Re: Bug#1071355: In how far are several packages affected by bug #1071355 of maptools

2024-07-04 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Hi Andreas,

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:56:40AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 
> there was a series of testing removals due to bug #1071355 of
> r-cran-maptools.  Since maptools was removed from CRAN[1] we intend to
> remove this package.  However, before doing so I would like to
> understand why packages like r-cran-factominer, r-cran-ggpubr,
> r-cran-vim, r-cran-systemfit, r-cran-survminer and others where I can't
> see any connection to r-cran-maptools were removed from testing.

I _think_ it's something like this:

r-cran-ggpubr depends r-cran-rstatix depends r-cran-car depends r-cran-maptools 
.
Therefore a #1071355 in r-cran-maptools which is serious and tagged ftbfs
causes r-cran-ggpubr to get removed.

Bye,

Joost

PS: tnx "apt-rdepends r-cran-ggpubr"

Bug#1035710: unblock: doc-debian/11.3

2023-05-23 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Hi Luca,

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: doc-debian/11.3+nmu1
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> 
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 23:37:23 +0100 Luca Boccassi 
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 May 2023 06:46:19 +0200 Joost van =?utf-8?Q?Baal-
> Ili=C4=87?=
> >  wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > >  
> > > > On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > > reopen 1035710
> > > > > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please unblock package doc-debian
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable. Remove the moreinfo
> > > > tag once the package is available.
> > > 
> > > Thank you.  Unfortunately I don't think I'll make it before the deadline
> > > / in the next couple of hours, real life currently doesn't allow me that.
> > > 
> > > If anybody else has time to take a shot at it: here's the current
> > > issue's: I made a mistake in the upload to experimental: it says
> > > 'experimental' in the top of debian/changelog; should probably be
> > > 'unstable'.  And the last commit on salsa is misguided.
> > > 
> > > If nobody steps up I can probably prepare an upload for the first
> > > bookworm point release.
> > 
> > I can take care of this, I'll do a changelog-only upload of the current
> > version that's in experimental to unstable.
> 
> Done, you can find the changelog-only commit to pull from at:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/bluca/doc-debian/-/commits/master?ref_type=heads

Excellent, thanks a lot, you made my day \o/

Bye,

Joost

Bug#1035710: unblock: doc-debian/11.3

2023-05-22 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
 
> On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > reopen 1035710
> > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3
> > thanks
> > 
> > Please unblock package doc-debian
> > 
> > [ Reason ]
> > The doc-debian package claims to ship the Constitution for the Debian 
> > Project,
> > the Debian Social Contract and other Debian documents.  The versions of 
> > those
> > documents are obsolete [obsolete], which makes the package as now in testing
> > very buggy.

> > 
> > unblock doc-debian/11.3
> 
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable. Remove the moreinfo tag
> once the package is available.

Thank you.  Unfortunately I don't think I'll make it before the deadline / in
the next couple of hours, real life currently doesn't allow me that.

If anybody else has time to take a shot at it: here's the current issue's: I
made a mistake in the upload to experimental: it says 'experimental' in the top
of debian/changelog; should probably be 'unstable'.  And the last commit on
salsa is misguided.

If nobody steps up I can probably prepare an upload for the first bookworm
point release.

Bye,

Joost

-- 
irc: joostvb @ OFTC / libera.chat / ...

Bug#1035710: closing / Re: unblock: doc-debian/11.1

2023-05-11 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Closing this request.  11.2 which is in experimental [11.2] is better suited
for bookworm: it has a smaller diff with what's in stable now.  However, since
11.2 has some other problems ( #1035913 ), I'll do more work in the coming days
and hope to come up with an ever better candidate for bookworm.  Sorry for the
noise.

Bye,

Joost


[11.2] 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1430982/accepted-doc-debian-112-source-into-experimental/

Bug#1035710: Bug#1035913: doc-debian 11.0 changed /usr/share/doc-base/ paths

2023-05-11 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
tnx, i'm now preparing a new doc-debian targetted for bookworm with only
minimal changes.  will have a closer look at this issue soonish (likely today).

sorry for this hassle.

Bye,

Joost

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues 
wrote:
> Package: doc-debian
> Version: 11.0
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 07:46:09 +0200 Joost van =?utf-8?Q?Baal-Ili=C4=87?= 
>  wrote:
> > [ Risks ] None.  The doc-debian package is a key package due to Priority:
> > standard.  It acts as a leaf package: Its only true reverse depends is the
> > live-task-standard package.[reverse-depends]
> 
> you are forgetting packages using doc-debian in their autopkgtests.
> 
> > [ Other info ] I made a mistake uploading doc-debian 11.0 to unstable; that
> > got accepted.  The version 11.1 is now available from
> > http://mdcc.cx/tmp/doc-debian/ .  I've incorporated some small cosmetic
> > changes next to the much needed document updates.  Attached is a 161 kB
> > doc-debian_6.5-11.1.dsc-debdiff , as well as a summarizing 13kB
> > doc-debian_6.5-11.1.dsc-debdiff-tldr .
> 
> Before your upload of 11.0, doc-debian contained:
> 
> /usr/share/doc-base/debian-constitution-text
> /usr/share/doc-base/debian-mailing-lists
> /usr/share/doc-base/debian-manifesto
> /usr/share/doc-base/debian-reporting-bugs
> /usr/share/doc-base/debian-social-contract
> 
> Then with 11.0 this became:
> 
> /usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-constitution-text
> /usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-mailing-lists
> /usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-manifesto
> /usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-reporting-bugs
> /usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-social-contract
> 
> This broke the autopkgtest of mmdebstrap which you can also see on the excuses
> page for doc-debian: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=doc-debian
> 
> Since I noticed this breakage, I uploaded a new version of mmdebstrap that
> works around this problem, assuming that this change was intentional. In
> hindsight, I probably should've contacted you instead because when
> investigating http://mdcc.cx/tmp/doc-debian/doc-debian_11.1_all.deb and
> comparing it to the version from unstable I see:
> 
> diff -u <(curl --silent 
> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/doc-debian/doc-debian_11.0_all.deb
>  | dpkg-deb -c - | awk '{print $6}' | sort) <(curl --silent 
> http://mdcc.cx/tmp/doc-debian/doc-debian_11.1_all.deb | dpkg-deb -c - | awk 
> '{print $6}' | sort)
> --- /dev/fd/632023-05-11 08:18:34.782823397 +0200
> +++ /dev/fd/622023-05-11 08:18:34.782823397 +0200
> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
>  ./usr/share/
>  ./usr/share/doc/
>  ./usr/share/doc-base/
> -./usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-constitution-text
> -./usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-mailing-lists
> -./usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-manifesto
> -./usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-reporting-bugs
> -./usr/share/doc-base/doc-debian.debian-social-contract
> +./usr/share/doc-base/debian-constitution-text
> +./usr/share/doc-base/debian-mailing-lists
> +./usr/share/doc-base/debian-manifesto
> +./usr/share/doc-base/debian-reporting-bugs
> +./usr/share/doc-base/debian-social-contract
>  ./usr/share/doc/debian/
>  ./usr/share/doc/debian/bug-log-access.txt
>  ./usr/share/doc/debian/bug-log-mailserver.txt.gz
> 
> What are the intended paths. Should I revert my changes to mmdebstrap or not?
> 
> Also, these changes of paths in /usr/share/doc-base/ forth and back are not
> recorded in debian/changelog. If the change was intended, please document it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> cheers, josch

Bug#718511: transition: mbt

2013-09-12 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:50:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 16:52:54 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
 
  But anyway the big thing that still needs to happen AFAICS is
  fixing the ucto dependency of frog. This can either be fixed by
  reuploading ucto similar to the others or changing frog's build dependency.
  
 Ping Joost?

Just arrived back home from trip to .uk.  I can (and will) spend some more time
on this during next weeks.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130912201417.gb6...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#718501: transition: ticcutils

2013-08-01 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition



Hi,

Excuses for the delay in dealing with this issue. Anyway, here it is: I am
requesting a transition from libticcutils1 to libticcutils2.  libticcutils1 is
build by ticcutils  0.4-1.  libticcutils2 is build by ticcutils = 0.4-1.  A
soname bump was done upstream.  (ticcutils 0.3-1 is in jessie, ticcutils 0.4-4
is in sid now, I have ticcutils 0.4-5 ready for upload to unstable.)

Once this and other upcoming transitions are completed, these bugs:

 #717394 [frog] FTBFS: libucto2-dev/libucto-dev not available
 #714711 [src:libfolia] libfolia: FTBFS: No package 'ticcutils' found
 #713119 [src:mbtserver] mbtserver: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: 
libtimblserver3-dev, libmbt1

will get squashed.

Packages that need to be updated are all maintained by me:

 timbl
 timblserver
 mbt
 mbtserver
 ucto
 libfolia
 dimbl
 frog

Ben file:

title: ticcutils;
affected: .build-depends ~ libticcutils-dev | .build-depends ~ 
libticcutils1-dev | .build-depends ~ libticcutils2-dev
good: .depends ~ libticcutils2
bad: .depends ~ libticcutils1


Thanks, Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130801153719.gy18...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#718503: transition: timbl

2013-08-01 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


Hi,

I am requesting a transition from libtimbl3 to libtimbl4.  libtimbl4 is build
by timbl = 6.4.4-1.  I have prepared timbl 6.4.4-4 for unstable, can I upload
that?

See also related Bug#718501: release.debian.org: transition: ticcutils.

Packages that need to be updated are all maintained by me:

 timblserver
 mbt
 mbtserver
 dimbl
 frog

Ben file:

title: timbl;
affected: .build-depends ~ libtimbl-dev | .build-depends ~ libtimbl3-dev;
good: .depends ~ libtimbl4;
bad: .depends ~ libtimbl3

Thanks, Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130801162533.gj7...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#718511: transition: mbt

2013-08-01 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


Hi,

I am requesting a transition from libmbt0 to libmbt1.  libmbt1 is build
by mbt = 3.2.10-1.  I have prepared mbt 3.2.10-4 for unstable, can I upload
that?

See also related bugs #718501: release.debian.org: transition: ticcutils and
#718503: release.debian.org: transition: timbl.

Packages that need to be updated are all maintained by me:

 mbtserver
 frog

Ben file:

title: mbt;
affected: .build-depends ~ libmbt-dev | .build-depends ~ libmbt0-dev | 
.build-depends ~ libmbt1-dev;
good: .depends ~ libmbt1;
bad: .depends ~ libmbt0

Thanks, Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130801180146.gz18...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#712420: release.debian.org: RM: ticcutils/0.3-1

2013-06-15 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Please:

 RM: ticcutils/0.3-1

since ticcutils 0.3-1 builds binary packages libticcutils1 and
libticcutils1-dev, while ticcutils 0.4-3 builds binary packages libticcutils2
and libticcutils2-dev.  Binary packages libticcutils1 and libticcutils1-dev
should not get shipped with jessie.

  - suggested command:
dak rm -m [auto-cruft] no longer built from source -s unstable -a all -p 
-R -b ticcutils
  - broken Build-Depends:
timbl: ticcutils

See also http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ticcutils and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/06/msg00560.html .

Thanks, Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615200811.gb2...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#694490: release.debian.org: unblock: aephea/10.008-2

2012-12-15 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
 On 2012-12-02 13:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
  
  diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
  --- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
  +++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
  @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
   Package: aephea
   Architecture: all
   Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
  +Breaks: zoem-doc
  +Replaces: zoem-doc
   Recommends: zoem
   Description: text-based authoring tool for HTML
Aephea is an HTML authoring framework.  It enforces HTML well-formedness
 
  Does that actually work?  I'm not sure what Breaks without a version
  even means...
 
 It does; it means it breaks all versions of zoem-doc.  To my knowledge,
 it is mainly used when the package being replaced (e.g. zoem-doc) is no
 longer built from any source (as an alternative to use the highest
 known version of that package).
 
 There was a request for making Lintian ignore the lack of version in
 such cases a while back, so Lintian no longer complains about the lack
 of version in this case.

Exactly.

zoem-doc gets shipped with squeeze (stable) only.  It is not shipped with
wheezy, since zoem-doc is no longer built from the zoem source package since
zoem 10-265-1.

Bye,

Joost


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121215133440.gy18...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#694490: release.debian.org: unblock: aephea/10.008-2

2012-11-26 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package aephea

This upload fixes RC bug #694365 (file conflict between two packages).

unblock aephea/10.008-2

Thanks,

Joost



PS: full diff between aephea 10.008-1 (currently in testing/wheezy)
and the proposed one is:

diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/changelog aephea-10.008/debian/changelog
--- aephea-10.008/debian/changelog  2011-05-12 02:13:25.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/changelog  2012-11-26 10:14:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+aephea (10.008-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control: add missing Breaks+Replaces: zoem-doc, to enable upgrades
+from squeeze to wheezy.  Thanks Andreas Beckmann.  (Closes: #694365)
+
+ -- Joost van Baal-Ilić joos...@debian.org  Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:13:51 +0100
+
 aephea (10.008-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * First upload (Closes: #620479).
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
--- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 Package: aephea
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks: zoem-doc
+Replaces: zoem-doc
 Recommends: zoem
 Description: text-based authoring tool for HTML
  Aephea is an HTML authoring framework.  It enforces HTML well-formedness


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121126205525.gp18...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#691411: unblock: uruk/20120608.1-1

2012-10-25 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Please unblock package uruk, which was just uploaded to
testing-proposed-updates.

Without this fix an upgrade from squeeze to wheezy will lead to
all IPv6-traffic being blocked.

unblock uruk/20120608.1-1


Here's the diff between uruk-20120608-1 as currently in testing and the
proposed one (debdiff uruk_20120608-1.dsc uruk_20120608.1-1.dsc) :

diff -Nru uruk-20120608/ChangeLog uruk-20120608.1/ChangeLog
--- uruk-20120608/ChangeLog 2012-06-08 16:01:32.0 +0200
+++ uruk-20120608.1/ChangeLog   2012-10-25 12:53:27.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2012-10-25  Joost van Baal-Ilić 
+
+   * uruk/script/uruk: Apply patch contributed by Thijs Kinkhorst in
+   Message-Id: 1350907287-15481-1-git-send-email-th...@uvt.nl: Uruk
+   implemented RFC 4890 section 4.3: Recommendations for ICMPv6 Transit
+   Traffic. However uruk is used in some (many?) cases not as a transit
+   firewall but as a host firewall for destination entities. Therefore,
+   also the recommentations from section 4.4: Recommendations for
+   ICMPv6 Local Configuration Traffic need to be added.
+
 2012-06-08  Joost van Baal-Ilić 
 
* uruk/TODO, uruk/script/uruk: No longer block, but allow ICMPv6
diff -Nru uruk-20120608/configure uruk-20120608.1/configure
--- uruk-20120608/configure 2012-06-08 16:01:34.0 +0200
+++ uruk-20120608.1/configure   2012-10-25 12:56:03.0 +0200
@@ -586,8 +586,8 @@
 # Identity of this package.
 PACKAGE_NAME='Uruk'
 PACKAGE_TARNAME='uruk'
-PACKAGE_VERSION='20120608'
-PACKAGE_STRING='Uruk 20120608'
+PACKAGE_VERSION='20120608.1'
+PACKAGE_STRING='Uruk 20120608.1'
 PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='joostvb-u...@mdcc.cx'
 PACKAGE_URL=''
 
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@
   # Omit some internal or obsolete options to make the list less imposing.
   # This message is too long to be a string in the A/UX 3.1 sh.
   cat _ACEOF
-\`configure' configures Uruk 20120608 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
+\`configure' configures Uruk 20120608.1 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
 
 Usage: $0 [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
 
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@
 
 if test -n $ac_init_help; then
   case $ac_init_help in
- short | recursive ) echo Configuration of Uruk 20120608:;;
+ short | recursive ) echo Configuration of Uruk 20120608.1:;;
esac
   cat \_ACEOF
 
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@
 test -n $ac_init_help  exit $ac_status
 if $ac_init_version; then
   cat \_ACEOF
-Uruk configure 20120608
+Uruk configure 20120608.1
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69
 
 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
 This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
 running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
 
-It was created by Uruk $as_me 20120608, which was
+It was created by Uruk $as_me 20120608.1, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69.  Invocation command line was
 
   $ $0 $@
@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@
 
 # Define the identity of the package.
  PACKAGE='uruk'
- VERSION='20120608'
+ VERSION='20120608.1'
 
 
 cat confdefs.h _ACEOF
@@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@
 # report actual input values of CONFIG_FILES etc. instead of their
 # values after options handling.
 ac_log=
-This file was extended by Uruk $as_me 20120608, which was
+This file was extended by Uruk $as_me 20120608.1, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69.  Invocation command line was
 
   CONFIG_FILES= $CONFIG_FILES
@@ -2826,7 +2826,7 @@
 cat $CONFIG_STATUS _ACEOF || ac_write_fail=1
 ac_cs_config=`$as_echo $ac_configure_args | sed 's/^ //; 
s/[\\\`\$]//g'`
 ac_cs_version=\\
-Uruk config.status 20120608
+Uruk config.status 20120608.1
 configured by $0, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69,
   with options \\\$ac_cs_config\\
 
diff -Nru uruk-20120608/debian/changelog uruk-20120608.1/debian/changelog
--- uruk-20120608/debian/changelog  2012-06-12 16:38:24.0 +0200
+++ uruk-20120608.1/debian/changelog2012-10-25 13:49:39.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+uruk (20120608.1-1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release, for Debian wheezy. 
+
+ -- Joost van Baal-Ilić joos...@debian.org  Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:26:34 +0200
+
 uruk (20120608-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release: The Hooidonk Release.
diff -Nru uruk-20120608/NEWS uruk-20120608.1/NEWS
--- uruk-20120608/NEWS  2012-06-08 16:01:05.0 +0200
+++ uruk-20120608.1/NEWS2012-10-25 12:52:04.0 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,17 @@
 
 Refer to ChangeLog for detailed per-file info.
 
+uruk version 20120608.1 - released October 25, 2012, for Debian wheezy
+
+- uruk/script/uruk: Fix IPv6 firewalling in case uruk is used on a host (not
+  transit) firewall by applying patch contributed by Thijs Kinkhorst: Uruk
+  implemented RFC 4890 section 4.3: Recommendations for ICMPv6 Transit
+  Traffic. However uruk is used in some (many?) cases not as a transit firewall
+  but as a host firewall for destination

Bug#690475: release.debian.org: unblock: pear-horde-channel/4

2012-10-14 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello release team,

Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable.
This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists
of just the file /usr/share/php/.channels/pear.horde.org.reg.  This file
is needed for building

 php-horde-activesync
 php-horde-alarm
 php-horde-argv
 php-horde-auth
 php-horde-autoloader
 php-horde-browser
 php-horde-cache
 [...]
 php-horde-vfs
 php-horde-view
 php-horde-xml-element
 php-horde-xml-wbxml

(see (Bug #683554 RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies) for the complete list).

In current testing, the pear-horde-channel binary package is created from the
horde3 source package, which is scheduled for removal from Debian (Bug#683554:
RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies).

The debdiff of the old and new binary package is available from
http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/pear-horde-channel_3.3.12%2bdebian0-2.2_vs_4.debdiff
 .
The files debian/copyright as well as a full diff are available from
http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/ .

Unfortunately, the new pear-horde-channel Debian source package lacks
instructions on how to recreate the generated file pear.horde.org.reg.  I've
just filed Bug #690463 reporting this issue.

In the mean time, please allow pear-horde-channel/4 to enter Debian testing.

Thank you for considering.

Joost

unblock: pear-horde-channel/4


PS: See Bug#683628 release-notes: Re: Horde and Kolab removed for even
more background information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014172017.ge...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Bug#679913: unblock: frog/0.12.15-3

2012-07-02 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi,

Please unblock package frog.

Wheezy currently has frog/0.12.9-3.  Since frog/0.12.15-3 has new upstream
code, with lots of bugfixes, and depends upon the new frogdata package, both me
and upstream (Ko van der Sloot) consider this new version much more suitable
for inclusion in Debian wheezy.

Upstream writes about 0.12.15:
 
 Frog can be considered beta software, and, as of 2012-06, is being stabilized.
 All planned functionality (including a dependency parser, the multi-word
 chunker, Named Entity Recognition, Chunking and error handling and reporting)
 has been implemented and tested.

The new frogdata package is architecture: all, it installs about 100 MB of
data.  Package frog in wheezy (arch: any) installs 70 MB, frog in sid installs 
500 kB.

The only other change in frog 0.12.9-3 vs 0.12.15-3 is: more strict build
dependencies.

unblock frog/0.12.15-3

Thanks for your time!

Bye,

Joost

-- 
Ho Mitakuye Oyasin ※ joostvb@{牛在田里,ad1810}.com ※ http://mdcc.cx/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702123512.gb16...@beskar.mdcc.cx