Re: Easy removals: C and D
Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. You'll see some source package names which don't.) # 365794 remove cbrowser/0.8-1 Unreproducible, possibly specific to a tk variant that's been removed from etch; downgraded. # 365680, security remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 Fixed on security.d.o, waiting for proposed-updates to be unblocked so that it can be let into the main archive; AFAICT, no reason to remove it now from testing, though it would be good if the fixed package were available from *somewhere* other than security/stable... # 365181 remove s-http-server/20051218-1 Fixed by update from unstable. # 340177, security remove cscope/15.5-1.1 Fixed for stable/testing by DSA, same hold-up as cgiirc. # 366128 remove ding/1.4-3 Previously downgraded as unreproducible. # 364264 remove directvnc/0.7.5-7.1 Fixed in maintainer upload, available now in testing. # 365174 remove doc-iana/2003.07-1 Hinted. # 233004 -- patched bug, probably deserves NMU remove docbook-website/2.5.0.0-7.1 Hinted. # 344942 -- patched bug, also orphaned remove doxymacs/1.6.0-3 Hrm, package was removed from testing in February... # 365989 remove dspam/3.6.4-3 Previously downgraded as unreproducible. That's right, I'm not able to reproduce it. But 3.6.6-2 is in incoming / unstable and fixes a number of segfaults. # 362588 remove tmview/1:01.03-12 Hinted. Cheers, Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy removals: C and D
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. > You'll see some source package names which don't.) > # 365794 > remove cbrowser/0.8-1 Unreproducible, possibly specific to a tk variant that's been removed from etch; downgraded. > # 365680, security > remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 Fixed on security.d.o, waiting for proposed-updates to be unblocked so that it can be let into the main archive; AFAICT, no reason to remove it now from testing, though it would be good if the fixed package were available from *somewhere* other than security/stable... > # 365181 > remove s-http-server/20051218-1 Fixed by update from unstable. > # 340177, security > remove cscope/15.5-1.1 Fixed for stable/testing by DSA, same hold-up as cgiirc. > # 366128 > remove ding/1.4-3 Previously downgraded as unreproducible. > # 364264 > remove directvnc/0.7.5-7.1 Fixed in maintainer upload, available now in testing. > # 365174 > remove doc-iana/2003.07-1 Hinted. > # 233004 -- patched bug, probably deserves NMU > remove docbook-website/2.5.0.0-7.1 Hinted. > # 344942 -- patched bug, also orphaned > remove doxymacs/1.6.0-3 Hrm, package was removed from testing in February... > # 365989 > remove dspam/3.6.4-3 Previously downgraded as unreproducible. > # 362588 > remove tmview/1:01.03-12 Hinted. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: cgiirc removal (was: Easy removals: C and D)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm currently (almost done) updating cgiirc packages, I intend to adopt >or NMU this, closing this and many other bugs. I would like to remind you of the following statement which I made with the first of these "easy kick-out-of-etch" messages: >These all have RC bugs and are 'leaf' packages in etch. >(As such, they will all get back in easily if the RC bugs are fixed.) I am *not* proposing kicking any of these packages out of unstable (if I were proposing that, the messages would go to debian-qa). If cgiirc is removed from etch right now (as I suggest) -- then ten days after you upload the new versions of the packages, the new versions will enter etch. Just as they would if cgiirc wasn't removed from etch now. In other words, this (new, fixed package coming soon) is *not* a reason to postpone the removal of the old package from etch. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cgiirc removal (was: Easy removals: C and D)
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. > You'll see some source package names which don't.) > # 365680, security > remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 I'm currently (almost done) updating cgiirc packages, I intend to adopt or NMU this, closing this and many other bugs. I still have to contact actual mantainers to see how to integrate my work, if this is enough I would like to ask for the removal to be hold a little while. I'll try to reach them and comment here before the end of the week. Damián Viano(Des). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Easy removals: C and D
C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. You'll see some source package names which don't.) # 365794 remove cbrowser/0.8-1 # 365680, security remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 # 365181 remove s-http-server/20051218-1 # 340177, security remove cscope/15.5-1.1 # 366128 remove ding/1.4-3 # 364264 remove directvnc/0.7.5-7.1 # 365174 remove doc-iana/2003.07-1 # 233004 -- patched bug, probably deserves NMU remove docbook-website/2.5.0.0-7.1 # 344942 -- patched bug, also orphaned remove doxymacs/1.6.0-3 # 365989 remove dspam/3.6.4-3 # 362588 remove tmview/1:01.03-12 -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/ Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder... Get me out of this fascist nightmare! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
