Bug#681788: unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-10

2012-07-22 Thread jaalto
On 2012-07-21 19:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 20:00:38 +0300, jaalto wrote:
| 
|  On 2012-07-21 12:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
|  | On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 18:47:14 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
|  | 
|  | Add required font package to debian/control::Recommends
|  |  
|  | Making the software deal sanely with a missing font (where SIGSEGV
|  | doesn't count as sane) is not an option?
|  
|  The policy says that font packages are not allowed to be listed in
|  debian/control::Depends. If this is permissable to be overridden, I
|  can move it from Recommends to Depends.
|  
| That's not what I meant.

Given the release time frame, upstream probably is unable to provide
updates on this at code level.

To improve it for release, I'm wondering if it would be more sensible
to play it safe and use:

 debian/controll::Depends

Currenly the measures in 1.3-10 are the ones that are allowed by
policy.

Jari

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#680951: unblock: ace-of-penguins/1.3-9

2012-07-12 Thread jaalto
On 2012-07-11 22:46, Neil McGovern wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
|  |  +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
|  
|  1.3-9 has been uploaded to unstable with this change.
|  
| 
| Ok, looking at the actual diff, I also see:
| -45-libpng15

Thanks for noticing. This is mistake. I have no explanation why the
patch line got deleted. It contains important libpng transition
support.

| +50-buildflags.patch

This was added to improve 2012-03-24 and I had forgetten to list
it. The patch enables CPPFLAGS, thus making full use of hardened build
flags (hardening=+all) added in 1.3-8.

I'll upload 1.3-10 with these fixes,
Jari


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature