Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 19:43:42 +0100
with message-id <1367433822.28602.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691988: Re: Bug#691988: pre-approve unblock:
libpam-ssh/1.92-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #691988,
regarding unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
691988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team managers,
please pre-approve the unblock of libpam-ssh/1.92-15
in view to encourage potential sponsor to upload it for reintroduction.
libpam-ssh was removed because some easy to fix RC bugs persisted due to its
unofficial orphan state.
This pacakge is already in Squeeze, and bug reports have been filled to request
its reintroduction to ( #664177 ).
This minimal version purposely fixes only these easy to fix RC bugs: it is
meant for Wheezy,
hence my request.
Note that an upstream version of the package with ECDSA support is ready to be
uploaded,
but it is meant for Jessie.
Jerome
unblock libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-- System Information:
Debian Release: Wheezy*
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.23-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 11:46 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> As reported in #685614 and #664177, libpam-ssh is important for some computer
> and cluster setup;
> for example, it can be used to mount the home partition on cluster using
> sshfs.
> So its absence in Wheezy may cause some troubles during the coming upgrade as
> it is already in Squeeze;
> according to popcon, libpam-ssh has grossly 400 users.
*insert large flashing "there is no precedent being set here" signs.
possibly with hooters too.*
After some careful procrastination, and considering the fact that no
further uploads have been necessary, I've decided to unblock the
package. Hopefully that turns out to be the right decision. :-)
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
