Re: Bug#769355: reportbug: extend binNMU support to cover more distros besides unstable
Hi Sandro, On Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, Sandro Tosi wrote: That's great! now, last doubt: what type of suites are allowed in the nmu command? Andreas mentioned some (other than the default 'unstable'): * experimental * $STABLE-backports * $STABLE-proposed-updates * $STABLE are there any other acceptable? $OLDSTABLE-lts comes to my mind. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug#769355: reportbug: extend binNMU support to cover more distros besides unstable
On 2015-04-16 0:48, Sandro Tosi wrote:
That's great! now, last doubt: what type of suites are allowed in the
nmu command? Andreas mentioned some (other than the default
'unstable'):
* experimental
* $STABLE-backports
* $STABLE-proposed-updates
* $STABLE
are there any other acceptable? is $STABLE 'stable' or 'wheezy' (the
former is preferred - from my POV - to avoid to update the suites list
at each release)? No binnmu in testing? so, really, what should I put
in this suites menu?! :)
The suites in wanna-build use codenames, and there are no
-proposed-updates suites. wanna-build also exposes aliases for a
handful of suites, but not all (wanna-build --distribution-aliases on
buildd.d.do will give you a list), and I assume the alias list is
managed by hand. Due to both of those considerations, I'd suggest using
the codenames.
As a not-necessarily-complete list, which will obviously change RSN:
- experimental
- sid/unstable (default if no suite is specified)
- jessie/testing
- wheezy/stable
- {wheezy,stable}-security
- wheezy-backports
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/49c0c92332b4b2667537d1bab1162...@mowgli.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#769355: reportbug: extend binNMU support to cover more distros besides unstable
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: On 2015-04-13 13:22, Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Please enhance the release.debian.org binNMU reporting functionality to ask for the release where the binNMU should be performed. The question should default to sid similarily to the ftp.debian.org RM template questions. This seems like a valid request for me, but I'm adding release.d.o team in the loop to seek for their input too. Regards, Hi Sandro, Sounds like a fine idea for me. That's great! now, last doubt: what type of suites are allowed in the nmu command? Andreas mentioned some (other than the default 'unstable'): * experimental * $STABLE-backports * $STABLE-proposed-updates * $STABLE are there any other acceptable? is $STABLE 'stable' or 'wheezy' (the former is preferred - from my POV - to avoid to update the suites list at each release)? No binnmu in testing? so, really, what should I put in this suites menu?! :) Thanks Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxyjk+fmzktfoddb03jwjua918ak__qspcrhwweypwd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#769355: reportbug: extend binNMU support to cover more distros besides unstable
On 2015-04-13 13:22, Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Please enhance the release.debian.org binNMU reporting functionality to ask for the release where the binNMU should be performed. The question should default to sid similarily to the ftp.debian.org RM template questions. This seems like a valid request for me, but I'm adding release.d.o team in the loop to seek for their input too. Regards, Hi Sandro, Sounds like a fine idea for me. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/552d3c68.9050...@thykier.net
Re: Bug#769355: reportbug: extend binNMU support to cover more distros besides unstable
Hello, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Please enhance the release.debian.org binNMU reporting functionality to ask for the release where the binNMU should be performed. The question should default to sid similarily to the ftp.debian.org RM template questions. This seems like a valid request for me, but I'm adding release.d.o team in the loop to seek for their input too. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAB4XWXwV30DsfDkQV5vuxW=pgbuer4cfztspctpwahldv10...@mail.gmail.com
