Processed: Re: Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 685354 unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.2 Bug #685354 [release.debian.org] unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.2' from 'unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 685354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134597475618744.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
retitle 685354 unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.2
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> H, okay. With the changelog update for the new dependencies, please
> go ahead.
Andreas uploaded sendfile 2.1b.20080616-5.2. The debdiff against wheezy is
attached.
Thanks for the review and the upload.
Cheers,
Ivo
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Section: net
Priority: optional
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5,
update-inetd, libdpkg-perl
Suggests: pgp-i
Description: Simple Asynchronous File Transfer
Sendfile is an asynchronous file transfer service for the Internet,
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
@@ -2,20 +2,7 @@
# post install script for the Debian GNU/Linux sendfile package
require DebianNet;
-
-# First modify the services file
-
-open(SERVICES, "/etc/services");
-@services=;
-close(SERVICES);
-
-if (! grep(/^saft.*/, @services)) {
- push (@services, "saft 487/tcp # simple
asynchronous file transfer\n");
- open(SERVICES, ">/etc/services.new");
- print SERVICES @services;
- close (SERVICES);
- system ("mv -f /etc/services.new /etc/services");
-}
+use Dpkg::Version;
# Now modify the inetd.conf file
@@ -29,30 +16,38 @@
}
undef(@inetd);
-for $profile (('/etc/profile')) {
-open(PROFILE, "$profile");
-@profile=;
-close(PROFILE);
-
-open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
-printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile));
-close (PROFILE);
+# cleanup edits from versions before 2.1b.20080616-5.2
+# this can be removed after wheezy
+if (($ARGV[1] ne "") &&
+ (version_compare($ARGV[1],"2.1b.20080616-5.2") < 0)) {
+
+ # remove line added by old version of sendfile
+ my $profile = '/etc/profile';
+ if (-e $profile) {
+ open(PROFILE, "$profile");
+ @profile=;
+ close(PROFILE);
+
+ open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
+ printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/,
@profile));
+ close (PROFILE);
+ }
+
+ # delete /etc/services with only 1 line created by previous versions of
+ # sendfile
+ my $services = "/etc/services";
+ if (-e $services) {
+ open(SERVICES, $services);
+ my @srv = ;
+ close(SERVICES);
+ my $srv = join('',@srv);
+ my $oldsrv = "saft 487/tcp #
simple asynchronous file transfer\n";
+ if ($srv eq $oldsrv) {
+ unlink $services;
+ }
+ }
}
-for $profile (('/etc/csh.login')) {
-open(PROFILE, "$profile");
-@profile=;
-close(PROFILE);
-
-if (grep(/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile)) {
- open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
- printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile));
- close(PROFILE);
-}
-}
-
-system "/etc/init.d/netbase reload";
-
if ($ARGV[0] eq 'configure') {
if (defined $ARGV[1] && $ARGV[1] =~
/2\.1b(-[67]|\.20080311-|\.20080616-1)/) {
system "chmod 644 /etc/logrotate.d/sendfile";
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
@@ -3,15 +3,6 @@
set -e
-if [ "$1" = "remove" ]
-then
-for profile in /etc/profile /etc/csh.login
-do
- grep -v 'check-sendfile' $profile > $profile.new || true
- mv -f $profile.new $profile
-done
-fi
-
if [ "$1" = "purge" ]
then
rm -rf /var/log/sendfile >/dev/null
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
+sendfile (2.1b.20080616-5.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't edit /etc/services, /etc/profile and /etc/csh.login
+ * Cleanup edits to those files from previous versions
+Closes: #685631
+ * Depend on update-inetd because the postinst script requires the perl
+module DebianNet
+ * Depend on libdpkg-perl for version checks in postinst script
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:03:41 +0200
+
+sendfile (2.1b.20080616-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove all files on purge. Thanks for the patch to
+Andreas Beckmann
+Closes: #668721
+
+ -- Andreas Tille Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:03:55 +0200
+
sendfile (2.1b.20080616-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Add new config file /etc/pr
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:14 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:56:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
> > +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl |
> > perl5, update-inetd, libdpkg-perl
[...]
> The second one (libdpkg-perl) is necessary for the version check (the postinst
> in wheezy is in perl, and it was my impression that the freeze doesn't allow
> changing it to a shell script).
Correct. :-)
> > These aren't explicitly mentioned in the changelog.
>
> Sorry for that.
[...]
> > + # delete /etc/services with only 1 line created by previous versions of
> > + # sendfile
> >
> > Did that really happen? People actually remove either /etc/services or
> > netbase? (I guess maybe on embedded systems, but do they generally have
> > Python?)
>
> piuparts doesn't install netbase, so without this piuparts will fail on
> upgrade. Whether this is realistic or not is for someone else to decide :)
H, okay. With the changelog update for the new dependencies, please
go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1345826825.22919.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:56:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The attached patch (against the version in wheezy) should do just that.
>
> Thanks for this.
Thanks for the review,
> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5,
> update-inetd, libdpkg-perl
The first one (update-inetd) was already there in -5.1 (currently in sid). It
contains /usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm, which is needed for
require DebianNet;
which is in the postinst in wheezy (this means the postinst doesn't work if
update-inetd isn't installed).
The second one (libdpkg-perl) is necessary for the version check (the postinst
in wheezy is in perl, and it was my impression that the freeze doesn't allow
changing it to a shell script).
> These aren't explicitly mentioned in the changelog.
Sorry for that.
> +# cleanup edits from versions before 2.1b.20080616-5.2
> +# this can be removed after wheezy
> +if (($ARGV[1] ne "") &&
> + (version_compare($ARGV[1],"2.1b.20080616-5.2") < 0)) {
>
> Is it worth checking this? If there happens to be a new upload that
> makes in to wheezy then running the cleanup in any case doesn't seem
> that bad.
It seems common practice to do this when cleaning up stuff from previous
versions (moving or deleting old config files etc), so it seems logical to do
this here as well.
> + # delete /etc/services with only 1 line created by previous versions of
> + # sendfile
>
> Did that really happen? People actually remove either /etc/services or
> netbase? (I guess maybe on embedded systems, but do they generally have
> Python?)
piuparts doesn't install netbase, so without this piuparts will fail on
upgrade. Whether this is realistic or not is for someone else to decide :)
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120823191411.ga21...@ugent.be
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 09:34 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >
> > > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> > > violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this
> > > last
> > > part is removed from the postinst, the line remains in /etc/profile
> > > (where it
> > > never should have been). Removing the line in the postinst of the package
> > > in
> > > wheezy is a policy violation. Which is preferable:
> > > - leaving the line in /etc/profile and having a package in wheezy that
> > > has no
> > > policy violations
> > > - having a package in wheezy that violates policy, but that cleans up the
> > > changes caused by the policy violation in squeeze
> > >
> > The latter, IMO.
>
> The attached patch (against the version in wheezy) should do just that.
Thanks for this.
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5,
update-inetd, libdpkg-perl
These aren't explicitly mentioned in the changelog.
+# cleanup edits from versions before 2.1b.20080616-5.2
+# this can be removed after wheezy
+if (($ARGV[1] ne "") &&
+ (version_compare($ARGV[1],"2.1b.20080616-5.2") < 0)) {
Is it worth checking this? If there happens to be a new upload that
makes in to wheezy then running the cleanup in any case doesn't seem
that bad.
+ # delete /etc/services with only 1 line created by previous versions of
+ # sendfile
Did that really happen? People actually remove either /etc/services or
netbase? (I guess maybe on embedded systems, but do they generally have
Python?)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1345748208.22919.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 685354 - moreinfo Bug #685354 [release.debian.org] unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 685354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134570727730655.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
tags 685354 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>
> > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> > violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this last
> > part is removed from the postinst, the line remains in /etc/profile (where
> > it
> > never should have been). Removing the line in the postinst of the package in
> > wheezy is a policy violation. Which is preferable:
> > - leaving the line in /etc/profile and having a package in wheezy that has
> > no
> > policy violations
> > - having a package in wheezy that violates policy, but that cleans up the
> > changes caused by the policy violation in squeeze
> >
> The latter, IMO.
The attached patch (against the version in wheezy) should do just that.
Andreas Tille agreed to do an upload of this new version after pre-approval
from the release team
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685631#56).
Cheers,
Ivo
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/control
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Section: net
Priority: optional
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5, update-inetd, libdpkg-perl
Suggests: pgp-i
Description: Simple Asynchronous File Transfer
Sendfile is an asynchronous file transfer service for the Internet,
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postinst
@@ -2,20 +2,7 @@
# post install script for the Debian GNU/Linux sendfile package
require DebianNet;
-
-# First modify the services file
-
-open(SERVICES, "/etc/services");
-@services=;
-close(SERVICES);
-
-if (! grep(/^saft.*/, @services)) {
- push (@services, "saft 487/tcp # simple asynchronous file transfer\n");
- open(SERVICES, ">/etc/services.new");
- print SERVICES @services;
- close (SERVICES);
- system ("mv -f /etc/services.new /etc/services");
-}
+use Dpkg::Version;
# Now modify the inetd.conf file
@@ -29,30 +16,38 @@
}
undef(@inetd);
-for $profile (('/etc/profile')) {
-open(PROFILE, "$profile");
-@profile=;
-close(PROFILE);
-
-open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
-printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile));
-close (PROFILE);
+# cleanup edits from versions before 2.1b.20080616-5.2
+# this can be removed after wheezy
+if (($ARGV[1] ne "") &&
+ (version_compare($ARGV[1],"2.1b.20080616-5.2") < 0)) {
+
+ # remove line added by old version of sendfile
+ my $profile = '/etc/profile';
+ if (-e $profile) {
+ open(PROFILE, "$profile");
+ @profile=;
+ close(PROFILE);
+
+ open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
+ printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile));
+ close (PROFILE);
+ }
+
+ # delete /etc/services with only 1 line created by previous versions of
+ # sendfile
+ my $services = "/etc/services";
+ if (-e $services) {
+ open(SERVICES, $services);
+ my @srv = ;
+ close(SERVICES);
+ my $srv = join('',@srv);
+ my $oldsrv = "saft 487/tcp # simple asynchronous file transfer\n";
+ if ($srv eq $oldsrv) {
+ unlink $services;
+ }
+ }
}
-for $profile (('/etc/csh.login')) {
-open(PROFILE, "$profile");
-@profile=;
-close(PROFILE);
-
-if (grep(/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile)) {
- open(PROFILE, ">$profile");
- printf PROFILE "%s", join ('', grep (!/^.*check-sendfile/, @profile));
- close(PROFILE);
-}
-}
-
-system "/etc/init.d/netbase reload";
-
if ($ARGV[0] eq 'configure') {
if (defined $ARGV[1] && $ARGV[1] =~ /2\.1b(-[67]|\.20080311-|\.20080616-1)/) {
system "chmod 644 /etc/logrotate.d/sendfile";
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/postrm
@@ -3,15 +3,6 @@
set -e
-if [ "$1" = "remove" ]
-then
-for profile in /etc/profile /etc/csh.login
-do
- grep -v 'check-sendfile' $profile > $profile.new || true
- mv -f $profile.new $profile
-done
-fi
-
if [ "$1" = "purge" ]
then
rm -rf /var/log/sendfile >/dev/null
diff -u sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
--- sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
+++ sendfile-2.1b.20080616/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+sendfile (2.1b.20080616-5.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't edit /etc/services, /etc/profile and /etc/csh.login
+ * Cleanup edits to those files from previous versions
+Closes: #685631
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:51:51 +0200
+
+sendfile (2.1b.20080616-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove all files on purge. Thanks for the
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy > violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this last > part is removed from the postinst, the line remains in /etc/profile (where it > never should have been). Removing the line in the postinst of the package in > wheezy is a policy violation. Which is preferable: > - leaving the line in /etc/profile and having a package in wheezy that has no > policy violations > - having a package in wheezy that violates policy, but that cleans up the > changes caused by the policy violation in squeeze > The latter, IMO. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Hi Adam, On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify > >>(or at least attempt to modify) several files not shipped by the > >>package, including /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, both of which > >>are conffiles? > > On 20.08.2012 14:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > >I admit that I basically applied the patch in the bug report and > >did not > >thought about this issue specifically but my (re)reading exactly fits > >yours. I guess we agree that this is a policy violation (not only in > >the package in question but also in previous versions). > > Yep. :-( At least for the /etc/services case, it looks like the > desired change is already in the default file in squeeze, so the > code could likely be removed with no ill effect. The changes to these files in the postinst are no longer necessary and can be removed, but this leaves another problem: The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this last part is removed from the postinst, the line remains in /etc/profile (where it never should have been). Removing the line in the postinst of the package in wheezy is a policy violation. Which is preferable: - leaving the line in /etc/profile and having a package in wheezy that has no policy violations - having a package in wheezy that violates policy, but that cleans up the changes caused by the policy violation in squeeze Similar problems exist with /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, but only if these files don't exist (if the packages that ship them aren't installed). If those files exist, they will not be changed: - /etc/services in squeeze contains the lines for the saft service, so no new line is added - the postinst script in squeeze removes the line in /etc/csh.login from a previous version (but creates an empty file in the process if the file doesn't exist). For those wondering: the lines in /etc/profile and /etc/csh.login are replaced by files in /etc/profile.d (in wheezy) and /etc/csh/login.d (in squeeze). Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120821185122.ga6...@ugent.be
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
[re-ordered] On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 20.08.2012 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote: >Please unblock package sendfile > >The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to >testing. Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify (or at least attempt to modify) several files not shipped by the package, including /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, both of which are conffiles? On 20.08.2012 14:02, Andreas Tille wrote: I admit that I basically applied the patch in the bug report and did not thought about this issue specifically but my (re)reading exactly fits yours. I guess we agree that this is a policy violation (not only in the package in question but also in previous versions). Yep. :-( At least for the /etc/services case, it looks like the desired change is already in the default file in squeeze, so the code could likely be removed with no ill effect. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e253a0a5d51819296b70cc0c92c0d...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Hi Adam, I admit that I basically applied the patch in the bug report and did not thought about this issue specifically but my (re)reading exactly fits yours. I guess we agree that this is a policy violation (not only in the package in question but also in previous versions). Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 20.08.2012 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > >Please unblock package sendfile > > > >The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to > >testing. > > Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify > (or at least attempt to modify) several files not shipped by the > package, including /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, both of which > are conffiles? > > Regards, > > Adam > -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120820130214.ga25...@an3as.eu
Processed: Re: Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #685354 [release.debian.org] unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 685354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b685354.134546591613597.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 20.08.2012 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote: Please unblock package sendfile The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to testing. Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify (or at least attempt to modify) several files not shipped by the package, including /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, both of which are conffiles? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91d71ee5b10fa170c6b10502cf310...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#685354: unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package sendfile The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to testing. Thanks for your work on Debian release Andreas. unblock sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120820061401.15919.15286.report...@mail.an3as.eu
