Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2011 08:40:34 +0200 with message-id <4de33be2.3070...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#627394: transition: rpm has caused the Debian Bug report #627394, regarding transition: rpm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 627394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable. Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be broken: dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev rpm2html: librpm-dev I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them. The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN1jshAAoJEGo39bHX+xdNMMcQAJWgqhI5HahlYxj9CPd4f+AK pBG80tUbnzQd/fXEa9UzdWDTSuHX7lC9VVZ2eXO2GlO/GC2xNrqfz64koRXiU8Jb dW3R1CsJHFHrqpW1LIy3jiIoOQG8JNvYKl6b/OBItCyh6NflFEKBxd1X+1djvdBN eG7LC+IrUIseHO11zUkJkvEZ2D1n9T96YTVetupoW29tzDL07a1ZW9uIhsB1xNYE CKkdqtgNjdZcD8dgsfLrIVNETA4gezlRyygjlBw5UbzlRwX+xGsEw8fsvJqc2ph+ 4tEt9oby7jc8UsA4n0ZxUfUAZPs/EapS6QU8aoeWCGFfDeuFnEgEIv+4/UHtMdNG GBOKm2dxCXhMm6o5jcNroG0DKXGfoOwusxIsc4vIeODgJ1o3Tw+5BB0reb7jZ+E9 CUnVQn24gtgF4VkYmt3qc+mlgIXTa/QvBe08YySnD/7y0xGkZteyP3NcTf57zG6/ ZJuIN1oF+R6jqq6qY24wb14AjGEpGYG8MxEFZv2XmzsrKhqBTz9CvwSV6l7wHN9K 5y17c2L6HaG7k42EsubewLoLzDRenoUW8qFblzsVWpLF3Lv6drfLT5zxQVOcTV0l gG2Avr/W3aO0yggtZR4yyPc/JPhOC6cutiKoZ9r1w2UWWwetXtlps2ll05pD9l7W npKfnFsBH/j6nGPAkH6n =AujB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 05/20/2011 11:57 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: > release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition > > Hi > > I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with > asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable. > > Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be > broken: > > dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev > rpm2html: librpm-dev > > I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them. > > The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452. > It has migrated. rpm |4.9.0-5 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 627394 Bug #627394 {Done: Enrico Tassi } [release.debian.org] transition: rpm 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130618582125912.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
reopen 627394 thanks On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 21:13 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2011 21:11:47 + > with message-id > and subject line Bug#627394: fixed in lua5.1-policy 31 > has caused the Debian Bug report #627394, > regarding transition: rpm > to be marked as done. I think you meant #627395 - the bug you closed is a release.d.o transition tracking bug. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306185814.3592.536.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2011 21:11:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#627394: fixed in lua5.1-policy 31 has caused the Debian Bug report #627394, regarding transition: rpm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 627394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable. Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be broken: dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev rpm2html: librpm-dev I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them. The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN1jshAAoJEGo39bHX+xdNMMcQAJWgqhI5HahlYxj9CPd4f+AK pBG80tUbnzQd/fXEa9UzdWDTSuHX7lC9VVZ2eXO2GlO/GC2xNrqfz64koRXiU8Jb dW3R1CsJHFHrqpW1LIy3jiIoOQG8JNvYKl6b/OBItCyh6NflFEKBxd1X+1djvdBN eG7LC+IrUIseHO11zUkJkvEZ2D1n9T96YTVetupoW29tzDL07a1ZW9uIhsB1xNYE CKkdqtgNjdZcD8dgsfLrIVNETA4gezlRyygjlBw5UbzlRwX+xGsEw8fsvJqc2ph+ 4tEt9oby7jc8UsA4n0ZxUfUAZPs/EapS6QU8aoeWCGFfDeuFnEgEIv+4/UHtMdNG GBOKm2dxCXhMm6o5jcNroG0DKXGfoOwusxIsc4vIeODgJ1o3Tw+5BB0reb7jZ+E9 CUnVQn24gtgF4VkYmt3qc+mlgIXTa/QvBe08YySnD/7y0xGkZteyP3NcTf57zG6/ ZJuIN1oF+R6jqq6qY24wb14AjGEpGYG8MxEFZv2XmzsrKhqBTz9CvwSV6l7wHN9K 5y17c2L6HaG7k42EsubewLoLzDRenoUW8qFblzsVWpLF3Lv6drfLT5zxQVOcTV0l gG2Avr/W3aO0yggtZR4yyPc/JPhOC6cutiKoZ9r1w2UWWwetXtlps2ll05pD9l7W npKfnFsBH/j6nGPAkH6n =AujB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: lua5.1-policy Source-Version: 31 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lua5.1-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lua5.1-policy-dev_31_all.deb to main/l/lua5.1-policy/lua5.1-policy-dev_31_all.deb lua5.1-policy_31.dsc to main/l/lua5.1-policy/lua5.1-policy_31.dsc lua5.1-policy_31.tar.gz to main/l/lua5.1-policy/lua5.1-policy_31.tar.gz lua5.1-policy_31_all.deb to main/l/lua5.1-policy/lua5.1-policy_31_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 627...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Enrico Tassi (supplier of updated lua5.1-policy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:17:26 +0200 Source: lua5.1-policy Binary: lua5.1-policy lua5.1-policy-dev Architecture: source all Version: 31 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Enrico Tassi Changed-By: Enrico Tassi Description: lua5.1-policy - Lua 5.1 Debian policy lua5.1-policy-dev - Lua 5.1 Debian policy - template and scripts Closes: 627394 Changes: lua5.1-policy (31) unstable; urgency=low . * Rework liker lines, kudos to Colin (Closes: #627394, LP: #770817) Checksums-Sha1: 265b64f5f1ba319bd0984a36f43fc5f5465c06e3 952 lua5.1-policy_31.dsc 607591f1924a3f3703de9936a7d93c388f951683 17658 lua5.1-policy_31.tar.gz a89f94b85468e87bcbcab7a81e620a03696fa4e3 19502 lua5.1-policy_31_all.deb d4b149d4a9ac85b3ad6a3ed346a88b9b80904e46 15010 lua5.1-policy-dev_31_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: ddacc71515ce335c7aa65cca75be5b0c45a4fc1c066b3ffa46af668ea839202a 952 lua5.1-policy_31.dsc 927409b4f4ce6bc48b08e51d375e97bbacb0cf6bc769824c8025bc7de6cb26df 17658 lua5.1-policy_31.tar.gz 2734c5aa025c317796fc86fc2f84ef683ea8224879721ec5d6d1d5033b65a3bd 19502 lua5.1-policy_31_all.deb 474446d67e23e367b1203587a6892558676ddd0d9cda7ee3fcd846aa41bb1f89 15010 lua5.1-policy-dev_31_all.deb Files: b009a723784ddf962e6077c1d4a24c72 952 doc optional lua5