Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (26/05/2012): libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616 doddle | FTBFS: #674333 fossology| FTBFS: #674381 libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359 (No, I didn't look into gnunet*, too much fail already.) This also means that vdr (and dozens of related packages) can't migrate, because it gets tied to this transition through this package: lia id=vdr-plugin-xineliboutput name=vdr-plugin-xineliboutputvdr-plugin-xineliboutput/a (1.0.7+cvs20120325.0846-1 to 1.0.7+cvs20120419.2159-1) ul liMaintainer: Debian VDR Team li29 days old (needed 10 days) liInvalidated by dependency liNot considered liDepends: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput a href=#libextractorlibextractor/a (not considered) liDepends: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput a href=#vdrvdr/a /ul This also means that some other transitions can be removed from our radar because the old binaries can't go away, since getting vdr in would be needed. Now please fix those RC bugs so that we can move on. Adding the sponsor to the Cc list so that he can give a hand. Alternative way of getting stuff unfucked at this point: reupload the old package (with an epoch, or with a $foo.really-is.$bar trick), until you're able to fix all those RC bugs? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Hi, On Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote: This also means that vdr (and dozens of related packages) can't migrate, eek. Alternative way of getting stuff unfucked at this point: reupload the old package (with an epoch, or with a $foo.really-is.$bar trick), until you're able to fix all those RC bugs? as said yesterday on irc I will look into this today and tomorrow... cheers, Holger P.S.: I'm really unimpressed by the problems I've caused. But I've checked the rdepends and I thought this was sufficient to not cause problems... obviously it wasn't, but now I wondering how to better prevent these things in future... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205271150.18864.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Hi, On Samstag, 26. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote: libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616 doddle | FTBFS: #674333 libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359 I've just successfully rebuild these on sid/amd64 with the versions in experimental and would be willing to do QA uploads of those today to sid, if acked here. (And I could imagine the gnunet+libextractor maintainer will pick those up anyway and I#d be willing to sponsor those uploads as well...) fossology| FTBFS: #674381 fossology still fails to build, but is not in wheezy and has three other serious bugs anyway. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205271306.24398.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
block 672117 by 674333 674381 674359 674616 thanks Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (20/05/2012): BinNMUs will follow shortly. libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616 doddle | FTBFS: #674333 fossology| FTBFS: #674381 libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359 (No, I didn't look into gnunet*, too much fail already.) I'm so glad this transition was carefully planned, tested, and issues fixed before the transition started. Oh wait. Now please fix those RC bugs so that we can move on. Adding the sponsor to the Cc list so that he can give a hand. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 672117 by 674333 674381 674359 674616 Bug #672117 [release.debian.org] transition: libextractor 672117 was not blocked by any bugs. 672117 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 672117: 674333, 674616, 674381, and 674359 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133799103115569.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
tag 672117 pending thanks Bertrand Marc beberk...@gmail.com (17/05/2012): Despite the wontfix tag on the RFS, libextractor got uploaded to unstable with gnunet... Tracker is at: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libextractor.html BinNMUs will follow shortly. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 672117 pending Bug #672117 [release.debian.org] transition: libextractor Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133751050428194.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Hello, Despite the wontfix tag on the RFS, libextractor got uploaded to unstable with gnunet... Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb569d3.2080...@gmail.com
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Hi Cyril, 2012/5/8 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: Did you a rebuild test for the reverse dependencies? Thobias Grimm confirmed a few weeks ago that vdr-plugin-xineliboutput builds fine with libextractor3. And at this time it seemed to me the other reverse deps were from the GNUnet stack, so they are written by the same dev (Christian Grothoff), and are either orphaned or RFS by me. And I've just asked people not to sponsor it. Please wait until we say OK, meaning after the exiv2 transitions is over. Ok, I didn't want to mess up with an ongoing transition. But don't you think a 'wontfix' tag on the RFS is a bit final ? Wouldn't a simple 'blocked by' be enough ? Cheers, Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACz8X-HA=HDSU7DfzrKXr4fC8bPnS8c+yfOGU=hbr6bxbqh...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Bertrand Marc beberk...@gmail.com (09/05/2012): Ok, I didn't want to mess up with an ongoing transition. But don't you think a 'wontfix' tag on the RFS is a bit final ? Wouldn't a simple 'blocked by' be enough ? I didn't set that tag. And it can be removed at any time when the situation clears up. So it's not a big deal, IMHO. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I am filing this bug for the transition of the libextractor package. Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from 1c2a to 3. Among the reverse deps, it may not be necessary to binNMU gnunet, since a new version is waiting for a sponsor on mentors. The new package is already waiting for a sponsor on mentors, see RFS #669717. Best regards, Bertrand -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa93d84.2010...@gmail.com
Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
Hi Bertrand. Bertrand Marc beberk...@gmail.com (08/05/2012): Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from 1c2a to 3. Among the reverse deps, it may not be necessary to binNMU gnunet, since a new version is waiting for a sponsor on mentors. Did you a rebuild test for the reverse dependencies? The new package is already waiting for a sponsor on mentors, see RFS #669717. And I've just asked people not to sponsor it. Please wait until we say OK, meaning after the exiv2 transitions is over. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
