Re: Advocating for unstable->testing flow
Greetings, Mattia and Release Managers, On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:51:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi, On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:55:00AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: Greetings, Fellow Debianites and Release Managers, I would like to advocate for two pacakges to enter testing if no critical bugs are found in them: Please file a proper unblock bug for each of them, stating your case there. Mails in the mailing list are easily overlooked, and the regular process asks for bugs anyway. Understood, in fact I did that right after having sent the mail to the mailing list. - isospec: a very small library for science; This one is already in buster, and looking at the changelog I think it should really be unblocked (using -march is a RC bug, you should actually file one affecting the version in buster and fixed in unstable…) Done with a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org. - daps: an all-architecture package to build documentation; Also for this package, have I made an unblock bug report. Thank you for your attention and your work, Sincerely, Filippo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Filippo Rusconi, PhD ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Scientist at CNRS ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ http://msxpertsuite.org http://www.debian.org
Re: Advocating for unstable->testing flow
Hi, On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:55:00AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > Greetings, Fellow Debianites and Release Managers, > > I would like to advocate for two pacakges to enter testing if no critical bugs > are found in them: Please file a proper unblock bug for each of them, stating your case there. Mails in the mailing list are easily overlooked, and the regular process asks for bugs anyway. > - isospec: a very small library for science; This one is already in buster, and looking at the changelog I think it should really be unblocked (using -march is a RC bug, you should actually file one affecting the version in buster and fixed in unstable…) > - daps: an all-architecture package to build documentation; -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Advocating for unstable->testing flow
Greetings, Fellow Debianites and Release Managers, I would like to advocate for two pacakges to enter testing if no critical bugs are found in them: - isospec: a very small library for science; - daps: an all-architecture package to build documentation; I have packaged these software pieces myself because my msxpertsuite software needs them. I really would like msxpertsuite to be part of stable, because it is a replacement of massxpert that had a pretty good popularity contest rate. It is not a recent development, and I currently have a paper in revision where I pretend it will be in Debian :-). isospec and daps do not have reverse-dependencies other than msxpertsuite. In the hope that you will consider this request favorably, Sincerely, Filippo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Filippo Rusconi, PhD ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Scientist at CNRS ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ http://msxpertsuite.org http://www.debian.org
