Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Hi Julien, Julien Cristau wrote, On 17/02/2014 18:07: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15:48 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote: >> Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? >> > #706044 is very much not "make libhdf5-serial-dev work again". Indeed. AIUI #706044 is about re-enabling the HDF5 C++ API. > And is > IMO not material for stable, though OMMV. Hmm... YMMV for sure. My take is that we re-introduce something that shouldn't have been removed in the first place. This C++ API is in squeeze and will be in jessie. It makes sense to enable it in wheezy as well. And I fail to see potential nasty side effects. Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15:48 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > > Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: > > > Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. > > > > > > I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix > > > #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with > > > a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. > > > > > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in > > > wheezy (closes: #739261)" > > > > Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing "send" (missing > > '.'). > > The nmu line should read: > > > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in > > wheezy (closes: #739261)" > > Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? > #706044 is very much not "make libhdf5-serial-dev work again". And is IMO not material for stable, though OMMV. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
fixed 706044 1.8.9-1~exp1 thanks Adam D. Barratt wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:53: > On 2014-02-17 13:27, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: >>> Hi Gilles, >>> >> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current >> gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" > > Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? >>> >>> If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. >>> (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy >>> freeze.) >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! >> >> Let's go this way then. > > I've not looked at the detail of the bug, but the metadata for #706044 > indicates that it affects the package in unstable as well. If that's > correct then it needs to be fixed in unstable before considering a > stable fix. #706044 was fixed in 1.8.9-1~exp1 but not marked as such. Thanks for the notice, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On 2014-02-17 13:27, Gilles Filippini wrote: Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: Hi Gilles, nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy freeze.) Thanks, Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. I've not looked at the detail of the bug, but the metadata for #706044 indicates that it affects the package in unstable as well. If that's correct then it needs to be fixed in unstable before considering a stable fix. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8c8773bcecfac21fefe8061bc377c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: > Hi Gilles, > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" >>> >>> Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? >> >> I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So >> the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would >> close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? > > If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. > (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy > freeze.) > >> Thanks, > > Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. It is currently building on my box. Then would retitling this bug as "pu: ..." be sufficient? _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Hi Steffen, Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 12:15: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: >>> Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. >>> >>> I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix >>> #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with >>> a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. >>> >>> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy >>> (closes: #739261)" >> >> Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing "send" (missing >> '.'). >> The nmu line should read: >> >> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in >> wheezy (closes: #739261)" > > Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: > > Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. > > > > I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix > > #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with > > a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. > > > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy > > (closes: #739261)" > > Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing "send" (missing '.'). > The nmu line should read: > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy > (closes: #739261)" Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? - S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217111548.gr9...@casco.aei.mpg.de
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: > Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. > > I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix > #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with > a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy > (closes: #739261)" Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing "send" (missing '.'). The nmu line should read: nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi release team, Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" Many thanks in advance, _g. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTAeWrAAoJEO/obGx//s+Dg+QH/jtBfwpXaBGUul3rK8+3f7jx bqL3T+Kh0zyTZKBDiVJFdCJ5ciu3TJtuEuATGqNgErArnlViVRSpg0FJKchVHvZG MIQd+/Jj9ywCXX2PdwNTuzAR37/O/KD91b6BcV2yYnIX3WaPYd2snGylgtF8mbjT YN1nxXkM/tQm08ccE6qWcvD9/2y9w3ust+5dTvaV2xxyiW3m89UOmpM7RIZvzaWN KBECXzrBqRV1gt9JQfpdudYJPWZ0RCugtjcHXeykjq4jrRl5q0KF56R5l5WuxEHB gfOPvXL4XTwjky8UwND2jqLU+Hwe932dxfVF5+k9RbaE8+wlz8N7D9GhVrrz4pg= =gasF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217103436.31884.7378.report...@pini.bou-fi.net
