Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:16:29 +0100 with message-id <5255dea79878fb830ad805d14a6e0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#685835: tpu: racket/racket_5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1 has caused the Debian Bug report #685835, regarding tpu: racket/racket_5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+deb7u1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685835 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal I recently uploaded a new upstream version of racket, completely forgetting that I meant to do a minor upload to fix #680685 (racket and planet-venus both ship a planet binary) first. The unstable upload does fix that bug, but the delta between the versions is far too large to ask for an unblock. In case it's worth fixing that for Wheezy, I have a package I can upload to testing. Attached is the debdiff. What do you think? Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org>diffstat for racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2 racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2 NEWS | 9 +++++++++ changelog | 6 ++++++ rules | 1 + 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+) diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog --- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog 2012-06-26 19:07:18.000000000 -0400 +++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog 2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1) testing; urgency=low + + * Stop shipping /usr/bin/planet. (Closes: #680685) + + -- James McCoy <james...@debian.org> Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:49:27 -0400 + racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Update description to use Racket in place of scheme (Closes: #679000). diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS --- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500 +++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS 2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1) testing; urgency=low + + The planet binary is no longer provided with racket. Uses of it should be + replaced with “raco planet”. + + This removal is planned upstream as well, but it is being performed earlier + in Debian's packaging due to #680685. + + -- James McCoy <james...@debian.org> Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:34:33 -0400 diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules --- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules 2012-06-26 19:07:18.000000000 -0400 +++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules 2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400 @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ do-install-arch: PLT_EXTRA=--no-docs --no-zo do-install-arch: $(DEB_MAKE_ENVVARS) $(MAKE) -C $(DEB_BUILDDIR) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp + rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/bin/planet do-install-indep: PLT_EXTRA=--no-launcher --no-install --no-post-install do-install-indep:signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 26.08.2012 17:09, James McCoy wrote:On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:18:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:James McCoy <james...@debian.org> (25/08/2012): > > On a related note, it looks to me like racket isn't exactly a > > widespread package, so picking up xz compression too for t-p-u > > wouldn't help with fitting more stuff on 1st/2nd CDs, would it? >> EPARSE. Are you suggesting I should add the xz compression changes to > the t-p-u upload, too? Looking at cdimage-search.d.o, racket's down> in the 30s for the CD it's on.ESENDINGMAILSAT4AM. I meant to ask whether first CDs would benefit from having racket xz-compressed. Given your answer, clearly not, so stickingto the proposed fix only for your t-p-u upload looks sufficient.Ok, uploaded.Approved; thanks. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---