Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

2005-12-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
You'll have to add

urgent gcj-4.0/4.0.2-5j2

atop the hint.

It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Insert famous quote here]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

2005-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Nathanael Nerode writes:
 It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
 gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

no, it does not. 4.2 won't be released before late 2006.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

2005-12-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:12:15AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
 You'll have to add

 urgent gcj-4.0/4.0.2-5j2

 atop the hint.

With an RC bug and 7 days to go, that wouldn't be very effective.  Force
hint was added, and the hint has been accepted today.

 It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
 gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

Not really; blocking a couple hundred RC bugfixes in C++ packages for a
single gij bug isn't a great tradeoff, even if it is the case that gij fails
to build gjdoc.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature