NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: reopening 1040001

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 1040001
Bug #1040001 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [release.debian.org] 
transition: r-base
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions r-base/4.3.1-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040001: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1

[Aaron M. Ucko]

u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:

>> The fix itself looks fine, so please feel free to go ahead (with the
>> Closes: removed and possibly with .gitignore restored if appropriate).
>
> Will do, thanks!

Uploaded, final debdiff confirmed not to touch .gitignore.  Thanks!

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: glibc_2.36-9+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT

Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:16:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>...
> ### NMU
> 
> Can be easily added back by adding "bX" or so to the ABI.

That would be confusing, bX is naming convention for binNMUs in Debian 
revisions.

> ### BinNMU
> 
> Is impossible to support.  The version change requires changes in the
> names of the created packages.
>...

It should only be impossible to make them co-installable,
or what other reason requires a rename?

cu
Adrian

Processed: glibc 2.36-9+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040868 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040868 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040868: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040868
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040868: glibc 2.36-9+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040868 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: glibc
Version: 2.36-9+deb12u1

Explanation: fix a buffer overflow in gmon; fix a deadlock in getaddrinfo 
(__check_pf) with deferred cancellation; fix y2038 support in strftime on 
32-bit architectures; fix corner case parsing of /etc/gshadow which can return 
bad pointers, causing segfaults in applications; fix a deadlock in system() 
when called concurrently from multiple threads; cdefs: limit definition of 
fortification macros to __FORTIFY_LEVEL > 0 to support old C90 compilers

Bug#1040001: marked as done (transition: r-base)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:59:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1040001: fixed in r-base 4.3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040001,
regarding transition: r-base
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1040001: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: r-b...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:r-base

Hi,

I'm not sure that we are in the right status to ask for a transition bug
since the affected package was just uploaded some time ago by its
maintainer who did not considered a proper transition.  This was discussed
on debia...@lists.debian.org in several postings - I try to point you to
the most relevant ones

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00011.html
as a response to >30 bugs against single packages all affecting
the r-base migration due to (to be expected) autopkgtest errors
in testing.  You can basically get this list of now all RC buggy
packages from the tracker page or r-base[1]

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00017.html
suggests r-graphics-api-* after r-base maintainer confirmed
"they cheated _a little_ and changes the graphics API" (probably
meaning ABI not API)

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00016.html
Reference to the docs

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00025.html
In the end of this mail three options are listed which I simply
repeat here for your comfort:

   1. implement the r-graphics-api-*
  This might be a bit complex since for the moment I do not know
  any means how to detect the packages that need this dependency
  (and how we can implement this into dh-update-R)  So this might
  become technically complex in the first case

   2. Just do a full r-api transition
  This would work but affects more packages than strictly
  necessary.  My gut feeling says we will be able to finish this
  earlier than 1. despite technically not perfect

   3. Blindly ignore the fact that we need a transition and follow
  the hackish workaround by using random versioned Depends as
  suggested by Nilesh for r-cran-epi.

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00027.html
Confirmation for option 1.


While I would love to hear the opinion of the release team what kind of
transition (1. or 2.) should be prefered (if this is possible now at all
since the affected package r-base 4.3.1 is in the archive since some
time and also the most urgent packages are rebuild manually) or whether
we need to fight manually through this mess (option 3.)  I confirm that
I agree with Johannes Ranke to prefer option 1. and do it "right" to be
safe for the next time.

To support this idea I just commited some proof of concept change to
dh-r which would support injecting a virtual package in case r-base
would define it.  This requires confirmation of the r-base maintainer.

Sorry that this transition bug is that complex.  I would have loved if
it would went more coordinated but unfortunately that's not in my hands
and I simply try to reassemble the pieces.

Kind regards
Andreas.

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-base
[2] 
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/commit/f79e2573a59c1ff01c526a7dcf15b7f85263cc29

Ben file:

title = "r-base";
is_affected = ;
is_good = ;
is_bad = ;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: r-base
Source-Version: 4.3.1-3
Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
r-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1040...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dirk Eddelbuettel  (supplier of updated r-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:13:20 -0500
Source: r-base
Architecture: source
Version: 4.3.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dirk 

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: dbus_1.14.8-2~deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mrtg_2.17.10-5+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: dbus 1.14.8-2~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040915 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040915 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: mrtg 2.17.10-5+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040860 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040860 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040860
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040915: dbus 1.14.8-2~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040915 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: dbus
Version: 1.14.8-2~deb12u1

Explanation: stop trying to take DPKG_ROOT into account, restoring copying of 
systemd's /etc/machine-id in preference to creating an entirely new machine ID

Bug#1040860: mrtg 2.17.10-5+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040860 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: mrtg
Version: 2.17.10-5+deb12u1

Explanation: handle relocated configuration file; translation updates

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

Graham,

On 13 July 2023 at 18:59, Graham Inggs wrote:
| I believe the attached patch should do the trick.  It's basically
| Paul's list from message #210, plus r-cran-interval and
| r-cran-maldiquant.  I've also used a << relationship against the
| versions in unstable, and appended a tilde at the end.  I believe this
| will work better for derivatives and make backports easier.

Almost done building, will upload shortly.

Thanks, Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901

[Bastian Blank]

Hi folks

You might have heard that the masters of Linux Secure Boot, aka shim
reviewers, have spoken.  They have told us that our way of handling
kernel modules is not longer acceptable.  For some context see #1040901.

This means for us that we have to make sure that kernel and modules
can't be mixed between different builds.  If we want to continue with
the current behaviour, where you can keep old kernels usable, we have to
rename packages and kernel internal ABI on every upload.

This is the first version of a proposal that should work. But it also
ignores some Debian and release policy points to avoid some problematic
behaviour.  For example it should not possible for package names to grow
unrestricted.

Please share your thoughts or if we have a better solution overall.

Regards,
Bastian

## Current behaviour

Currently in use are the following types:

* experimental:
Version 6.1~rc2-3~exp4, 6.1.2-3~exp4
ABI 6.1.0-0-arm64
* unstable/testing/stable:
Version 6.1.2-3
ABI 6.1.0-1-arm64
* security/LTS:
Version 6.1.2-3~deb12u4
ABI 6.1.0-1-arm64
* backports:
Version 6.1.2-3~bpo12+4
ABI 6.1.0-0.bpo.1-arm64

But our version check allows allow more variants, including NMU, BinNMU,
local versions, +bpo, ~deb11u1~deb10u1.

## Proposed behaviour

This tries to make sure everything apart from experimental gets new
names and ABI on every upload.

* experimental:
Keep version 6.1~rc2-3~exp4, 6.1.2-3~exp4
Keep ABI 6.1.0-0-arm64
* unstable/testing/stable:
Keep version 6.1.2-3
ABI 6.1.2-3-arm64
* security:
Use same version ranges as stable, makes it impossible to do stable
and security with the same minor.
Version 6.1.2-3
ABI 6.1.2-3-arm64
* backports:
Keep version 6.1.2-3~bpo12+4
ABI 6.1.2-3.bpo12.4-arm64
* LTS:
Version 6.1.2-3~deb12u4
ABI 6.1.2-3.deb12.4-arm64
* Everything else:
Not for Debian archive.
Keep version
ABI 6.1.2-local

## Removed feature for now

### NMU

Can be easily added back by adding "bX" or so to the ABI.

### BinNMU

Is impossible to support.  The version change requires changes in the
names of the created packages.

### Release team prefix

The release team mandated debXuY suffix is not used for any
stable/security or similar release.  Only the LTS one for now uses that.

This makes sure we never accrue more then one such suffix in any
version, to make sure it does not grow unlimited.

New stable uploads always try to gather new upstream minor releases, so
we should be safe.

-- 
I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer to
any question.
-- Spock, "This Side of Paradise", stardate 3417.3

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

[Graham Inggs]

Hi Dirk

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:
> Sounds good, and thanks for the assist! I should be able to provide a pretty
> quick turn-around.

I believe the attached patch should do the trick.  It's basically
Paul's list from message #210, plus r-cran-interval and
r-cran-maldiquant.  I've also used a << relationship against the
versions in unstable, and appended a tilde at the end.  I believe this
will work better for derivatives and make backports easier.

Regards
Graham
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -52,31 +52,17 @@
 Provides: r-api-4.0, r-graphics-engine-${graphicsengine:Version}
 Recommends: r-recommended, r-base-dev, r-doc-html
 Suggests: elpa-ess, r-doc-info | r-doc-pdf, r-mathlib, r-base-html
-Breaks: r-bioc-graph (<< 1.62.0-1~),
-r-cran-bbmle (<< 1.0.20-5~),
-r-cran-biocmanager (<< 1.30.4+dfsg-2~),
-r-cran-caret (<< 6.0-84-2~),
-r-cran-cmprsk (<< 2.2-8-1~),
-r-cran-coin (<< 1.3-0-1~),
-r-cran-dendextend (<< 1.12.0+dfsg-1~),
-r-cran-fields (<< 9.8-3-1~),
-r-cran-filehash (<< 2.4-2-2~),
-r-cran-future (<< 1.14.0+dfsg-1~),
-r-cran-genetics (<< 1.3.8.1.2-1~),
-r-cran-haplo.stats (<< 1.7.9-4~),
-r-cran-igraph (<< 1.2.4.1-1~),
-r-cran-lava (<< 1.6.5-1~),
-r-cran-libcoin (<< 1.0-4-1~),
-r-cran-msm (<< 1.6.7-1~),
-r-cran-permute (<< 0.9-5-1~),
-r-cran-phangorn (<< 2.5.5-1~),
-r-cran-popepi (<< 0.4.7-1~),
-r-cran-recipes (<< 0.1.6-1~),
-r-cran-sp (<< 1:1.3-1-2~),
-r-cran-spam (<< 2.2-2-1~),
-r-cran-units (<< 0.6-3-1~),
-r-cran-vegan (<< 2.5-5+dfsg-1~),
-r-cran-zelig (<< 5.1.6.1-1~)
+Breaks: r-cran-cairo (<< 1.6-0-4~),
+r-cran-intervals (<< 0.15.3-1~),
+r-cran-fnn (<< 1.1.3.2-1~),
+r-cran-magick (<< 2.7.4+dfsg-2~),
+r-cran-maldiquant (<< 1.22.1-1~),
+r-cran-ps (<< 1.7.5-1~),
+r-cran-ragg (<< 1.2.5-3~),
+r-cran-svglite (<< 2.1.1-3~),
+r-cran-tibble (<< 3.2.1+dfsg-2~),
+r-cran-tikzdevice (<< 0.12.4-3~),
+r-cran-vdiffr (<< 1.0.5-3~)
 Description: GNU R core of statistical computation and graphics system
  R is a system for statistical computation and graphics.  It consists 
  of a language plus a run-time environment with graphics, a debugger, 

Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1

[Aaron M. Ucko]

"Adam D. Barratt"  writes:

> If you were intending to close this p-u request there, please don't.
> The bug will get closed once the updated package is in stable as part
> of a point release.

Ah, right, I'll leave that off, then.

> Is the removal of .gitignore intentional?

No, that was an artifact of using an atypical build procedure; sorry for
the noise.  (I'd held off on committing these tentative changes, so gbp
would have required a special flag; I substituted plain debuild but
evidently didn't get its flags quite right.)

> The fix itself looks fine, so please feel free to go ahead (with the
> Closes: removed and possibly with .gitignore restored if appropriate).

Will do, thanks!

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu

Bug#1040868: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u1

[Aurelien Jarno]

Hi Adam,

On 2023-07-13 17:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 20:51 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The upstream stable branch got a few fixes during the bookworm freeze
> > period, and this update pulls them into the debian package. In short:
> >  - Fix a buffer overflow and memory corruption in the gmon
> >functionality.
> >  - Fix a deadlock in getaddrinfo() and system() functions
> >  - Fix y2038 support in strftime on 32-bit architectures.
> >  - Fix possible segmentation fault in applications using sgetsgent()
> >when /etc/gshadow contains very long lines
> >  - Fix support for old C90 compilers.
> > 
> > In addition this include a Slovak translation update fixing typos,
> > that
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 12.1 closes over
> the coming weekend.

Thanks for the review, I have just uploaded it.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#1040875: bookworm-pu: package qemu/1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 23:18 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 2 upstream stable/bugfix releases of qemu 7.2 series has been
> releases since the version of qemu in bookworm, - 7.2.3 and 7.2.4,
> with a good set of fixes each.  See
>   https://salsa.debian.org/qemu-team/qemu/-/commits/stable-7.2/
> for the stable-7.2 branch mirrored on salsa.d.o, or on gitlab.com.
> There are many fixes in there, some of which already affected
> debin users and even debian infrastructure (like qemu-based buildds).
> 
> Many various crashes has been fixed too, including some which can
> cauese data corruption in some cases (an unexpected crash of qemu
> with not all guest data written to permanent storage).
> 
> Among the changes there's 2 security fixe too, CVE-2023-0330
> (LSI controller reentrancy issue) and CVE-2023-2861 (opening
> special files in 9pfs).
> 
> I believe every bit of this is worth having in debian stable.
> 
> Besides that, there's one debian-specific bug being fixed by this
> release, - when I split out xen-specifx bits into a separate
> package, I forgot to enable USB devices support. This update
> re-enables usb support for Xen HVM domUs again (#1037341).
> 

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#1040875: bookworm-pu: package qemu/1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1040875 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package qemu/1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040875: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1040953 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package 
sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040953: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 22:37 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Per #1039621, the new libngs-jni package accidentally wound up with
> bad content (unexpanded variables in the key symlink's source *and*
> target) that rendered it useless.

+sra-sdk (3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+  * Reupload to bookworm (stable).  (Closes: #10n).

If you were intending to close this p-u request there, please don't.
The bug will get closed once the updated package is in stable as part
of a point release.

--- sra-sdk-3.0.3+dfsg/debian/.gitignore2023-02-24 05:52:27.0 
-0500
+++ sra-sdk-3.0.3+dfsg/debian/.gitignore1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 
-0500
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@

Is the removal of .gitignore intentional?

The fix itself looks fine, so please feel free to go ahead (with the
Closes: removed and possibly with .gitignore restored if appropriate).

Regards,

Adam

Bug#1040915: bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1

[Simon McVittie]

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:58:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > [ Reason ]
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
> 
> Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 12.1 closes over
> the coming weekend.

I uploaded it already, it's in
. The
corresponding unstable update should reach testing tomorrow.

I'm sorry for the timing. I fixed it as fast as I was able, as soon as
I was aware of the issue (I know both should have happened quicker).

smcv

Bug#1040915: bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 17:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:58:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > [ Reason ]
> > > > https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
> > 
> > Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 12.1 closes
> > over
> > the coming weekend.
> 
> I uploaded it already, it's in
> ;. The
> corresponding unstable update should reach testing tomorrow.
> 

Heh, that'll teach me to catch up on e-mail before reviewing the queue.

> I'm sorry for the timing. I fixed it as fast as I was able, as soon
> as I was aware of the issue (I know both should have happened
> quicker).
> 

FTAOD, it absolutely wasn't a complaint, rather just making sure you
were aware of the date.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

Hi Graham,

On 13 July 2023 at 11:14, Graham Inggs wrote:
| On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 19:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:
| > On 12 July 2023 at 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
| > | Yes, you only need to carry the Breaks until in the next release. So
| > | every Breaks that's present in the r-base package in bookworm can be
| > | removed from the r-base package in unstable.
| >
| > Good point and much less ugly then :)
| 
| I'll prepare a patch dropping the old and adding the new Breaks.

Sounds good, and thanks for the assist! I should be able to provide a pretty
quick turn-around.

Onwards!

Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#1040868: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1040868 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040868: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040868
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040868: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 20:51 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The upstream stable branch got a few fixes during the bookworm freeze
> period, and this update pulls them into the debian package. In short:
>  - Fix a buffer overflow and memory corruption in the gmon
>functionality.
>  - Fix a deadlock in getaddrinfo() and system() functions
>  - Fix y2038 support in strftime on 32-bit architectures.
>  - Fix possible segmentation fault in applications using sgetsgent()
>when /etc/gshadow contains very long lines
>  - Fix support for old C90 compilers.
> 
> In addition this include a Slovak translation update fixing typos,
> that
> 

Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 12.1 closes over
the coming weekend.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#1040915: bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1040915 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040915: bookworm-pu: package dbus/1.14.8-2~deb12u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > [ Reason ]
> > https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
> > [ Changes ]
> > All changes are part of resolving or testing #1040790.
> 
> Debdiff attached.
> 
> > [ Tests ]
> 
> I should also have mentioned that I'm running the proposed package on
> a bookworm desktop system and it works normally.
> 

Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 12.1 closes over
the coming weekend.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

[Graham Inggs]

Hi Dirk

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 19:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:
> On 12 July 2023 at 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> | On 12-07-2023 16:02, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > I can add the Breaks as a 'best of the worse alternative'. And, I 
> presume, I
> | > can remove the existing four-year breaks? [1]
> |
> | Yes, you only need to carry the Breaks until in the next release. So
> | every Breaks that's present in the r-base package in bookworm can be
> | removed from the r-base package in unstable.
>
> Good point and much less ugly then :)

I'll prepare a patch dropping the old and adding the new Breaks.

Regards
Graham

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: dkms_3.0.10-8+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
node-openpgp-seek-bzip_1.0.5-2+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: spip_4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: dkms_3.0.10-8+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
node-openpgp-seek-bzip_1.0.5-2+deb12u1_sourceonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: spip_4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2_source.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: Re: Bug#1040860: bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1040860 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040860
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040860: bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:07:17PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Older versions of the MRTG on Debian had the /etc/mrtg.cfg configuration
> file. Currently, this file is located in /etc/mrtg/ directory. This PU
> introduces changes from Sid (revision 2.17.10-6) to ask to user if the
> configuration file must be moved to /etc/mrtg/, if it exists in /etc/.
> Some updated and new translations for the debconf template are being sent
> with this PU (from revisions 2.17.10-7 and 2.17.10-8). This PU closes
> #1039103.

Please go ahead.

On aother note, some of the templates look like they would benefit from a
review by debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org. That's not necessary for
this upload, just something to consider.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1

Processed: node-openpgp-seek-bzip 1.0.5-2+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040680 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040680 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package 
node-openpgp-seek-bzip/1.0.5-2+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040680: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040680
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: dkms 3.0.10-8+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040921 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040921 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dkms/3.0.10-8+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040921: dkms 3.0.10-8+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040921 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: dkms
Version: 3.0.10-8+deb12u1

Explanation: add Breaks against obsolete, incompatible *-dkms packages

Bug#1040756: spip 4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040756 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: spip
Version: 4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2

Explanation: security fix (authentication data filtering)

Processed: spip 4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2 flagged for acceptance

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040756 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040756 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package spip/4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1040680: node-openpgp-seek-bzip 1.0.5-2+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

package release.debian.org
tags 1040680 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: node-openpgp-seek-bzip
Version: 1.0.5-2+deb12u1

Explanation: correct installation of files in seek-bzip package