NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: request-tracker5_5.0.3+dfsg-3+deb12u1_source.changes REJECT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.18.16-1~deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gnome-software_43.5-1~deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT
Bug#1038000: bookworm-pu: package texlive-bin/2022.20220321.62855-5.1+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:09:55PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > * Stop building *jit* binaries on i386 based arches to make TL installable > on computers not supporting sse2 (Closes: #1035461). > * Add patch for CVE-2023-32668: disable socket in luatex by default > (Closes: #1036470). Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#1037444: bookworm-pu: package kanboard/1.2.26+ds-4
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1037444 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package kanboard/1.2.26+ds-4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1037444: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037444 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1037444: bookworm-pu: package kanboard/1.2.26+ds-4
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:32:06PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote: > Attached is a revised debdiff between -2 and -2+deb12u1. > --Joe Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1038000: bookworm-pu: package texlive-bin/2022.20220321.62855-5.1+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1038000 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package texlive-bin/2022.20220321.62855-5.1+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1038000: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038000 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: gnome-software 43.5-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1036849 = bookworm pending Bug #1036849 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: cvs 1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1039047 = bookworm pending Bug #1039047 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package cvs/2:1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1039047: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039047 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039047: cvs 1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1039047 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: cvs Version: 1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1 Explanation: configure full path to ssh
Processed: Re: Bug#1037990: bookworm-pu: package nvidia-support/20220217+3~deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1037990 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package nvidia-support/20220217+3~deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1037990: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037990 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1037990: bookworm-pu: package nvidia-support/20220217+3~deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:50:06AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > [ Reason ] > Upgrades from bullseye to bookworm may fail while building kernel > modules with dkms if some obsolete nvidia-*-dkms packages (that have no > successor in bookworm) are still installed. > (The dkms hook in bookworm no longer returns success if building a > module has failed.) > Let's add some Breaks against them (to nvidia-installer-cleanup which > has the highest score from apt in these scenarios), to ensure the > obsolete packages (and anything depending on them) gets removed during > the upgrade to bookworm. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Bug#1036849: gnome-software 43.5-1~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1036849 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: gnome-software Version: 43.5-1~deb12u1 Explanation: new upstream release; memory leak fixes
Bug#1038344: bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 04:42:27PM +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 17:43 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > I just happened to look at this; otherwise as it was still tagged
> > "moreinfo" it would probably have been waiting for attention for quite a
> > while.
>
> Oops, I did wonder if I should change the tag.
>
> > As 5.0.3+dfsg-3 in unstable is limited to these changes anyway, you can
> > backport it directly and the version history makes things a bit clearer
> > for
> > some infrastructure. Just add a changelog entry on top of the unstable
> > version, "Backport to bookworm" or something, version 5.0.3+dfsg-
> > 3~deb12u1,
> > target bookworm. Don't remove the changelog for 5.0.3+dfsg-3.
> >
> > Example:
> > https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/bookworm_diffs/onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u1.debdiff
> >
> > Other than that, please go ahead.
>
> Awesome, thank you. I figured it'd make life easier to upload only these
> changes to unstable initially.
>
> Changelog updated as requested, and uploaded to bookworm.
You need a tilde in the version, not a plus ("lower than"). I'll reject the
upload, you can upload a fixed version whenever you like.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Bug#1038344: bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1
On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 17:43 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > I just happened to look at this; otherwise as it was still tagged > "moreinfo" it would probably have been waiting for attention for quite a > while. Oops, I did wonder if I should change the tag. > As 5.0.3+dfsg-3 in unstable is limited to these changes anyway, you can > backport it directly and the version history makes things a bit clearer > for > some infrastructure. Just add a changelog entry on top of the unstable > version, "Backport to bookworm" or something, version 5.0.3+dfsg- > 3~deb12u1, > target bookworm. Don't remove the changelog for 5.0.3+dfsg-3. > > Example: > https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/bookworm_diffs/onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u1.debdiff > > Other than that, please go ahead. Awesome, thank you. I figured it'd make life easier to upload only these changes to unstable initially. Changelog updated as requested, and uploaded to bookworm. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand and...@etc.gen.nz | Catalyst Cloud: | This space intentionally left blank https://catalystcloud.nz |
Bug#1036849: bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 at 17:13:01 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Tested on a bookworm system (browse available packages, upgrade Flatpak > > apps, install a Flatpak app, install a .deb) and seems fine, and the > > upstream changes are really minimal, so I uploaded the proposed package. > > It doesn't seem to be in the queue so something has gone wrong with the > upload. Please check and go ahead. Sorry, I thought I had uploaded all of the GNOME 43.x bugfix releases that I prepared so far. Uploaded gnome-software now. smcv
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT
Bug#1039047: bookworm-pu: package cvs/2:1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1
Jonathan Wiltshire dixit: >Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. bye, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT
Bug#1038813: bullseye-pu: package aide/0.17.3-4+deb11u2
On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 20:15 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:29:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 11:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:13:58AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I was about to say "nothing other than a little more patience", > > > > given > > > > the request is only a few days old at this point. Looking back, > > > > however, it appears that there isn't actually a debdiff > > > > attached, > > > > as > > > > was claimed in the original mail. > > > > > > I apologize. Here we go. > > > > > > > Thanks. Please go ahead. > > Done. > > One more question that might be a good candidate for more in-depth > docs: > With both the bullseye and bookworm versions having been accepted to > the > respective proposed-updates repository, there is no longer need to > hold > back uploads to unstable, right? I can resume normal work on the > packages after the acceptance of the package for bullseye? > There's no need to block uploads to unstable on anything happening in (o)pu, no. The only requirement is that if the issue also affects unstable then it be fixed there first. Presumably future uploads to unstable wouldn't revert any fixes. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#1038990: transition: liblc3 1.0.3
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1038990 [release.debian.org] transition: liblc3 1.0.3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1038990: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038990 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038990: transition: liblc3 1.0.3
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-06-24 09:03:55 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > Please schedule a transition slot for liblc3 1.0.3. > > The auto-generated ben tracker looks good: > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblc3.html > > The unique reverse dep (pipewire) builds fine with the > new liblc3 in experimental. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1037474: marked as done (transition: openmm)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1037474 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher }
[release.debian.org] transition: openmm
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1037474 to the same values
previously set
--
1037474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1037474: marked as done (transition: openmm)
Control: reopen -1 > From: Sebastian Ramacher > To: Andrius Merkys , 1037474-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#1037474: transition: openmm > Message-ID: > > On 2023-06-20 23:50:00 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On 2023-06-13 11:20:02 +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to request a transition slot for openmm > > > (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1] > > > is OK. > > > > Please go ahead > > python-pdbfixer seems to need a sourceful upload due to the > python3-simtk => python3-openmm rename. Reopening. Closed by mistake -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1037107: Acknowledgement (pre-unblock: bookworm-pu: mariadb/1:10.11.3-2/+deb12u1)
Hi! > That MR looks sane; please prepare a backport of 1:10.11.4-1 and send a > confirmation source debdiff, and it can most likely be waved through. Thanks for confirmation/guidance. This is now on my TODO to be done immediately when I return from a vacation trip in about a week.
Processed: transition: tinygltf
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:tinygltf Bug #1039106 [release.debian.org] transition: tinygltf Added indication that 1039106 affects src:tinygltf -- 1039106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039106 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039106: transition: tinygltf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: tinyg...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:tinygltf -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, I want to transition tinygltf after a SONAME bump. I confirmed that Open3D builds with the new release on amd64. The Ben tracker is good: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tinygltf.html Cheers Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmSYhTcACgkQ+C8H+466 LVlRrgv/YwCR/B5Z73XK09kHIrI+WrsOmA1Sjegx16OYAqkLhFJsUeJuXmkl6UO7 c/lXZw6OOcpiN0aiJOzmetzAGomdHFylXrDop5X1Z/1T/1PaTMIasxrk/uAmxVy9 vfDfAIgZ9geBfY+ni0pCFsP5ZApuvp8eEMVv8fbZRyt9uBCt2brg8qu0kYuO0KSZ WDix8208Vq03HwQbvacMoUbamK1EpzjgxAb9MTZKPhojRYyMOfiSYenmILDkU6Lz Lg0p/uW13w6Q+EQMNTcua4gGeEknmMWKuyNk0N5tadcuMQ+IECL+sLGpR/2a8vAZ apajqlPdg0DDCNWbICx5+btfAe6xMMTPZuxPHlr0ic/qeHNjfpqX6ccMlBrpdNoj oIh56y24+Hii2A4KHLYjT4xzpdUONNcuQ6CF3eKI79paWkKuHLpfx6Xd/8lqX05V yxBPPCZrRxIHtrsTpmKOr5Q1VgCVkJLP8T+J7o59VWg9X7Frg78YhyM9fdqeu3bm 58kRNFB9 =TeRm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#1037474: marked as done (transition: openmm)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:15:48 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1037474: transition: openmm has caused the Debian Bug report #1037474, regarding transition: openmm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1037474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I would like to request a transition slot for openmm (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1] is OK. Status of reverse dependencies: - cpptraj: not in sid - molmodel: FTBFS with gemmi (#1037472) - openstructure: OK - python-pdbfixer: OK - macromoleculebuilder: FTBFS with gemmi (#1037463) Thanks, Andrius [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openmm.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-06-20 23:50:00 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2023-06-13 11:20:02 +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to request a transition slot for openmm > > (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1] > > is OK. > > Please go ahead python-pdbfixer seems to need a sourceful upload due to the python3-simtk => python3-openmm rename. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1037286: marked as done (transition: libcamera 0.0.5)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:16:10 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1037286: transition: libcamera 0.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1037286, regarding transition: libcamera 0.0.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1037286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.0.5. The auto-generated ben tracker looks good: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html The unique reverse dep (pipewire 0.3.71-1) builds fine with the new libcamera in experimental. Thanks, Dylan --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-06-15 23:26:59 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirm > > On 2023-06-10 10:25:29 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.0.5. > > > > The auto-generated ben tracker looks good: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html > > > > The unique reverse dep (pipewire 0.3.71-1) builds fine with the > > new libcamera in experimental. > > Please go ahead. The old binaries got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1038813: bullseye-pu: package aide/0.17.3-4+deb11u2
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:29:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 11:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:13:58AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > I was about to say "nothing other than a little more patience", > > > given > > > the request is only a few days old at this point. Looking back, > > > however, it appears that there isn't actually a debdiff attached, > > > as > > > was claimed in the original mail. > > > > I apologize. Here we go. > > > > Thanks. Please go ahead. Done. One more question that might be a good candidate for more in-depth docs: With both the bullseye and bookworm versions having been accepted to the respective proposed-updates repository, there is no longer need to hold back uploads to unstable, right? I can resume normal work on the packages after the acceptance of the package for bullseye? Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
Bug#1035466: bullseye-pu: package postfix/3.5.18-0+deb11u1
While this has been pending, another postfix maintenance update has been released for 3.5. Postfix 3.5.20 provides the relevant fixes already provided to Bookworm via the 3.7.6 update. Debdiff attached is oldstable to proposed change (not just the additional changes brought by 3.5.20). Scott Kdiff -Nru postfix-3.5.18/debian/changelog postfix-3.5.20/debian/changelog --- postfix-3.5.18/debian/changelog 2023-01-21 20:17:03.0 -0500 +++ postfix-3.5.20/debian/changelog 2023-04-30 14:24:06.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,117 @@ +postfix (3.5.20-0+deb11u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + [Wietse Venema] + + * 3.5.20 +- Bugfix (defect introduced: Postfix 1.0): the command "postconf + .. name=v1 .. name=v2 .." (multiple instances of the same + parameter name) created multiple name=value entries with + the same parameter name. It now logs a warning and skips + the earlier update. Found during code maintenance. File: + postconf/postconf_edit.c + +- Bugfix (defect introduced: Postfix 3.3): the command "postconf + -M name1/type1='name2 type2 ...'" died with a segmentation + violation when the request matched multiple master.cf + entries. The master.cf file was not damaged. Problem reported + by SATOH Fumiyasu. File: postconf/postconf_master.c. + +- Bugfix (defect introduced: Postfix 2.11): the command + "postconf -M name1/type1='name2 type2 ...'" could add a + service definition to master.cf that conflicted with an + already existing service definition. It now replaces all + existing service definitions that match the service pattern + 'name1/type1' or the service name and type in 'name2 type2 + ...' with a single service definition 'name2 type2 ...'. + Problem reported by SATOH Fumiyasu. File: postconf/postconf_edit.c. + +- Bitrot: preliminary support for OpenSSL configuration files, + primarily OpenSSL 1.1.1b and later. This introduces new + parameters "tls_config_file" and "tls_config_name", which + can be used to limit collateral damage from OS distributions + that crank up security to 11, increasing the number of + plaintext email deliveries. Details are in the postconf(5) + manpage under "tls_config_file" and "tls_config_name". + Viktor Dukhovni. Files: mantools/postlink, proto/postconf.proto, + global/mail_params.h, posttls-finger/posttls-finger.c, + smtp/smtp.c, smtp/smtp_proto.c, tls/tls_client.c, tls/tls.h, + tls/tls_misc.c, tls/tls_proxy_client_print.c, + tls/tls_proxy_client_scan.c, tls/tls_proxy.h, tls/tls_server.c, + tlsproxy/tlsproxy.c. + +- Cleanup: use TLS_CLIENT_PARAMS to pass the OpensSSL 'init' + configurations. This information is independent from the + client or server TLS context, and therefore does not belong + in tls_*_init() or tls_*_start() calls. The tlsproxy(8) + server uses TLS_CLIENT_PARAMS to report differences between + its own global TLS settings, and those from its clients. + Files: posttls-finger/posttls-finger.c, smtp/smtp.c, + smtp/smtp_proto.c, tls/tls.h, tls/tls_proxy_client_misc.c, + tls/tls_proxy_client_print.c, tls/tls_proxy_client_scan.c, + tls/tls_proxy.h, tlsproxy/tlsproxy.c. + +- Cleanup: reverted cosmetic-only changes to minimize the + patch footprint for OpenSSL INI file support; updated daemon + manpages with the new tls_config_file and tls_config_name + configuration parameters. Files: smtp/smtp.c, smtpd/smtpd.c, + tls/tls_client.c, tls/tls.h, tls/tls_server.c, tlsproxy/tlsproxy.c, + +- Cleanup: made OpenSSL 'default' INI file support error + handling consistent with OpenSSL default behavior. Viktor + Dukhovni. Files: proto/postconf.proto, tls/tls_misc.c. + +- Backwards compatibility for stable releases that originally + had no OpenSSL INI support. Skip the new OpenSSL INI support + code, unless the Postfix configuration actually specifies + non-default tls_config_xxx settings. File: tls/tls_misc.c. + +- Cleanup: added a multiple initialization guard in the + tls_library_init() function, and made an initialization + error sticky. File: tls/tls_misc.c. + +- Security: new parameter smtpd_forbid_unauth_pipelining + (default: no) to disconnect remote SMTP clients that violate + RFC 2920 (or 5321) command pipelining constraints. Files: + global/mail_params.h, smtpd/smtpd.c, proto/postconf.proto. + + * 3.5.19 +- Portability: the EVP_get_digestbyname change broke OpenSSL + 1.0.2 support. File: tls/tls.h. + +- Bugfix (introduced: Postfix 3.4): the posttls-finger command + failed to detect that a connection was resumed in the case + that a server did not return a certificate. Viktor Dukhovni. + File: posttls-finger/posttls-finger.c. + +- Workaround: OpenSSL 3.x EVP_get_cipherbyname() can return + lazily-bound handles. Postfix now checks that
Processed: transition: draco
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:draco Bug #1039104 [release.debian.org] transition: draco Added indication that 1039104 affects src:draco -- 1039104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039104 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039104: transition: draco
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: dr...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:draco -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, I want to transition draco after a SONAME bump. AFAICT the new version builds fine with the reverse dependencies. The Ben tracker looks good, too: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html Cheers Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmSYgdoACgkQ+C8H+466 LVkFDwwA0QTML+UwUCCo21sQ9kdO0orbo0CHQR4vL1KmtsOE7BQ7/hQDo36nK6Vk 7CwEYn6GglGiNiBGsikFtQCmcWeHn60pFXgvnDVTizq+vm0g1R9iNPUetnqZ+J6d jeCh3Mo3HA2vlkhIsudvwNRN6cVtLGUp/6glui9OQ8jJJToSzpNAKoiGVX7urJXF MJUqagDACOiuX3EJTHcxL8rF3rVB1s+PYvmp5oKnMYqbN2CBYbMHWWbKApkwAtgy ZBgqHQMZS6/mqEL4R1+v/j94ObsTfmRnX/8LlwsqaQmXnZLTu2IWXABCGbex8OFE sdmCQKYQdOI/j2Sa28mY93aRgZj2LX1B4GMSMBo9mUjeKXpRW8Wl+wOBTdk5Ofru yQIEXIYzLXNdjzQ11Gst414OFhkNT80Td63+DRT9hrvFqLO7JW6Di1zdGGe4FhaT eAAz97k1NAe8cz1bF0lZrsdMoV1cA+wcwlGE8MDmt8jDqo+Ez/xxZ1Zr8Dxda3hK w3+HwyuO =J0xZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#1028602: marked as done (transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:02:03 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028602: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui has caused the Debian Bug report #1028602, regarding transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1028602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028602 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui Dear Release team, We would like your permission to carry out a GNUstep transition (two libraries simultaneously with one round of binNMUs): libgnustep-base1.28 -> 1.29 libgnustep-gui0.29 -> 0.30 I realise we are already late and in all likelihood we've missed the last bookworm train, which is rather unpleasant for us and GNUstep users but entirely our fault. In case it's not possible to do it now (after tiff/poppler) then please have us in mind for the early stages of the trixie development cycle. gnustep-base/1.29.0-1 is available in experimental, not yet built on mipsen, ppc64el and s390x. But note that 1.28.1-2 was built in unstable on all release architectures; 1.29.0 is essentially the same except the version bump (the damage done was corrected; see #1028189). gnustep-gui/0.30.0-1 is also available in experimental, not yet built on ppc64el and s390x but I do not expect any problems there. While build-testing all rdeps on amd64, the following problems were observed: agenda.app #1028185 gnustep-gui bug, will be fixed with next upload gnustep-dl2 #1028577 fixed locally; needs a sourceful upload pantomime#1028578 likewise sope #1028579 patch sent to the BTS; needs a sourceful upload In addition, gnustep-back will require a sourceful upload (that is always the case). The automatic ben trackers at release.d.o look fine. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-06-15 23:28:39 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > On 2023-01-13 15:15:10 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui > > > > Dear Release team, > > > > We would like your permission to carry out a GNUstep transition (two > > libraries simultaneously with one round of binNMUs): > > > > libgnustep-base1.28 -> 1.29 > > libgnustep-gui0.29 -> 0.30 > > Please go ahead. The old binaries got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1038996: transition: pantomime
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pantomime.html On 2023-06-24 11:39:54 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: pantom...@packages.debian.org, > pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:pantomime > Control: block -1 with 1032830 > > On behalf of the GNUstep team I'd like to request a transition slot > for pantomime (libpantomime1.3 > 1.4). Out of the two rdeps > lusernet.app builds successfully while gnumail will require a > sourceful upload due to incompatible API changes (#1032830). Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1038996: transition: pantomime
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1038996 [release.debian.org] transition: pantomime Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pantomime.html Bug #1038996 [release.debian.org] transition: pantomime Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pantomime.html'. -- 1038996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1036046: bullseye-pu: package debian-parl/1.9.27+deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1036046 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package debian-parl/1.9.27+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1036046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1036046: bullseye-pu: package debian-parl/1.9.27+deb11u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:14:48PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > debian-parl needs to be rebuilt against newer boxer-data to drop > dependencies on packages lo longer built by src:thunderbird, e.g. > lightning. Currently design-parl* are uninstallable in bullseye. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1036300: Fwd: bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1036300 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1036300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1036044: bullseye-pu: package debian-design/3.0.22+deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1036044 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package debian-design/3.0.22+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1036044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1036300: Fwd: bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:11:17AM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote: > [ Reason ] > * Backport upstream patches to fix 5 CVEs: > - CVE-2023-27533: TELNET option IAC injection > - CVE-2023-27534: SFTP path ~ resolving discrepancy > - CVE-2023-27535: FTP too eager connection reuse > - CVE-2023-27536: GSS delegation too eager connection re-use > - CVE-2023-27538: SSH connection too eager reuse still > * d/p/add_Curl_timestrcmp.patch: New patch to backport Curl_timestrcmp(), > required for CVE-2023-27535. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Bug#1036044: bullseye-pu: package debian-design/3.0.22+deb11u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:01:16PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > debian-design needs to be rebuilt against newer boxer-data to drop > dependencies on packages lo longer built by src:thunderbird, e.g. > lightning. Currently design-desktop* are uninstallable in bullseye. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1036043: bullseye-pu: package boxer-data/10.8.28+deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1036043 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package boxer-data/10.8.28+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1036043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1036043: bullseye-pu: package boxer-data/10.8.28+deb11u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 11:44:31AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > This is a data update to remove packages no longer built by > src:thunderbird, e.g. lightning. This is needed for rebuilding > src:debian-design and src:debian-parl in order to drop the unavailable > dependencies and make their binary packages installable again in > bullseye. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Adding tracker link for #1039030
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1039030 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-10.html Bug #1039030 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-10 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-10.html'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1039030: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039030 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1037107: Acknowledgement (pre-unblock: bookworm-pu: mariadb/1:10.11.3-2/+deb12u1)
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:07:50PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi! > > Note that upstream released 10.11.4 today. Import preparation in > progress at > https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/50. > I plan to upload this to experimental tomorrow and eventually into > bookworm-pu if the release team approves. > > - Otto That MR looks sane; please prepare a backport of 1:10.11.4-1 and send a confirmation source debdiff, and it can most likely be waved through. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1037107: Acknowledgement (pre-unblock: bookworm-pu: mariadb/1:10.11.3-2/+deb12u1)
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1037107 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: mariadb/1:10.11.4-0+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1037107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: multipath-tools_0.9.4-3+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT
Processed: Re: Bug#1038344: bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1038344 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1038344: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038344 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038344: bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed I just happened to look at this; otherwise as it was still tagged "moreinfo" it would probably have been waiting for attention for quite a while. On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 12:50:47AM +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > [Resent Cc'ing in the bug, Evolution dropped it first time round, sigh] > > On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 13:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > You appear to have attached a binary debdiff. Please provide a _source_ > > debdiff for checking. > > My apologies, first time I've done this. I had generated it as well. > > Please find the source debdiff attached. As 5.0.3+dfsg-3 in unstable is limited to these changes anyway, you can backport it directly and the version history makes things a bit clearer for some infrastructure. Just add a changelog entry on top of the unstable version, "Backport to bookworm" or something, version 5.0.3+dfsg-3~deb12u1, target bookworm. Don't remove the changelog for 5.0.3+dfsg-3. Example: https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/bookworm_diffs/onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u1.debdiff Other than that, please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: tagging 1038344
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1038344 - moreinfo Bug #1038344 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package request-tracker5/5.0.3+dfsg-2+deb12u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038344: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038344 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039039: multipath-tools 0.9.4-3+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1039039 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: multipath-tools Version: 0.9.4-3+deb12u1 Explanation: hide underlying paths from LVM; prevent initial service failure on new installations
Processed: multipath-tools 0.9.4-3+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1039039 = bookworm pending Bug #1039039 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package multipath-tools/0.9.4-3+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1039039: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039039 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1038813: bullseye-pu: package aide/0.17.3-4+deb11u2
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1038813 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package aide/0.17.3-4+deb11u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1038813: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038813 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038813: bullseye-pu: package aide/0.17.3-4+deb11u2
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 11:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:13:58AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I was about to say "nothing other than a little more patience", > > given > > the request is only a few days old at this point. Looking back, > > however, it appears that there isn't actually a debdiff attached, > > as > > was claimed in the original mail. > > I apologize. Here we go. > Thanks. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Bug#1036849: bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: retitle -1 bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1 > > On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 21:53:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > GNOME upstream has done a stable point release of gnome-software. This > > doesn't seem urgent enough to want to break the freeze for, but it would > > be good to get it in 12.1. > ... > > I have not uploaded to unstable due to the full freeze, and I can't > > upload to experimental because GNOME 44 is already there. > > I uploaded to unstable after Debian 12 was released, and that version > migrated to testing with no apparent regressions. The version I'm now > proposing is a simple rebuild of what's in testing. > > Tested on a bookworm system (browse available packages, upgrade Flatpak > apps, install a Flatpak app, install a .deb) and seems fine, and the > upstream changes are really minimal, so I uploaded the proposed package. It doesn't seem to be in the queue so something has gone wrong with the upload. Please check and go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1036849: bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1036849 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package gnome-software/43.5-1~deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1036849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038879: bookworm-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 11:06:14AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm
> > > proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm
> > > --- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm 1970-01-01
> > > 01:00:00.0 +0100
> > > +++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm 2023-06-22
> > > 11:13:30.0 +0200
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > +#!/bin/sh
> > > +
> > > +set -e
> > > +
> > > +if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ] && [ "$1" = remove ] && [ -d
> > > /run/systemd/system ] ;
> > > +then
> > > +deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.service' >/dev/null || true
> > > +deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.socket' >/dev/null || true
> > > +fi
> >
> > This gives rise to a race condition where the socket starts the service
> > again before the socket is stopped.
> >
>
> Well, this is exactly what debhelper does in current prerm in bookworm.
> Eventually, it could be unified in `deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.socket'
> 'proftpd.service' || true` like other packages do.
> I'm not sure if this is what you intend, but if that risks a race condition
> it would applies to
> a lots of other packages.
Ok, I didn't look at the debhelper behaviour. It's not a big risk.
> > > diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
> > > proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
> > > --- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
> > > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
> > > +++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
> > > 2023-06-22 11:12:42.0 +0200
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +[Unit]
> > > +Description=ProFTPD FTP Server in standalone/socket mode
> > > +Documentation=man:proftpd(8)
> > > +OnFailure=proftpd.socket
> > > +OnSuccess=proftpd.service
> > > +
> > > +[Service]
> > > +Type=oneshot
> > > +Environment=CONFIG_FILE=/etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf
> > > +EnvironmentFile=-/etc/default/proftpd
> > > +ExecStart=/usr/bin/grep -iqE
> > > '^[[:space:]]*ServerType[[:space:]]+standalone$' $CONFIG_FILE
> >
> > Maybe I missed something important, but this seems a very odd way of doing
> > things. Do you really set up a dummy service unit which is expected to fail
> > in standalone mode, and therefore starts the socket instead?
> >
> > Why not use an ExecStartPre= or ExecCondition= in your normal units to
> > prevent starting when in inetd mode?
> >
>
> Unfortunately, Exec* directives can only be used in .service units.
This statement is at odds with the documentation for systemd.socket(5).
> That's
> the reason to enable an external oneshot .service unit to start
> alternatively one of the two other units. Ideally one day or another such
> features could
> be available also in other type of units (there is an issue open since
> 2019). Incidentally, it is possible to add a ConditionPathExists and a
> something like /etc/proftpd/proftpd_not_to_be_run (which is the trick used
> in sshd) but would be completely Debian specific and out of the usual
> workflow to manage inetd/standalone modes in proftpd. So, I'm not that keen
> on
> this kind of trick.
I don't think a ConditionPathExists hack is necessary here. Yes, in the
standalone case you will end up with the socket unit failing, and the local
admin will have to disable that if it annoys them, but any competent
administrator should be able to figure that out with the help of
NEWS.Debian.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT
Processed (with 1 error): merging 1038996 1038997
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 1038996 1038997 Bug #1038996 [release.debian.org] transition: pantomime Unable to merge bugs because: blockedby of #1038997 is '1032830 1038734' not '1038734 1032830' Failed to merge 1038996: Did not alter merged bugs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038996 1038997: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038997 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: onionshare_2.6-4+deb12u1_source.changes REJECT
Processed: onionshare 2.6-5~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1038140 = bookworm pending Bug #1038140 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package onionshare/2.6-5 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038140: onionshare 2.6-5~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1038140 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: onionshare Version: 2.6-5~deb12u1 Explanation: fix installation of desktop furniture
Processed (with 1 error): merging 1038996 1038997
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 1038996 1038997 Bug #1038996 [release.debian.org] transition: pantomime Unable to merge bugs because: blockedby of #1038997 is '1032830 1038734' not '1038734 1032830' Failed to merge 1038996: Did not alter merged bugs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038996 1038997: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038997 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: onionshare_2.6-5~deb12u2_source.changes REJECT
Bug#1039039: bookworm-pu: package multipath-tools/0.9.4-3+deb12u1
* Jonathan Wiltshire [230625 15:30]: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 11:46:44PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Packaging bugs #1037292 and #1037539 have been discovered after the release, > > this update will fix them in stable. > > Please go ahead. Uploaded. Thanks, Chris
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: groonga_13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nfdump_1.7.1-2+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT
Processed: nfdump 1.7.1-2+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1038899 = bookworm pending Bug #1038899 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.1-2+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: openvpn 2.6.3-1+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1038824 = bookworm pending Bug #1038824 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package openvpn/2.6.3-1+deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: groonga 13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1038387 = bookworm pending Bug #1038387 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package groonga/13.0.0+dfsg-2~deb12u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1038387: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038387 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1038899: nfdump 1.7.1-2+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1038899 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: nfdump Version: 1.7.1-2+deb12u1 Explanation: return success when starting; fix segfault in option parsing
Bug#1038824: openvpn 2.6.3-1+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1038824 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: openvpn Version: 2.6.3-1+deb12u1 Explanation: fix memory leak and dangling pointer (possible crash vector)
Bug#1038387: groonga 13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1038387 = bookworm pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: groonga Version: 13.0.0+dfsg-3~deb12u1 Explanation: fix documentation links
Processed: Re: Bug#1039047: bookworm-pu: package cvs/2:1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1039047 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package cvs/2:1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1039047: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039047 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039047: bookworm-pu: package cvs/2:1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 03:35:40AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > [ Reason ] > CVS was always compiled with --with-rsh=ssh but the configure > script ignored that and used rsh because it could not find an > ssh binary in the PATH at compile time. This used to be not a > problem because ssh was aliased to rsh but in bookworm it no > longer is. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1039039: bookworm-pu: package multipath-tools/0.9.4-3+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1039039 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package multipath-tools/0.9.4-3+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1039039: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039039 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039039: bookworm-pu: package multipath-tools/0.9.4-3+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 11:46:44PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Packaging bugs #1037292 and #1037539 have been discovered after the release, > this update will fix them in stable. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Bug#1038616: bookworm-pu: package network-manager-strongswan/1.6.0-1+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 06:31:49AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > [ Reason ] > The old network-manager-strongswan 1.6.0-1 was built for GTK3 only, > leaving the Gnome Netork Settings menu (GTK4) behind, see #1020495. > The package worked fine with the nm-connection-editor, but using > Gnome Network Settings there was just a message "Error: unable to > load VPN connection editor" instead of the expected config menu. > > The bug was introduced on the integration of the new upstream version > on July 16th 2022. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1039026: bookworm-pu: cups/2.4.2-3+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1039026 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: cups/2.4.2-3+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1039026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039026 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039026: bookworm-pu: cups/2.4.2-3+deb12u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 05:44:43PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > The attached debdiff for cups fixes CVE-2023-32324 and CVE-2023-34241 in > Bookworm. Both CVE have been marked as no-dsa by the security team. > > The same fixes have been already uploaded to Unstable and nobody complained > yet. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Processed: Re: Bug#1038616: bookworm-pu: package network-manager-strongswan/1.6.0-1+deb12u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1038616 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package network-manager-strongswan/1.6.0-1+deb12u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1038616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038616 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1039052: nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #1039052 [release.debian.org] nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1039052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039052: nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Sebastian, On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 at 20:01, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi > > On 2023-06-25 16:14:39 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: binnmu > > X-Debbugs-Cc: tclo...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:tclodbc > > > > nmu tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libodbc2 and > > libodbcinst2." > > Why is that necessary? I recently dropped the transitional packages libodbc1 and odbcinst1debian2 from unixodbc. Due to its age, the most recent version of tclodbc still depends on libodbc1 and libodbcinst1 (from odbcinst1debian2). All other packages have moved to libodbc2 and libodbcinst2. A binNMU of tclodbc links against the newer libodbc2 and libodbcinst2 libraries with no build issues. Hugh
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: onionshare_2.6-5+deb12u1_source.changes REJECT
Processed: Re: Bug#1039052: nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1039052 [release.debian.org] nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1039052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1039052: nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi On 2023-06-25 16:14:39 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > X-Debbugs-Cc: tclo...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:tclodbc > > nmu tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libodbc2 and > libodbcinst2." Why is that necessary? Best Sebastian -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1038140: bookworm-pu: package onionshare/2.6-5
On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 15:51 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:52:28PM +0200, Hefee wrote: > > Do I need to do update the version with a stable extension ~deb12u1 > > as there won't be any diff? > > Yes, you should add a changelog entry with target bookworm and > version > 2.6-5~deb12u1. Other than that addition, please go ahead. > You appear to have misread Jonathan's mail, and uploaded 2.6.5+deb12u1, which therefore has a higher version than the package in unstable. I've flagged that upload for rejection. Please re-build and re-upload using the correct version. Regards, Adam
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: gnome-shell_43.6-1~deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT
Bug#1038879: bookworm-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Why not use an ExecStartPre= or ExecCondition= in your normal units to prevent starting when in inetd mode? Unfortunately, Exec* directives can only be used in .service units. That's the reason to enable an external oneshot .service unit to start alternatively one of the two other units. Ideally one day or another such features could be available also in other type of units (there is an issue open since 2019). Incidentally, it is possible to add a ConditionPathExists and a something like /etc/proftpd/proftpd_not_to_be_run (which is the trick used in sshd) but would be completely Debian specific and out of the usual workflow to manage inetd/standalone modes in proftpd. So, I'm not that keen on this kind of trick. Even, the ConditionPathExists would also imply adding code to manage in postinst that kind of stuff, in order to update admin's configuration in a proper way to respect the rule of least surprise at upgrade time ... -- Francesco P. Lovergine
Bug#1038879: bookworm-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1
First of all, thanks for the review.
Answers are embedded below.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 02:29:54PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog
proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog2023-03-14 10:16:31.0
+0100
+++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog2023-06-22 11:15:57.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+proftpd-dfsg (1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1) bookworm-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
You should target `bookworm`, not the admin suites.
Right, to be done.
diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm
proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm
--- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.prerm 2023-06-22
11:13:30.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ] && [ "$1" = remove ] && [ -d /run/systemd/system ] ;
+then
+deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.service' >/dev/null || true
+deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.socket' >/dev/null || true
+fi
This gives rise to a race condition where the socket starts the service
again before the socket is stopped.
Well, this is exactly what debhelper does in current prerm in bookworm.
Eventually, it could be unified in `deb-systemd-invoke stop 'proftpd.socket' 'proftpd.service' || true`
like other packages do.
I'm not sure if this is what you intend, but if that risks a race condition it
would applies to
a lots of other packages.
diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
--- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/proftpd-core.proftpd-run.service
2023-06-22 11:12:42.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[Unit]
+Description=ProFTPD FTP Server in standalone/socket mode
+Documentation=man:proftpd(8)
+OnFailure=proftpd.socket
+OnSuccess=proftpd.service
+
+[Service]
+Type=oneshot
+Environment=CONFIG_FILE=/etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf
+EnvironmentFile=-/etc/default/proftpd
+ExecStart=/usr/bin/grep -iqE '^[[:space:]]*ServerType[[:space:]]+standalone$'
$CONFIG_FILE
Maybe I missed something important, but this seems a very odd way of doing
things. Do you really set up a dummy service unit which is expected to fail
in standalone mode, and therefore starts the socket instead?
Why not use an ExecStartPre= or ExecCondition= in your normal units to
prevent starting when in inetd mode?
Unfortunately, Exec* directives can only be used in .service units. That's
the reason to enable an external oneshot .service unit to start alternatively
one of the two other units. Ideally one day or another such features could
be available also in other type of units (there is an issue open since 2019).
Incidentally, it is possible to add a ConditionPathExists and a something
like /etc/proftpd/proftpd_not_to_be_run (which is the trick used in sshd)
but would be completely Debian specific and out of the usual workflow
to manage inetd/standalone modes in proftpd. So, I'm not that keen on
this kind of trick.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
