Bug#1055891: transition: gdal

2023-11-18 Thread Paul Gevers 

Hi

On 19-11-2023 07:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
For the libgdal-grass autopkgtest to pass it needs to pull gdal, grass, 
and libgdal-grass from unstable due to the tight coupling.


If it doesn't happen automatically and there is a tight coupling, where 
is the tight coupling missing in the package relations?


Paul
PS: I didn't check the situation, merely commented on the words in the 
e-mail that confused me.


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1055891: transition: gdal

2023-11-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg 
For the libgdal-grass autopkgtest to pass it needs to pull gdal, grass, 
and libgdal-grass from unstable due to the tight coupling.


Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Adrian Bunk 
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:51:15PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: block 1056183 by -1
> 
> On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> Hi Samuel,
> 
> > 
> > nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild 
> > against new zlib"
> > 
> 
> Thanks for filing the NMU bug.
> 
> > So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems needed on all archs
> > to fix installing texlive-binaries.
> > 
> 
> I tested if recompiling solves the issue and it does. Hence I bump severity
> of the NMU bug the get a solution ASAP.

I don't see how a binNMU would solve the problem.

A proper fix would be either to:
1. patch the version check out of texlive-bin (preferred), or
2. ensure texlive-bin has package dependencies that match this runtime check

After a binNMU the migration of zlib to testing would still be 
blocked forever by the autopkgtest of packages like asymptote that
will continue to test with zlib/unstable and texlive-bin/testing.

And it also might affects users directly, without proper dependencies 
e.g. a bookworm -> trixie upgrade might end up with the following order
(among many other things happening during the upgrade):
1. zlib gets upgraded
2. the tex-common trigger runs
3. texlive-bin gets upgraded
If this is permitted by the dependencies, then step 2 must not fail.

> Hilmar

cu
Adrian

Processed: Re: Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #1056204 [release.debian.org] nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> block 1056183 by -1
Bug #1056183 [texlive-binaries] texlive-luatex: lualatex exits immediately due 
to new zlib
Bug #1056186 [texlive-binaries] texlive-binaries: zlib library mismatch
Bug #1056189 [texlive-binaries] luahbtex: PANIC: unprotected error in call to 
Lua API (zlib library version does not match - header: 1.2.13, library: 1.3)
1056183 was not blocked by any bugs.
1056183 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1056183: 1056204
1056186 was not blocked by any bugs.
1056186 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1056186: 1056204
1056189 was not blocked by any bugs.
1056189 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1056189: 1056204

-- 
1056183: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056183
1056186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056186
1056189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056189
1056204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße 

Control: severity -1 important
Control: block 1056183 by -1

On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:

Hi Samuel,



nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new 
zlib"



Thanks for filing the NMU bug.


So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems needed on all archs
to fix installing texlive-binaries.



I tested if recompiling solves the issue and it does. Hence I bump 
severity of the NMU bug the get a solution ASAP.


Hilmar
--
Testmail



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: raising severity of Perl 5.38 transition blockers

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # see the Perl 5.38 transition bug #1055955
> severity 1042521 serious
Bug #1042521 [src:polymake] polymake: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: ‘Perl_ck_fun’ was 
not declared in this scope
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1042521
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was not blocked by any bugs.
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1042521
> severity 1042845 serious
Bug #1042845 [src:libembperl-perl] libembperl-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: test 
failures
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1042845
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1042521
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1042845
> severity 1040396 serious
Bug #1040396 [src:libapache-db-perl] libapache-db-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: 
hidden symbol `Perl_init_debugger' isn't defined
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1040396
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1042845 1042521
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1040396
> severity 1042853 serious
Bug #1042853 [src:docknot] docknot: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: t/spin/errors.t 
failure
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1042853
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1040396 1042521 1042845
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1042853
> severity 1050451 serious
Bug #1050451 [src:libperl-languageserver-perl] libperl-languageserver-perl: 
autopkgtest failure with Perl 5.38: given is deprecated
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1050451
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1040396 1042521 1042845 1042853
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1050451
> severity 1042525 serious
Bug #1042525 [src:localehelper] localehelper: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: t/help.t 
failure
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1042525
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1040396 1042845 1042521 1050451 1042853
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1042525
> severity 1042844 serious
Bug #1042844 [src:elinks] elinks: FTBFS with Perl 5.38: error: redefinition of 
‘struct object’
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 1055955 with 1042844
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1042845 1042853 1050451 1042521 1040396 1042525
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055955: 1042844
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040396: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040396
1042521: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042521
1042525: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042525
1042844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042844
1042845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042845
1042853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042853
1050451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050451
1055955: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1055908: marked as done (nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9932-8+b2)

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 18 Nov 2023 19:51:21 +
with message-id 
<54db87cde8e3f07a3ecbbf14b989c6e3dc1fc1be.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1055907: nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055908,
regarding nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9932-8+b2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1055908: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libwx-p...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libwx-perl

nmu libwx-perl_1:0.9932-8+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for wxwidgets3.2 
(3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 16:21 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Scott Talbert  (2023-11-16):
> > > Scott Talbert  (2023-11-13):
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-p...@packages.debian.org
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
> > > > 
> > > > nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -
> > > > m "Rebuild for wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
> > > 
> > > This looks like a redux of #1054146, with libwx-perl also needing
> > > a
> > > binNMU (after the libalien-wxwidgets-perl one)?
> > 
> > Yeah, I did at least file both at the same time this round though
> > :)
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055908
> 
> I was trying to suggest filing both in the same request, to have them
> scheduled in one go.

Yes, please. #1055908 also doesn't mention the dependency between the
binNMUs.

> In any case, actually binNMUing both packages would be nice, as we've
> been lacking d-i daily builds for some days already.

Done.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Bug#1055907: marked as done (nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3)

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 18 Nov 2023 19:51:21 +
with message-id 
<54db87cde8e3f07a3ecbbf14b989c6e3dc1fc1be.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1055907: nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055907,
regarding nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1055907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-p...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl

nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for 
wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 16:21 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Scott Talbert  (2023-11-16):
> > > Scott Talbert  (2023-11-13):
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-p...@packages.debian.org
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
> > > > 
> > > > nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -
> > > > m "Rebuild for wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
> > > 
> > > This looks like a redux of #1054146, with libwx-perl also needing
> > > a
> > > binNMU (after the libalien-wxwidgets-perl one)?
> > 
> > Yeah, I did at least file both at the same time this round though
> > :)
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055908
> 
> I was trying to suggest filing both in the same request, to have them
> scheduled in one go.

Yes, please. #1055908 also doesn't mention the dependency between the
binNMUs.

> In any case, actually binNMUing both packages would be nice, as we've
> been lacking d-i daily builds for some days already.

Done.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 18 nov. 2023 20:18:01 +0100, a ecrit:
> nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against 
> new zlib"

I forgot to mention that this should of course be made dep-wait
zlib1g-dev (>= 1:1.3.dfsg-1) 



> Hello,
> 
> Since the upload of zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-1, installing texlive-binaries
> texlive-base fails:
> 
> fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
> /tmp/fmtutil.ndDMEWN5
> 
> [...]
> 
> fmtutil: running `luatex -ini   -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex luatex.ini' 
> ...
> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib library version does not 
> match - header: 1.2.13, library: 1.3)
> Aborted
> 
> And indeed texlive-bin checks the zlib version:
> 
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=zlib+library+version+does+not+match=en
> 
> texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7/texk/web2c/luatexdir/luazlib/lzlib.c
> 
> if (strncmp(version, ZLIB_VERSION, 4))
> {
> lua_pushfstring(L, "zlib library version does not match - header: %s, 
> library: %s", ZLIB_VERSION, version);
> lua_error(L);
> }
> 
> So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems needed on all archs
> to fix installing texlive-binaries.
> 
> Samuel

Processed: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:texlive-bin
Bug #1056204 [release.debian.org] nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7
Added indication that 1056204 affects src:texlive-bin

-- 
1056204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-18 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texlive-bin

nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against 
new zlib"

Hello,

Since the upload of zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-1, installing texlive-binaries
texlive-base fails:

fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.ndDMEWN5

[...]

fmtutil: running `luatex -ini   -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex luatex.ini' ...
PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib library version does not 
match - header: 1.2.13, library: 1.3)
Aborted

And indeed texlive-bin checks the zlib version:

https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=zlib+library+version+does+not+match=en

texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7/texk/web2c/luatexdir/luazlib/lzlib.c

if (strncmp(version, ZLIB_VERSION, 4))
{
lua_pushfstring(L, "zlib library version does not match - header: %s, 
library: %s", ZLIB_VERSION, version);
lua_error(L);
}

So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems needed on all archs
to fix installing texlive-binaries.

Samuel

Bug#1055891: transition: gdal

2023-11-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg 
cmake on mips64el will also need a higher priority to unblock the 
rebuilds of several rdeps.


Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Bug#1056194: bookworm-pu: package python3-onelogin-saml2/1.12.0-2+deb12u1

2023-11-18 Thread Santiago Vila 

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: python3-onelogin-sa...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:python3-onelogin-saml2

[ Reason ]
This upload fixes Bug #1036255: FTBFS due to expired certificates in the tests

[ Impact ]
Anybody trying to build the package from source in bookworm will
get a build error.

[ Tests ]
I've verified that the package builds from source again.

[ Risks ]
Low risk. There are no real code changes, just the tests.

[ Checklist ]
  [X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
I've cherry-picked three commits from upstream repository,
required to fix the tests.

[ Other info ]
I've already uploaded the package.

Processed: bookworm-pu: package python3-onelogin-saml2/1.12.0-2+deb12u1

2023-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:python3-onelogin-saml2
Bug #1056194 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package 
python3-onelogin-saml2/1.12.0-2+deb12u1
Added indication that 1056194 affects src:python3-onelogin-saml2

-- 
1056194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1056169: bookworm-pu: package di-netboot-assistant/0.78~deb12u1

2023-11-18 Thread Andreas B. Mundt 
Hi Kibi,

thank you for your comment and explanation!

On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> […] 
> 
> The versioning seems a little weird.
> 
> Usually:
>  - either one cherry-picks stuff on top of the stable package, and uses
>0.76+deb12u1;
>  - or one ships a rebuild of the testing/unstable into stable, and uses
>0.78~deb12u1 (adding a changelog entry on top of unstable's,
>similarly to what would be done for backports).
> 
> Glancing very briefly at the patch and the git tree, it seems like
> you're doing the latter but versioning it like the former. I'll let
> others comment as to whether that's some nitpicking that should be
> ignored, or something they'd like to see adjusted.

Ah, you are absolutely right, makes sense.  I started with a
0.76+deb12u1 package, realized that cherry-picking ended up at 0.78,
adjusted the version number … but I wasn't aware that the changelog
should also be 'reset' to the one from 0.78 (which, I agree, makes
perfectly sense).  If needed, I can provide another upload.

Thanks and best regards,

  Andi

Bug#1055907: nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3

2023-11-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Scott Talbert  (2023-11-16):
> > Scott Talbert  (2023-11-13):
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-p...@packages.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
> > > 
> > > nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild 
> > > for wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
> > 
> > This looks like a redux of #1054146, with libwx-perl also needing a
> > binNMU (after the libalien-wxwidgets-perl one)?
> 
> Yeah, I did at least file both at the same time this round though :)
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055908

I was trying to suggest filing both in the same request, to have them
scheduled in one go.

In any case, actually binNMUing both packages would be nice, as we've
been lacking d-i daily builds for some days already.

(I could probably try and do that myself but “above all, do no harm”.)


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2023-11-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u2_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.2-1~deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2023-11-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_5.1.4-0+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.6.3-1+deb12u2_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2023-11-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.13-0+deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.42.1-1~deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#1056065: transition: spdlog

2023-11-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher 
Hi Andrius

binNMUs for the reverse dependencies have been scheduled.

spdlog's autopkgtest fail, though:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/spdlog/39983394/log.gz

Could you please take a look?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055891: transition: gdal

2023-11-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg 

grass is now also built & installed on all release architectures.

libgdal-grass & qgis can be rebuilt.

Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Bug#1056169: bookworm-pu: package di-netboot-assistant/0.78~deb12u1

2023-11-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Hi Andreas,

And thanks for keeping an eye on netboot-assistant.

Andreas B. Mundt  (2023-11-18):
> +di-netboot-assistant (0.78~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Fixes for bookworm live iso image inclusion.
> +  * Update/add/fix preseed examples.  Thanks to Holger Wansing.
> +
> + -- Andreas B. Mundt   Sun, 18 Jun 2023 09:11:47 +0200
> +
>  di-netboot-assistant (0.76) unstable; urgency=medium

The versioning seems a little weird.

Usually:
 - either one cherry-picks stuff on top of the stable package, and uses
   0.76+deb12u1;
 - or one ships a rebuild of the testing/unstable into stable, and uses
   0.78~deb12u1 (adding a changelog entry on top of unstable's,
   similarly to what would be done for backports).

Glancing very briefly at the patch and the git tree, it seems like
you're doing the latter but versioning it like the former. I'll let
others comment as to whether that's some nitpicking that should be
ignored, or something they'd like to see adjusted.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature