Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable version. RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2 unblock collectd/4.10.1-2.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101208201018.5570.18360.report...@localhost.localdomain
Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable version. RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2 Unfortunately it will need to go through t-p-u. Although the source packages were identical other than the changelogs, the reason that +squeeze1 was t-p-u-ed is that the collectd binary package Recommends: libesmtp6 which doesn't (and won't) exist in squeeze. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1291842197.15017.448.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable version. RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2 Unfortunately it will need to go through t-p-u. Although the source packages were identical other than the changelogs, the reason that +squeeze1 was t-p-u-ed is that the collectd binary package Recommends: libesmtp6 which doesn't (and won't) exist in squeeze. Steffen, can you rebuild your NMU for t-p-u, then? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101208210838.ga12...@galadriel.inutil.org
Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable version. RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2 Unfortunately it will need to go through t-p-u. Although the source packages were identical other than the changelogs, the reason that +squeeze1 was t-p-u-ed is that the collectd binary package Recommends: libesmtp6 which doesn't (and won't) exist in squeeze. Steffen, can you rebuild your NMU for t-p-u, then? Yes, I can upload to t-p-u, but not before tomorrow. If someone wants to beat me to it, feel free. Cheers, Steffen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
