Re: Hints for ghc needed?
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2011, 18:45 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > may I kindly ping about this issue? To my knowledge, all the packages > > mentioned here > > http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc have been > > binNMUed to be able to transition together with ghc-7.0.3-2. > > I've added a hint for tonight's britney run; let's see. thanks, that did the trick. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Hints for ghc needed?
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > may I kindly ping about this issue? To my knowledge, all the packages > mentioned here > http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc have been > binNMUed to be able to transition together with ghc-7.0.3-2. I've added a hint for tonight's britney run; let's see. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1309887956.1918.2.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Hints for ghc needed?
Hi, Am Samstag, den 02.07.2011, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > if I read http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc > correctly then ghc could migrate to testing if some of the binNMUed > packages mentioned there would migrate at the same time. I just > scheduled the the remaining binNMUs on armel (which was late to build > ghc), and they are through. Is manual interaction needed at this point? > > (It is a minor ghc update that only affected very few haskell packages > that are tied very closely to the internal ghc API.) may I kindly ping about this issue? To my knowledge, all the packages mentioned here http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc have been binNMUed to be able to transition together with ghc-7.0.3-2. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hints for ghc needed?
Hi, if I read http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc correctly then ghc could migrate to testing if some of the binNMUed packages mentioned there would migrate at the same time. I just scheduled the the remaining binNMUs on armel (which was late to build ghc), and they are through. Is manual interaction needed at this point? (It is a minor ghc update that only affected very few haskell packages that are tied very closely to the internal ghc API.) Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
