Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/10/17 19:27, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-10-26 10:18 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
>> On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
 Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
> and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
> four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
> versioned dependencies on the current perl version:
>
>  libpar-packer-perl
>  libdevel-cover-perl
>  libclass-xsaccessor-perl
>  libcommon-sense-perl
>
> Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.

 Please go ahead.
>>>
>>> Thanks, now uploaded and built on all architectures.
>>> Could you please schedule the binNMUs.
>>
>> Scheduled.
> 
> It seems that something went wrong here and perl was not upgraded to
> 5.26.1 on the buildd chroots, meaning the binNMUs were wasted. :-(

Rescheduled. I always forget that perl is already installed on the chroots so it
needs a manual hint so an upgrade is forced, until the chroots are re-generated
(which happens twice a week).

Cheers,
Emilio



Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-26 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2017-10-26 10:18 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

> On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed

 perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
 and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
 four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
 versioned dependencies on the current perl version:

  libpar-packer-perl
  libdevel-cover-perl
  libclass-xsaccessor-perl
  libcommon-sense-perl

 Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.
>>>
>>> Please go ahead.
>> 
>> Thanks, now uploaded and built on all architectures.
>> Could you please schedule the binNMUs.
>
> Scheduled.

It seems that something went wrong here and perl was not upgraded to
5.26.1 on the buildd chroots, meaning the binNMUs were wasted. :-(

Cheers,
   Sven



Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
>>> and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
>>> four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
>>> versioned dependencies on the current perl version:
>>>
>>>  libpar-packer-perl
>>>  libdevel-cover-perl
>>>  libclass-xsaccessor-perl
>>>  libcommon-sense-perl
>>>
>>> Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.
>>
>> Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks, now uploaded and built on all architectures.
> Could you please schedule the binNMUs.

Scheduled.

Cheers,
Emilio



Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-26 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > 
> > perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
> > and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
> > four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
> > versioned dependencies on the current perl version:
> > 
> >  libpar-packer-perl
> >  libdevel-cover-perl
> >  libclass-xsaccessor-perl
> >  libcommon-sense-perl
> > 
> > Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.
> 
> Please go ahead.

Thanks, now uploaded and built on all architectures.
Could you please schedule the binNMUs.

> > Given the tiny scope of this transition, I wasn't quite sure whether I
> > should file a bug, or just upload and ask for binNMUs later. Please let me
> > know if you'd like to see similar cases handled differently in the future.
> 
> Either way is fine with me.

Okay & thanks again :)
-- 
Niko



Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Niko,

On 22/10/17 17:36, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
> and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
> four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
> versioned dependencies on the current perl version:
> 
>  libpar-packer-perl
>  libdevel-cover-perl
>  libclass-xsaccessor-perl
>  libcommon-sense-perl
> 
> Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.

Please go ahead.

> Given the tiny scope of this transition, I wasn't quite sure whether I
> should file a bug, or just upload and ask for binNMUs later. Please let me
> know if you'd like to see similar cases handled differently in the future.

Either way is fine with me.

Cheers,
Emilio



Processed: Re: Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #879529 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.26.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
879529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#879529: transition: perl 5.26.1

2017-10-22 Thread Niko Tyni
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
four binNMUs will be needed once it enters unstable due to their strict
versioned dependencies on the current perl version:

 libpar-packer-perl
 libdevel-cover-perl
 libclass-xsaccessor-perl
 libcommon-sense-perl

Please let us know if/when it's OK to upload.

Given the tiny scope of this transition, I wasn't quite sure whether I
should file a bug, or just upload and ask for binNMUs later. Please let me
know if you'd like to see similar cases handled differently in the future.

Thanks for your work.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)