Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 21/02/16 19:39, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:23:25PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>>> iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
>>>
>>> The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
>>> libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if 
>>> any).
>>>
>>> Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
>>> Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
>>> reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
>>>
>>>  * xtables-addons: no problems
>>>  * connman: no problems
>>>  * west-chamer: no problems
>>>
>>> So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.
>>
>> The transition completed.
> 
> Please also binNMU iproute2 to build against the new libxtables and
> pick up a new recommends, or the 'ipt' module will be/stay broken.

Scheduled.

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Andreas Henriksson]

Hello!

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:23:25PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
> > 
> > The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
> > libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if 
> > any).
> > 
> > Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
> > Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
> > reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
> > 
> >  * xtables-addons: no problems
> >  * connman: no problems
> >  * west-chamer: no problems
> > 
> > So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.
> 
> The transition completed.

Please also binNMU iproute2 to build against the new libxtables and
pick up a new recommends, or the 'ipt' module will be/stay broken.

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

Processed: Re: Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 812887 + pending
Bug #812887 [release.debian.org] transition: iptables
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
812887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Arturo Borrero Gonzalez]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.

The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any).

Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:

 * xtables-addons: no problems
 * connman: no problems
 * west-chamer: no problems

So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.

[0] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

Ben file:

title = "iptables";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ "iptables-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libxtables10" 
| .build-depends ~ "libxtables11";
is_good = .build-depends ~ "libxtables11";
is_bad = .build-depends ~ "libxtables10";

Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 27/01/16 16:58, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Dear release team,
> 
> iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
> 
> The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
> libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any).
> 
> Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
> Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
> reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
> 
>  * xtables-addons: no problems
>  * connman: no problems
>  * west-chamer: no problems
> 
> So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.

You can go ahead.

Cheers,
Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #812887 [release.debian.org] transition: iptables
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
812887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems