Re: Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

2006-08-23 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
> Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" reproducible.
> 

Right. The buildd is set up to deliver SIGBUS on unaligned accesses.
This is configurable, and not the default kernel behaviour. It is,
however, a Good Thing(tm). Unaligned accesses are quite costly, so
catching and fixing them on the buildd is ideal. However, in most cases
they are nontrivial to fix and should be rebuilt and uploaded and a 
bug filed with upstream...

When I initially added prctl for parisc, iirc there were three options
logging an unaligned access, delivering a SIGBUS, or silently catching
it and continuing on.

I have a machine that can be used to do these rebuilds, if need be.

Cheers,
Kyle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

2006-08-23 Thread Matthias Klose
The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" reproducible.

Christopher Martin writes:
> reassign 342545 libgcc2
> stop
> 
> On Thursday 10 August 2006 00:25, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It hasn't been, because I can't see any way that libglu1-mesa could
> > have anything to do with the failure in question.  libglu1-mesa
> > should not be a dependency of the tool that's failing with SIGBUS in
> > the build log.
> >
> > I would suggest that someone should investigate this further and get
> > a clear answer on the nature of the bug, because I really don't buy
> > that libgcc skew is to blame.
> 
> Fair enough, but before I take off for the weekend, I'm sending this 
> report back to libgcc2, since it seems to have been established long 
> ago that this isn't a Qt bug, and it really should be assigned to 
> something in the toolchain. I note that, for a time, the problem was 
> thought to be in glibc, so perhaps the glibc team would again be worth 
> consulting.
> 
> Cheers,
> Christopher Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS on hppa (again)

2006-07-29 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
thanks

please make sure, that qt-x11-free is built using g++-4.1 on hppa. The
binary packages still depend on libgcc2 in some way.

Note, that (before the release) we need to rebuild all binaries
depending on libgcc2 on hppa, so that the dependency is replaced by
libgcc4.

  Matthias

Christopher Martin writes:
> reopen 342545 2.3.6-15
> severity 342545 grave
> stop
> 
> Unfortunately, the qt-x11-free FTBFS on hppa has re-occurred:
> 
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=qt-x11-free&ver=3%3A3.3.6-3&arch=hppa&stamp=1153689954&file=log&as=raw
> 
> The error is exactly the same as before:
> 
> /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.6/bin/uic -L 
> /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.6/plugins 
> pixmapfunction.ui -o pixmapfunction.h
> make[4]: *** [pixmapfunction.h] Bus error
> 
> Cheers,
> Christopher Martin
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]