Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?) > > I don't see where it has a dep on something provided by hdf5? > Sorry my mistake. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100223121105.gd9...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
"Francesco P. Lovergine" writes: [hdf5 binNMUs] > AFAIK there are still missings: > > gnudatalanguage No idea how I forgot that. Done now. > mpb Was in the list, already done :) > gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?) I don't see where it has a dep on something provided by hdf5? > h5utils As gnudatalanguage, forgotten. Probably used a broken regex. Also done now. Marc -- BOFH #132: SCSI Chain overterminated pgp1LdZCWqW0g.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: > >> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be > >> > >requested? (@RMs) > >> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > >> > > >> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and > >> > the follow-up. > >> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would > >> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. > > Yes, please. > > I've now constructed my own list and scheduled the following binNMUs: > nmu 1 yorick-hdf5_0.8.0-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc > mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new > hdf5" > nmu 2 udav_0.5.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips ia64 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 . -m > "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 udav_0.5.2-1 . s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel sparc armel i386 . -m > "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 2 plplot_5.9.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 s390 alpha hppa kfreebsd-i386 powerpc > sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 2 h5py_1.2.1-2 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 2 pygpiv_2.0.0-1 . mips . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 mpb_1.4.2-14 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 > kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 4 tessa_0.3.1-4 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 > kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 octave3.0_1:3.0.5-7 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc > mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new > hdf5" > nmu 1 libgpiv_0.6.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel > ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 hdf-eos5_5.1.12.dfsg.2-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc > mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new > hdf5" > nmu 3 minc_2.0.18-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 > kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 octave-optim_1.0.6-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc > mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new > hdf5" > nmu 2 pytables_2.1.2-3 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 mathgl_1.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 > kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 pfstools_1.8.1-1.1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel > ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 2 labplot_1.6.0.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel > ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 meep_1.1.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 > kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" > nmu 1 r-cran-hdf5_1.6.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc > mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new > hdf5" > AFAIK there are still missings: gnudatalanguage mpb gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?) h5utils -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100223115825.gc9...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: >> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be >> > >requested? (@RMs) >> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. >> > >> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and >> > the follow-up. >> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would >> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. > Yes, please. I've now constructed my own list and scheduled the following binNMUs: nmu 1 yorick-hdf5_0.8.0-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 udav_0.5.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips ia64 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 udav_0.5.2-1 . s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel sparc armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 plplot_5.9.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 s390 alpha hppa kfreebsd-i386 powerpc sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 h5py_1.2.1-2 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 pygpiv_2.0.0-1 . mips . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 mpb_1.4.2-14 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 4 tessa_0.3.1-4 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 octave3.0_1:3.0.5-7 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 libgpiv_0.6.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 hdf-eos5_5.1.12.dfsg.2-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 3 minc_2.0.18-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 octave-optim_1.0.6-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 pytables_2.1.2-3 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 mathgl_1.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 pfstools_1.8.1-1.1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 2 labplot_1.6.0.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 meep_1.1.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" nmu 1 r-cran-hdf5_1.6.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5" Let's see what breaks. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 143: bps Beats Per Second. (Felix Deutsch) pgpC8dqlEbQAN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
Hi all On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:19:03PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: > > >On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > >> Just a gently polling. > > >> > > >> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python > > >transition > has > > >> major priority... > > > > > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be > > >requested? (@RMs) > > > > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > > > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and > > the follow-up. > > > > Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would > fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. Sorry for my 'unclear' question. This was indeed that what I wanted to ask, if each maintainer is asked to to a separate binNMU request, or if it will be done in 'a row'. Thanks Franceso, if you will do it! Bests Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: > > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be > > >requested? (@RMs) > > > > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > > > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and > > the follow-up. > > > > Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would > fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. Yes, please. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1266873136.8296.1052.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> > Just a gently polling. >> > >> > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python >> transition > has >> > major priority... >> >> What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested? >> (@RMs) > > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and the > follow-up. That's not enough. I only looked for octave-related packages that didn't have hdf5 as build-dependencies (hdf5 is pulled in by Octave). Sorry, but I didn't want to touch other maintainer's ground. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010010043.ga6...@atlan
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: > >On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > >> Just a gently polling. > >> > >> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python > >transition > has > >> major priority... > > > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be > >requested? (@RMs) > > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and > the follow-up. > Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100222191903.ga2...@frankie.is-a-geek.org
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Just a gently polling. > > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition > has > major priority... What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested? (@RMs) binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and the follow-up. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a1bff86cef704b7c9deea80c329f7...@internal.avcosystems.com
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
Hi all On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Just a gently polling. > > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has > major priority... What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested? (@RMs) Bests Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Just a gently polling. > > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has > major priority... > > - Forwarded message from "Francesco P. Lovergine" > - > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:09 +0100 > From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" > To: debian-rele...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Hi RMs > > > > Long due migration to 1.8.4 has been started (pending in NEW). That will > > require a binNMU for all depedent packages. Thanks. > > > > This is the list of the packages that buil-dep on hdf5 and require a binNMU: > (build-dep on > libhdf5-serial-dev|libhdf5-openmpi-dev|libhdf5-mpich-dev|libhdf5-lam-dev) > > octave3.2 Upstream has released a new release of octave (3.2.4). Unless the release team objects, I intend to upload it tomorrow. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
Just a gently polling. Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has major priority... - Forwarded message from "Francesco P. Lovergine" - Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:09 +0100 From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" To: debian-rele...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Hi RMs > > Long due migration to 1.8.4 has been started (pending in NEW). That will > require a binNMU for all depedent packages. Thanks. > This is the list of the packages that buil-dep on hdf5 and require a binNMU: (build-dep on libhdf5-serial-dev|libhdf5-openmpi-dev|libhdf5-mpich-dev|libhdf5-lam-dev) yorick-hdf5 udav jhdf gpiv scilab magics++ gnudatalanguage pytables pygpiv paraview h5py mpb gpivtools octave3.2 mathgl libfvm grads tessa h5utils labplot meep octave3.0 med-fichier gdal libgpiv hdf-eos5 r-cran-hdf5 cdo ecs libcgns minc -- Francesco P. Lovergine - End forwarded message - -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
