Bug#991425: unblock: mupdf/1.17.0+ds1-2 [pre-approval]
Package: release.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #991425 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The new version is now available in unstable. Thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEE2JDTPWFH4vUeM4aHCjk1SrblfeEFAmD7f4ISHGtvc3RlckBk ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEAo5NUq25X3hT9EP/3gl8TAB7JhSBZ6pUILtkH5PpsD06+xT nO7zIi4oztl0Mqea5KrrtHILHJm9bf3TUMFFRLwLLc1+VJlKQdV6tp6oX69qVAVS ugfn+ELi4PVGflySF2D1kpBW3pyKqr7QwBTwfcsPro4/QmNVQBss7bx4GhC7n3FL EuJ8DA/YfS0B92V+Arh9e63CeA5P783nQZEQTF2TGiJ9pFT1tYIeaZm+icYXeTZU Dr5/sueWCs/QC9pMBNXyqJlMG6KoyJlE98yngm9n+GJDjGXgSwoLuwqg674sZ/WT IVQ43j6KeSh/aqcXsIXwJ/lCQNc4XpU0PnZgjrzlxw/mz3vQzluvl2Ze7qFBhjQp hQIKvYeRv72lghwl4C3kcpzRojeeFCjNV6syzhD57CxdRKlZ7KPPHIeI5yIW2UyV qSOkhXnrZTFA5keQuShKDbmwJ1l5yxI60xxwmPFpgssJM7hudH/Bz0exS19pseoi /Zp8wRLXmxeRof0iG+U5YcJzTngmSG7TndAIOkTGkULKNqvcBQIqVMMJpNMK1kv0 xr+XSTFK1vteaJoWVZR4rkj2Tq3DOj9d27fP9zywuclF2FH8WdKg6IjxKyR++4K2 U3itwqSjS5LusMmYgwev3U1oafGY1EBi2+5uD87WYsxrG0po8tDrg2LdWv61bhN1 1oEPXrZ6b4zY =r3KQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#675359: nmu: ibus-chewing_1.3.10+clean-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ibus-chewing_1.3.10+clean-3 . i386 . -m "Rebuild against new libchewing3-dev (Closes: #671118)" -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120531140426.14856.97125.report...@isil.kanru.info
Bug#619221: nmu: calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Calibre needs rebuild against the sip-api update: nmu calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against python-sip 4.12.1-1 (Closes: #616372)" Regards, Kanru - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-rc4+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2IEFEACgkQsbdbXzZcx6LxNwCgv8d17aJe3MB480qy7lj3x29i PDgAn0HDL+6Fj900Zap98SrFu0w5ciwH =JcfR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110322025829.15564.94524.report...@anar.kanru.info
Re: Freeze exception for mupdf 0.7-1
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:10:03 -0300, "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Kan-Ru Chen, > > On 29-08-2010 23:46, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > I'd like to upload a new upstream release that should fixes two FTBFS > > and one correctness bug: #590263, #590264, and #590245, respectively. > > > > In fact due to the bugs mentioned above, mupdf is not in testing > > yet. Would it be acceptable to add new packages to testing like this? If > > not, should I update the package in unstable and wait until squeeze > > is released? (hopefully it wouldn't take too long :) > > As you noticed, mupdf is not in testing. It is also a fairly new > package in Debian and a new upstream version would mean that it > is even less tested. > > Unless you have a stronger reason to unfreeze mupdf, I'm sorry > to say but we will release Squeeze without mupdf. > Thanks, I think so, too. Let it stay unstable for now. Regards, Kanru pgp0OhylmxFP3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Freeze exception for mupdf 0.7-1
Hi, I'd like to upload a new upstream release that should fixes two FTBFS and one correctness bug: #590263, #590264, and #590245, respectively. In fact due to the bugs mentioned above, mupdf is not in testing yet. Would it be acceptable to add new packages to testing like this? If not, should I update the package in unstable and wait until squeeze is released? (hopefully it wouldn't take too long :) Regards, Kanru pgpUA7Wyncc3f.pgp Description: PGP signature
