Re: computer shutdown error

2023-12-11 Thread cimeries1
the problem was solved only by rolling back the kernel to the version:
6.1.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.55-1 (2023-09-29) 

В Пн, 11/12/2023 в 18:01 +0300, cimeri...@gmail.com пишет:
> After today's update, my computer stopped shutting down! It takes a
> very long time as a result, you have to turn off the button!! Issues
> a
> long shutdown of the network Manager!!  



Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-12-11 16:57:34 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > OK, but what is your suggestion?  Reverting and have broken tests due to
> > > the pandoc issue?
> > 
> > pandoc is fixed in unstable.
> 
> Really?  Salsa CI[1] says:
> 
>pandoc : Depends: pandoc-data (>= 3.0.1+ds) but 3.0.1-3 is to be installed
> 
> I uploaded anyway and hope this will be cured somehow.

This issue was fixed in 3.0.1+ds-3 which was uploaded today.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Processed: Re: Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

2023-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
Bug #1054189 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package 
debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#1054189 to the same title

-- 
1054189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

2023-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
Bug #1054189 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package 
debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17
Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package 
debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11' from 'bullseye-pu: package 
debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17'.

-- 
1054189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

2023-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
control: retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
thanks

hi,

I've updated this update request for adding 3 more lines to
security-support-ended.deb11 (and updating d/changelog)

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:46:44PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> The reasons for this proposed update are:
> * Fix two bugs already solved in bookworm (#986581 and #986333)
> * Include samba in the list of packages with limited support (#1053109).
> 
> Currently, because of #986581 and #986333, d-d-s's check-support-status
> silently ignores "golang*" packages, so users don't get any warning
> about their limited support status.

now also to add these 3 lines to security-support-ended.deb11:

tor  0.4.5.16-1  2023-11-22  
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2023/msg00258.html
consul   1.8.7+dfsg1-2   2023-12-04  
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057418
xen  4.14.5+94-ge49571868d-1 2023-09-30  
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053246

 
> [ Impact ]
> Bullseye users will continue to don't get any warning about the limited
> support regarding the golang.* packages installed in their systems.
> 
> As for the samba-related change, without the upload, users will lose a
> change to get informed about its security support situation.
> 
> [ Tests ]
> The changes include tests to verify #986581 and #986333 have been fixed.
> I have also manually verified on a bullseye container how the current
> and the proposed packages behave, and I can confirm the issues are
> fixed, and I didn't identify any regression.
> 
> [ Risks ]
> The relevant code has been included in bookworm since its release. They
> were fully included in 1:12+2021.09.30:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1263114/accepted-debian-security-support-11220210930-source-into-unstable/
> 
> The only difference in check-suppor-status.in between the proposed
> update and bookworm is:
> 
> git diff HEAD bookworm -- check-support-status.in
> diff --git a/check-support-status.in b/check-support-status.in
> index 3ebf5e9..86b080a 100755
> --- a/check-support-status.in
> +++ b/check-support-status.in
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ VERSION='[% VERSION %]'
>  # Oldest Debian version included in debian-security-support
>  DEB_LOWEST_VER_ID=9
>  # Version ID for next Debian stable
> -DEB_NEXT_VER_ID=12
> +DEB_NEXT_VER_ID=13
> 
>  if [ -z "$DEBIAN_VERSION" ] ; then
>  DEBIAN_VERSION="$(cat /etc/debian_version | grep '[0-9.]' | cut -d. -f1)"
> 
> So the risk of regression is miminum.
> 
> 
> Regarding the change of adding samba in the list of packages with
> limited support. That doesn't represent any risk.
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
>   [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
> 
> [ Changes ]
> 
> From d/changelog:

the full new changelog is:

debian-security-support (1:11+2023.12.11) UNRELEASED-bullseye; urgency=medium

  [ Santiago Ruano Rincón ]
  * Mark samba support limited to non-AD DC uses cases (Closes: #1053109)
  * Drop version-based check (Closes: #986581) and update test suite
accordingly. Backport changes made by Sylvain Beucler.
  * Match ecosystems with limited support, test case updated. (Closes: #986333)
Backport changes by Sylvain Beucler.
* Use golang.* (as regex) instead of golang* in security-support-limited

   [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
   * Add tor to security-support-ended.deb11 Closes: #1056606.

   [ Moritz Muehlenhoff ]
   * Mark Consul as EOLed in Bullseye. Closes: #1057418.
   * Mark Xen as EOLed in Bullseye. Closes: #1053246.

 -- Santiago Ruano Rincón   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:08:20 
-0300



I haven't uploaded this yet but everything is ready in a git branch.

Thanks!


-- 
cheers,
Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the "m" is silent.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > OK, but what is your suggestion?  Reverting and have broken tests due to
> > the pandoc issue?
> 
> pandoc is fixed in unstable.

Really?  Salsa CI[1] says:

   pandoc : Depends: pandoc-data (>= 3.0.1+ds) but 3.0.1-3 is to be installed

I uploaded anyway and hope this will be cured somehow.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-rmarkdown/-/jobs/5026534

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-12-11 13:28:59 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> > > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package.  It seems that pandoc is not used for
> > > > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm, -ioniser, scrnaseq
> > > > and -tximeta, which I tried.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the patch - applied and uploaded.
> > 
> > This change broke autopkgtests of reverse dependencies.
> 
> OK, but what is your suggestion?  Reverting and have broken tests due to
> the pandoc issue?

pandoc is fixed in unstable.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian,

Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package.  It seems that pandoc is not used for
> > > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm, -ioniser, scrnaseq
> > > and -tximeta, which I tried.
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch - applied and uploaded.
> 
> This change broke autopkgtests of reverse dependencies.

OK, but what is your suggestion?  Reverting and have broken tests due to
the pandoc issue?

Kind regards
   Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Andreas

On 2023-12-07 16:09:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> 
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille  wrote:
> > > I have no idea how to work around this.
> > 
> > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> > the r-cran-rmarkdown package.  It seems that pandoc is not used for
> > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm, -ioniser, scrnaseq
> > and -tximeta, which I tried.
> 
> Thanks for the patch - applied and uploaded.

This change broke autopkgtests of reverse dependencies.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher