Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

2013-01-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 17:03:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

 I tried to rebuild the package prepared by Laszlo without the added
 debian/compat, so resulting debdiff attached. At first glance it looks
 okay to me.
 
 The lintian override probably was added, as the embedded-library tag
 is listed in the autorejects list for ftp-masters[1].
 
  [1]: http://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags
 
 binary debdiff shows that a css file get's added to the rebuilded
 package.
 
OK, go ahead with a tpu upload then.

Thanks,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

2013-01-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 17:03:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
 
  I tried to rebuild the package prepared by Laszlo without the added
  debian/compat, so resulting debdiff attached. At first glance it looks
  okay to me.
  
  The lintian override probably was added, as the embedded-library tag
  is listed in the autorejects list for ftp-masters[1].
  
   [1]: http://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags
  
  binary debdiff shows that a css file get's added to the rebuilded
  package.
  
 OK, go ahead with a tpu upload then.

Ok, just uploaded the package by Laszlo, with the debdiff mentioned.

Regards,
Salvatore


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130119131737.GA21729@elende



Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

2012-12-15 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien, hi Laszlo,

Probably not of much help, maybe for deciding, but I stumbled over
this looking at current issues for wheezy:

On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:52:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 15:10:15 +0100, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
 
  Package: release.debian.org
  Severity: normal
  User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
  Usertags: unblock
  
  Please unblock package src:rgl
  
  Dear Release Team!
  
  This is Laszlo from BSP Munich addressing bug #684810.
  
  Maintainer of rgl would have liked to have the fixed version 
  (rgl/0.92.892-1) or the current (0.92.894-1) in unstable unblocked, but has 
  forgotten to send the unblock request.
  The changes are quite extensive (diffs are attached for both versions), but 
  the maintainer says that 'Just push the updated package. These interfaces 
  are stable -- the rgl package only does one thing -- and there should not 
  be side effect.'
  
  I have prepared a fix that addresses the bug (and does no more) - diff 
  attached.
  
  I see no versioned  = == dependency on r-cran-rgl (binary pack build 
  from rgl).
  
  Please tell us: which diff should we - if any - turn into an upload to 
  testing-proposed-updates?
  
  rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.798-1+deb7u1.diff
  rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.892-1.diff
  rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.894-1.diff
  
 Only the first of those might be acceptable.  Although the addition of
 debian/compat makes me kind of suspicious, as does the lintian override.
 Also, please don't send insanely big diffs by mail, otherwise mails are
 dropped by the list software (I was getting ready to remove this package
 from testing when I was pointed at this bug).

I tried to rebuild the package prepared by Laszlo without the added
debian/compat, so resulting debdiff attached. At first glance it looks
okay to me.

The lintian override probably was added, as the embedded-library tag
is listed in the autorejects list for ftp-masters[1].

 [1]: http://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags

binary debdiff shows that a css file get's added to the rebuilded
package.

cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-
debdiff binary-r-cran-rgl/r-cran-rgl_0.92.798-1_amd64.deb 
r-cran-rgl_0.92.798-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb 
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/lib/R/site-library/rgl/html/R.css

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)

Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1), libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1, 
libglu1-mesa | libglu1, libpng12-0 (= 1.2.13-4), libstdc++6 (= [-4.1.1),-] 
{+4.6),+} libx11-6, r-base-core (= 2.12.1)
Installed-Size: [-3224-] {+3146+}
Version: [-0.92.798-1-] {+0.92.798-1+deb7u1+}
cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-

Maintainer replied also [2] that if this does not mesh with the rest
of
testing/stable, I'd say let us remove it.

 [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684810#36

cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-
$ dak rm -R -n -s testing rgl
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from testing:

r-cran-rgl | 0.92.798-1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
   rgl | 0.92.798-1 | source

Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org

--- Reason ---

--

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
misc3d: r-cran-misc3d
rcmdr: r-cran-rcmdr

Dependency problem found.
cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-

So if removal of rgl should happen, also some other packages needs to
be removed.

Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u rgl-0.92.798/debian/changelog rgl-0.92.798/debian/changelog
--- rgl-0.92.798/debian/changelog
+++ rgl-0.92.798/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+rgl (0.92.798-1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * FTBFS: types.h:98:5: error: 'copy' was not declared in this scope, and no
+declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of
+instantiation [-fpermissive] (Closes: #684810).
+
+ -- Laszlo Kajan lka...@rostlab.org  Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:08:19 +
+
 rgl (0.92.798-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rgl-0.92.798.orig/src/types.h
+++ rgl-0.92.798/src/types.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 // C++ header file
 // This file is part of RGL
 //
-// $Id: types.h 494 2006-08-01 17:25:31Z dmurdoch $
+// $Id: types.h 880 2012-05-08 11:54:12Z murdoch $
 
 
 #include cstring
@@ -80,6 +80,16 @@
 };
 
 //
+// mem copy
+//
+
+templateclass A, class B
+inline void copy(A* from, B* to, int size)
+{
+  memcpy( (void*) to, (const void*) from, size*sizeof(A) );
+   }
+
+//
 // TEMPLATE
 //   ARRAY
 //
@@ 

Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

2012-11-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 15:10:15 +0100, Laszlo Kajan wrote:

 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock
 
 Please unblock package src:rgl
 
 Dear Release Team!
 
 This is Laszlo from BSP Munich addressing bug #684810.
 
 Maintainer of rgl would have liked to have the fixed version (rgl/0.92.892-1) 
 or the current (0.92.894-1) in unstable unblocked, but has forgotten to send 
 the unblock request.
 The changes are quite extensive (diffs are attached for both versions), but 
 the maintainer says that 'Just push the updated package. These interfaces are 
 stable -- the rgl package only does one thing -- and there should not be side 
 effect.'
 
 I have prepared a fix that addresses the bug (and does no more) - diff 
 attached.
 
 I see no versioned  = == dependency on r-cran-rgl (binary pack build from 
 rgl).
 
 Please tell us: which diff should we - if any - turn into an upload to 
 testing-proposed-updates?
 
 rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.798-1+deb7u1.diff
 rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.892-1.diff
 rgl_0.92.798-1_0.92.894-1.diff
 
Only the first of those might be acceptable.  Although the addition of
debian/compat makes me kind of suspicious, as does the lintian override.
Also, please don't send insanely big diffs by mail, otherwise mails are
dropped by the list software (I was getting ready to remove this package
from testing when I was pointed at this bug).

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature