Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:23:42AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-19 19:08]: > > This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel. > > I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that. > > We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default > compiler. fwiw, i'm comfortable with switching the kernel to gcc-4.2. i've been using it for kernels on all my boxes since around christmas, i believe (when i found problems with gcc-3.4 that made me move.) i haven't tried it on any "older" boxes (pa1.1 based) but it seems to be working well enough both 32-bit and 64-bit on my newer machines. cheers, kyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
* Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-19 19:08]: > This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel. > I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that. We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default compiler. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > > kernel bug? > > > > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... > > Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If > anything, more breakages gives us a better chance to debug it. > > I'd just need gcc-4.2 to stick around for a while for the kernel. Kyle, This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel. I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > kernel bug? > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If anything, more breakages gives us a better chance to debug it. I'd just need gcc-4.2 to stick around for a while for the kernel. regards, Kyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
Kyle McMartin a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a >> kernel bug? >> > > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... I am actually asking that, because on the 3 problems detected when switching glibc from gcc-4.2 to gcc-4.3, 2 were due to a bug on the glibc side. > Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If > anything, more breakages gives us a better chance to debug it. Agreed. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
Kyle McMartin a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Grant Grundler writes: >> ... Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get the right version? >>> gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are both available in the same version in >>> testing and unstable. >> This is what I tested the 2.6.25-rc6 kernel with: >> >> j6k:~# gcc-4.3 -v >> Using built-in specs. >> Target: hppa-linux-gnu >> Configured with: ../src/configure linux gnu >> Thread model: posix >> gcc version 4.3.1 20080309 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-1) >> j6k:~# >> >> And during update (currently running), I pulled: >> >> Get:11 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-hppa64 4.3.0-3 [3113kB] >> >> Get:12 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-base 4.3.0-3 [105kB] >> >> >> So I'll rebuild a kernel with that tomorrow and report back if no one >> else can test that sooner. >> > > It's still broken, I tried today. > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a kernel bug? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Grant Grundler writes: > ... > > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > > > the right version? > > > > gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are both available in the same version in > > testing and unstable. > > This is what I tested the 2.6.25-rc6 kernel with: > > j6k:~# gcc-4.3 -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: hppa-linux-gnu > Configured with: ../src/configure linux gnu > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.3.1 20080309 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-1) > j6k:~# > > And during update (currently running), I pulled: > > Get:11 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-hppa64 4.3.0-3 [3113kB] > > Get:12 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-base 4.3.0-3 [105kB] > > > So I'll rebuild a kernel with that tomorrow and report back if no one > else can test that sooner. > It's still broken, I tried today. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: ... > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > > the right version? > > gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are both available in the same version in > testing and unstable. This is what I tested the 2.6.25-rc6 kernel with: j6k:~# gcc-4.3 -v Using built-in specs. Target: hppa-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure linux gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.1 20080309 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-1) j6k:~# And during update (currently running), I pulled: Get:11 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-hppa64 4.3.0-3 [3113kB] Get:12 http://mirror.anl.gov testing/main gcc-4.3-base 4.3.0-3 [105kB] So I'll rebuild a kernel with that tomorrow and report back if no one else can test that sooner. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > ... > > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > > > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. > > > > > > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. > > > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > > the right version? > > gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are both available in the same version in > testing and unstable. ok - I'll check tonight if that's the same version Kyle and I tried 3-4 weeks ago. I reported the symptom and version numbers in this forum. To remind: the symptom was NIC driver ws reporting it could see traffic (ifconfig stats) but remote host was not seeing ICMP responses - only ARP traffic. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
Grant Grundler writes: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > ... > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. > > > > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > the right version? gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are both available in the same version in testing and unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. > > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get the right version? thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
Matthias Klose a écrit : > Ludovic Brenta writes: >> Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload >> gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as >> for all other archs. >> >> As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and >> mipsel, if depends on gnat-4.2 which is not in testing and has RC >> bugs. >> >> I've committed the necessary change in the Subversion repo but I will >> not upload without approval. So, is it OK to upload now? > > please wait until Tue. the immediate need for the upload apparently > was worked around by hinting both gnat-4.2 and gnat-4.3 into testing. > > I'd like to re-ask the hppa porters, if they want to make 4.3 the > default for lenny. > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?
Ludovic Brenta writes: > Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload > gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as > for all other archs. > > As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and > mipsel, if depends on gnat-4.2 which is not in testing and has RC > bugs. > > I've committed the necessary change in the Subversion repo but I will > not upload without approval. So, is it OK to upload now? please wait until Tue. the immediate need for the upload apparently was worked around by hinting both gnat-4.2 and gnat-4.3 into testing. I'd like to re-ask the hppa porters, if they want to make 4.3 the default for lenny. A short notice from the d-r team about by-passing RC reports would be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
