Please consider firehol-1.231-2 for sarge

2005-05-05 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi folks,

I fixed an annyoing bug in firehol (#304853), so I would be pleased
if could push this version into sarge.

Thanks for your great work

Alex

P.S. I'm not subscribed, so please CC me



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Please let mp3burn back to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, 
due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822), 
mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in
mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it. 
mp3burn works fine for me and others. So I would be pleased
if you could put it back to sarge.

Best wishes 
Alex



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#289822: Please let mp3burn back to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi Steve!

On Sun, 08 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:

> Hi Alexander,
> 
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:22:18AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822), 
> > mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in
> > mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it. 
> > mp3burn works fine for me and others. So I would be pleased
> > if you could put it back to sarge.
> 
> Is mp3burn known to work on 2.6 kernels?  Does mp3burn invoke cdrecord with
> any particular commandline options that could trigger this bug, whereas
> cdrecord would normally work for people?
It is. I develop mp3burn under 2.6 and had never complains except that bug
that it doesn't works. 

> 
> Since cdrecord reports a *read* error on input file, not a write error to
> the disk, it seems very plausible to me that this could be a bug in mp3burn,
> and this was why I removed the package from testing.  I think I would like
> to know that this package at least works for someone other than the
> maintainer before letting it back in.
There was some kernel bug with cdrecord during that time that prevented cdrecord
properly, so maybe that was the problem...

Best wishes
Alex




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


documentation updates for keepalived

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi,

to deal with #305751 (which was formely release critical), I updated
some docs in the package (README.Debian and the description). 
Please consider this updates for sarge to prevent confusions for our
users. 

Best wishes
Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]