Bug#863031: RM: nikola/7.6.4-1

2017-05-20 Thread martin f krafft
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

The current version in stable is almost 2 years old. Bug#801796 has
been tracking the requests for new versions to be packaged. However,
the maintainer hasn't engaged. Upstream co-maintainer Chris Warrick
has made it clear in #801796 that they'd rather not have nikola in
Debian, than an ancient version that annoys people and causes them
spurious bug reports.

Given how nobody has put in any work on nikola in almost 2 years,
I think we should have the decency to remove the package from
stretch and sid before the release.

nikola has no reverse dependencies, so…

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#857347: Acknowledgement (unblock: reclass/1.4.1-2)

2017-03-10 Thread martin f krafft
I approve of this upload and back the request for a freeze
exception.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Re: Bug#777124: unblock: di-netboot-assistant/0.38a+nmu1

2015-02-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Andreas B. Mundt andi.mu...@web.de [2015-02-05 11:42 +0100]:
 Note that di-netboot-assistant is used in debian-lan and removal from
 jessie would break part of the PXE installation functionality there.

The version in jessie also just doesn't work without manual
intervention, at which point most of the purpose of this package is
kinda rendered useless. The modifications essentially just provide
a standardised and tested approach to these otherwise manually
required changes.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
all information contained in the above is false,
for reasons of military security.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

2015-01-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org [2015-01-17 20:38 +0100]:
 Martin, did you actually test that version? If so, please let us
 know.

Yes I did, a long time ago though.

 I'm still not convinced. You didn't really give an argument why an
 update via unstable wouldn't work.

Because a newer version is already in unstable. It's my
understanding that you cannot upload 1.8.10p3-1.1 to unstable when
1.8.11p2-1.1 is already there. Am I wrong?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
never eat more than you can lift.
   -- miss piggy


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

2015-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2015-01-17 00:20 +0100]:
 It is a new upstream version. Jessie has 1.8.10, sid has 1.8.11.
 (The diff is also significant, even after stripping obvious
 noise.)

Ah, sorry. I had somehow overlooked that.

Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
Doable?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images.
   -- jean cocteau


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

2015-01-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org [2015-01-14 21:58 +0100]:
 I'm reluctant to allow this, as this essentially means dumping this new
 version into jessie untested. I would prefer if it was just uploaded to
 unstable (reverting the new upstream version there), to allow it to be tested
 there, and migrate to jessie that way. If there is a good reason why this
 isn't possible (if it introduces other issues in unstable by doing this),
 please explain why and I'll consider allowing a t-p-u upload.

It's my understanding that unstable contains a fixed non-new
upstream version which could migrate to jessie now. Christian would
still like to get p3 into jessie, but I agree that this should not
happen without testing.

So how about unblocking p2-1.1 and letting it into jessie, then
uploading p3-1 to unstable and revisiting the issue in a few days?
In the unlikely event that we need to push p2-1.2 or p2-2 to jessie,
we would need to use t-p-u to bypass unstable.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#770822: unblock: reclass/1.4.1-1

2014-11-24 Thread martin f krafft
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package reclass

There's been a bit of difficulty relating to the 1.4 upload to
unstable prior to the freeze resulting from another developer
uploading an NMU (1.3-2) that was required for another package
(boxer-data), which first needed to migrate to testing before we
could finally push 1.4-1. And then it turned out that 1.4-1 had
a bug, which we fixed by reverting the change upstream, resulting in
1.4.1-1, which missed the freeze window.

Due to this being a new upstream release, the diff is a little
longer than you'd want it, but I am annotating it and abbreviating
all the stuff that is related only to example data files:

diff -Nru reclass-1.3/ChangeLog.rst reclass-1.4.1/ChangeLog.rst
--- reclass-1.3/ChangeLog.rst   2014-03-01 14:45:02.0 +0100
+++ reclass-1.4.1/ChangeLog.rst 2014-10-28 15:52:25.0 +0100
@@ -5,6 +5,14 @@
 = == 
 Version   Date   Changes
 = == 
+1.4.1 2014-10-28 * Revert debug logging, which wasn't fault-free and so
+   it needs more time to mature.
+1.4   2014-10-25 * Add rudimentary debug logging
+ * Prevent interpolate() from overwriting merged values
+ * Look for init instead of index when being fed
+   a directory.
+ * Fix error reporting on node name collision across
+   subdirectories.
 1.3   2014-03-01 * Salt: pillar data from previous pillars are now
available to reclass parameter interpolation
  * yaml_fs: classes may be defined in subdirectories
diff -Nru reclass-1.3/debian/changelog reclass-1.4.1/debian/changelog
--- reclass-1.3/debian/changelog2014-10-14 11:06:24.0 +0200
+++ reclass-1.4.1/debian/changelog  2014-10-28 15:57:42.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,18 @@
-reclass (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+reclass (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release reverting the logging changes, which weren't ready
+yet.
+
+ -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:56:59 +0100
+
+reclass (1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release (closes: #761952).
+  * Compliant with Debian Policy 3.9.6.
+
+ -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:12:25 +0200
+
+reclass (1.3-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 
   * Add myself as uploader.
   * Update Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URLs.
@@ -6,7 +20,7 @@
   * Have python-reclass depend on python-pkg-resources.
 Closes: bug#757423.
 
- -- Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk  Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:06:20 +0200
+ -- Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk  Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:17:04 +0200
 
 reclass (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
diff -Nru reclass-1.3/debian/control reclass-1.4.1/debian/control
--- reclass-1.3/debian/control  2014-09-17 14:20:00.0 +0200
+++ reclass-1.4.1/debian/control2014-10-25 20:45:57.0 +0200
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 Section: python
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org
-Uploader: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
+Uploaders: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
 Build-Depends: python-setuptools, python, debhelper (= 8.9.7), python-sphinx, 
python-yaml
-Standards-Version: 3.9.5
+Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 XS-Python-Version: all
 Homepage: http://reclass.pantsfullofunix.net/
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/reclass.git
diff -Nru reclass-1.3/doc/source/extrefs.inc 
reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/extrefs.inc
--- reclass-1.3/doc/source/extrefs.inc  2014-03-01 14:45:02.0 +0100
+++ reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/extrefs.inc2014-10-28 15:52:25.0 
+0100
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 .. _Salt: http://saltstack.com/community
 .. _Ansible: http://www.ansibleworks.com
 .. _Hiera: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/hiera
-.. _Artistic Licence 2.0: 
http://www.perlfoundation.org/legal/licenses/artistic-2_0.html
+.. _Artistic Licence 2.0: http://opensource.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0
 .. _Jinja2: http://jinja.pocoo.org
diff -Nru reclass-1.3/doc/source/index.rst reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/index.rst
--- reclass-1.3/doc/source/index.rst2014-03-01 14:45:02.0 +0100
+++ reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/index.rst  2014-10-28 15:52:25.0 +0100
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 
 Licence
 ---
-|reclass| is © 2007–2013 by martin f. krafft and released under the terms of
+|reclass| is © 2007–2014 by martin f. krafft and released under the terms of
 the `Artistic Licence 2.0`_.
 
 Contents
diff -Nru reclass-1.3/doc/source/operations.rst 
reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/operations.rst
--- reclass-1.3/doc/source/operations.rst   2014-03-01 14:45:02.0 
+0100
+++ reclass-1.4.1/doc/source/operations.rst 2014-10-28 15:52:25.0 
+0100
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@
 Merging of parameters is done

Bug#770822: unblock: reclass/1.4.1-1

2014-11-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org [2014-11-24 23:34 +0100]:
  Due to this being a new upstream release, the diff is a little
  longer than you'd want it, but I am annotating it and abbreviating
  all the stuff that is related only to example data files:
 
 What's the justification for the only fixed bug being wishlist?

Thanks Jonathan for your time!

The wishlist is about packaging the new upstream version, which
includes bug fixes that didn't have Debian bug reports since I found
them or they were reported on Github.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
 well, I have others.
   -- groucho marx


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#745541: Any news?

2014-09-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org [2014-09-28 14:24 +0200]:
 This is fixed in unstable with the last virt-manager upload 1.0.1-2
 (which now contains virtisnt). Sorry for not getting around to it
 earlier.

So this should also fix #745537 in combination with libvirt from
backports, eh?

Thank you!

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
there's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#745541: Any news?

2014-09-24 Thread martin f krafft
Any news on this bug?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#641155: pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1

2011-09-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru [2011.09.11.0846 +0200]:
 So I have to upload this squeeze1 version to unstable,

No, we prepare 3.2.2-1 for unstable, which contains all the fixes we
propose for squeeze1. Once 3.2.2-1 moves to testing, we cherry-pick
the fixes into a new squeeze1 package.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
-- orbital


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]:
 I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own.

It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with
a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next
r-release?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
*** important disclaimer:
by sending an email to any address, that will eventually cause it to
end up in my inbox without much interaction, you are agreeing that:
 
  - i am by definition, the intended recipient
  - all information in the email is mine to do with as i see fit and
make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it
lends itself to. in particular, i may quote it on usenet.
  - i may take the contents as representing the views of your company.
  - this overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that
may be included on your message.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

2010-09-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2010.09.13.2137 +0200]:
 Looking at the bug report for this issue, the maintainer doesn't
 seem to think that this even qualifies for normal severity,
 which doesn't really sound like freeze exception material (I
 realise this a leaf package).

I expected this response, but I would appreciate if you made an
exception. From all I can tell, this is unproblematic and would
alleviate an inconvenience from our users, which didn't exist in the
lenny version.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost;
 that is where they should be. now put the foundations under them.
-- henry david thoreau


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

2010-09-12 Thread martin f krafft
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package libapache-mod-musicindex

The current libapache-mod-musicindex has a memory access bug
(pointer accessed outside scope), causing it to return an invalid
Content-Disposition for playlist downloads. This is primarily
inconvenient to users (whose default handler application will not be
respected, as the browser is required by the standard to ask what to
do if it cannot decipher the Content-Disposition.

We found and fixed the problem last week, and 1.3.5-1 has been in
the archives for 10 days. Please let it into squeeze.

libapache-mod-musicindex (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

 * Fix Content-Disposition for playlists (Closes: #595232)


unblock libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Bug#596659: unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

2010-09-12 Thread martin f krafft
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mdadm

Although I expect there to be a 3.1.5 soon, this version fixes
numerous serious bugs in the version currently in testing, as well
as som others:

mdadm  (3.1.4-1+8efb9d1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Added patch with Makefile fix from upstream (commit 8efb9d1) to fix
compiler/linker problem on non-x86 architectures (closes: #595290).

 -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:01 +0200

mdadm (3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release, which closes:#595039 and addresses the following
issues too:
- reverts move of incremental map (closes: #585015).
- fixes mdadm monitor in the case of an inactive (or start-failed) raid0
  or linear array (closes: #539154).
- prevent --remove faulty from skipping renumbered devices
  (closes: #587550).
- fixed overflow when growing a RAID6 (closes: #589493).
  * However, disable the incremental assembly upstream turned on in 3.1.3 for
now, this will have to wait until after the squeeze release.
  * initramfs/hook: make sure configuration file exists before accessing it;
thanks to Michael Prokop for the fix and NMU (closes: #589836).
  * initramfs/hook: Match UUID case-insensitive while checking for running
arrays not listed in mdadm.conf; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe for the
patch (closes: #583545).
  * Fix URL in the bug reporting preamble (presubj) (closes: #589833).
  * Add I/O rescheduling functionality to the checkarray script and make the
cronjob use the idle priority; this should now minimise the impact of the
monthly re-check on the running system; Florian Heigl had the idea
(closes: #592149, #508123).

 -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:44:59 +0200



unblock mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Git for Squeeze

2010-08-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com [2010.08.15.0031 +0200]:
 I’m writing for advice.  The old plan was to release with git
 1.7.2.x, but now that Squeeze is frozen I am having mild doubts.

As you well know, the freeze isn't a hard freeze, so considerations
like yours are in order, but there is no categorical reasoning
against newer upstreams.

Nobody yet knows how long the freeze will last, so it might be worth
now to expend the effort to put in there a version of Git you are
ready to support for 2–3 years.

 The only risky bits from “git log --first-parent
 maint-1.7.1..maint”
 I could find:

Of the issues you identify, none look critical. I'd say the
by/log-follow feature could/should go in together with the fix, but
that's diverting from upstream. jk/url-decode might be good with the
patch in pu, but the others aren't necessary, and you'll be best off
reverting them.

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
-- orbital


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-04-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.04.03.0957 +0200]:
 Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the
 necessary binNMUs? Thanks.

After further investigation, it seems that the problem was specific
to the NMU package, which was never uploaded. I don't remember where
the NMU came from, nor do I still have the package. Sorry.

Consider the issue closed.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
this space intentionally left occupied.
 
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team,

Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
although occasionally there is something to be said for solitude.
  -- special agent dale cooper


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]:
 * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
  Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?
 
 why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a
 dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything.

I don't exactly know, but on the previous build, it seems that
configure decided that libvformat was not available, and thus didn't
compile/install m_vcf. If I recompile now, it just works.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
if voting could really change things, it would be illegal.
 -- revolution books, new york
 
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


unblock: mdadm 3.1.1-1

2010-02-10 Thread martin f krafft
Please unblock mdadm 3.1.1-1 and let it enter testing. My goal is to
then move the experimental package to unstable and try to get it
ready for squeeze too. The incremental assembly stuff is
off-by-default.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
what's your conceptual continuity? --
 well, it should be easy to see:
 the crux of the bisquit is the apopstrophe!
-- frank zappa


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Time-based freezes

2009-11-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luk Claes l...@debian.org [2009.11.11.1828 +0100]:
  Any reaction to this?
 
 This seems like an invitation to get whatever statement to attack.

No, I wasn't going to attack anything. Sorry, I should have made
that clear maybe. I just want a baseline on which to formulate a new
press statement.

 What are the reasons you want an updated statement? The media
 coverage on the time based freezes does not seem wrong to me or am
 I missing something?

You mean apart from the media that missed the freeze part of the
regularity and think that Debian will be doing time-based
*releases*?

There are still media expecting us to freeze in December.

The media seem to think that what happened in July was officially
sanctioned (due to it being an official press announcement). Ever
since, a lot of discussion, the decision was reverted, and
a tentative freeze date announced. No announcement about any of this
was made, so you cannot really blame the media for assuming that the
goals of July are still current.

Does this make sense and explain my motivation now?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
vulgarity is simply the conduct of other people.
-- oscar wilde


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Time-based freezes

2009-11-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luk Claes l...@debian.org [2009.11.11.1859 +0100]:
 As far as I have seen it was not the message, but the title that was wrong.
 
  There are still media expecting us to freeze in December.
 
 We did send another announcement [1] to rectify that.
 
  The media seem to think that what happened in July was officially
  sanctioned (due to it being an official press announcement). Ever
  since, a lot of discussion, the decision was reverted, and
  a tentative freeze date announced. No announcement about any of this
  was made, so you cannot really blame the media for assuming that the
  goals of July are still current.
 
 There was another announcement [1].
 
  Does this make sense and explain my motivation now?
 
 Not really. There was another press announcement [1] and as far as
 I've seen the media used indeed sometimes wrong titles, but the
 focus if not all of their message was around time based freezes
 and not so much about any particular date.

Hm, strange. I cannot recall the article(s) that made me write my
initial message. It definitely seemed like this announcement was
never seen or absorbed by anyone. Maybe the two were too close to
each other.

So http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html
together with the announcement about a tentative goal March is still
current?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
those who are faithful know only the trivial side of love:
 it is the faithless who know love's tragedies.
-- oscar wilde


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Time-based freezes

2009-11-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009.10.26.1054 +0100]:
 As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still
 taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if
 I scan the pertinent media sources.
 
 Luk's e-mail updates have not overly embraced the original proposal,
 but the media does not read those, it seems.
 
 We have a non-binding freeze date for squeeze in March, but I am not
 sure if that is the beginning of the next cycle, or just in
 anticipation of the 18 month release cycle that would have squeeze
 come out in August 2010 (a five month freeze is long, but probably
 realistic).
 
 0. http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg9.html
 
 Would it be possible to get an updated statement? Will there be
 regular freezes from now on? What period? I think we should issue
 a press release about this.

Any reaction to this?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
have you drugged your kids today?


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Time-based freezes

2009-10-26 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team members,

As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still
taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if
I scan the pertinent media sources.

Luk's e-mail updates have not overly embraced the original proposal,
but the media does not read those, it seems.

We have a non-binding freeze date for squeeze in March, but I am not
sure if that is the beginning of the next cycle, or just in
anticipation of the 18 month release cycle that would have squeeze
come out in August 2010 (a five month freeze is long, but probably
realistic).

0. http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg9.html

Would it be possible to get an updated statement? Will there be
regular freezes from now on? What period? I think we should issue
a press release about this.

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
in the country of the blind,
 the one-eyed man is not king.
 he is taken to be a hallucinating lunatic.
 -marshall mcluhan


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

2009-08-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org [2009.08.03.1047 +0200]:
  In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this
  point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state
  the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide
  security upgrades for squeeze).
 
 Oh, did they?

That was just one possible outcome/example.

  Hope this helps,
 
 I dont think so. You made it sound as if Debian would follow
 Ubuntu or Marks wishes, and that Ubuntu/Canonical has committed to
 support Debian. AFAIK, we dont and they dont.

I phrased it badly then. It's exactly points like this which need to
be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? And iff
Canonical/Ubuntu is part of the reason, then state exactly where the
benefits for Debian are, and ideally how this decision was reached
in the first place.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
a fundamentalist is someone who hates sin more than he loves virtue.
 -- john h. schaar


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.07.13.1938 +0200]:
 Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is that the
 changelog has made the BTS believe that mdadm 2.6.9-3 is
 a descendent of 3.0~devel3-1, and thus affected by #526806.

Hm, so the BTS pays attention to changelog stanza order (which is
chronological) without differentiating between experimental and
unstable?

Thanks for spotting this. I hope I fixed it now.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
there are two groups of people in the world: those who believe that
the world can be divided into two groups of people, and those who
don't.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.07.14.1020 +0200]:
 Not quite.  It needs to be marked as /fixed/ in 2.6.9-3, rather than
 notfound.
 
 notfound simply removes the version from the list of versions in
 which the bug has been explicitly marked as present; it has no effect
 on the changelog parsing so 2.6.9-3 is still believed to contain the
 bug.  Marking it as fixed  in that version isn't right since the bug
 never existed there, but in this case it is the means of telling the
 BTS that it shouldn't be treated as containing the bug.

Done. Thanks.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
she is absolutely inadmissible into society. many a woman has a past,
 but I am told that she has at least a dozen, and that they all fit.
-- oscar wilde


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Don Armstrong d...@debian.org [2009.07.14.1125 +0200]:
  Hm, so the BTS pays attention to changelog stanza order (which is
  chronological)
 
 It's not necessarily chronological.

It was in this case.

 If you're uploading experimental packages, the penultimate version
 should either be the preceeding experimental upload, or the
 unstable version which the experimental upload is based on. If
 you're uploading an unstable version, the experimental uploads
 should not show up in the changelog unless the unstable version is
 based upon a version which is in experimental.

Serious time to start auto-generating changelogs from commit
messages...

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
officer, arrest that man! he's whistling a copyrighted song.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-12 Thread martin f krafft
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
don't hate yourself in the morning -- sleep till noon.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-05-26 Thread martin f krafft
... has been in testing for 20 days. Should not affect d-i.

 mdadm  (2.6.9-3) unstable; urgency=low

   * Fix the multipath prereq patch (#516605) and make it exit after printing
 the prerequisites (closes: #526793).
   * Change my previous recommendation for postfix over to the new virtual
 package default-mta (see #522300 and #508644).
   * Enhance bugscript, which now asks to run as root (sudo/su) if invoked by
 a normal user.
   * Include MD5 sums of md-related files in initrd in bug reports.
   * Add grub2 information retrieval to bugscript.
   * Trap SIGINT and thus prevent ctrl-c from terminating the bugscript
 prematurely.

 -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Tue, 05 May 2009 11:46:22 +0200

mdadm (2.6.9-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Fix the check of whether mdadm.conf defines all devices known to the
 system; thanks Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn (closes: #525655).
   * No longer pass -k to modprobe, which has been deprecated for a long time;
 thanks to Jan Hudec (closes: #51).
   * Remove Mario Joußen from the uploaders list, since his email started
 bouncing.
   * Prepare mdadm source to use quilt, with the long-term goal to switch to
 TopGit, once I find the time.
   * Cherry-pick caa0f6c  667e66d from Neil into a quilt patch to fix gcc-4.4
 compiler issues (closes: #505375).

 -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:08:28 +0200

mdadm (2.6.9-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release.
   * Do not set -eu in the bugscript to maximise information output in the case
 of errors.
   * Make initramfs script depend on multipath to ensure its script is run
 before ours (closes: #516605).
   * Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent (closes:
 #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only one I could recommend,
 and since the alternative does not affect people who already have an MTA
 installed, or have a preference, it won't affect them.
   * Honour debconf pre-selection of mdadm/initrdstart (closes: #516802).
   * Incorporate patch from Adrian Bridgett: the initramfs hook now checks to
 see if all known arrays are listed in mdadm.conf and issues a warning if
 this is not the case (closes: #519328).
   * Make checkarray skip over arrays still marked auto-read-only
 (closes: #510641).
   * Add cron.daily snippet from Paul Slootman to run one-shot scans every day
 to ensure that failed arrays don't go unnoticed (closes: #497949).
   * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.1; no changes necessary.

 -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org  Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:04:47 +0200 

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
it is better to have loved a short man
than never to have loved a tall.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


[SRM] mdadm 2.6.7.2-3, take two

2009-05-07 Thread martin f krafft
mdadm 2.6.7.2-3 is in s-p-u, now without the postfix dependency,
waiting for approval.

Closes: 510641 514923 516605 516802 51 522300
Changes:
 mdadm (2.6.7.2-3) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 .
   * Change my previous recommendation for postfix over to Debian's default
 MTA, exim4 (see #522300 and #508644).
   * Cherry-pick bug script enhancements from sid version:
 - Enhance bugscript, which now asks to run as root (sudo/su) if invoked by
   a normal user.
 - Include MD5 sums of md-related files in initrd in bug reports.
 - Add grub2 information retrieval to bugscript.
 - Trap SIGINT and thus prevent ctrl-c from terminating the bugscript
   prematurely.
 - Add information about udev and device links in /dev to bugscript output.
 .
 mdadm (2.6.7.2-2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix start/stop runlevels in header of mdadm monitor init.d script
 (closes: #514923)
   * Do not set -eu in the bugscript to maximise information output in the case
 of errors.
   * Make initramfs script depend on multipath to ensure its script is run
 before ours (closes: #516605).
   * Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent (closes:
 #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only one I could recommend,
 and since the alternative does not affect people who already have an MTA
 installed, or have a preference, it won't affect them.
   * Honour debconf pre-selection of mdadm/initrdstart (closes: #516802).
   * Make checkarray skip over arrays still marked auto-read-only
 (closes: #510641).
   * No longer pass -k to modprobe, which has been deprecated for a long time;
 thanks to Jan Hudec (closes: #51).
   * Remove Mario Joußen from the uploaders list, since his email started
 bouncing.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
consciousness: that annoying time between naps.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

2009-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2009.05.04.0932 +0200]:
 * Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent
 (closes: #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only
 one I could recommend, and since the alternative does not
 affect people who already have an MTA installed, or have
 a preference, it won't affect them.
 
 This is broken.  The default mta in debian is exim4, whether you
 like it or not.  It has nothing to do with what you want to
 recommend.

If exim4 is installed, then the alternative is never used. If people
don't like postfix being pulled in by mdadm, they can choose
another MTA, including exim4. This is an improvement over the
current situation, which might pull in citadel-server instead.

Anyway, if this is what keeps the update from entering 5.0.2, I'll
obviously fix it.

Time to attack this ridiculous exim4 default choice. Monolithic
setuid approaches must die.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
it may look like i'm just sitting here doing nothing.
but i'm really actively waiting
for all my problems to go away.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

2009-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org [2009.05.04.1057 +0200]:
  If exim4 is installed, then the alternative is never used. If
  people don't like postfix being pulled in by mdadm, they can
  choose another MTA, including exim4. This is an improvement over
  the current situation, which might pull in citadel-server
  instead.
 
 A better improvement would be to have the same defaults as the
 rest of the distribution.

Sure.

 The appropriate change would be to create a default-mta virtual
 package that is always provided by only one MTA at a time, so you
 might want to work on this solution instead of breaking important
 packages.

I will look into this; Holger just pointed it out to me.

I'll also provide an updated mdadm package, but I'll wait a few days
in case there are other issues.

Finally I'll note that I didn't do anything like breaking important
packages.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
cs class at 8:30am. ugly. if you can wake up early enough to get
 good grades here, you need to develop hacker habits...
 -- jeff bailey on #debian-devel


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


new release goal default-mta? (was: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2)

2009-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
[moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log]

also sprach Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org [2009.05.04.1856 
+0200]:
 FWIW as previously discussed on debian-devel starting with the
 lastest upload (4.69-10) exim4-daemon-light provides default-mta.

Excellent. If there are no objections, I'll formulate a squeeze
release goal and file the bugs.

(updated mdadm coming to s-p-u on Thursday, are there other
comments?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/05/msg00024.html)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

2009-05-03 Thread martin f krafft
Hey SRMs,

I just uploaded mdadm 2.6.7.2-2 to s-p-u, here is the changelog
entry:

 mdadm (2.6.7.2-2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix start/stop runlevels in header of mdadm monitor init.d script
 (closes: #514923)
   * Do not set -eu in the bugscript to maximise information output in the case
 of errors.
   * Make initramfs script depend on multipath to ensure its script is run
 before ours (closes: #516605).
   * Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent (closes:
 #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only one I could recommend,
 and since the alternative does not affect people who already have an MTA
 installed, or have a preference, it won't affect them.
   * Honour debconf pre-selection of mdadm/initrdstart (closes: #516802).
   * Make checkarray skip over arrays still marked auto-read-only
 (closes: #510641).
   * No longer pass -k to modprobe, which has been deprecated for a long time;
 thanks to Jan Hudec (closes: #51).
   * Remove Mario Joußen from the uploaders list, since his email started
 bouncing.

All changes are cherry-picked from the testing and unstable
versions.

Please accept.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
distrust all those who love you extremely
 upon a very slight acquaintance and without any visible reason.
  -- lord chesterfield


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

2009-02-28 Thread martin f krafft
please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
the ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't.
 -- hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: Bug#514818: lenny-backports not a recognised distribution

2009-02-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.02.11.0858 +0100]:
 Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
 those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
 create an etch-backports upload, but I haven't changed that in order to
 keep the diff minimal and because --bpo is a convenience method).


also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt h...@ftwca.de [2009.02.11.0927 +0100]:
 Please upload.

I suggest to also include the fix to --bpo. I'll gladly review the
diff.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
hi! i'm a .signature virus!
copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 uploaded, please unblock

2009-02-05 Thread martin f krafft
Following my recent call for testers, I've had 7 positive and
0 negative reports, so I've uploaded mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 to unstable,
which should hopefully take care of those RC bugs once and for all.

The new version should not have any effect on the operation within
D-I at all.

Please unblock.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
i wish i hadn't slept all day, it's really lowered my productivity
   -- robert mcqueen


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

2009-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luca Capello l...@pca.it [2009.02.04.1208 +0100]:
 I am going to re-install another HP Vectra VEi8 with the same
 specifications as above: should I test our udeb, as well?

Not necessary. Thanks!

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
people with narrow minds usually have broad tongues.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

2009-02-03 Thread martin f krafft
I found a bit of time to package up mdadm 2.6.7.2-1, which fixes two
RC bugs, but I cannot test it. I've built unofficial packages for
i386 and amd64 and put them at

  http://debian.madduck.net/repo/pool/main/m/mdadm/

so please try them out if you can, otherwise I won't be able to
upload them soon, which might delay the lenny release.

mdadm (2.6.7.2-1~unreleased.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release, created for Debian lenny:
- fixes assembly of arrays that are being reshaped (closes: #512475)
- this bug was also responsible for other assembly problems
  (closes: #498505, #499643, #496334)
Again, many thanks to Neil Brown for being such an awesome upstream.

  * Documentation updates:
- Actually install David Pashley's blog post added in 2.6.7.1-1, and
  register it with doc-base.
- Update md.txt to version 2.6.26 (the lenny kernel).
- Add a dump of a website detailing md superblock formats.
- Register FAQ, md.txt, RAID5-vs-RAID10, README.recipes with doc-base
- Cherry-picked UID/UUID typo in mdadm.conf(5) manpage fix (commit
  0e69da7) (closes: #506245).

  * Added Italian debconf translation; thanks Luca Monducci (closes: #506572).

The upstream changes between 2.6.7.1 and .2 are:

piper:..an/pkg/mdadm/mdadm|build|% git cherry -v mdadm-2.6.7.{1,2}
+ 3b9d24da5bdb88f5668d795f22c93911f55682f6 Fix an error when assembling arrays 
that are in the middle of a reshape.
+ a856723ab6baf9423d7c27fd61c795fc59c26f1d Italic/bold fixes in man pages.
+ 5b53734ed8d9648205957b1b555a4e45fdcb510d Add text to man pages suggesting 
partition type to use for version 1.x metadata.
+ 15f37068018812e7669e0a1b5da5f53c01eff7e7 Couple more man page fixes
+ 257abe70415427f471ad245f202f153c0aa6d1f5 Describe the HOMEHOST entry in the 
mdadm.conf man page.
+ 84ba6910af0bb94d599967bc1f3cc62b62f7e94a Fix confusing usage in md.4 man page.
+ fd53a2c5e58438b923a0a03ea40ea92103c54bac Cosmetic cleanup of some messages.
+ 69b24ddc4ef64c46edff7e10463b8e95665b3434 Remove .UR .UE macros from man page 
because the don't do what we want.
+ d305b6e623bed4767f9c97f01ca5db46482c430b Release mdadm-2.6.7.2

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
friendships last when each friend thinks he has
 a slight superiority over the other.
   -- honoré de balzac


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


freeze exception: net-tools 1.60-22

2008-12-06 Thread martin f krafft
Please let net-tools into testing:

net-tools (1.60-22) unstable; urgency=low

  * Add new command line option -W/--wide to netstat which prevents
truncation of IPv6 addresses (Closes: #254243). Thanks Luar Roji.

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. teach a man to
 fish, and he'll buy a funny hat. talk to a hungry man about fish,
 and you're a consultant.
  -- scott adams


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

2008-09-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.09.20.2303 +0100]:
 Unblocked. It will be removed the second there's an rc bug.

Sounds fair, thanks! I'll make sure this happens if there is an RC
bug.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
i'd rather be riding a high speed tractor
with a beer on my lap,
and a six pack of girls next to me.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

2008-09-14 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team:

ttf-aenigma (0.0.20080510.dfsg-1) has spent 12 days in unstable and
I know from myself and those who use it that it just works. It is
a very simple package. It would be really nice if it could be part
of lenny. Would you please let it through?

The package was uploaded before the freeze but had to go through the
NEW queue, and with DebConf etc., that was delayed for a while.
Joerg also spotted a small licence problem, which I fixed
immediately during DebConf and thus reuploaded it.

ttf-aenigma provides 465 truetype fonts, and Philip and myself spent
a good 3-4 months to get the package into shape for Debian,
convincing upstream to let us distribute it in a Free fashion. It
would be a real shame if lenny users couldn't benefit from that.

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
dies ist eine manuell generierte email. sie beinhaltet
tippfehler und ist auch ohne großbuchstaben gültig.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


logcheck 1.2.68 freeze exception

2008-08-26 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team, please unblock logcheck 1.2.68, which only adds
a few new rules and has been in testing for almost an entire month.

 logcheck (1.2.68) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Thanks to Hanspeter Kunz for all his patches.
 .
   * ignore.d.server/dovecot:
 - ignore connection closed messages.
 - ignore forwards and to cope with missing 's at the end of long msgids.
 - ignore closed connection messages also when connection is reset by peer.
 .
   * ignore.d.server/postfix:
 - ignore NOQUEUE: milter-reject messages.
 - enhanced TLS library problem rule to also ignore bad
   certificate errors.
 - added rule to ignore SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol
   messages.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
.   `___
(o-(o-(o-(o-   (o-(o-(o-   /\/| | |
//\//\//\//\   //\//\//\  `  /\/\/l-+-|
v_/_   v_/_   v_/_   v_/_  v_/_   v_/_   v_/_.`  /\/\/|_|_|


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


RM: jppy/unstable [ia64] -- NVIU; ia64 build screws up, thus preventing testing migration

2008-07-15 Thread martin f krafft
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy

No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere else, this
is likely an ia64 problem.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
i always had a repulsive need to be something more than human.
  -- david bowie


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


please unblock mdadm 2.6.4-2

2008-04-22 Thread martin f krafft
Please let mdadm 2.6.4-2 into testing. The udeb is unaffected by the
changes.

 mdadm (2.6.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adjusted logcheck rules to follow kernel changes; thanks to Frédéric
 Brière (closes: #462478).
   * Debconf templates and debian/control reviewed by the debian-l10n-
 english team as part of the Smith review project. Closes: #463673
   * Debconf translation updates (thanks to Christian Perrier for compiling
 them):
 * Japanese. Closes: #464438
 * Galician. Closes: #464454
 * French. Closes: #465984
 * Czech. Closes: #466306
 * Dutch. Closes: #466543
 * Russian. Closes: #466577
 * Portuguese. Closes: #466794
 * German. Closes: #466989
 * Vietnamese. Closes: #467118
   * New debconf translations:
 * Finnish. Closes: #468048
   * Fixed bashism in mdadm-raid init.d script; thanks to Raphael Geisser
 (closes: #471874).
   * Do not output warning when run from cron and no arrays are found
 (closes: #474542).
   * Add doc-base registration file; thanks to Roberto C. Sanchez
 (closes: #451684).
   * Reschedule mdadm Sunday to 00:57 instead of 01:06 to prevent double
 invocation on DST change (closes: #449244).
   * Bump DH compatibility level to 6; no changes required.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
security at micro$oft: how do we secure a billion dollar profit?


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


netconf lenny: possible freeze exception?

2008-03-04 Thread martin f krafft
Hi release team,

With the planned freeze in July but it looks like I won't be able to
get netconf into testing before August - unless of course a GSoC
student or other people help out. Unfortunately, this means that
netconf could not be made default in Debian before lenny+3. I'd much
rather be able to aim for lenny+2, though.

I would thus like to ask whether it would be possible to get
a tentative freeze exception.

netconf is a new package without reverse dependencies. In as such,
I cannot see any technical reasons against a freeze exception, but
I may of course be wrong.

Having already talked to Andi on IRC, I understand that you have
reservations about making exceptions during the freeze. This is why
I bring up the issue now already, in the hope that it won't need an
exception anymore by the time August comes around.

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
we did rate the microsoft security researcher as
 less-bad than the people who prepare the carcasses for dissection in
 biology laboratories.
 -- michael moyer, executive editor of _popular science_


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


unblock mdadm/2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3

2007-12-19 Thread martin f krafft
subject says it all; please.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
la lune, c'est comme les canards
il faut aimer caresser les chats
pour avoir envie d'y aller.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


molly-guard for r1

2007-06-10 Thread martin f krafft
I've fixed #426107 in molly-guard 0.3-1, which also uses a much more
reliable way to determine whether a halt/reboot request comes in via
SSH. I definitely want to have #426107 fixed in r1. Could I propose
0.3-1 for r1 or do you want me to backport the fix?

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
wenn elephanten tanzen leidet das gras.
 -- die vogelpredigt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Debian release cycle for enterprise ?

2007-06-07 Thread martin f krafft
On 2007-06-07 10:07, Frédéric PICA wrote:
 I want to use debian in a production environnement and I think
 this life time is to short.

I agree with you but see little chance that Debian will fix this.
Our 18 months target right now is a compromise, and those never suit
everyone.

To support a release for 4-5 years, we would need substantially more
resources: people who backport security fixes and maintain the
archive, mirror operators who don't mind additional gigabytes,
package maintainers who don't mind cooperating on old packages, and
upstreams who are equally cooperative.

I am not saying your idea is bad, just that Debian can't do it.

However, since you're not the only one with such interests, I could
imagine a group forming to support e.g. etch for the next 4-5
years, backed by financial resources from the companies who are
interested in this. If I were you, I'd find similarly minded people
and pool resources.

But even though I said I agree, I don't think I'll join such an
endeavour since it would conflict directly with my activities as
developer of Debian unstable.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
SUSE: Soll Unix Sein, Eigentlich.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

2007-04-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.04.04.2256 +0200]:
 BTW, according to the udev maintainer on IRC, this is not an
 appropriate solution because it is an abuse of a non-public udev
 interface.

BTW, that udev maintainer, with all due respect, could really talk
to me and/or the bug report about these things. That udev maintainer
could also explain how a script in /sbin with a manpage and all does
not constitute a public interface.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Erik Norlander / Music Machine (Disc 2: Fall)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

2007-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
#416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into
etch? If so, urgency=high upload?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
i always choose my friends for their good looks and my enemies for
 their good intellects. man cannot be too careful in his choice of
 enemies.
  -- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

2007-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.03.31.1206 +0200]:
 #416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into
 etch? If so, urgency=high upload?

changes:
  http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm?op=comp[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
the english take english for granted.
but if we explore its paradoxes,
we find that quicksand can work slowly.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

2007-03-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.03.18.2317 +0100]:
 Sorry, only RC bugs are considered anymore.

Okay, thanks for the explanation.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
it is impossible to foresee the consequences of being clever.
-- cristopher strachey


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

2007-03-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.03.18.1632 +0100]:
 Previous versions were pushing the limit, now it's over the limit,
 sorry not unblocking.

The limit?

What is the limit and how did I go over it? I fixed a typo in
debian/docs, added a one-liner to postinst to handle very special
cases of installations, where a user would have deleted the logcheck
group but not the user (only jordi manages that kind of stuff), and
otherwise added more filters.

This is logcheck we're talking about. Please unblock it.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
be the change you want to see in the world
 -- mahatma gandhi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

2007-03-11 Thread martin f krafft
Logcheck 1.2.55 fixes a few very minor and obvious bugs and adds
the Galician debconf translation, but mainly adds new rules. Please
unblock it. It's been in testing for 10 days.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logcheck/news/20070228T121703Z.html

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Mathias Grassow  Mathias Kohlmann / The Art of Sysyphus (Volume 4)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9

2007-02-24 Thread martin f krafft
Hi release team,

please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9. I only added two debconf translations:

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20070224T160206Z.html

Thanks!

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
the strength of women comes from the fact
 that psychology cannot explain us.
 men can be analyzed, women merely adored.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.54

2007-02-10 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team,

I would greatly appreciate if you could exempt logcheck 1.2.54 from
the freeze. As usual, it updates filters but has no functionality
changes over the previous version.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logcheck/news/20070130T161703Z.html

Cheers,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if you can dream it, you can do it
-- walt disney


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.53

2007-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.25.1144 +]:
 I would greatly appreciate if you could exempt logcheck 1.2.53 from
 the freeze. It's scheduled to go in during Friday's second Britney
 run.

Executive summary: please let 1.2.53 through, I'll take
responsibility :)

I forgot to include the changelog in my last request:
  http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logcheck/news/20070116T063201Z.html

It's long, but I've only added filters, except for the last three
entries. 1.2.53 is definitely fit for a freeze exception.

   * logcheck now chdir()s to /var/lib/logcheck before cleanup of the temporary
 directory. This should hopefully fix some of the Check temporary
 directory messages.
 
   * Check for existence of home directory of the system account. If it points
 to a non-existing directory, change it to /var/lib/logcheck. Also ignore
 the corresponding log entry by usermod.

These two were necessary to prevent logcheck failures when it
encountered a problem and couldn't dump a temporary file because it
had no home directory.

   * Modified the system account Gecos name to logcheck system account.

And this one is just a cosmetic change over a previous version that
will only affect new installations.

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
literature always anticipates life.
 it does not copy it, but moulds it to its purpose.
 the nineteenth century, as we know it,
 is largely an invention of balzac.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.53

2007-01-25 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team,

I would greatly appreciate if you could exempt logcheck 1.2.53 from
the freeze. It's scheduled to go in during Friday's second Britney
run.

Cheers,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if you can dream it, you can do it
-- walt disney


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-8

2007-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.16.0009 +0100]:
  mdadm 2.5.6-8 contains a small update over -7, and I would feel much
  more comfortable to have that in etch. Could you thus please unblock
  mdadm 2.5.6-8?
 
 Unblocked.

Dankeschön.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
to get back my youth i would do anything in the world, except take
 exercise, get up early, or be respectable.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.52 (and 1.2.53)

2007-01-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.15.1026 +0100]:
  To increase the likelyhood to get it into etch, I would like to
  do so with urgency medium or even high. I have been testing
  pre-releases[1] on 9 production machines and I feel confident
  that there is no harm done in shortening the unstable cycle.
 
 I don't see any reason why a higher urgency is needed here to get
 it into etch.

You make it sound like we won't be releasing in the next 11 days
then.

But okay, my mind's not set. I'll make a regular upload of 1.2.53
when 1.2.52 has migrated.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Solar Project / Force Majeure


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-8

2007-01-15 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team:

mdadm 2.5.6-8 contains a small update over -7, and I would feel much
more comfortable to have that in etch. Could you thus please unblock
mdadm 2.5.6-8?

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20070108T011704Z.html

From the point of view of the udeb, nothing has changed.

Cheers,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
security here. yes, ma'am. yes. groucho glasses. yes, we're on it.
 c'mon, guys. somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
 can't deal with deconstructionist humor. code blue.
  -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.52 (and 1.2.53)

2007-01-12 Thread martin f krafft
Dear release team,

Two questions ahead: freeze exception for logcheck 1.2.52 and
request for permission to upload 1.2.53 with urgency high or medium.
See below for reasoning.

As new software is coming into etch, new log messages are appearing
on my systems on a daily basis. I try to update logcheck as fast as
I can. 1.2.52 is due to enter etch tomorrow, and I would appreciate
if you accepted it:

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logcheck/news/20070102T180204Z.html

Apart from new filters, the only real change is that postinst now
assigns a Gecos name to the logcheck user, unless one is already
defined. This was done in response to #402800.

Once 1.2.52 is accepted into etch, I would like to upload 1.2.53
with more filter updates (and no functional changes). I am doing so
on the basis of extrapolation from [0].

0. http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20061230.120041.5e431373.en.html

To increase the likelyhood to get it into etch, I would like to do
so with urgency medium or even high. I have been testing
pre-releases[1] on 9 production machines and I feel confident that
there is no harm done in shortening the unstable cycle.

1. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/sid/main/binary-all/admin/

Could I please have permission to set urgency=high on the 1.2.53
upload? If not, can I use medium?

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if you can dream it, you can do it
-- walt disney


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


permission to upload new logcheck upstream

2006-12-28 Thread martin f krafft
logcheck is a native package, so when i added some filters,
i produced a new upstream version. I'd like to see 1.2.52 in etch
and would like to reqest permission to upload it to unstable. I'll
get in touch with d-r again when it's time for a freeze exception.

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
we all know linux is great...
 it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
 -- linus torvalds


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


freeze exception: mdadm 2.5.6-7

2006-12-28 Thread martin f krafft
mdadm 2.5.6-7 has been in unstable for two weeks and even though the
diff between -6 and -7 is not as small as it should be, I feel
confident that -7 can go into etch.

Changelog:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20061213T144703Z.html

None of the changes affect the udeb or d-i.

I would appreciate if you unblocked it.

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
why didn't noah swat those two mosquitoes?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Really 2.6.18?

2006-11-10 Thread martin f krafft
Are we sure we want 2.6.18 as the kernel for etch? I reported two
bugs, #391929 and #391955, the first of which is readily
reproducible on 2.6.18 only (including ABI -2), meaning I cannot see
the problem with 2.6.17. #391955 is rather sporadic.

I know the kernel team has been incredibly busy, but I have received
zero reaction to my bug reports, which makes me think that they may
not have been seen? After all, I did originally assign them to the
kernel packages causing the problems: linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd64 and
linux-image-2.6.18-1-686, rather than the linux-2.6 source package;
they're reassigned now.

Do we really want to release 2.6.18 with etch? If I alone am already
able to identify two hard kernel freezes, there must be plenty
others, no? Do we want to lock out users into 2.6.18 with its bugs?

Wouldn't it be better to let 2.6.18 mature a bit more, provide
2.6.17 with etch, and let 2.6.18 follow with r1?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
half a bee, philosophically,
 must ipso facto half not be.
 -- monty python


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Really 2.6.18?

2006-11-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.10.1102 +0100]:
 Are we sure we want 2.6.18 as the kernel for etch? I reported two
 bugs, #391929 and #391955, the first of which is readily
 reproducible on 2.6.18 only (including ABI -2), meaning I cannot see
 the problem with 2.6.17. #391955 is rather sporadic.

Correction, #391955 does not persist in 2.6.18-4; I can readily
reproduce it in 2.6.18-3. Bug closed.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Amplifier / Amplifier (Bonus Disc)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

2006-11-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.09.0524 +0100]:
 I'd prefer to delay this until after the release of RC1 (which is
 being delayed somewhat because we still need BYHAND processing for
 three architectures). This means that mdadm should hopefully be
 able to migrate sometime next week.

I respect your preference, Frans, but doesn't this also mean that
mdadm 2.5.6 will be rather unlikely to make it?

Or should I upload 2.5.6 now?

Remember: 2.5.5 fixes an RC bug that's currently in testing.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
try to remove the color-problem by
 restarting your computer several times.
 -- microsoft internet explorer's readme.txt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

2006-11-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.09.1156 +0100]:
 Yes, it does.  But we do have to draw the line somewhere; is there any
 particular reason that 2.5.5 isn't an ok place to draw that line?  9 of 10
 days old and I've tested it extensively sounds like exactly where we want
 to be right now for a package as important as mdadm; about to upload a new
 upstream version of mdadm that hasn't been tested yet, much less so.

which is why I was not going to upload 2.5.6 until 2.5.5 was in
testing and then see if 2.5.6 makes it through.

Frans, what's there to say against letting mdadm 2.5.5 be part of
d-i RC1 and thus to migrate to etch today? It fixes an RC bug in
2.5.3 currently in testing, and I would definitely prefer people to
use 2.5.5 instead of the 2.5.3 series.

2.5.6 basically fixes #396582, which is an important bug that could
very well bite people who are trying to boot systems with degraded
arrays. It does include other changes, but minor ones:

  
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm/mdadm/trunk/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0

As said before, changes between testing and 2.5.6 available now are
basically all because I fed them to upstream or asked upstream to
fix a certain issue.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port, and the bus is
 interrupted at a very last resort, and the access of the memory makes
 your floppy disk abort, then the socket packet pocket has an error to
 report.
  -- speedstream


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

2006-11-08 Thread martin f krafft
mdadm 2.5.5-1 has been in sid 9/10 days and I've tested it
extensively; d-i should not be affected by any of the changes
between 2.5.3 currently in testing and 2.5.5 in sid. Thus, I hereby
request its unblocking.

Upstream just released 2.5.6. Basically, 2.5.4-2.5.6 have been
releases specific to Debian, fixing RC and important bugs, and have
been made in close cooperation between Neil Brown (who's a great
upstream btw) and myself. Therefore I am very interested in getting
2.5.6-1 into etch, but I won't upload 2.5.6-1 until 2.5.5 is in
testing.

Thanks!

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
the mind of the thoroughly well-informed man is a dreadful thing.
 it is like a bric-à-brac shop, all monsters and dust,
 with everything priced above its proper value.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


permission to upload mdadm 2.5.5

2006-10-16 Thread martin f krafft
mdadm upstream is releasing 2.5.5 really soon now, and it fixes
#393314 (FTBFS on sparc/ia64/arm).

I've closely cooperated on both 2.5.4 and 2.5.5. All patches between
2.5.3 (which is currently in testing) and 2.5.5 are true bug fixes
and no drastic changes have been introduced which would affect the
use of mdadm by d-i.

I would like to see 2.5.5 in etch. Do I have permission to upload?
(I am specifically asking because with the 2.5.4-1 upload I kind of
violated the rules)...

Cheers,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
logik ist analsadismus: gedanken werden gewaltsam
durch einen engen gang gepreßt.
-- frei nach lacan


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: mdadm/sid into etch please

2006-09-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.07.1321 +0200]:
 Could you please give a thumbs-up on mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2
 migrating into etch, please? It's blocked because of the udeb...

Hm, #385994 is RC (I just bumped it to serious).

I'll upload -3 with urgency high because it basically doesn't change
any of the functionality, and I really would prefer not waiting for
another 10 days. There's more to do on mdadm once I am comfortable
with the version in testing, and -3 looks like the ticket.

So please, if at all, unblock 2.5.3.git200608202239-3, which is
forthcoming. The changelog is here:

http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm/mdadm/trunk/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0

I'll wait for Joey Hess' reaction to the debhelper bug I just filed
about adding a -v argument to dh_installdebconf, which would be the
cleanest fix for #385994.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Psychomuzak / The Exstasie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


unblock mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2

2006-09-05 Thread martin f krafft
Please unblock the udeb-generating mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2
from entering testing. It fixes a number of serious issues with the
2.5.2-* packages and should definitely replace 2.5.2-7 in testing.

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
NP: Berg Sans Nipple / Form of...


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901

2006-09-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.01.1843 +0200]:
 http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901
 is dated April 19th, 2006, and points to
 http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/
 
 Looks like somebody was a little too quick with
 the cut-and-paste.
 
 I hope you can correct this soon, before you get flooded
 with emails like this.  Maybe it's too late.  ;-)

Thanks, I've forwarded it to the right people. We'll see what we can
do. Your help and quick reaction is greatly appreciated!

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
darwinism is nothing without enough dead bodies.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Summary: Secure APT Key Management

2006-07-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [2006.07.30.1408 +0100]:
 On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
  The way he envisions key management is that every Debian machine
  trusts the SPI CA.  Debian should provide a webpage for downloading
  and verifying keys, protected by SSL/TLS.  The use would require
 
 I think a proper SSL key, trusted using the regular methods is
 important, but I don't think it's reliable enough to be our primary/sole
 verification method.

It's going to be hard to come up with additional methods, IMHO, so
if you have anything in mind, please share and I can stop wrecking
my brain over it.

I think the most important thing still is that we should *never*
install and trust a key automatically.

I also vote for per-release keys. The argument that they will be
easier to crack is invalid IMHO because we cannot use limited
lifetime as security measure anyway. Thus, we anticipate that the
key will be cracked and have a proper procedure to follow when
that's the case.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
crying is the refuge of plain women but the ruin of pretty ones.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Fwd: Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0

2006-07-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jason Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.27.1901 +0200]:
 And, as Brian Durant pointed out, this isn't just about the iMac G5
 but also the Power Mac G5 (PowerMac 9.1) as well. In fact, Debian
 chokes on most of Apple's newer PowerPC machines. I and many others
 had been looking to Etch as a solution, but it won't provide one with
 2.6.17 and I'm not looking forward to the potential of waiting through
 the lifetime of another stable release before gaining support.
 
 It's important, IMHO, that 2.6.17 _not_ be selected as the default
 kernel but rather 2.6.18 (or later) for the reasons discussed on
 debian-powerpc... even if that means delaying the release of Etch.

With all due respect, but I oppose to delaying etch because of
powerpc sound problems. If we get 2.6.18 ready by October, so be it,
but if not, then it's either no cookie for powerpc, or a separate
powerpc release of etch a bit later.

Don't forget that it was liw who bribed Apple to use broken hardware
just so he would stand a slight chance at not having to get
a tattoo.

And please do not cross-post messages.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
love your enemies; they'll go crazy
trying to figure out what you're up to.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Secure APT Key Management

2006-07-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.26.1601 +0100]:
 If you can get ftp-master to put the key in that place then I'm
 willing to patch apt to use it for key updates with enough checking
 and interactivity to make it save.

I am much in disfavour of any method that automatically makes APT
trust keys downloaded over the network. If the key came from media
we distribute, this is fine, but there's just too much danger of
MITM or DNS-poisoning attacks for automatic upgrades, unless we
finally start using SSL.

The way I envision key management is that every Debian machine
trusts the SPI CA. Then we provide a page to download and verify
keys, protected by SSL/TLS. Finally, we give the user easy-to-use
tools to install these keys, and proper error messages from APT that
will make it obvious what to do.

I don't think it's asking too much of our users to manually declare
trust for a new release. But we should definitely get rid of the
one-year-long archive keys, which make no sense. Instead, have a key
for etch, one for sid, one for etch+1, one for security, and so on.
The user can then pick which ones s/he wants to trust.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
no micro$oft components were used
in the creation or posting of this email.
therefore, it is 100% virus free
and does not use html by default (yuck!).


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Secure APT Key Management

2006-07-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]:
 While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting
 binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure
 package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped
 accepting signed binary packages.

Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with
signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that
this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in
Mexico.

Cheers,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
i must get out of these wet clothes and into a dry martini.
 -- alexander woolcott


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Secure APT Key Management

2006-07-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.26.1711 +0100]:
 Feel free to start a separate discussion about it though if you feel
 that's useful.

(on another mailing list)

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
sailing is, after all, a kind of grace, a kind of magic.
-- phil berman


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7

2006-07-20 Thread martin f krafft
Please unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7 and let it into testing so that the d-i
team can work with it for beta4.

Thanks,

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
in contrast to the what-you-see-is-what-you-get philosophy,
 unix is the you-asked-for-it,-you-got-it operating system.
   --scott lee


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7

2006-07-20 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.20.1732 +0100]:
 AFAIK mdadm 2.5.2-7 is still fairly new in unstable. From a d-i POV there 
 is no need to rush it into testing.

Then I misunderstood you.

 We plan to release D-I Beta3 using mdrun, which is still present in this 
 version of mdadm and has been tested to work.
 The deprecation of mdrun in D-I will happen after the Beta3 release. 
 Before we can do that mdadm 2.5.2-7 needs to be in testing, but that is 
 no reason to rush it.

Okay, but it still needs to be unblocked. :)

Also note that I purposely referred to beta4, not beta3.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
the unix philosophy basically involves
giving you enough rope to hang yourself.
and then some more, just to be sure.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: CVE-2006-2314: debian dovecot package vulnerable. (fwd)

2006-06-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.15.1832 +0200]:
 Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing
 to let it into the next update?

I am sorry, I accidentally replied to this as if it had come in via
a different mailing list.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
hi! i'm a .signature virus!
copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: CVE-2006-2314: debian dovecot package vulnerable. (fwd)

2006-06-15 Thread martin f krafft
I tend to agree with Joey on the issue, though I do think it's not
very nice that the postgresql security upgrade breaks other
packages. But going via stable-proposed-updates seems like the right
path.

Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing
to let it into the next update?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
they that can give up essential liberty
 to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  -- benjamin franklin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Erich Schubert: SELinux support is a release goal for etch

2006-06-04 Thread martin f krafft
From Erich Schubert's blog:

 SELinux is an [official release goal for etch][1].
 
 [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-
 announce/2006/05/msg00015.html
 
 However, we're currently far from that. So far, very few developers
 are actually using SELinux (if any), or even testing it. I won't be
 doing anything on SELinux for the next 6 weeks at least, more likely
 6 months.
 
 So currently I don't see how we can manage this goal, unless more
 DDs (and of course users; you don't need to be allowed to upload
 packages) help getting SELinux properly integrated.

I know from discussions with Manoj that it's basically just three
or four people working on it. While I am very interested in SELinux
and use it myself (but don't have much time available either,
unfortunately), I think it's *much* more important that we do meet
our release schedule and I'd thus rather see this release goal
dropped than our release delayed.

I don't want to step in the way of people who're serious about
getting it in (in addition to the 3-4 already working on it), but
I wanted to get my thoughts out.

-- 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
no survivors? then where do the stories come from I wonder?
   -- captain jack sparrow


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Erich Schubert: SELinux support is a release goal for etch

2006-06-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.04.1208 +0200]:
 You might want to read debian-devel-announce with the explanation of
 release goal...

Thanks, that was the needed hit with the clue bat. So, as you
explained on IRC, selinux-related issues are approved for 0-day
NMUs, but they won't delay the release.

Erich: that should settle it. Mind to update your blog respectively?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
philosophy: unintelligible answers to insoluble problems.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please let mdadm-udeb into testing

2006-06-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.0526 +0200]:
 Hint added.

Muchas gracias, señor.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
never speak disrespectfully of society.
 only people who can't get into it do that.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: please let mdadm-udeb into testing

2006-06-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.0423 +0200]:
 I uploaded mdadm-udeb 2.4.1-2 into unstable tonight. Please let it
 progress into testing (it's a UDEB and thus requires a hint,
 AFAICR).

16:20  fjp vorlon: Please remove hint for mdadm. In 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin warns that mdrun 
 will be deprecated and so migrating mdadm will break Beta2.

There seems to be a misunderstanding. Of course I would not remove
mdrun and request the migration.

mdadm 2.4* will continue to support mdrun as before (no changes). It
has been deprecated in 2.5-1. I will remove mdrun from 2.5 only when
it's ready to move to unstable.

For now, let 2.4 go into testing. If we release etch with it, that
would be just okay. 2.5 doesn't really add that many new features.
But then again, we might just well make it. Upstream is very nice.

Anyway, mdadm 2.4.1-3 replaces -2. Please readd the hint.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
politics is the entertainment branch of industry.
-- frank zappa


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Re: Drop the minor release number

2005-07-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.08.1854 +0200]:
 How do you explain RCS/CVS? 

I am sorry to everyone who tries. Same applies to subversion.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
imagination is a quality given a man
 to compensate him for what he is not,
 and a sense of humour was provided
 to console him for what he is.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Release team for etch?

2005-06-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.10.2300 +0200]:
 Currently, I am planning to stick around for etch.  If we're still waiting
 for etch two years from now, it's hard to predict how I'll feel at that
 point. :)

QUICK, ALL: this should be enough of a reason to get etch out in
a year!

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Release Notes - Proposed last minute changes

2005-06-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.01.0822 +0200]:
 There is also a time bomb for people that installed Sarge/Testing in the
 last months. apt-setup has created sources.list lines with testing
 distribution in them.

WTF? debian's tools should really not use the canonical names, but
the code names instead. I think this is a bug in apt-setup. Though
you are right in pointing this out as a potential problem.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.
 - friedrich nietzsche


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

2005-06-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.01.1317 +0200]:
 -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ]  [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
 +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
 
 I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix.

I do not have the mental capacity after this day to judge it, but
vorlon took care of it, and I do trust his judgement. From a cursory
look, it seems that the only downside of the fix is a stray error
message for devfs users.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
#define emacs eighty megabytes and constantly swapping.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

2005-05-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.26.1110 +0200]:
 Does the package fail to install in this case?  That's perfectly reasonable
 behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from debconf.  The
 solution for such cases is for the user to either preseed the debconf cache,
 or not expect non-interactive installs to work.

Right now it fails even with priority==high. My patch would create
the behaviour you describe. Let me know if I should upload.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
linux is like a wigwam.
no gates, no windoze, and an apache inside.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

2005-05-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Tore Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.26.1209 +0200]:
   With regard to this particular bug, I think the default should be not
  to create an instance like Martin suggested yesterday.  Why a package
  like Zope /insists/ on creating an instance for you is beyond me..

Zope 2.6 is old, and it's a beast, including the packaging. If need
be, I can investigate whether removing the instance creation would
make sense at this stage of the release.

   But in my opinion, Sarge is so far overdue that holding it up awaiting
  such a fix would be a clear disservice to our users.  I'd prefer simply
  documenting the existence of this bug in the release notes, unless of
  course a properly fixed package is uploaded soon, and is granted a
  freeze exception.

I would be okay with that, though I would want to explicitly mention
in the release notes that the use of Zope 2.6 is highly discouraged,
and Zope 2.7 should be used instead, if at all possible.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because
 fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; truth isnt.
   -- mark twain


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: zope bugs

2005-05-25 Thread martin f krafft
tags 310644 + confirmed patch
thanks

also sprach Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.25.1606 +0200]:
 Basically, zope will not install, either from scratch or via upgrade
 from woody, if debconf is configured to hide questions of medium
 priority.  This probably does not warrant a package update at this
 point, since the workaround is simple (simply reconfigure debconf).
 This probably should be documented in the Release Notes, though.

Debian Zope is and has been a catastrophe. For this reason, pkg-zope
exists on alioth, which I am going to officially start at debconf5.
If zope gets mentioned in the release notes, you should also say
that it's really just preferable at the moment to run Zope from
/usr/local! If I had my ways, I'd get zope* removed from Debian
sarge. :)

In the meantime, the following patch to debian/zope.config or
/var/lib/dpkg/info/zope.config should fix the problem:

55c55
 db_input medium $PKG/admin-user || true
---
 db_input critical $PKG/admin-user || true
66c66
 db_input medium $PKG/admin-password || true
---
 db_input critical $PKG/admin-password || true
71c71
 db_input medium $PKG/admin-password-confirmation || true
---
 db_input critical $PKG/admin-password-confirmation || true

If this warrants a new upload, I can prepare one within minutes...
it's building now...

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
the search for the perfect martini is a fraud. the perfect martini
 is a belt of gin from the bottle; anything else is the decadent
 trappings of civilization.
-- t. k.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

2005-05-25 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Tore Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.25.1814 +0200]:
   Even with this patch applied, I would think the bug would still appear
  with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, no?

Yes, and then we have a problem because there simply is no default
for a password, is there? And I refuse to create a default password.

An alternative would be to accept an empty password, render zope
unstartable until the password is set, and display a message to this
effect (which would be mailed if noninteractive was set).

This might not be trivial, but I think it would be the best
solution...

zope2.7 handles this by not creating an instance in postinst. We
will use the same approach also for zope 2.6, but not before sarge.

Anyway, do people want me to fix this? If so, how?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
sed -e '/^[when][coders]/!d' \
-e '/^...[discover].$/d' \
-e '/^..[real].[code]$/!d' \
/usr/share/dict/words


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: libcwd/non-free

2005-05-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.24.0331 +0200]:
 Does this mean that the libcwd in testing is also non-free, and is
 in the wrong section?

Well, it's QPL, and I was never convinced that it was non-free. Some
people on -legal seemed to think so, and I was indifferent at the
time.

So theoretically, yes... 0.99.37 is just about as non-free as
0.99.39. If this is reason enough for you to get 0.99.39 from
non-free into sarge, please do. If not, I'd much rather have 0.99.37
removed for good.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time
 to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.
-- oscar wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: libcwd/non-free

2005-05-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.24.0344 +0200]:
 libcwd is licensed under the QPL, about which there was an extended
 debian-legal thread a while back and non-free seemed to be the consensus
 (he says warily, not particularly liking trying to summarize
 debian-legal).

I don't think consensus ever existed on debian-legal. For what it's
worth, I disagree with you.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
/.ing an issue is like asking an infinite number of monkeys for advice
   -- in #debian-devel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


please accept adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 (RC fix)

2005-05-23 Thread martin f krafft
adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 fixes #310246 and should be in incoming now.
Build works in pbuilder. Please accept it.

 adduser-ng (0.1.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Urgency high to target sarge release as this fixes an RC bug.
   * Applied patch by Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
 debian/rules, which prevents generation of PDF documentation (it does not
 generate all documentation anymore, but explicitly generates the plain
 text and HTML versions for the available languages).
 Rationale for PDF removal: plain text and HTML documentation are enough,
 and PDF documentation is available from the upstream website.
 (closes: Bug#310246)
   * Added README.pdf to refer to the upstream website PDF documentation to the
 two -doc packages.
   * Removed unneeded passivetex build dependency.
   * Added build dependency on w3m for plain text documentation generation from
 HTML.

 eb7a7a1d759319b295168bd38193fedd 797 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.dsc
 b245a02962dfe354055888530f6e0a64 70446 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.tar.gz

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
this space intentionally left occupied.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


libcwd/non-free

2005-05-23 Thread martin f krafft
I am not sure what the status is on non-free packages, but libcwd
has really not been treated nicely:

  220 days old (needed 10 days)

I have requested it to be built several times and for architectures
to be masked (or whatever that was called), but have been ignored
apparently.

Since non-free will also have a sarge component and 0.99.37 has many
critical bugs that 0.99.39 fixes, I herewith request for libcwd to
be hinted for inclusion, and if it's only i386. The library was
designed for i386 only, but so far, I have not been able to get it
to break on other architectures. Thus, the other architectures have
been left in, but I would be satisfied if it at least came for i386.

Thanks for your consideration.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
emacs sucks, literally, not an insult, just a comment that it's
 large enough to have a noticeable gravitational pull...
   -- mercury on #debian-devel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


  1   2   >