > The following packages have been kept back: > libgpod-common" The upgrade needs to install new packages and remove an old one. I suspect you will need an `apt full-upgrade` instead. Cheers > > The software centre still gives the first error described further above. > > My system info: > > Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid > 64-bit > GNOME version: 43.3 > Windowing system: wayland > > > > I searched for a fix to this and found this bug - sorry if it's not related. > > Thanks! > Andreas -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1032614: ddcutil: pre-approval request ddcutil-1.4.2-1 fixes bug #1031259
[Reason ] (Explain what the reason for the unblock request is.) As noted, the unblock request addresses bug #1031259. ddcutil requires driver i2c-dev. If it happens not to be built into the kernel, this entails post-installation system configuration. Despite extensive documentation and application warnings if the driver is not loaded, this can be challenging for inexperienced users. [ Impact ] (What is the impact for the user if the unblock isn't granted?) Manual post installation configuration will continue to be required as previously. [ Tests ] (What automated or manual tests cover the affected code?) None [ Risks ] (Discussion of the risks involved. E.g. code is trivial or complex, key package vs leaf package, alternatives available.) The changes are trivial, ensuring that driver i2c-dev is loaded if it is not already built into the kernel. Package libddccontrol0, an alternative to ddcutil for monitor control, installs file ddccontrol-i2c-dev.conf, which loads i2c-dev. The contents of that file, a single line containing "i2c-dev", is identical to the contents of the files to be installed by ddcutil. Additional examples of packages that install files in /user/lib/modules-load.d are fwupd, which installs file fwupd-msc.conf, and encryptfs-utils, which installs file ecryptfs.conf. If the installed conf file were incorrect, the only effect would be an error in the system log, and manual user configuration would still be required as before. The only (potential) known dependency within Debian is from KDE PowerDevil. However, PowerDevil, as installed by Debian, is built with use of libddcutil if-tested out. (Recommended since its use of libddcutil is "proof of concept" level code.) [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x ] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x ] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] (Anything else the release team should know.)
Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 1031259 release.debian.org
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ddcutil Bug #1031259 [release.debian.org] ddcutil requires module i2c-dev Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ddcutil'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1031259 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1031259 to the same values previously set -- 1031259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031259 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Processed: reassign 1031259 release.debian.org
Control: reassign -1 ddcutil On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 09:42 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > reassign 1031259 release.debian.org > Bug #1031259 [ddcutil] ddcutil requires module i2c-dev > Bug reassigned from package 'ddcutil' to 'release.debian.org'. > Reassigning this bug to release.debian.org makes no sense. #1032614 is already assigned there, and has outstanding questions that you haven't answered yet. Please keep discussion with the Release Team in that bug, requests for changes to ddcutil belong as bugs against ddcutil. Regards, Adam
Processed: reassign 1031259 release.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1031259 release.debian.org Bug #1031259 [ddcutil] ddcutil requires module i2c-dev Bug reassigned from package 'ddcutil' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions ddcutil/1.4.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1031259 to the same values previously set > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1031259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031259 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1032710: marked as done (unblock: libtpms/0.9.2-3.1)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:22:43 + with message-id and subject line unblock libtpms has caused the Debian Bug report #1032710, regarding unblock: libtpms/0.9.2-3.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1032710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032710 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: libt...@packages.debian.org, Seunghun Han , car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libtpms Dear release team, Please unblock package libtpms It contains security fixes for CVE-2023-1017 and CVE-2023-1018. Side note: there is actually 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 already in bookworm-security and bookworm-proposed-updates now as the package was used to test the security suite setup for bookworm. Regards, Salvatore --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Unblocked.--- End Message ---
Processed: unblock: libtpms/0.9.2-3.1
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libtpms Bug #1032710 [release.debian.org] unblock: libtpms/0.9.2-3.1 Added indication that 1032710 affects src:libtpms -- 1032710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032710 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1032710: unblock: libtpms/0.9.2-3.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: libt...@packages.debian.org, Seunghun Han , car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libtpms Dear release team, Please unblock package libtpms It contains security fixes for CVE-2023-1017 and CVE-2023-1018. Side note: there is actually 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 already in bookworm-security and bookworm-proposed-updates now as the package was used to test the security suite setup for bookworm. Regards, Salvatore
